On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 10:47 PM, Nic Roets <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My reasoning behind gosmore was that tracks not suitable for vehicles should
> be tagged as footway.
tracks that are not suitable for any kind of vehicle, yes
but I believe that most tracks are suitable for at least some kind
On Tue, Nov 04, 2008 at 10:52:57PM +0100, Rainer Dorsch wrote:
That depends on the state (Bundesland). So there cannot be a global
default, only a local one.
I am just curious: which Bundesländer do typically allow motorcars on
tracks?
Sorry, don't know that off the top of my head, but one was
On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 12:58 AM, Rainer Dorsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Do I have a way to tell gosmore that I have a permission or would it also
> route me there when I want to do a short leissure walk there (maybe by
> selecting the destination with a click)?
>
If the closest way to click (
Am Dienstag, 4. November 2008 schrieben Sie:
> > surface paved /cobblestone /unpaved way
> > Apply to all types of highways. If the tag is not present, it is assumed
> > surface=paved, excepted for highway=footway. (sealed/unsealed outside
> > UK).
>
> (IMHO surface=paved should not be assumed f
Hi,
Nic Roets wrote:
> (IMHO surface=paved should not be assumed for highway=track either.)
The contrary is the case. Before the advent of "tracktype=...", tracks
were defined as unpaved (anything paved would have been a
highway=service or such); nowadays, "tracktype=grade1" is used to
designa
Am Dienstag, 4. November 2008 schrieb Nic Roets:
> > (except for some special cases like if you own land
> > which is accessible only using such a track or if you have special
> > permission).
>
> Then it should be tagged with access=destination
>
> It's not yet supported in gosmore, but I've thoug
On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 12:05 AM, Rainer Dorsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> (except for some special cases like if you own land
> which is accessible only using such a track or if you have special
> permission).
Then it should be tagged with access=destination
It's not yet supported in gosmore,
Am Dienstag, 4. November 2008 schrieb Nic Roets:
> Using the script below I found 219469 tracks of which 202630 did not have a
> motorcar= tag.
>
> My reasoning behind gosmore was that tracks not suitable for vehicles
> should be tagged as footway.
I think many tracks here could technically be us
I have problems building the debian Package because of a Compile Problem in
josm-ng.
Please can someone fix this.
Thanks
Joerg
- Compile Josm-ng
BUILD SUCCESSFUL
Total time: 0 seconds
[javac]
/home/tweety/svn.openstreetmap.org/applications/editors/josm-ng/src/org/openstreet
Sascha,
Am Dienstag, 4. November 2008 schrieb Sascha Silbe:
> On Tue, Nov 04, 2008 at 09:04:06PM +0100, Rainer Dorsch wrote:
> > In Germany (Switzerland and Austria as well?) there are probably a
> > very low fraction of tracks on which motorcars are allowed.
>
> That depends on the state (Bundes
Using the script below I found 219469 tracks of which 202630 did not have a
motorcar= tag.
My reasoning behind gosmore was that tracks not suitable for vehicles should
be tagged as footway. It's flawed because we so many unsurfaced way types.
Perhaps we can adopt the following scheme ?
highway=tr
On Tue, Nov 04, 2008 at 09:04:06PM +0100, Rainer Dorsch wrote:
In Germany (Switzerland and Austria as well?) there are probably a
very low fraction of tracks on which motorcars are allowed.
That depends on the state (Bundesland). So there cannot be a global
default, only a local one.
CU Sasch
Hello,
I am wondering, if there is a default for motorcar defined for highway=track
if motorcar=yes/no is not specified explicitly.
In Germany (Switzerland and Austria as well?) there are probably a very low
fraction of tracks on which motorcars are allowed.
This seems to be different in other
I remember that the first proposal of "path" tried to deprecate
footway, cycleway and bridleway but it was removed after legitimate
complaints.
I think the wiki page should clearly state that the tag can be used
only if the way has really no main usage and only in that case. I'm
sure that many peop
It is currently possible to set up access restrictions[1], and then use
hour_on, day_on and date_on and their *_off equivalents to state that
the "access closure" is lifted at some times. I take this as meaning
that all normally restricted traffic is permitted as if it were
foo_access=yes betwe
>So: Someone thought that dropping the well-established and well-working
>highway=footway was a good idea. He or she seems to have managed to
>convince people to actually *change* existing data to fit his new idea,
>without, obviously, spending a second thinking about the data consumers
>(i.e.
Hi,
Igor Brejc wrote:
> Anyway, I checked Tagwatch for Germany and it has
> some 17,000 paths, so it's not totally unused.
I checked a random sample. Of 10 "highway=path" objects I checked, 8 had
been "highway=footway" before someone decided to change it. One was a
"highway=residential" before
On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 2:28 PM, Johnny Rose Carlsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Andy Allan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> > Isn't there a description of "highway=path" on Map
>> > Features page?
>>
>> Ahahahahahahaha. So what?
>
> Are you saying "Map Features" is useless?, in that case we bette
On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 2:28 PM, Johnny Rose Carlsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Andy Allan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> > Isn't there a description of "highway=path" on Map
>> > Features page?
>>
>> Ahahahahahahaha. So what?
>
> Are you saying "Map Features" is useless?
No, it's not useless.
"Andy Allan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Isn't there a description of "highway=path" on Map
> > Features page?
>
> Ahahahahahahaha. So what?
Are you saying "Map Features" is useless?, in that case we better find
another solution which can tell what tags programs will try to support.
Best r
I'd like to invite you to vote on the proposed "wetland" tag.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/Proposed_features/Wetland_areas
An area subject to inundation by water, or where waterlogged
ground may be present. Examples include swamps, tropical
mangr
another use case, when in Japan, some tourist attractions require you
to take your shoes off, and some don't. with some occasionally
providing slippers for tourists to wear.
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/li
Joseph Gentle wrote:
>
> The english term for clothing requirements is a Dress Code. I'm not
> sure how this can best fit in - dress_code_min=formal,
> dress_code_max=naked ?
I second use of the term "dress code", and conversion of this proposal
into dress_code. "clothing" is too open to interpre
23 matches
Mail list logo
