I compared the road data from NAMRIA and OSM and Google MapMaker:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/esambale/sets/72157624161537611/
On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 10:34 AM, Marloue Pidor
mur...@mail2engineer.com wrote:
Oops, typo error
You do? That's nice.
-Original Message-
From: maning
what about between OSM and MapMaker?
would be interesting to see how they compare.
maning sambale wrote:
I compared the road data from NAMRIA and OSM and Google MapMaker:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/esambale/sets/72157624161537611/
On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 10:34 AM, Marloue Pidor
On my list. :)
On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 5:00 PM, Ronny Ager-Wick r...@develo.ltd.uk wrote:
what about between OSM and MapMaker?
would be interesting to see how they compare.
maning sambale wrote:
I compared the road data from NAMRIA and OSM and Google MapMaker:
Really its done? nice I just drove by here today on my way to batangas,
too bad you couldnt drive down it, maybe perhaps if you had a motorcycle
you could get past the barriers and zoom down it and back before anyone
catches you :)
___
talk-ph
quarter grid road density comparison of osm and g's mapmaker.
http://maker.geocommons.com/maps/17156
Interpretation later. For now, go figure. :)
On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 5:00 PM, Ronny Ager-Wick r...@develo.ltd.uk wrote:
what about between OSM and MapMaker?
would be interesting to see how
Hi guys,
As mentioned on the main OSM mailing list, Wolfram|Alpha (that cool
computational-not-search engine) uses OSM data for showing overview maps of
places on earth. Here's Manila:
http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=manila(scroll down a bit to see
the map). You can even choose various scale
Hi all,
Another week, another summary. Not a lot of interesting discussions in talk@
this week, but luckily we still have tagg...@...
Greetings
Ben
* OSM in WolframAlpha
WolframAlpha now displays an OSM map when you ask information of a city
http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=Brussels
On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 1:28 PM, Ben Welsh ben.we...@gmail.com wrote:
Long story short: I'm curious whether our boundaries might have a home in
the OSM database. I don't know a ton about the project, but I've always
IMHO they might be useful, on the basis that they're not just any old
informal
Thank you, Tom and anyone else involved in working on this. Much appreciated as
always.
And, to quote, Richard Weait, http://donate.openstreetmap.org/;.
Mike
At 06:44 PM 15/06/2010, Grant Slater wrote:
OSM Talk,
Website and API is now up and running again after earlier issues.
Happy mapping.
Hi!
More than one month ago I tracked a small harbor in Croatia (Lucina, Dugi
Otok) and edited and uploaded the new map data using Josm. Nevertheless, if I
look at the map using the OSM online viewer the new outline of the island is
not rendered. It still shows the old imprecise one.
What is
Hi!
Several months ago I added some farms (place=farm) in my region. I also added
names (name=... + place_name=...) as well as addresses using the addr:*=
scheme. I also added roads with names.
Nevertheless, if I try to find them by using the search bar of the OSM online
viewer they do not
On 16 June 2010 07:48, Bernhard R. Fischer b...@abenteuerland.at wrote:
More than one month ago I tracked a small harbor in Croatia (Lucina, Dugi
Otok) and edited and uploaded the new map data using Josm. Nevertheless, if I
look at the map using the OSM online viewer the new outline of the
On 16 June 2010 08:15, Bernhard R. Fischer b...@abenteuerland.at wrote:
Several months ago I added some farms (place=farm) in my region. I also added
names (name=... + place_name=...) as well as addresses using the addr:*=
scheme. I also added roads with names.
Nevertheless, if I try to find
2010/6/16 Bernhard R. Fischer b...@abenteuerland.at:
Hi!
Several months ago I added some farms (place=farm) in my region. I also added
names (name=... + place_name=...) as well as addresses using the addr:*=
You might also want to look at place=isolated_dwelling (and probably a
subtag for
A compromose would be to add the centre of each neighbourhood (as locality=place
or similar) but not the exact boundaries.
--
Ed Avis e...@waniasset.com
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
On 16 June 2010 18:46, Ed Avis e...@waniasset.com wrote:
A compromose would be to add the centre of each neighbourhood (as
locality=place
or similar) but not the exact boundaries.
That doesn't tell you what objects exist inside those boundaries...
2010/6/16 Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com:
OSM does need to think more carefully about what exactly is in and out
of scope.
The scope is IMHO the worldmap drawn with the knowledge of locals,
that's why I'd consider these informal neighbourhoods precious to our
data, even more as they are not
On 16/06/10 10:04, John Smith wrote:
On 16 June 2010 18:46, Ed Avise...@waniasset.com wrote:
A compromose would be to add the centre of each neighbourhood (as
locality=place
or similar) but not the exact boundaries.
That doesn't tell you what objects exist inside those boundaries...
Does
On 16 June 2010 19:17, Tom Hughes t...@compton.nu wrote:
Does that matter if the boundaries are essentially guesswork inventions
anyway?
If we used that logic we would only ever map from very hi-res very
high accurate aerial imagery then because anything less is mostly
guess work...
It sounds
Hi Kate,
A translation proposal is now in github, under a fork at :
http://github.com/rodo/OpenStreetMap-Humanitarian-Tags/blob/master/humanitarian_presets_josm.xml
I have assumed that, like the key=... content, the values=... was
not to be translated, for interoperability (it was sometimes
We already had a discussion about something smaller than suburbs last year:
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/2009-September/041903.html
But I don't know if you consider quarters or districts differently as
neighborhoods.
Pieren
___
talk
Hi Jean-Guilhem,
That is correct about the key= and the values=.
Thank you so much for your help!
-Kate
On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 10:04 AM, Jean-Guilhem Cailton j...@arkemie.com wrote:
Hi Kate,
A translation proposal is now in github, under a fork at :
On Wednesday 16 June 2010 10:38:55 M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote:
2010/6/16 Bernhard R. Fischer b...@abenteuerland.at:
Hi!
Several months ago I added some farms (place=farm) in my region. I also
added names (name=... + place_name=...) as well as addresses using the
addr:*=
You might
This sounds like a good compromise to me, as most people will have a general
agreement of where a given neighborhood is located, but differ about where the
boundaries are located.
--
John F. Eldredge -- j...@jfeldredge.com
Reserve your right to think, for even to think wrongly is better than
At the risk of over complicating things, let me give a little more info.
LA County is a fragmented place with many different cities and
unincorporated areas puzzled together. Our neighborhoods are in fact three
different types of areas consolidated.
1. Cities divided into neighborhoods. i.e.
There is a find command in Maperitive so you can work directly with the .osm
data and tags and aren't restricted to the indexing.
Cheerio John
On 16 June 2010 08:17, Bernhard R. Fischer b...@abenteuerland.at wrote:
On Wednesday 16 June 2010 10:38:55 M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote:
2010/6/16
WolframAlpha uses OpenStreetMap data
http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=Berlin
Is the license attribution they are using OK?
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 11:47 AM, Frank Sautter
openstreet...@sautter.com wrote:
WolframAlpha uses OpenStreetMap data
http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=Berlin
Cool.
Is the license attribution they are using OK?
Not according to the FAQ:
On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 05:47:05PM +0200, Frank Sautter wrote:
WolframAlpha uses OpenStreetMap data
http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=Berlin
I can't see anything about OSM on that page!? What does it show you?
Jochen
--
Jochen Topf joc...@remote.org http://www.remote.org/jochen/
On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 10:47 AM, Frank Sautter
openstreet...@sautter.comwrote:
WolframAlpha uses OpenStreetMap data
http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=Berlin
Is the license attribution they are using OK?
Down at the bottom of every W|A page they have a Source Information link.
In there,
Nashville, Tennessee, where I live, is much the same way. In the last sixty
years, Nashville has gone from being a city perhaps three or four miles across
to being a metro area perhaps twenty-five miles across, swallowing up numerous
smaller communities and subdivisions in the process. Those
16.06.2010 17:47, Frank Sautter wrote:
WolframAlpha uses OpenStreetMap data
http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=Berlin
That's great! It's a useful way to present OSM and it demonstrates
growing popularity. If we want to reach a larger audience, we need to be
present on search engines and the
Ed Avis e...@... writes:
For example the following row from
...
gets turned into the following in OSM:
node with lat=51.5729084, lon=-0.0116965, and tags:
amenity=post_box
ref=E10 18
postal_code=E10 5AH
addr:street=Capworth Street
I would suggest
2010/6/16 Tobias Knerr o...@tobias-knerr.de:
Imo, it is. They name OSM as a data source directly below the image and
let you access osm.org when you click on the image. They also give more
detailled attribution (with the license abbreviation and another link to
osm.org) on the Source
It's somewhat discouraging, though, that *every time* anyone uses OSM,
we instantly react with this:
+1
It's really good to see OSM being used for something that isn't a pet
project of someone in this community.
It was great to go to WolframAlpha, type in my home town and see a map
that I had
I think it's a good idea but needs a good idea for the tagging with these
different combinations and dividing.
neighborhood names are common in other cities too and well known to locals. So
it is valuable info for osm and should be rendered too. currently some are
added as place nodes and also
Hi,
If you have been involved in bulk import of data from third-parties, may I ask
you to check that this is on
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Cataloguehttp://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Catalogue
.
Why? Now we have final versions of everything, the License Working Group is
Hi,
Frank Sautter wrote:
WolframAlpha uses OpenStreetMap data
http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=Berlin
Interesting, they seem to have their own rendering as well. A little
yesterday perhaps with no slippy map and zooming via a dropdown but
surely a good start. Should like to find out how
Am Mittwoch, 16. Juni 2010, um 18:41:36 schrieb Joseph Reeves:
It's somewhat discouraging, though, that *every time* anyone uses OSM,
we instantly react with this:
+1
It's really good to see OSM being used for something that isn't a pet
project of someone in this community.
It was
On Wednesday 16 June 2010 18:00:11 Ian Dees wrote:
Down at the bottom of every W|A page they have a Source Information link.
In there, under the Mapping data source information they show
OpenStreetMap (CC-BY-SA). » http://www.openstreetmap.org/ with a link to
OpenStreetMap.org.
Yeah. And that
On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 11:55 AM, Serge Wroclawski emac...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 11:47 AM, Frank Sautter
openstreet...@sautter.com wrote:
WolframAlpha uses OpenStreetMap data
http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=Berlin
Cool.
Is the license attribution they are using OK?
On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 11:47 AM, Frank Sautter
openstreet...@sautter.com wrote:
WolframAlpha uses OpenStreetMap data
http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=Berlin
Nice catch. That's super.
Is the license attribution they are using OK?
It looks good to me. Different from what we recommend for
On 17 June 2010 03:47, Frank Sautter openstreet...@sautter.com wrote:
WolframAlpha uses OpenStreetMap data
http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=Berlin
Is the license attribution they are using OK?
I think it depends on whether you can seperate the map that Wolfram|Alpha
have created from
Tim,
Tim McNamara wrote:
The whole thing creates a single creative work.
The term single creative work is not used in the CC license text.
Displaying OSM content and other content side-by-side does not form a
work derived from OpenStreetMap according to community consensus. You
need to do
On 17 June 2010 10:00, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
Tim McNamara wrote:
The whole thing creates a single creative work.
The term single creative work is not used in the CC license text.
Displaying OSM content and other content side-by-side does not form a work
derived from
On 16 June 2010 23:09, Tim McNamara paperl...@timmcnamara.co.nz wrote:
Sorry if I've neglected to look into this issue in more detail. May I ask,
which community consensus are you referring to? OSM or CC? My understanding
was the intention behind a share-alike clause is to compel people using
On Thursday 17 June 2010 00:41:43 Grant Slater wrote:
Things beyond the map data I am not interested in.
Aw, c'mon. You ARE interested in beer and map cakes.
:-P
--
--
Iván Sánchez Ortega i...@sanchezortega.es
___
Hi Ben,
I'm just wondering: are the suggestions/improvements by your readers based
on anything else than Google Maps?[1]
Regards,
Thomas
[1] e.g.
http://projects.latimes.com/mapping-la/debates/westside/#comment-form
___
talk mailing list
Apollinaris, our boundaries have a classification system we roughed out. How
well they would mesh with OSM is something I'd love to hear a critique on.
Simplifying things a bit, the taxonomy of our database is two tiers:
Neighborhoods and Regions. Neighborhoods come in three types: 1, parts
of a
On 17 June 2010 14:38, Ben Welsh ben.we...@gmail.com wrote:
Thomas, if I understand you right, you are asking about the mapping tiles,
correct? All of our mapping tiles are drawn from Google. Though we're using
OpenLayers, rather than the Google API, most of the time to pull them in. In
the
On 16 June 2010 16:30, John Henderson snow...@gmx.com wrote:
I think Peter Ross is correct in that orienteering is the sport with the
closest mapping needs to bushwalking.
The orienteering information Peter posted seem to have a lot of
features specific to that sport...
As for the rest of the
While playing round with mapnik style sheets I came across a noname
style sheet which makes a red line for the way:
http://beta.letuffe.org/mapnik-styles/noname.xml
I extended it a little by making it render up to z7, and it also
ignores unnamed roundabouts:
I forgot to mention, the author of the style sheet uses the following
tags to hide streets with no names, or at least no sign posts:
tag k='validate:no_name' v='no_sign'/
tag k='validate:no_name' v='yes'/
___
Talk-au mailing list
On 16 June 2010 21:56, {Tim} m526244+osm...@gmail.com wrote:
In the absence of any objection I intend proceeding with this scheme on
the coming Monday (21st June, 2010).
Can you please update a couple of stations and paste links showing
what you plan to do?
On Wed, 16 Jun 2010, John Smith wrote:
On 16 June 2010 21:56, {Tim} m526244+osm...@gmail.com wrote:
In the absence of any objection I intend proceeding with this scheme on
the coming Monday (21st June, 2010).
Can you please update a couple of stations and paste links showing
what you plan
On 16 June 2010 22:24, Liz ed...@billiau.net wrote:
specific request to check hillston airport
Station Details ID: 075032 Name: HILLSTON AIRPORT
and hay airport
Station Details ID: 075019 Name: HAY AIRPORT AWS
as i have found those ones and moved them already
the numbers on the BoM
Important information for folks who have imported data.
-- Forwarded message --
From: Mike Collinson m...@ayeltd.biz
Date: Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 12:21 PM
Subject: [OSM-talk] Calling all bulk importers
To: t...@openstreetmap.org
Hi,
If you have been involved in bulk import of
Hello Australian list,
Are any of you planning to attend SotM 2010? Because you should.
Book your ticket to SotM now.
http://stateofthemap.org/register-now/
If you are considering attending SotM but don't know if it will be
worthwhile, I say this.
Yes, it will be worthwhile.
There is no
Hi.
Does anyone have any pointers for generating high quality PDF or SVG maps
(suitable for printing)?
I have a couple of use cases in mind:
* My other half would love a large (e.g. A0 size) printed street map. I have
found places that can print that size from PDF, but I'm not sure how to
I'm a bushwalker and I'm attempting to map the Blue Mountains, including
roads, tracks, cliffs and watercourses. A key reason is that I'd like to
be able to use OSM to auto-generate maps for my website, which I
currently have to create by hand eg
I'm doing some work on the outskirts of Brisbane, where the properties
start to get bigger, doing some clean up. And I got to wondering about
residential landuse.
At one end of the scale, you have inner city housing (350-1000 sq m
lots), and there's no question they are residential. At the
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 7:57 PM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote:
Some of us were discussing making a custom hiking map styles on IRC
earlier so we can print out such maps or use them in presentations to
show bush walkers the potential of what they can get back out of OSM.
In case
Stephen,
I am facing the same issue in Bendigo. I have been considering suggesting a
landuse=rural_residential tag. AS you state, these blocks are too small for
farming and are therefore still residential. In general, these sort of areas
are on the periphery of townships and are a transition into
On 17 June 2010 10:39, Craig Feuerherdt craigfeuerhe...@gmail.com wrote:
I am facing the same issue in Bendigo. I have been considering suggesting a
landuse=rural_residential tag. AS you state, these blocks are too small for
Aren't they commonly known as hobby farms if you have a few animals
On 17 June 2010 07:17, Tom Brennan webs...@ozultimate.com wrote:
Other than contours, the key things bushwalkers want to see for
Do you have any suggestions on how contours should be marked? eg every
10m elevation, or 5 or 50 or ... ?
navigation are:
- tracks
- render as dashed black line
I am sure they are called numerous things, what is the most appropriate/most
commonly recognised term in the Australian context?
A farm is an area of land that you derive the majority of your income from.
Given the drought of the last decade it could be argued that there are many
more hobby farms
On 17 June 2010 11:33, Craig Feuerherdt craigfeuerhe...@gmail.com wrote:
A farm is an area of land that you derive the majority of your income from.
Given the drought of the last decade it could be argued that there are many
more hobby farms across the southern states. Personally I don't like
are we mapping for tax purposes?
what is it referred to in the local government act (or planning act) of your
particular state.
not all of these properties will be classified as a hobby farm ie I may have
40 hectares but only grow a few weeds.
On 17 June 2010 11:37, John Smith
On 17 June 2010 11:40, Craig Feuerherdt craigfeuerhe...@gmail.com wrote:
are we mapping for tax purposes?
We map what ever is verifiable, a tax purpose might be verifiable :D
what is it referred to in the local government act (or planning act) of your
particular state.
No idea, I've always
On 17 June 2010 06:16, Ben Kelley ben.kel...@gmail.com wrote:
My current thinking is that Mapnik would be the best tool for this.
I don't know what produces a SVG file, but if you click on the export
tag on the main OSM website you can export areas as SVG.
My argument is that a tax purpose is not a land use - you can run a small
business (tax purpose) from a residential address but it doesn't make it a
commercial property.
On 17 June 2010 11:42, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote:
On 17 June 2010 11:40, Craig Feuerherdt
On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 11:30 AM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote:
- ideally there needs to be more granularity of track difficulty
- track_visibility=* is probably useful
- sac_scale=* is less useful as it is too specific to alpine areas
- however, something
On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 11:07 AM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote:
On 17 June 2010 10:39, Craig Feuerherdt craigfeuerhe...@gmail.com wrote:
I am facing the same issue in Bendigo. I have been considering suggesting a
landuse=rural_residential tag. AS you state, these blocks are too
On 17 June 2010 13:49, Roy Wallace waldo000...@gmail.com wrote:
Try Australian Standard AS 2156.1-2001 (Walking tracks -
Classification and signage)
http://infostore.saiglobal.com/store2/Details.aspx?ProductID=260163
(not free, but try e.g. the following page for some details:
I don't disagree Roy.
I still argue that the land use isn't wholly residential and that these
peri-urban areas are a distinct land use.
The other alternative is another tag to help (those who want to) distinguish
between types of landuse?
On 17 June 2010 13:54, Roy Wallace waldo000...@gmail.com
On 17 June 2010 14:09, Craig Feuerherdt craigfeuerhe...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't disagree Roy.
I still argue that the land use isn't wholly residential and that these
peri-urban areas are a distinct land use.
The other alternative is another tag to help (those who want to) distinguish
On 17 June 2010 14:06, {Tim} m526244+osm...@gmail.com wrote:
In essence there's six cases, varying in reliability of the result:
1. Example: Ballina Airport AWS
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/node/741763977
* Site already exists in OSM; both WMO:id and name details match those
On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 2:11 PM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote:
On 17 June 2010 14:09, Craig Feuerherdt craigfeuerhe...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't disagree Roy.
I still argue that the land use isn't wholly residential and that these
peri-urban areas are a distinct land use.
The
On 17/06/10 15:27, John Smith wrote:
tagging names...
AS2156=* isn't descriptive enough, the standard covers several aspects
from gradients to publicity, this document was interesting, if nothing
else for the publicity section on the bottom of page 5:
On 17 June 2010 15:46, John Henderson snow...@gmx.com wrote:
I may have raised this issue in the past. Walking tracks are never
signposted or otherwise marked through declared wilderness areas. This
includes some sections of the Australian Alps Walking Track. Maps
should not show tracks in
+1
nothing is ever perfect in everyones eyes, but I can live with it :)
On 17 June 2010 15:19, Roy Wallace waldo000...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 2:11 PM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 17 June 2010 14:09, Craig Feuerherdt craigfeuerhe...@gmail.com
wrote:
I
Informação importante para os que realizaram ou estão realizando importações
aqui no Brasil.
-- Forwarded message --
From: Mike Collinson m...@ayeltd.biz
Date: Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 1:21 PM
Subject: [OSM-talk] Calling all bulk importers
To: t...@openstreetmap.org
Hi,
If you
Hi Jan,
wie würdet Ihr THW-Stützpunkte und andere Tagen ??
Es gibt da einen Vorschlag:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Emergency_service
emergency_service=technical
name=THW Ortsverband XYZ
operator=THW
Tschuess
Michael
___
Am 14.06.2010 um 00:49 schrieb Bodo Meissner b...@bodo-m.de:
Am 14.06.2010 00:05, schrieb M∡rtin Koppenhoefer:
Am 13. Juni 2010 19:20 schrieb steffterra steffte...@me.com:
Dass der Weg eine Autobahnauffahrt ist, und wo die hinfuehrt, steht
schon in den Daten.
Du meinst es steht in den Daten
Hi!
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 10:36:28PM +0200, Sebastian Hohmann wrote:
ich hatte in einem anderen Thread schon auf mein Tool hingewiesen, mit
dem man sich Verkehrszeichen zusammenklicken kann und die passenden Tags
dazu erhält. Nun ist es etwas erweitert und hat auch eine neue Adresse:
Martin Simon grenzde...@gmail.com wrote:
Naja, nach fast 2 Jahren kann man's ja nochmal wagen. ;-)
Ich hatte mir das Layout gestern nochmal angeschaut.
Spreadshirt T-Shirts mit Flexdruck haben ja eine tolle Qualität. Ich hab mir
selber dort schon ein Shirt anfertigen lassen.
Allerdings gibt
Hallo,
man könnte bspw. wenn bicycle=no auf bicycle=yes|designated trifft eine
Meldung ausgeben, dass es quatsch ist.
Übrigens hast du Lieferverkehr mit access=delivery drin. Ich kenne es als
goods=*.
Viele Grüße,
aighes
--
View this message in context:
Am 16. Juni 2010 10:15 schrieb aighes h.scholl...@googlemail.com:
Übrigens hast du Lieferverkehr mit access=delivery drin. Ich kenne es als
goods=*.
Lieferverkehr frei *=delivery wird ähnlich dem Anlieger
frei-Schild *=destination verwendet.
goods sind kleine LKWs bis 3.5t. Diese
Am 16. Juni 2010 07:23 schrieb Martin Simon grenzde...@gmail.com:
Fahrradstraße ist eine Verkehrsregelung, die Fahrradfahrern auf
damit ausgestatteten *Straßen* mehr Rechte einräumt und Motorfahrzeuge
erst einmal ausschließt.
Daher ist es eher unangebracht, die Straße selbst als Radweg, also
Zitat Sven Geggus:
Ulf Lamping ulf.lamp...@googlemail.com wrote:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tshirt_competition
Aah ich erinenre mich!
Das SURVEYOR shirt geällt mir ganz gut. Leider nur PNG kein
Vektormotiv. Sonst hätte ich einfach mal nen Spreadshirt Shop
aufgemacht.
Darf man
Walter Nordmann schrieb:
hi falk,
es wurde schon an mehreren stellen die meinung vertreten, dass wir in osm
sowas nicht machen.
die entscheidung, einen solchen weg zu nehmen, liegt letzendlich beim
radfahrer. er kann doch sicher dort absteigen und das bike ein stückchen
schieben. das
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 05:38:41PM +0200, Florian Gross wrote:
Ich würde da fast zu bicycle=no tendieren.
Je nachdem, ob man nur Verbote so taggen würde oder auch die
physikalisch (fast) unmögliche Passierbarkeit.
Das bringt wieder die hier schon früher diskutierte Frage des
subjektiven
Am Mittwoch 16 Juni 2010, 13:48:47 schrieb Heiko Jacobs:
Walter Nordmann schrieb:
hi falk,
es wurde schon an mehreren stellen die meinung vertreten, dass wir in osm
sowas nicht machen.
die entscheidung, einen solchen weg zu nehmen, liegt letzendlich beim
radfahrer. er kann doch
Michael Buege mich...@buegehome.de wrote:
Ich hab das vor ueber einem Jahr mal versucht, keine Chance.
Zitat: Es tut uns sehr leid, Dir mitteilen zu müssen, dass das gewünschte
Motiv (siehe unten) mit hoher Wahrscheinlichkeit urheberrechtlich geschützt
ist.
Die sind wohl schon mal
Am 16. Juni 2010 14:17 schrieb Andreas Tille andr...@an3as.eu:
Ich habe keine Ahnung, ob Router sowas berücksichtigen und
setze daher einfach ein 'bycicle=no' mit der objektiven Motivation, daß
man mit dem Fahrrad bei schlecht erkennbaren Wegen die Natur kaputt
macht. Sicher kann man dieses
Am 16.06.2010 14:38, schrieb Martin Simon:
Wer mit dem Mountainbike sowieso überall langfahren will, der wird
auch die Abweichung von einer Route in
Kauf nehmen.
Stimmt. ich habe auch motor_vehicle=no an meine Wohnstraße getaggt,
mit der objektiven Motivation, daß man mich nicht in meiner
wenn es verboten ist, stehen da auch schilder.
Auf Pfaden im Wald darf man zumindest in Thüringen theoretisch überhaupt
nicht Rad fahren, wenn es nicht ausdrücklich erlaubt ist. Auf Pfaden ist
das laut Thüringer Waldgesetz §6 (3) verboten. Da stehen keine Schilder.
Gruß
Burkhard
Am Dienstag 15 Juni 2010, 17:12:56 schrieb Falk Zscheile:
highway=path, foot=yes, bridge=yes
Was spricht gegen ein highway=footway?
Ich meine, wenn der Baumstamm so gebaut ist, dass man da mit einem
handelsüblichen Fahrrad nicht weiter kommt, dann ist das definitiv eine
Brücke, die für die
Hallo Sven,
T-Shirt Karten Könnte man sicher recht einfach mit nem modifizierten
Osmarender
style bauen.
Das ist eine geniale Geschäftsidee:
*individuelle T-Shirts mit Landkarte*
- Web-Interface mit OSM-Karte
- mit Zoom, Scroll und Rechteck Kartenausschnitt wählen
- Style auswählen
-
Am 16. Juni 2010 15:04 schrieb Bernd Wurst be...@bwurst.org:
Am Dienstag 15 Juni 2010, 17:12:56 schrieb Falk Zscheile:
highway=path, foot=yes, bridge=yes
Was spricht gegen ein highway=footway?
Ich meine, wenn der Baumstamm so gebaut ist, dass man da mit einem
handelsüblichen Fahrrad nicht
1 - 100 of 283 matches
Mail list logo
