On 31/10/12 11:58, Steve Doerr wrote:
On 31/10/2012 11:54, Tom Hughes wrote:
On 31/10/12 11:51, Steve Doerr wrote:
On 31/10/2012 11:44, Tom Hughes wrote:
On 31/10/12 11:39, Steve Doerr wrote:
Can we get this data into Nominatim?
Why? What would it give us over the CodePoint Open data
.
The John Snow is reasonable - it's a Sam Smith's pub these days so
nothing special except that the beer is cheap.
We have used it once or twice for meetups, but not recently.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
Talk-GB mailing list
for a large area.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
the same
problem because it's redirection logic fails when the referer has a
different protocol to the login page.
In the end I made trac entirely https to fix it, not sure what the fix
for mediawiki is.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu
On 20/09/12 12:46, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
Following the discussion on the infamous french Cadastre 'imports',
I've tried to find the country of living of the DWG members (according
to http://www.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Data_Working_Group):
Matt Amos (OSMF Board) ; Matt ; UK
Tom Hughes
not sure whether the English text
is correct, I get the German one.
You will do, until the next sync between Translatewiki and git.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http
people to
monitor for admin abuse).
It should be pretty obvious from browsing the block list:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks
the first page of 20 entries normally covers at least a few weeks.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu
to
TranslateWiki and help us out!
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
upload from yesterday that I think was holding a lock
on your account - hopefully it should be fixed now.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
/Mangareva_language. ISO 639-3:
mrv.
- Austral. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Austral_language. ISO 639-3: aut.
- Rapa. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rapa_language. ISO 639-3: ray.
If these only exist in 639-3 then I would say the three letter tag is fine.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http
anything yet, though I did discover that en-GB-scouse is a
valid tag ;-)
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
/copyright.html.erb#L48
https://github.com/openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website/blob/master/config/locales/en.yml#L1068
Otherwise open a ticket with the requested wording.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
/right etc that
was changed, not highway=footway.
Also, mass-retagging I frown upon. Why was this even done?!
Agreed. Frederick has already applied a block.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB
href=\u0022http:\/\/www.openstreetmap.org\/\u0022\u003EOpenStreetMap.org\u003C\/a\u003E
contributors, [...]
Something just seems to be preventing it from displaying.
They probably haven't added the attribution control to the map.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu
kept up to date you see, which is why it was dropped.
There are number of other inspection tools that can do the same thing as
well as many more things.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
talk mailing list
talk
product is open geodata, not a rendered map.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
://www.frankieandshadow.com/gallery/ using PHPSESSID then ;-)
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
On 11/06/12 16:18, Richard Fairhurst wrote:
Which is a shame, because mid-Wales is lovely.
Well it is to you as a boater ;-) To everybody else right now it's a big
lake...
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
talk
On 31/05/12 13:37, Colin Smale wrote:
Does OSM have any facility for hosting these files? They are about 500MB
all together, but they compress very nicely.
Sure - just ask for a dev serv account:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Using_the_dev_server
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu
that will preserve as much information
as possible about each trace while still providing the level of privacy
requested by the owner of each trace.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http
call is unavailable during the downtime.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
and those possibly should be left
alone.
In any case, clearly doing this in an automated way without discussion
is inappropriate.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http
in the map are not reflected in the map key
Has this e.g. to be generated for an updated mapnik stylesheet?
It's completely manual - at some point somebody gave me a load of images
and text and I build a key from them.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu
On 21/03/12 08:26, Simon Poole wrote:
See http://www.osmfoundation.org/wiki/License/Rebuild_Plan
I think that date is very unlikely to be met.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
... It's ephemeral noise.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
:
https://github.com/openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website/pull/31
Note Tom MacWright's comment Map Key needs to move out, onto the map,
and probably be rethought entirely, but that can be a separate push.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu
is the attribution.
What's more interesting is your claim that there is no longer proper
attribution, which suggests that you think something has changed.
What exactly do you think we used to do that we no longer do?
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu
you print.
We have always taken the position that the attribution is implicit when
you're visiting the web site - it's blatantly obvious that you're
looking at the OpenStreetMap data.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
talk
contributed data to the currently visible part of the map ;-)
Clearly that would be insane however...
How hard is it to do? 10 minutes?
Well the hardest thing, as always on the frontpage, is finding space for
it. Actually adding it is easy by comparison.
As always, patches welcome.
Tom
--
Tom
in the UK though, and I suspect there
is no fixed rule for working it out.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
On 02/02/12 13:58, Mikel Maron wrote:
I would really love to see these kind of monitoring tools baked into
osm.org...
As I'm sure you're well aware you will have them as soon as Matt gets
OWL up and running on the dedicated server we provided for the task.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t
to explain that it
was nothing to do with the OSM admins as such and it wasn't something we
had any direct control over.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http
On 20/01/12 10:15, Andreas Labres wrote:
On 20.01.12 10:25, Tom Hughes wrote:
Sorry, I wasn't trying to be negative, just trying to explain that it was
nothing to do with the OSM admins as such and it wasn't something we had any
direct control over.
To get to the root of the problem:
How
with motorways
• Post diary entry.
Yes indeed, I just tried to show of different alternatives. So why don't
we use just captchas before registering new users?
Because they don't make any difference to real humans, and it is my
belief that the spammers targeting us are real humans.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes
just now...
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
.
we get currently a lot of spam, that
seems to be send out via our twitter account anyway:
https://twitter.com/#!/osmblogs
That twitter account is completely unofficial as far as I know. I have
no idea who even runs it. The openstreetmap account is the official one.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t
.
No, nobody has reported that at all.
Please open a ticket and I'll look at it, but it will probably have to
wait until tomorrow as I'm out tonight.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http
?
It's a wiki - anybody can change it. At least I don't think that page is
protected at all. I think this is the one you want:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/MediaWiki:Portal-url/de
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
talk
once again at the sidebar/navigation, there are even
more translation issues at least for the german interface languages
de and de_ch.
I do have admin right but I'm no expert on mediawiki so probably best to
wait for Grant to show up as he will know more about it than me.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t
and we know
exactly how we will do it. Hell there's even code kicking around to do
it, we just need to get around to finishing it off.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
google maps (on the web, not the app), you will find it is exactly
the same.
and the size is not auto resize, like i visit openstreetmap.org
Because we have javascript which reacts to resize events and changes the
size of the map.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu
explained that the problems with loading
the SVG into AI stem from AI's poor SVG import, but we would not wish
the master copy to be held as native AI for obvious reasons.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
talk mailing list
talk
to see the bounce to see if it is just
OTRS saying it can't find a ticket to associate the mail with, or if the
mail is not reaching OTRS.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http
://git.openstreetmap.org/rails.git
http://git.openstreetmap.org/rails.git
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
it was as the limits are entirely based on the
source IP address.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
, they are not API calls.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
.
Thanks for clarifying that. Maybe that page should not be called API
v0.6/Command Overview if they're not actually related to the API.
Well this was the first I knew about that page and yes, it is grossly
misnamed... Only those URLs with start /api are actually API calls.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes
.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
On 25/11/11 22:39, woll wrote:
I don't really understand why this problem has not been fixed yet. Can anyone
help?!
Because none of he people who VOLUNTEER to deal with these things in
their SPARE time has found time to deal with it yet.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
which should have resolved the problems.
Please let me know if you see anything odd.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
On 03/11/11 23:49, Fredy Rivera wrote:
ESRI use our map[0] without respecting the terms of our license
[0] http://www.votosycifras.com/
This has been corrected now:
https://twitter.com/#!/Esri_Spain/status/132380656759083008
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu
already around this stuff and making various
suggestions.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
regarding IP, I am
not going to hold my breath on it changing.
No it's not the reason, because Nominatim can handle that data
separately. Indeed I believe Brian has code to do so in the next version
of Nominatim.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu
/GeocodeType
Easting459904/Easting
Northing451314/Northing
StreetNameNUNNERY LANE/StreetName
BarrierInOperationNo/BarrierInOperation
/AccessPoints
etc etc.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t
to an already mapped car park area?
If you read the documentation then you wouldn't have to guess what
things means...
To save you the trouble, yes, that is exactly what the Map access
point is for.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu
to turn them off on that date so that they
would no longer work.
Our permission to trace from them was never an issue, and nobody thought
that it was.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
talk mailing list
talk
we
have no chance of keeping valid and which is of little use to anybody
other than the people who created it.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo
there is an
authority but it's boundary does not match what the man on the clapham
omnibus would regard as the area of the town.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org
already be giving some sort of message though, as we bumped
the required version to 10 this morning.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
to look at the logs.
Will do. Can I provide this to you Tom directly rather than on the list?
Sure.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
will be available to OSM for such areas.
There is imagery (from Bing) there, but only up to z13. We have the
imagery we're given (or rather allowed to use) I'm afraid and we don't
have a way to magically conjure up high res imagery where Bing don't
have it.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http
entering a roundabout in that way, nor
can I see any reason to do so.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
and trailing whitespace
anymore, but it did before 28th June 2010.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
, but not one which is very
to fix.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
the Foundation to provide
a full list of members to anybody that asks anyway...
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
for
permission to do so:
http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2006/46/section/117
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
, the third year it has happened.
Two years ago it was, as you say, a large number of Cloudmade employees,
and I assume that it what Steve was alluding to.
Last year it was a large number of Skobbler employees.
This year it appears to be an additional group of Skobbler employees.
Tom
--
Tom
)?
Surely you just leave it there but change it to access=private or
whatever...
As and when you find a legitimate way to map the real public footpath
you can add that in separately.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
Talk-GB
expired and I had not been invited to
pay for another year. I know I wasn't the only one who suffered from
that problem last year, and it seems destined to be repeated this year
as my membership lapsed again about three weeks ago without any reminder
being issued.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t
errors.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/blocks/64
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
are made people revert them. Shit happens, and we deal with it.
How exactly do you suggest that we disable that corruption?
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http
is to get lat/lon out of the database then
you'd be better off reloading it and telling osm2pgsql not to project
the data to spherical mercator.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http
On 21/07/11 11:01, Craig Loftus wrote:
Additionally (some) Boris' Bike stations are grouped into a network
relation, with each station having the role rental_station.
Which is, of course, wrong. Relations are not categories people.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu
be
impossible.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
legal-talk mailing list
legal-talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
be limited to active
contributors, was IMHO a bad idea.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
legal-talk mailing list
legal-talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
and with personal attacks.
Hardly anyone of the people who criticised my suggestion have made any efforts
to seriously work towards alternative solutions to the problem, and those who
did were themselves ignored.
What exactly was this constructive proposal?
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http
of logging in.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
legal-talk mailing list
legal-talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
months so a vote could be rigged
would clearly be unreasonable and would be ignored.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
legal-talk mailing list
legal-talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
for the
transaction to happen before letting the user move on.
Matt is already planning that I believe, although the token used to
monitor the progress of the upload would just be transient I believe
rather than a long lived transaction ID.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu
: 181482 (89.2%)
Edits by users who have not agreed: 218756288 (10.8%)
Hope that helps,
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
On 16/06/11 17:09, Renaud MICHEL wrote:
On jeudi 16 juin 2011 at 10:20, Tom Hughes wrote :
To inject some actual hard data into the conversation, here are some
actual numbers, straight from the database:
Users with edits who have agreed: 96917
Users without edits who have agreed: 104663
Users
of Passenger Info at NRE...
Sounds similar to the one RichardF saw at Charlbury a while back...
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
;-)
Secondly, assuming that you actually used the right domain, then what is
the email address or username involved, as I can't see any account under
the gmail address you sent your mail from.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu
wait for each page to load
as you move from message to message.
I know which model I prefer thanks.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo
On 07/06/11 08:41, Frederik Ramm wrote:
But before I do all that, I would like to hear from the community at
large - you - whether you share my view. Do you agree that airspace
should be elsewhere but not in OSM?
+100
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu
of storehouse for any data that happens to have
coordinates attached, rather than a database of map data.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
, or water pipes, or contour lines?
Contour lines certainly are, like airspace, something that we're always
said we don't think is appropriate.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http
certainly is viewed as excessive by us - the API is designed to support
editors not bulk exporting of data.
Suggestions, work-arounds?
Use the full history dump, as somebody has already suggested.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu
history calls and got
manually blocked from the whole site.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Sat.
My guess is you have the max zoom set too low in JOSM. IIRC it defaults
to 18 but bing can go higher than that, depending on the area.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http
authority so yes, they probably do appear eccentric to people outside
that authority.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
On 17/05/11 15:26, Donald Campbell II wrote:
Would be nice if I could set my local timezone somewhere and see
changesets and node info in local times.
Am I missing it somewhere or does that need to be added?
It needs to be added.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu
of any box means it spans the whole area though.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
On 13/05/11 17:30, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
On 5/13/2011 11:59 AM, Tom Hughes wrote:
Put your mouse over an entry in the list and the area it cover will be
highlighted on the map. If it spans the whole area then the whole map is
supposed to be highlighted but that often doesn't seem to work
On 13/05/11 18:12, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
On 5/13/2011 12:32 PM, Tom Hughes wrote:
As to scanning the list, what exactly does seeing that there are N big
changesets in the list tell you?
It tells me which ones I can ignore when looking at recent changes in my
area.
Well no, it doesn't
them. Once
it is released we will of course implement that on openstreetmap.org.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
301 - 400 of 918 matches
Mail list logo
