On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 5:51 AM, Lester Caine [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Christoph Böhme wrote:
Elena of Valhalla [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 9:39 PM, Christoph Böhme [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
[...]
Marking of farm tracks which have generally have no names was never
On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 9:58 AM, Dave Stubbs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Since then the map has been expanded to cover everywhere (thanks to
CloudMade), which is useful because the tracing problem exists in many
other places. But it's also completely irrelevant in some areas. And
frankly, if
Rory McCann wrote:
Hi,
What to do about a road that doesn't have a name comes up on the list
frequently. There's a few options suggested.
I've created a new proposed feature for this listing the available
options (noname=yes, name:absent=yes, missing_tags=name, etc etc)
Lester Caine wrote:
Am I missing something here, or is the editing interface now CREATING a new
problem? If something does not have a name why would you ADD a name=xx tag.
No
name tag = no name. I doubt that every trackway has a name so why ADD
thousands of noname=yes when simply not
Frederik Ramm wrote:
Lester Caine wrote:
Am I missing something here, or is the editing interface now CREATING
a new problem? If something does not have a name why would you ADD a
name=xx tag. No name tag = no name. I doubt that every trackway has a
name so why ADD thousands of noname=yes
Hi,
Lester Caine wrote:
My comment still applies - if a item REALLY has no name then you do not ADD
something - you leave out the name= tag?
I refuse to repeat all that has been said.
Bye
Frederik
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
Elena of Valhalla wrote:
On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 9:34 AM, Lester Caine [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
There was a suggestion for name=__NONAME__ but that is also wrong - what is
needed is a SIMPLE name=__TODO__ where there is an item that we know HAS a
name but we do not know what it is?
Christoph wrote:
So far I followed the whole noname discussion quietly, but I am
getting
the feeling that nobody is advocating what I think is the only
clean
solution of the problem: Frederik's ignore_test suggestion.
With the Mapnik layer this morning highlighting
residential-without-name
I wrote:
With the Mapnik layer this morning highlighting
residential-without-name (orange edges), not-in-map_features
(yellow
edges), and a big red circle around nodes-on-same-spot (based
on
stuff I spotted just in the Wolverhampton area), the
ignore_test
suggestion begins to look like
Lester Caine escribió:
Rory McCann wrote:
Hi,
What to do about a road that doesn't have a name comes up on the list
frequently. There's a few options suggested.
I've created a new proposed feature for this listing the available
options (noname=yes, name:absent=yes, missing_tags=name,
Gervase Markham [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
Christoph Böhme wrote:
The other solutions made so far essentially suggest to add a
negative image of the world to the database: Not only saying what
is there but also what is not. Consequently this would mean to tag
streets not only with the
Stefan Hirschmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
In case of routing, I think it is a big difference if you know, that
the road has definitely no adress. The absense of the name is such a
strange thing, that it should be mentioned.
But what would you do differently in a routing application in
On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 9:39 PM, Christoph Böhme [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
Marking of farm tracks which have generally have no names was never
planned, I think. Just roads that usually should have a name like
residential streets and for which this fact is tested.
such farm tracks are
Elena of Valhalla [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 9:39 PM, Christoph Böhme [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
[...]
Marking of farm tracks which have generally have no names was never
planned, I think. Just roads that usually should have a name like
residential streets and for
Christoph Böhme wrote:
Elena of Valhalla [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 9:39 PM, Christoph Böhme [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
[...]
Marking of farm tracks which have generally have no names was never
planned, I think. Just roads that usually should have a name like
Hi,
What to do about a road that doesn't have a name comes up on the list
frequently. There's a few options suggested.
I've created a new proposed feature for this listing the available
options (noname=yes, name:absent=yes, missing_tags=name, etc etc)
Hi,
thanks for putting this proposal together, Rory!
So far I followed the whole noname discussion quietly, but I am getting
the feeling that nobody is advocating what I think is the only clean
solution of the problem: Frederik's ignore_test suggestion.
The other solutions made so far
On Sun, Sep 21, 2008 at 10:34 PM, Christoph Böhme [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
thanks for putting this proposal together, Rory!
So far I followed the whole noname discussion quietly, but I am getting
the feeling that nobody is advocating what I think is the only clean
solution of the
Christoph Böhme wrote:
The other solutions made so far essentially suggest to add a negative
image of the world to the database: Not only saying what is there but
also what is not. Consequently this would mean to tag streets not
only with the features they have but also with oneway:absent=yes,
19 matches
Mail list logo
