May 27, 2020, 17:31 by etcomma...@gmail.com:
>> I know I can use JOSM to copy data from OHM to OSM, but for a large
>> geographic area I don't think that would not be practical.
>>
I would JOSM to download OHM and save it as an .osm file and process it further.
I wanted to link OHM planet fi
Date: Wed, 27 May 2020 14:02:47 +1000
From: Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com>
To: talk@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Should we map things that do not exist?
On 27/5/20 9:40 am, 80hnhtv4agou--- via talk wrote:
then why are there tags ?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.or
On 27/5/20 9:40 am, 80hnhtv4agou--- via talk wrote:
then why are there tags ?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Demolished_Railway
and if the platform posts are still there ?
Those tags are for things that are still there, if what remains is still
identifiable as a building/railway/road/bri
(1) sorry for an empty email send earlier
(2) we have plenty of things that should not be added
https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/mapper - single paid
mapping group produced 800 000+ instances of an unwanted tag
(they promised recently to fix it)
(3) sometimes this tags are used to describ
May 27, 2020, 01:40 by talk@openstreetmap.org:
> then why are there tags ?
>
> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Demolished_Railway
>
> and if the platform posts are still there ?
>
>
>> Tuesday, May 26, 2020 4:52 PM -05:00 from Jack Armstrong
>> :
>>
>> Thanks. I'll try that.
>>
>
then why are there tags ?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Demolished_Railway
and if the platform posts are still there ?
>Tuesday, May 26, 2020 4:52 PM -05:00 from Jack Armstrong
>:
>
>Thanks. I'll try that.
>
>>From: Warin < 61sundow...@gmail.com >
>>
>>Advise them to enter the hi
Thanks. I'll try that.From: Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com>
Advise them to enter the historic railway into OHM ... or any
historic object for that matter. This satisfies them that the
object is mapped and frees OSM from it.
___
On 25/5/20 2:37 pm, Jack Armstrong wrote:
Greetings.
Recently, a user mapped “razed” railways inside a construction zone
(link below). These rails had been removed by our local mappers since
they don’t exist anymore. Using the latest imagery (Maxar), you can
see the rails have been complete
i would delete what i did, expanding on someone else edit, but what about
something like a road
that was never built and was mapped 7 years ago, with an edit 1 year ago ?
>Sunday, May 24, 2020 11:39 PM -05:00 from Jack Armstrong
>:
>
>Greetings.
>
>Recently, a user mapped “razed” railwa
On Mon, 25 May 2020 08:20:03 -0600 (GMT-06:00), Jack Armstrong
wrote:
>Why are railways given a special status?
One possible view is that railways were an early OSM data consumer. In
many cases, OSM became the best resource to know current and previous rail
lines, and useful for cases to tra
it was tagged ( proposed ), and asphalt.
>Monday, May 25, 2020 11:56 AM -05:00 from Mateusz Konieczny via talk
>:
>
>I would say that anyone has right to remove such objects.
>
>I am also unsure what would even be a correct tagging. never_existed:highway=*?
>
>(sole reason for possible ke
On 2020-05-25 18:52, Mateusz Konieczny wrote:
> Even if "Nothing is "approved"" is true it does not mean that nothing is
> forbidden.
> Can you name one tag that is "forbidden"? Does that mean a standing
> instruction to all mappers to remove it whenever it is found, or a license to
> do a see
I would say that anyone has right to remove such objects.
I am also unsure what would even be a correct tagging. never_existed:highway=*?
(sole reason for possible keeping would be danger of accidental mapping it, but
given that it never existed it should not appear on any aerial images)
May 25,
May 25, 2020, 17:34 by colin.sm...@xs4all.nl:
>
> On 2020-05-25 17:08, Mateusz Konieczny via talk wrote:
>
>
>> May 25, 2020, 16:48 by colin.sm...@xs4all.nl:
>>
>>>
>>> On 2020-05-25 16:20, Jack Armstrong wrote:
>>>
>>>
Why are railways given a special status?
>>> Nobody gives anythin
On 2020-05-25 17:08, Mateusz Konieczny via talk wrote:
> May 25, 2020, 16:48 by colin.sm...@xs4all.nl:
>
> On 2020-05-25 16:20, Jack Armstrong wrote:
>
> Why are railways given a special status?
>
> Nobody gives anything a status in OSM. Nothing is "approved" so nothing is
> "forbidden" eit
? should a highway never built in 2011, mapped, that goes through a farm still
be there even if tagged
right, and if not who has a right to remove it ?
>Monday, May 25, 2020 10:10 AM -05:00 from Mateusz Konieczny via talk
>:
>
>May 25, 2020, 16:48 by colin.sm...@xs4all.nl:
>>On 2020-05-25
May 25, 2020, 16:48 by colin.sm...@xs4all.nl:
>
> On 2020-05-25 16:20, Jack Armstrong wrote:
>
>
>> Why are railways given a special status?
>>
> Nobody gives anything a status in OSM. Nothing is "approved" so nothing is
> "forbidden" either.
>
It is not really accurate - there is plenty of forbi
On 2020-05-25 16:20, Jack Armstrong wrote:
> Why are railways given a special status?
Nobody gives anything a status in OSM. Nothing is "approved" so nothing
is "forbidden" either. It is either used, or it is not used. It is not
even "forbidden" to use tags that someone has declared "deprecated".
25 years ago, the Denver Stapleton Airport was closed and a new airport was built further from the city. Over 5,000 new homes were built, including schools, a library, a recreation center, over 150 shops, service businesses, restaurants and open spaces.The opinion of some users is that if nothing h
Here in Belgium many of these are repurposed as cycling highway
infrastructure. I wouldn't mind having highway=cycleway, railway=razed on
them.
Polyglot
On Mon, May 25, 2020 at 1:47 PM Mateusz Konieczny via talk <
talk@openstreetmap.org> wrote:
>
>
>
> May 25, 2020, 06:37 by jacknst...@sprynet.c
May 25, 2020, 06:37 by jacknst...@sprynet.com:
>
> Greetings.
>
>
>
>
>
> Recently, a user mapped “razed” railways inside a construction zone (link
> below). These rails had been removed by our local mappers since they don’t
> exist anymore. Using the latest imagery (Maxar), you can see the r
Greetings.Recently, a user mapped “razed” railways inside a construction zone (link below). These rails had been removed by our local mappers since they don’t exist anymore. Using the latest imagery (Maxar), you can see the rails have been completely removed from “Project 70”, a $1.2 billion Denver
22 matches
Mail list logo