Re: [OSM-talk] iD news: v1.9.6 released

On 17.06.16 16:35, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: Another issue I believe to have found in this item looking at https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q486972 : the first words, (I believe it is meant to be the definition, although it does not explicitly say so,) are "densely populated geographic location

Re: [OSM-talk] iD news: v1.9.6 released

sent from a phone > Il giorno 18 giu 2016, alle ore 03:44, Minh Nguyen > ha scritto: > > I'm familiar with our guidelines on automatic edits, but I find it a stretch > to apply them here. iD is essentially inserting an alternative, more stable > representation

Re: [OSM-talk] iD news: v1.9.6 released

sent from a phone > Il giorno 18 giu 2016, alle ore 03:44, Minh Nguyen > ha scritto: > > I see no problem with the semantics in > . if you wanted, you could see problems also there: it is at the same time: "abandoned

Re: [OSM-talk] iD news: v1.9.6 released

(Sorry, I sent from the wrong address, so this message got stuck in moderation.) Martin Koppenhoefer gmail.com> writes: > > > > Sorry that it took me a while to reply, I was out of office and just came back now. > > > Il giorno 10 giu 2016, alle ore 21:07, Minh Nguyen

Re: [OSM-talk] iD news: v1.9.6 released

2016-06-17 17:55 GMT+02:00 Minh Nguyen : > I disagree that these considerations make the iD feature less correct > given that the wikidata tag is already widely used. the important difference is, that someone adding a wikidata tag manually will likely check the wikidata object,

Re: [OSM-talk] iD news: v1.9.6 released

Sorry that it took me a while to reply, I was out of office and just came back now. Il giorno 10 giu 2016, alle ore 21:07, Minh Nguyen < m...@nguyen.cincinnati.oh.us> ha scritto: is this your interpretation or is it explicitly defined like this? I'm astonished that these 2 concepts are

Re: [OSM-talk] iD news: v1.9.6 released

Martin Koppenhoefer gmail.com> writes: > > > sent from a phone > > > Il giorno 10 giu 2016, alle ore 01:58, Minh Nguyen nguyen.cincinnati.oh.us> ha scritto: > > > > > > * “Administrative territorial entity” is the superset of “human > > settlements”. This superset has 2,225,880 items. [2]

Re: [OSM-talk] iD news: v1.9.6 released

sent from a phone > Il giorno 10 giu 2016, alle ore 01:58, Minh Nguyen > ha scritto: > > > * Currently, Wikidata has 1,775,365 items tagged as “human settlements”. [1] > You’d expect to see these items tagged on place POIs, including cities and > villages but

Re: [OSM-talk] iD news: v1.9.6 released

Martin Koppenhoefer gmail.com> writes: > > > sent from a phone > > > Il giorno 09 giu 2016, alle ore 02:23, Minh Nguyen nguyen.cincinnati.oh.us> ha scritto: > > > > If I understand correctly, you’re referring to a situation where, for > > instance, Wikipedia editors have opted to discuss

Re: [OSM-talk] iD news: v1.9.6 released

sent from a phone > Il giorno 09 giu 2016, alle ore 02:23, Minh Nguyen > ha scritto: > > If I understand correctly, you’re referring to a situation where, for > instance, Wikipedia editors have opted to discuss both an “administrative > territorial entity” and

Re: [OSM-talk] iD news: v1.9.6 released

Bryan - This is an awesome release, great work by yourself and all the contributing team! -- Coleman McCormick @colemanm On June 8, 2016 at 11:59:11, Bryan Housel (br...@7thposition.com) wrote: > *iD v1.9.6* was released June 7 2016 and is now available for editing on > openstreetmap.org > >

Re: [OSM-talk] iD news: v1.9.6 released

Martin Koppenhoefer gmail.com> writes: > > > sent from a phone > > Il giorno 08 giu 2016, alle ore 18:44, Michael Reichert gmx.net> ha scritto: > > >> Am 08.06.2016 um 17:59 schrieb Bryan Housel: > >> - When setting Wikipedia field value, also set corresponding Wikidata tag (worked on by

Re: [OSM-talk] iD news: v1.9.6 released

sent from a phone Il giorno 08 giu 2016, alle ore 18:44, Michael Reichert ha scritto: >> Am 08.06.2016 um 17:59 schrieb Bryan Housel: >> - When setting Wikipedia field value, also set corresponding Wikidata tag >> (worked on by Minh Nguyễn) > > Isn't this a kind of

Re: [OSM-talk] iD news: v1.9.6 released

On Wed, Jun 8, 2016 at 11:13 PM, Andy Mabbett wrote: >> Naturally (see previous wikidata discussions) it is questionable why it is >> necessary to add a tag that can automatically be determined from the other >> attributes of the object (as this feature proves without

Re: [OSM-talk] iD news: v1.9.6 released

On 8 June 2016 at 21:23, Simon Poole wrote: > Naturally (see previous wikidata discussions) it is questionable why it is > necessary to add a tag that can automatically be determined from the other > attributes of the object (as this feature proves without doubt). As answered in

Re: [OSM-talk] iD news: v1.9.6 released

On 8 June 2016 at 16:59, Bryan Housel wrote: > iD v1.9.6 was released June 7 2016 and is now available for editing on > openstreetmap.org > > The release includes: > - When setting Wikipedia field value, also set corresponding Wikidata tag > (worked on by Minh Nguyễn)

Re: [OSM-talk] iD news: v1.9.6 released

It's only adding them to the single entity that's selected, killing two birds with one stone. It's good time saver Dave On 08/06/2016 17:44, Michael Reichert wrote: Hi Bryan, Am 08.06.2016 um 17:59 schrieb Bryan Housel: - When setting Wikipedia field value, also set corresponding Wikidata

Re: [OSM-talk] iD news: v1.9.6 released

The way I understand it, it simply adds an extra tag if the user adds a wikimedia tag, don't seriously think that counts as a mechanical edit in the sense of our guidelines. Naturally (see previous wikidata discussions) it is questionable why it is necessary to add a tag that can automatically be

Re: [OSM-talk] iD news: v1.9.6 released

https://github.com/openstreetmap/iD/pull/2732 Regards, Hans On Jun 8, 2016 9:47 AM, "Michael Reichert" wrote: > Hi Bryan, > > Am 08.06.2016 um 17:59 schrieb Bryan Housel: > > - When setting Wikipedia field value, also set corresponding Wikidata > tag (worked on by Minh Nguyễn)

Re: [OSM-talk] iD news: v1.9.6 released

Hi Bryan, Am 08.06.2016 um 17:59 schrieb Bryan Housel: > - When setting Wikipedia field value, also set corresponding Wikidata tag > (worked on by Minh Nguyễn) Isn't this a kind of mechanical edit which should be discussed on this mailing list *beforehand*?