Just one box/task and a few minutes of your time can go a long way to
improve the map of Lesotho.
Maning Sambale (mobile)
-- Forwarded message --
From: Dave Corley davecor...@gmail.com
Date: Jul 25, 2014 6:24 PM
Subject: [HOT] #MapLesotho mapping happening now - Join in
To:
the email and any attachments.
===
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/attachments/20140725/ce67b378/attachment
Hi everyone,
The Mozilla Philippines community is organizing a Maker Festival on
September 13–14, 2014 (Saturday and Sunday) at the Glorietta 5 Atrium in
Makati.
More information: http://makerfestival.ph/
I think this is a really good event for OSM Philippines community to
participate in. We
On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 5:03 PM, Alex Barth a...@mapbox.com wrote:
Taking a step back, is the above use case not one we'd like to support
without triggering share alike? I'm directing my question to everyone, not
just Paul who's taken the time to review my example above.
Thanks for taking
Hi,
the initial concern was about a page on the wiki in french that was older
than the english one, and with significant differences in a list of tags
(still landuse=basin rather than the new natural=water), the change on
the english page was made more than 1 year ago !
the translate extension
On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 4:26 AM, Andreas Goss andi...@t-online.de wrote:
But that concept is not really reality. There a dozen for German pages which
are completely different from the English one, but both cover that topic in
a way that is usefull for people who get to that page.
The main
Some humaniterian team is using a drone for OSM in Haiti since 2 years:
http://cartong.org/project/communautary-mappinguav-project-haiti
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/UAV-HAITI
Pieren
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
So after 2 months of prep, several hundred tweets, emails and facebook
posts we're finally here!
Today is #MapLesotho day!
There are mapping parties happening in:
- Lesotho (2 locations)
- Ireland
- Poland
- Germany
- USA
- Canada
- UK
To help out, go to either the urban
Thanks Dave!
Will join from Ghana soon! :-)
- Enock
On Jul 25, 2014 10:26 AM, Dave Corley davecor...@gmail.com wrote:
So after 2 months of prep, several hundred tweets, emails and facebook
posts we're finally here!
Today is #MapLesotho day!
There are mapping parties happening in:
-
Thanks Enock
Folks,
For those of you also on regional mailing lists, can I ask that you
communicate this message out on those lists also as my mails to those are
bouncing and I would rather not have to join 50+ mailing lists.
One of our big objectives here is to show (Lesotho officials) what
features) -
http://tasks.hotosm.org/project/599
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/attachments/20140725/f01fd241/attachment.html
On Tue, 22 Jul 2014 18:51:24 -0700
Paul Norman penor...@mac.com wrote:
* Cleaning up path rendering on low zooms
(https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/pull/747)
Is there any chance this could be tweaked slightly? A lot of the
public footpaths near me are now disappearing
It is a tagging error to tag public footways as access=private. Can you
give an example? It seems that I miss something in this case.
2014-07-25 13:52 GMT+02:00 Andy Street a...@street.me.uk:
On Tue, 22 Jul 2014 18:51:24 -0700
Paul Norman penor...@mac.com wrote:
* Cleaning up path
No, it is not a tagging error. It is a direct result of the unholy mess
created by the definition of the path tag. Often the only way to tag
working access restrictions on highway=path, is to first close it with
access=no/private and then opening it up with more specific tags like
On Fri, 25 Jul 2014 13:58:18 +0200
Mateusz Konieczny matkoni...@gmail.com wrote:
It is a tagging error to tag public footways as access=private. Can
you give an example? It seems that I miss something in this case.
It's a public footpath i.e. private property over which the public has
been
On 25/07/2014 13:21, Andy Street wrote:
It's a public footpath i.e. private property over which the public has
been granted a right of access (on foot). Since everything but
pedestrian access is not permitted it therefore tagged as
access=private, foot=yes.
This isn't Andy's example, but is
IMHO it is a tagging error as it should be tagged as [highway=footway;
foot=permissive]
Using yes rather than permissive also seems to be wrong in this case.
2014-07-25 14:21 GMT+02:00 Andy Street a...@street.me.uk:
On Fri, 25 Jul 2014 13:58:18 +0200
Mateusz Konieczny matkoni...@gmail.com
Am 7/25/14 14:21 , schrieb Andy Street:
It's a public footpath i.e. private property over which the public has
been granted a right of access (on foot). Since everything but
pedestrian access is not permitted it therefore tagged as
access=private, foot=yes.
Not an expert here, but this sounds
On 25/07/2014 13:41, Mateusz Konieczny wrote:
IMHO it is a tagging error as it should be tagged as [highway=footway;
foot=permissive]
Using yes rather than permissive also seems to be wrong in this case.
Is my highway=track example also a tagging error?
Cheers,
Andy
On Fri, 25 Jul 2014 14:16:34 +0200
Cartinus carti...@xs4all.nl wrote:
No, it is not a tagging error. It is a direct result of the unholy
mess created by the definition of the path tag. Often the only way to
tag working access restrictions on highway=path, is to first close it
with
I was under the impression more shops would be displayed than
previously?
So far I'm seeing fewer, a notable example being liquor stores that have
now vanished from visual.
Examples: http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2939951075
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2125818740
Also worrying that
On Fri, 25 Jul 2014 14:41:44 +0200
Mateusz Konieczny matkoni...@gmail.com wrote:
IMHO it is a tagging error as it should be tagged as [highway=footway;
foot=permissive]
Using yes rather than permissive also seems to be wrong in this case.
It isn't permissive as the landowner does not have the
From this description - I would tag it as highway=footway (as for public it
is a footway and I guess that it is used
primarily as footway, not as a driveway) with vehicle=private (as owner may
use it this way). I am unsure about
value of foot tag, but I probably would leave default value as
Both linked shops are displayed.
2014-07-25 14:59 GMT+02:00 Jóhannes Birgir Jensson j...@betra.is:
I was under the impression more shops would be displayed than previously?
So far I'm seeing fewer, a notable example being liquor stores that have
now vanished from visual.
Examples:
On my screen I see a purple dot in zoom 19, the address number at zoom
18 and nothing in zoom 17. Before I was a basket with a wine bottle or
similar.
Þann 25.07.2014 13:04, Mateusz Konieczny reit:
Both linked shops are displayed.
2014-07-25 14:59 GMT+02:00 Jóhannes Birgir Jensson
Still, I think that it is better to use cascading tags - put as much
valuable info in basic tags (highway and access in this case)
so it is not be necessary to process all tags to achieve good results.
So [highway=footway] it can be used by pedestrians, maybe
[highway=footway; vehicle=private] it
Hi
Absolutely Awsome!!
Regards, Peter
Am 25.07.2014 10:58, schrieb Pieren:
Some humaniterian team is using a drone for OSM in Haiti since 2 years:
http://cartong.org/project/communautary-mappinguav-project-haiti
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/UAV-HAITI
Pieren
Addendum: http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2939951086 is a sport shop,
only displayed as the address number as well.
On my screen I see a purple dot in zoom 19, the address number at zoom
18 and nothing in zoom 17. Before a liquor store was a basket with a
wine bottle or
similar.
So I'm
2014-07-25 15:03 GMT+02:00 Mateusz Konieczny matkoni...@gmail.com:
From this description - I would tag it as highway=footway (as for public
it is a footway and I guess that it is used
primarily as footway, not as a driveway) with vehicle=private (as owner
may use it this way). I am unsure
On 25/07/2014 14:03, Mateusz Konieczny wrote:
From this description - I would tag it as highway=footway (as for
public it is a footway and I guess that it is used
primarily as footway, not as a driveway)
It's not used primarily as a footway - it's primarily a track used to
access farmland
On 25/07/14 14:51, SomeoneElse wrote:
I do get the impression that these changes haven't really been thought
through at all - no thought given to what the impact will be worldwide
(as opposed to a couple of well-mapped cities), no thought about tablet
or phone access, no attempt at QA (to let
On 25/07/14 15:20, SomeoneElse wrote:
On 25/07/2014 15:03, Tom Hughes wrote:
How about assuming good intent ...
No-one's suggesting anything other than people wanting to make the
standard layer better. It's better for what that's the issue. I
think that we ought to be making a map style
On 25/07/2014 15:03, Tom Hughes wrote:
How about assuming good intent ...
No-one's suggesting anything other than people wanting to make the
standard layer better. It's better for what that's the issue. I
think that we ought to be making a map style that better helps people
navigate to
On Fri, 25 Jul 2014 15:18:16 +0200
Mateusz Konieczny matkoni...@gmail.com wrote:
[highway=footway; vehicle=private] it can
be used by pedestrians but some people may drive here
The trouble is that you are merging the distinction between highway
and access. Your example above would, to me,
On 25/07/2014 15:26, Tom Hughes wrote:
Traditionally we have always said that out web site is aimed at
supporting mappers
That certainly used to be the case, but the most recent series of
changes have all being about showing less rather than showing more.
How does that support mappers?
On 25/07/14 15:33, SomeoneElse wrote:
On 25/07/2014 15:26, Tom Hughes wrote:
For the record I personally was perfectly happy to see things like
long obliterated railways removed from the standard rendering.
We never (well not for 5 years or so?) rendered dismantled railways -
it's the
2014-07-25 16:38 GMT+02:00 Tom Hughes t...@compton.nu:
I would dispute the claim that the Hertford East-North link is in any
way a significant feature in the landscape.
Looking at this http://www.hertford.net/images/Hertford_East_Sidings.jpg it
seems to be.
looking here it doesn't seem to
2014-07-25 16:20 GMT+02:00 SomeoneElse li...@mail.atownsend.org.uk:
On 25/07/2014 15:03, Tom Hughes wrote:
How about assuming good intent ...
No-one's suggesting anything other than people wanting to make the
standard layer better. It's better for what that's the issue. I think
that we
The issue with services seems to be already noticed and fixed - see
https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/issues/730
2014-07-25 16:30 GMT+02:00 Dave F. dave...@madasafish.com:
Hi
Good to see updates for the mapnik rendering.
Unsure if these two problems are directly linked to
Hi,
There is a big jump in the number of OSM users between 20th and 21st of
July, why? See http://osmstats.altogetherlost.com/
-Jukka Rahkonen-
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
On 25/07/14 15:42, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
2014-07-25 16:38 GMT+02:00 Tom Hughes t...@compton.nu
mailto:t...@compton.nu:
I would dispute the claim that the Hertford East-North link is in
any way a significant feature in the landscape.
Looking at this
Btw, the stats page is also showing 2207299 users but crashes on next
GPS data stats:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/stats/data_stats.html
Top 50 users for uploads of GPS data
Exception: undefined method `each' for #
/srv/www.openstreetmap.org/rails/script/statistics:36:in `block in
'
Hi Martin,
Latest diary post - http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/DaCor/diary/23392
Wiki page with details - http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lesotho_Mapathon
Dave
On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 4:26 PM, Martijn van Exel m...@rtijn.org wrote:
On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 4:21 AM, Dave Corley
On Friday 25 July 2014, Christian Quest wrote:
On the first zoom levels, I think we can put the priority on map
users a little bit more... but as map contributors are more checking
their work at the highest zoom levels we should stick with strict
rendering showing errors. Doing more than that
On 23 July 2014 02:51, Paul Norman penor...@mac.com wrote:
v2.17.0 of the openstreetmap-carto stylesheet has been released, though not
yet deployed on tile.osm.org.
I would like to thank everyone for all comments, which are really helpful.
Because there are so many comments about different
On 24 July 2014 05:17, Andreas Goss andi...@t-online.de wrote:
I hope craft=* and office=* will follow. Would probably encourage
more people to map them and report missing/wrong POIs.
We are working on it, but there are still some issues to resolve. See
On 25 July 2014 12:52, Andy Street a...@street.me.uk wrote:
* Cleaning up path rendering on low zooms
(https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/pull/747)
Is there any chance this could be tweaked slightly? A lot of the
public footpaths near me are now disappearing completely
at
On 25 July 2014 13:59, Jóhannes Birgir Jensson j...@betra.is wrote:
I was under the impression more shops would be displayed than previously?
So far I'm seeing fewer, a notable example being liquor stores that have now
vanished from visual.
Examples:
Hi Tom,
On 25 July 2014 15:26, Tom Hughes t...@compton.nu wrote:
Traditionally we have always said that out web site is aimed at supporting
mappers and not at providing end user services like helping people navigate
- we provide the data to let other people build services like that.
I have
On 25 July 2014 15:30, Dave F. dave...@madasafish.com wrote:
highway=services (ie service stations where you can get a drink/meal etc) as
an area are rendering as a high level layer hiding detail such as car parks.
Can this be put at a lower level?
I created an issue for that here:
Hi,
Public footpaths in the United Kingdom have been discussed at length and
are detailed on the wiki:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/UK_public_rights_of_way#Tagging_Access_Provisions
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/UK_access_provisions
In summary, for a Public Footpath:
* tag the
I think it will be time-concuming to find a particular topic about this
subject. However, I have the feeling that Tom's claim about what is the
slippy map being for mappers more than for users is deeply anchored in
the community.
I think others can back up this.
IMO, the fact that the map
On Fri, 25 Jul 2014 18:01:40 +0100
Matthijs Melissen i...@matthijsmelissen.nl wrote:
On 25 July 2014 12:52, Andy Street a...@street.me.uk wrote:
* Cleaning up path rendering on low zooms
(https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/pull/747)
Is there any chance this could be
So it is. Just came through now, with a bit of refreshing.
Thanks
Dave F.
On 25/07/2014 15:57, Mateusz Konieczny wrote:
The issue with services seems to be already noticed and fixed - see
https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/issues/730
2014-07-25 16:30 GMT+02:00 Dave F.
I just hope that the 'tertiary_link' casing problem can be fixed soon. In some
places, that looks horrible.
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
I just hope that the 'tertiary_link' casing problem can be fixed soon. In some
places, that looks horrible.
https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/issues/753
-James
Ik kwam toevallig in Blerick een groot aantal unconnected nodes tegen.
Na wat verder zoeken zag ik ook wat oude 3dshapes buildings nog over de
nieuwere BAG gebouwen liggen. Ik neem dus aan dat hier een BAG import
niet helemaal goed gegaan is.
De BAG import daar was van juni, dus ik heb alles
On 07/25/2014 12:11 PM, Maarten Deen wrote:
Kan iemand dit ook even op het forum wil posten?
Done: http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=26440
Mvg,
Bas
--
GPG Key ID: 4096R/E88D4AF1
Fingerprint: 8182 DE41 7056 408D 6146 50D1 6750 F10A E88D 4AF1
Goed, en nu?
Friesland is ondertussen gedaan door rivw en Mapping_Fryslan.
Annuleren of ..?
Harry
Op 27 juni 2014 21:04 schreef Johan C osm...@gmail.com:
Ik heb inmiddels een locatie voor de mappingparty in Friesland op 6
september, zie
On 07/25/2014 08:57 PM, Harry van der Wolf wrote:
Goed, en nu?
Friesland is ondertussen gedaan door rivw en Mapping_Fryslan.
Annuleren of ..?
Volgens mij is het stuk dat Johan had gereserveerd nog niet gedaan door
rivw noch Mapping_Fryslan, dus in dat opzicht hoeft er niets te
veranderen
Het dringt nu pas tot me door dat Mapping Fryslân niet de gebruiker is
die dat gedaan heeft maar dat dat het stuk Friesland is dat Johan
gereserveerd heeft. Al de gemeentes die Johan gereserveerd heeft zitten in
deze ene polygon.
Niets aan de hand dus.
Mijn Annuleren of...? was inderdaad een wel
Mapping Fryslân niet de gebruiker is die dat gedaan heeft maar dat
dat het stuk Friesland is dat Johan gereserveerd heeft
Klopt, ik heb die polygoon aangemaakt om het gebied af te grenzen dat ik
graag tijdens de mappingparty zou willen doen, met hopelijk diverse Friese
mappers die dan hun
So after 2 months of prep, several hundred tweets, emails and facebook
posts we're finally here!
Today is #MapLesotho day!
There are mapping parties happening in:
- Lesotho (2 locations)
- Ireland
- Poland
- Germany
- USA
- Canada
- UK
To help out, go to either the urban
Hallo,
Am 23. Juli 2014 19:55 schrieb Frank J. newslet...@fotodrachen.de:
Auf nach Norden, das Navi eichen:
Du meinst kalibrieren; eichen kann nur das Eichamt ;-)
http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eichung
___
Talk-de mailing list
Auch dieses Jahr können wir als Aussteller auf der INTERGEO einen gesponsorten
Stand bekommen. Ob es wieder ein eigener Stand ( 12qm ) sein wird oder wir auf
dem OS GeoPark eine Standfläche bekommen, ist noch in Planung.
Für unsere Planung habe ich die Wikiseite ergänzt.
On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 12:56 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer
dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
Am 24/lug/2014 um 23:31 schrieb Any File anysomef...@gmail.com:
C'è qualcuno che ha deciso che highway=motorway_link implicha oneway=yes
?
si, credo per lo più si presume senso unico anche per i link
2014-07-25 9:25 GMT+02:00 Andrea Musuruane musur...@gmail.com:
On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 12:56 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer
dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
Am 24/lug/2014 um 23:31 schrieb Any File anysomef...@gmail.com:
C'è qualcuno che ha deciso che highway=motorway_link implicha
oneway=yes
2014-07-25 10:55 GMT+02:00 Simone Saviolo:
Posso dire che mi sembrano una scelta sbagliata proprio i *_link?
sbagliati sulla BreBeMi o in generale?
Su autostrade e superstrade sono utili per le indicazioni vocali dei
navigatori che così possono dare indicazioni più comprensibili,
possono dire
Il giorno 25 luglio 2014 11:25, Daniele Forsi dfo...@gmail.com ha scritto:
2014-07-25 10:55 GMT+02:00 Simone Saviolo:
Posso dire che mi sembrano una scelta sbagliata proprio i *_link?
sbagliati sulla BreBeMi o in generale?
Su autostrade e superstrade sono utili per le indicazioni vocali
Ciao,
Il Mer, 23 Luglio 2014 11:24 am, sabas88 ha scritto:
historic=wreck non si può nemmeno usare per lasciarci la traccia, perchè
implica la presenza fisica della nave...
In effetti i progetti 4D (per tener conto anche del tempo) in OSM
rimandano al futuro il problema degli oggetti mobili
2014-07-25 12:18 GMT+02:00 Simone Saviolo simone.savi...@gmail.com:
Le corsie di accelerazione/decelerazione sono *veramente* pezzi di strada
speciali?
penso di si, puoi superare a destra se stai entrando in autostrada sulla
corsia di accelerazione (non su quello di decelerazione), al meno
On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 12:56 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer
dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
Am 24/lug/2014 um 23:31 schrieb Any File anysomef...@gmail.com:
C'è qualcuno che ha deciso che highway=motorway_link implicha oneway=yes ?
si, credo per lo più si presume senso unico anche per i link
On Fri, 25 Jul 2014, Any File wrote:
Inoltre l'ultimo tratto, diciamo più o meno ad Est di
http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=15/45.5302/10.0415layers=N
ha ancora access=no (e anche lo svincolo in quella posizione ha access=no).
Qualcuno sa se è corretta la cosa oppure è stato aperto anche
Domani vado a farmi un giro!
bravi mappers!
-
-
Le ultime dal mio blog: Perchè una mappa degli alberi?
--
View this message in context:
http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/BreBeMi-inaugurata-tp5812449p5812755.html
Sent from the Italy General mailing list
FYI
#MapLesotho
- Enock
-- Forwarded message --
From: Dave Corley davecor...@gmail.com
Date: Jul 25, 2014 10:24 AM
Subject: [HOT] #MapLesotho mapping happening now - Join in
To: h...@openstreetmap.org h...@openstreetmap.org
Cc:
So after 2 months of prep, several hundred tweets,
Od kud se dají získat výšky budov? Nyní jsou někde .27 což je naprostá
hovadina asi si to někdo spletl s výměrou nebo co. Nebo tři vyznačené
stejné budovy na sobě vykreslené pokaždé s jinou výškou. Doplněk
pointInfo (ver.30470) mě to nezobrazí.
S díky za odpověď
Lukáš
IMHO RUIAN - počet pater
J
Dne 25. července 2014 19:02 Lukas Novotny lenoc...@tiscali.cz napsal(a):
Od kud se dají získat výšky budov? Nyní jsou někde .27 což je naprostá
hovadina asi si to někdo spletl s výměrou nebo co. Nebo tři vyznačené
stejné budovy na sobě vykreslené pokaždé s jinou
0.27 pater? Nějaké divné ne.
Nechápu tu poznámku k ruian. V něm žádná výška budovy není. Pouze počet pater a
ty do tagu height=* nedáváme.
Netuším, jestli někdo na základě počtu pater zkouší odhadnout výšku budovy, ale
bude to jen hodně, hodně přibližné. Osobně bych to nedělal.
Marián
On
Ahoj,
obrázky parcel od Petra Vejsady mi nějak nedaly spát, tak jsem včera v
noci ubastlil skript na konverzi parcel do OSM.
Skriptík nemá jiné ambice než vyzkoušet si natažení parcel do JOSM a
vůbec se seznámit s VFR formátem RUIANu, takže nečekejte zázraky. Mj.
nefungují multipolygony,
Ahoj, vypadá to hezky, ale fakt chceme mít v OSM přesný obraz KM? Sem tam si
zemědělci něco přiorají, občas zase kus nechají a ten brzy zaroste nějakým
křovím nebo lesem. Někde jsem zase viděl velkou zahradu, o kterou se už majitel
nechtěl starat, tak jí kus pronajal sousedovi a ten si o to
No, poté co jsem si to vyzkoušel jsem si prakticky jistý, že 1:1
hromadný převod všech parcel do OSM není průchozí :-) Ty miliony
rozdrobených parcelek by nadělaly solidní binec v databázi i na mapě.
A jak říkáš, zrovna LPIS u zemědělské půdy líp kopíruje realitu.
Spíš je to o tom hledat
Ahoj,
ze 40 milionů drobných parcelek se dá jedním příkazem udělat 60 multipolygonů
select druh_pozemku,zpusob_vyuziti_pozemku,st_union(hranice) from
ruian.rn_parcela group by druh_pozemku,zpusob_vyuziti_pozemku
a z nich dalším jedním či dvěma příkazy se dá udělat N polygonů, které budou
Ahoj,
ano, tak bych si představoval to rozumné využití RUIANu. Akorát mě nenapadlo,
že je to až tak snadné. Asi je čas naučit se PostGIS ;-)
Martin
On 25.7.2014 22:25, Petr Vejsada wrote:
Ahoj,
ze 40 milionů drobných parcelek se dá jedním příkazem udělat 60 multipolygonů
select
Ahoj!
ani nic nequotuji, jen co se mi zdá, tak podle toho zákona, co sem dával
odkaz
hanoj, jsou v LPIS jen ty pozemky, u kterých to jejich uživatelé chtějí. Kdo
tam nechce být, tak tam není. Chápu správně?
Jistej si nejsem, ale taky mam ten pocit. Na druhou stranu -- je to
kvuli dotacim,
Bonjour,
je cherche comment taguer une halte garderie.
Si jette un petit coup d’œil sur ce que l'on peut trouver dans l'existant,
j'ai :
- amenity=nursery
- amenity=kindergarten
- nul=nul (uniquement tag name)
Et le wiki n'est pas très explicite sur le sujet :
Il y a une discussion proche en cours sur tagging@...
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/2014-July/018472.html
Le 25 juillet 2014 09:05, Mides mides@gmail.com a écrit :
Bonjour,
je cherche comment taguer une halte garderie.
Si jette un petit coup d'oeil sur ce que l'on
Ok vu.
Donc il ne serait peut être pas inintéressant que je regarde du coté de la
clé/ valeur : amenity = childcare
Le 25 juillet 2014 09:34, Christian Quest cqu...@openstreetmap.fr a écrit
:
Il y a une discussion proche en cours sur tagging@...
Hello,
Comment savoir quel ** efface des emplacements de radar ?
--
View this message in context:
http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/effacement-volontaire-de-radar-tp5812599.html
Sent from the France mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
Talk-fr
http://simon04.dev.openstreetmap.org/whodidit/
2014-07-25 10:20 GMT+02:00 willemijns sebast...@willemijns.com:
Hello,
Comment savoir quel ** efface des emplacements de radar ?
--
View this message in context:
Déjà un petit who did it dans la zone en question :
http://zverik.osm.rambler.ru/whodidit/
- Mail original -
De: willemijns sebast...@willemijns.com
À: talk-fr@openstreetmap.org
Envoyé: Vendredi 25 Juillet 2014 10:20:34
Objet: [OSM-talk-fr] effacement volontaire de radar
Hello,
Il te faut regarder dans la liste de tes changesets pour retrouver un
radar que tu as ajouté. Ensuite dans l'historique de cet objet tu verras
qui l'a supprimé.
Frédéric.
Le 25/07/2014 10:20, willemijns a écrit :
Hello,
Comment savoir quel ** efface des emplacements de radar ?
--
2014-07-24 16:23 GMT+02:00 Stéphane Péneau stephane.pen...@wanadoo.fr:
Tu as l'air contre l'idée de l'utilisation du tag place= pour les places.
Mais est-ce que tu estimes aussi qu'il n'y a pas besoin d'un tag
supplémentaire pour référencer leur emprise ?
Les places sont certes plus
L'été n'est pas la meilleure période pour ce genre d'évènement, donc un
petit décalage d'un mois s'impose si on veut avoir un peu d'écho.
Le NUMA nous met à disposition sa salle du 4ème étage pour la soirée du
lundi 8 septembre.
C'est peut être l'occasion de caler d'autres évènements de ce type
Hello tout le monde,
Il a été question il y a un certain temps des infos de direction que
certains Apn ainsi que les iphone incluent dans les données exif des
photos. Cette info permet à Josm d'indiquer dans quelle direction pointe
une photo, ce qui est très pratique lorsqu'on en prend
OK pour chez Papa, mais le mois d'août en terrasse alors ! ;)
Le 24 juil. 2014 19:55, Christian Quest cqu...@openstreetmap.fr a écrit
:
Vu qu'on n'a pas annoncé, on risque d'avoir quelques personnes qui
viennent à l'adresse habituelle.
Je resterai sur le Chez Papa pour ce coup-ci, mais pour le
2014-07-25 7:58 GMT+02:00 David Crochet david.croc...@free.fr:
Cette étiquette n'est utilie que lorsque l'extrémité d'une voie est proche
d'un autre chemin pour indiquer que ce n'est pas un oublie
Absolument. Ca n'set utile que pour les logiciles qualité qui
cherchent les highways qui
C'est une bonne idée, en termes de communication, a-t-on la possibilité
d'avoir des chiffres clefs à travers le temps, un zoom sur le bâti, les
adresses, les intégrations opendata, les réutilisations intéressantes de la
base et les grands défis du futur ?
C'est une méga liste, je sais ;)
Le 25
2014-07-25 9:58 GMT+02:00 Mides mides@gmail.com:
Ok vu.
Donc il ne serait peut être pas inintéressant que je regarde du coté de la
clé/ valeur : amenity = childcare
Le tag childcare fait partie du débat. Ce terme a différentes
significations suivant les pays anglophones. Ca peut aussi
Hello,
merci de vos réponses...
c'est vrai que c'est dur de trouver son propre historique...
j'ai essayé un whodidit, il avait une vieille database
ce qui est bien dommage c'est que le groupe de modifications n'est pas une
possibilité de connaitre les modifications sur une parcelle
De quel radar s'agit-il. Peut-être il avait été de façon incorrecte comme
noeud de la route au lieu d'à coté?
Jo
2014-07-25 10:20 GMT+02:00 willemijns sebast...@willemijns.com:
Hello,
Comment savoir quel ** efface des emplacements de radar ?
--
View this message in context:
1 - 100 of 146 matches
Mail list logo
