Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdreist at gmail.com writes:
m.E. passt am besten historic=wayside_shrine
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:historic%3Dwayside_shrine
Der wurde u.a. für Marterl eingeführt.
das Wort shrine bezeichnet einen umschlossenen Raum, sei es ein Gebäude
oder nur ein
Am Mittwoch, 8. April 2015, 20:36:13 schrieb Martin Koppenhoefer:
Am 08.04.2015 um 15:17 schrieb fly lowfligh...@googlemail.com:
Warum eigentlich railway: als name space ?
ich finde so einen namespace dort nicht schlecht, wo es um Spezialistentags
geht. Hauptsignale und Ähnliches wird
Im Forum wurde das Thema schon mal kurz angeschnitten, dort gibt es einen
Thread der sich speziell mit historischen Objekten befasst:
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=473183#p473183
Am 4. April 2015 um 00:00 schrieb Helmut Kauer li...@helmut-kauer.de:
Griaß eich,
in Bayern gibt
Am 9. April 2015 um 08:22 schrieb Manuel Reimer manuel.s...@nurfuerspam.de
:
das Wort shrine bezeichnet einen umschlossenen Raum, sei es ein Gebäude
oder nur ein Kästchen, für ein
Brett halte ich das nicht für geeignet.
Es gilt im Bereich OpenStreetMap auch generell für Bildstöcke. Und
From: Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com
but what does this combination of tags mean for bicycles.
IMHO it says there is a bicycle lane, but you cannot use it by bike (as you
can't use any of the lanes by bike, including those for cars).
I beg to differ.
My reasoning was in
Hi Romain,
I would also be pretty interested in a bicriteria (or multicriteria) OSRM
version. What bicriteria algorithm would you like to use?
Let me first introduce myself. I'm involved in a SmartCities European
Project in my city and we would like to provide routes that consider the
On 2015-04-09 16:29, Volker Schmidt wrote:
From: Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com
but what does this combination of tags mean for bicycles.
IMHO it says there is a bicycle lane, but you cannot use it by bike
(as you
can't use any of the lanes by bike, including those for cars).
I
Hi Francis,
I'm working on the dynamic case of the problem but I think I might help you.
What if you create a formula for your critera for example, for the costs
that you gave you can define :
weight = (Travel Time * TT_Weight) + (Cost * C_Weight) where TT_ and
C_Weight are factors and weight
Please also check horse=no and access=permissive on this way (if you
lost it: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/12823327). Especially horses.
I think that's the drawback of listing all possible tags in editors, and
people feeling obliged to answer them all.
Perhaps we should create a farmer
I came across this example [1] where a way has bicycle=no and
cycleway=lane. I was using brouter [2] for some bicyclerouting and one
of the rules for bikerouting there is that bicycle=no means no bicycles
are allowed.
IMHO these two tags are also conflicting and the bicycle=no should be
On 2015-04-09 14:00, Phil Endecott wrote:
Maarten Deen wrote:
I came across this example [1] where a way has bicycle=no and
cycleway=lane.
IMHO these two tags are also conflicting and the bicycle=no should be
removed. Any thoughts?
Cycle lanes that you cannot, either practically or legally,
2015-04-09 15:34 GMT+02:00 Maarten Deen md...@xs4all.nl:
but what does this combination of tags mean for bicycles.
IMHO it says there is a bicycle lane, but you cannot use it by bike (as you
can't use any of the lanes by bike, including those for cars).
Cheers,
Martin
1) For me there is no a-priori conflict: according to the tagging, this is
a pedestrian street, where you cannot ride your bicycle, except on a cycle
lane which is somewhere on this pedestrian street. Why should a pedestrian
street not have a bicycle lane like any other street.
Or am I missing
My opinion on the subject;
I agree that the ground principle should be followed, and the 3
nautical miles should be indicated and maintained as read only by OSM.
I don't know how to do this but with some help from Gibraltar
Government GIS project (http://www.geoportal.gov.gi/webviewer/)
someone
2015-04-09 16:29 GMT+02:00 Volker Schmidt vosc...@gmail.com:
My reasoning was in analogy to a street with compulsory-use cycle lanes
with tags like:
highway=residential|
bicycle=no
cycleway=lane
bicycle=no says that bikes are not allowed. If there is a cycleway on that
street, that
[bicycle=no; cycleway=lane] means that there is a lane for bicycles but
cycling is anyway not allowed there.
Typically it would be a tagging mistake, usable cycleway lanes should
be tagged as [cycleway=lane].
On Thu, 09 Apr 2015 10:03:42 +0200
Maarten Deen md...@xs4all.nl wrote:
I came across
On 2015-04-09 15:15, Volker Schmidt wrote:
1) For me there is no a-priori conflict: according to the tagging,
this is a pedestrian street, where you cannot ride your bicycle,
except on a cycle lane which is somewhere on this pedestrian street.
Why should a pedestrian street not have a bicycle
2015-04-09 15:00 GMT+02:00 Phil Endecott spam_from_osm_t...@chezphil.org:
http://homepage.ntlworld.com/pete.meg/wcc/facility-of-the-
month/December2013.htm
this one doesn't seem to prohibit bicycles, it seems to be stroken through?
Is this an official sign?
Cheers,
Martin
Maarten Deen wrote:
I came across this example [1] where a way has bicycle=no and
cycleway=lane.
IMHO these two tags are also conflicting and the bicycle=no should be
removed. Any thoughts?
Cycle lanes that you cannot, either practically or legally, cycle
along are horribly common. Examples:
Hello!
We're hosting an OSM workshop with Batangas LGUs this weekend, April 11-12.
This is a partnership with World Bank to encourage municipalities to map
their road networks on OSM to visualize road needs for government funding
and to help create more maps on OSM. Down the road we'll be mapping
Hello all,
I'm writing this text to let you know that during my work of adding/fixing
proper administrative divisions in Portugal I noticed that the border
between our countries had, sometimes, broken relations and/or slight way
deviations according to the data I'm using.
I'm offering my time to
Iván,
Thank you for your reply, I'll try my best to make it accurate!
If you want to be extra accurate, you'll have to survey the boundary
milestones along the border, recalculate river centerlines and try to match
everything to old documents.
Regarding rivers, I normally disregard mapping
El Jueves 9. abril 2015 12.21.12 Marcos Oliveira escribió:
I'm also looking for the official data you use to map Spain's
administrative limits
What you want is the files for Líneas Límite Municipales from here:
https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/bunker_type#values
Mozna by stalo za to rozsirit i zapis na wiki, pokud vim, tech bunkru je
nekolik typu - pechotni, protitankovy, delostrelecky ...
Dne 8.4.2015 v 20:30 Lukas Michek napsal(a):
Proste jen military=bunker ;-)
8. dubna 2015 19:56:24
On 08-04-2015 23:20, Victor Valore wrote:
Da vi i de fleste bydele ikke har fortovslinierne tegnet ind, så kan
disse, med samt entrances droppes med ind ved samme lejlighed. Herefter
består der så et stykke loddearbejde i at skabe de nødvendige relationer
mellem det eksisterende vejnet og
8. april 2015 kl. 23.20 skrev Victor Valore vic...@valore.dk:
Min tanke er om man i områder hvor der er mange dårligt tegnede bygninger,
med få eller ingen detaljer, kan lave en rip-n-replace, altså fjerne et
større antal eksisterende bygninger og så droppe det nye sæt bygninger ind?
Hvis du
Det tror jeg nu er at overvurdere historikkens bestandighed, for når først en
way er slettet,
er historikken da væk med den, for alle praktiske formål. Måske den kan
genfindes
dybt i databasen, men er ikke ved hånden til vores daglige brug ved arbejdet
med at mappe.
Wikien opfordrer da også
The “North Approach Road extension” opened yesterday according to
today’s Gazette; I’ll be able to go get a GPS trace or two after
work tomorrow. The bus lane by Colchester North station will
reportedly be complete by the end of overnight roadworks at 5am on
Monday (the first buses being at 7am).
Brilliant - thanks.
Stuart
On 9 Apr 2015, at 09:53, Ed Loach edlo...@gmail.commailto:edlo...@gmail.com
wrote:
The “North Approach Road extension” opened yesterday according to today’s
Gazette; I’ll be able to go get a GPS trace or two after work tomorrow. The bus
lane by Colchester North
Hi,
Pulling down the latest Lake District mapping, I noticed a few days ago
that lake Windermere had flooded parts of the regional map. Looking again
today, the regional flood has gone having been replaced by a dry lake with
flooded islands.
Anyone familiar with the local area able to correct
Sur l'adressage et les hameaux je pense aussi qu'on va avoir du nouveau
pour alimenter notre réflexion avec les données BAN.
On y trouve assez souvent des noms de voies qui traversent plusieurs
hameaux. Dans ce cas, on a une forme de hirarchie entre la commune, le
hameau et la voie...
Il y a
Il y a la notion d'ensemble immobilier qui correspond à ces cas
d'immeubles figurant dans FANTOIR.
Il faudrait fouiller un peu plus FANTOIR pour avoir une meillure idée de
ce qu'on y trouve car le document décrivant FANTOIR ne va pas trop dans
le détail.
Pour ma commune, je trouve par exemple
L'avantage que l'on a aussi aujourd'hui c'est que par ce redécoupage
global qui vient d'être fait et surtout publié pour une fois sans faire
référence à d'anciens découpage on part d'un ensemble complet, cohérent
et à jour.
Les futures mise à jour seront bien plus facile à prendre en compte que
Bonjour,
Petit apparté pour signaler l'existence de la Tour Penchée de Dame Eve (à
Laon) :
http://www.monumentum.fr/tour-penchee-pa00115772.html
http://planet-terre.ens-lyon.fr/planetterre/objets/Images/Img169/169-tour-penchee-Laon.jpg/view
Celle-là ne va pas s'écrouler :)
Le 3 avril 2015
Merci pour les retours,
ça y est c'est fait ;)
pour les résidences ou le FANTOIR n'existe pas ou est ce que je pourrais
stocker/inscrire ça ?
en couple de valeurs pourquoi ne pas prendre tous les bâtiments qui sont
des appartements et qui ont un nom ! ça ferait ressortir une partie des
Ici http://www.enlargeyourparis.fr/dans-quel-etat-gr-2/, des définitions
originales du GR.
Romain
Le 8 avril 2015 15:23, JB jb...@mailoo.org a écrit :
Ha ben tiens, quand on se retrouve aux mêmes endroits…
Je viens de leur poser la question par le formulaire de contact, en
évoquant :
-
Il y a la notion d'ensemble immobilier qui correspond à ces cas
d'immeubles figurant dans FANTOIR.
Il faudrait fouiller un peu plus FANTOIR pour avoir une meillure idée de
ce qu'on y trouve car le document décrivant FANTOIR ne va pas trop dans
le détail.
Pour ma commune, je trouve par exemple
there are a number of orthoimagery layers available from
New York State, beginning with 2000. i have inquired about
any usage restrictions and according to Ray Faught of the NYS
GIS Program Office, they are free for public use without
restriction.
the layers may be found here:
Richard,
Nice. You should add that info here:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Aerial_imagery
Elliott
On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 12:05 PM Richard Welty rwe...@averillpark.net
wrote:
there are a number of orthoimagery layers available from
New York State, beginning with 2000. i have inquired
Martin Koppenhoefer writes:
I do agree that they might likely have copyright on the routes, and
that we maybe can't reproduce their routes in our db, but I do
question that we can't map their signposts. Reasoning: the routes
are nothing physically existing, they are, similar to a novel,
Grazie Daniele, lo studiamo.
___
Talk-it mailing list
Talk-it@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it
Si uso Linux. Ok Risolto.
grazie
--
View this message in context:
http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/servizio-di-statistica-per-contribuzione-su-una-determinata-zona-tp5840207p5840236.html
Sent from the Italy General mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Ciao a tutti.
Sto sistemando con JOSM un po' di relazioni in merito a percorsi di
autobus nella mia città.
Tutto ok per le strade, ma ho qualche difficoltà con le rotatorie,
laddove devo inserire nella relazione solo una parte della stessa.
Posto che mi è stato consigliato di non usare la
Il giorno 9 aprile 2015 15:08, Davide Mangraviti davide...@inwind.it ha
scritto:
Esiste un servizio in modalità on line, analogamente a quanto fa JOSM, ma
scaricando i dati in locale (pochi purtroppo) attivando nel gestore gruppi
di modifiche la voce autori? Che offra la possibilità di sapere
Il 09/04/2015 15:08, Davide Mangraviti ha scritto:
...
I dati .osm che si possono scaricare dai vari servizi presenti, mi pare che
non abbiano presente una colonna negli attributi con l'autore dell'ultima
modifica.
Se scarichi, ad esempio da Gfoss [1], il file .osm questa informazione
la
Il 09/apr/2015 20:49, Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com ha
scritto:
io lo farei, spezzi con p la rotatoria ed inserisci soltanto la parte
che fa parte della route
+1
ciao,
Martin
Ciao
Luca
___
Talk-it mailing list
Ti ringrazio Alessandro, ma dove vedi queste info? Con cosa hai visto il
file?
Ho provato ad aprire con QGIS il file .osm di una regione, ma non nei tag
che vedo sta info, chiaramente..
--
View this message in context:
Am 09.04.2015 um 20:08 schrieb Davide Mangraviti davide...@inwind.it:
Ti ringrazio Alessandro, ma dove vedi queste info? Con cosa hai visto il
file?
Ho provato ad aprire con QGIS il file .osm di una regione, ma non nei tag
che vedo sta info, chiaramente..
il commando head (oppure
Ciao Paul, grazie!
Sembra funzionare bene.
Ciao, Mirco
--
View this message in context:
http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Routing-per-bici-piedi-con-gpx-import-esiste-tp5840014p5840197.html
Sent from the Italy General mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Il 09/04/2015 20:08, Davide Mangraviti ha scritto:
Ti ringrazio Alessandro, ma dove vedi queste info? Con cosa hai visto il
file?
Ho provato ad aprire con QGIS il file .osm di una regione, ma non nei tag
che vedo sta info, chiaramente..
Ho giochicchiato con QGIS solo un paio d'ore, ma direi
Grazie Max!
Gentilissimo :)
Ciao, Mirco
Il 09/04/2015 21:28, Max1234Ita [via GIS] ha scritto:
Se hai un dispositivo Android, puoi provare BRouter: è un sistema di
routing alternativo che si sostituisce a quello di default di molteapp
di navigazione, OsmAnd in primis.
Per maggiori info,
Spero di potere essere d'aiuto.
Ciao, Mirco
--
View this message in context:
http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Aiuto-per-tradurre-le-descrizioni-delle-immagini-della-settimana-tp5839507p5840198.html
Sent from the Italy General mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Ho inserito la traduzione, ma non viene commutata. Le note in inglese su
come fare non sono a prova di scemo.
Per me la sintassi é nuova. Probabilmente ho sbagliato nei pressi di | it
--
cascafico.altervista.org
twitter.com/cascafico
___
Talk-it
Am 09.04.2015 um 19:09 schrieb Mattia Martinello
mat...@mattiamartinello.com:
Tutto ok per le strade, ma ho qualche difficoltà con le rotatorie, laddove
devo inserire nella relazione solo una parte della stessa.
Posto che mi è stato consigliato di non usare la funzione strumenti -
Se hai un dispositivo Android, puoi provare BRouter: è un sistema di routing
alternativo che si sostituisce a quello di default di molteapp di
navigazione, OsmAnd in primis.
Per maggiori info, vai su Play Store
https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=btools.routingapp
MAx
--
View
Esiste un servizio in modalità on line, analogamente a quanto fa JOSM, ma
scaricando i dati in locale (pochi purtroppo) attivando nel gestore gruppi
di modifiche la voce autori? Che offra la possibilità di sapere la
percentuale di contributo in % di tutti i volontari mappers che hanno
modificato
On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 9:03 PM, Davide Mangraviti davide...@inwind.it wrote:
Si uso Linux. Ok Risolto.
grazie
Non so se possa in qualche modo interessarti, ma su ITO World
(http://www.itoworld.com/) utilizzando il prodotto OSM mapper
(all'interno della sezione ITO Tools) è possibile, dopo aver
2015-04-06 2:33 GMT+02:00 Gianmario Mengozzi gianmario.mengo...@gmail.com:
ciao lista,
ultimamente vedo spesso giovani mappatori che male interpretano il senso
dei 2 valori in oggetto.
Purtroppo anche io ho spesso riscontrato lo stesso problema!
Qui un esempio di questi giorni:
58 matches
Mail list logo
