Re: [Diversity-talk] Code of conduct

Hello/*Kumusta*, *Salamat*/Thanks everyone for continuing the conversations and taking this seriously. It is good to speak up and comment about it in our individual capacities, but a collective can build a fire  (charcoal comparison). This is what we did in OSM PH's Call to Correct Narratives

Re: [talk-latam] Respuesta a [Ticket#2020120710000024]

Hola Maritza y YMUP, no sé porqué es necesario que sea yo a escribir en los intereses de la comunidad OSM de Panamá, quizás que estoy interpretando mal lo que quiere la comunidad, y que al fin y al cabo lo que hace el YMUP está muy bien en esta comunidad.  entonces sabes qué?  en lugar de

Re: [talk-latam] Fwd: Respuesta a [Ticket#2020120710000024]

There is one point which I do need to clarify, because this is a misrepresentation of the facts and it offends me. Maritza20r writes: Un ejemplo de esto es cuando nuestros estudiantes pidieron su ayuda y apoyo durante la reunión del 17 de septiembre. En lugar de ayudar a proporcionar

[talk-cz] Fwd: OSM uvitaci skript

Ahojte, Na SotM sme sa bavili o "greeting" sktipte, tak preposielam čo používame. Credits: Jose -- Forwarded message - From: Jozef Riha Date: Tue, Dec 8, 2020 at 11:07 PM Subject: Re: OSM uvitaci skript To: Martin Ždila ahoj martin, pokec k tomu nemam, ale z toho

Re: [talk-cz] vektorové dlaždice pro Leaflet

On Tue, Dec 8, 2020 at 11:11 PM Mikoláš Štrajt wrote: > Zdar, > v rámci jedné přednášky na SOTM 2020 se někdo (bohužel už si nepamatuju > kdo) zeptal, zda je možné použít vektorové dlaždice pro Leaflet. > > Doplňoval jsem, že na to byl nějaký plugin. Na ten plugin jsem teď > narazil, tak posílám

[talk-cz] vektorové dlaždice pro Leaflet

Zdar, v rámci jedné přednášky na SOTM 2020 se někdo (bohužel už si nepamatuju kdo) zeptal, zda je možné použít vektorové dlaždice pro Leaflet. Doplňoval jsem, že na to byl nějaký plugin. Na ten plugin jsem teď narazil, tak posílám odkaz - https://github.com/mapbox/mapbox-gl-leaflet Není

Re: [OSM-talk] Please review "Community attribution advice” wiki page

Dec 8, 2020, 18:41 by r...@technomancy.org: > On Tue, 8 Dec 2020, at 09:43, Mateusz Konieczny via talk wrote: > >> Can you give an example of something that would follow >> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Community_attribution_advice >> and still would not fulfill ODBL? >> > > What is and

Re: [Diversity-talk] Code of conduct

I should mention that what we, Maggie Crawely, Rob Nickerson and myself, want to accomplish is to create a committee to moderate the existing etiquette guidelines and later update the guidelines to reflect best practices of Code of Conducts.We planned to form a sub committee under the LCCWG since

Re: [talk-cz] [osm_sk] SotM CZ+SK 2020

Ahoj, Posielam svoje slajdy: https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1Sm-Zcsv9SnOrhHPw7Zfde2DRxk0xgqbGAXNBYmUIROI/edit?usp=sharing A ďakujem za organizáciu :-) -- Ing. Martin Ždila OZ Freemap Slovakia tel:+421-908-363-848

Re: [Diversity-talk] Code of conduct

Always Heather Leson heatherle...@gmail.com Twitter/skype: HeatherLeson Blog: textontechs.com On Tue, Dec 8, 2020 at 10:31 PM Clifford Snow wrote: > Heather - A small group of the LCCWG met via BigBlueButton yesterday to > start a similar initiative. I was going to send an invite to the rest

Re: [Diversity-talk] Code of conduct

Heather - A small group of the LCCWG met via BigBlueButton yesterday to start a similar initiative. I was going to send an invite to the rest of the LCCWG as well as to this mailing list. Since you have the ball rolling, can you include lo...@osmfoundation.org in the mailing. On Tue, Dec 8, 2020

Re: [Diversity-talk] Code of conduct

Great. working in the draft now. Thank you right back. Saturday is just a way to discuss this restart. We can keep building. Heather Heather Leson heatherle...@gmail.com Twitter/skype: HeatherLeson Blog: textontechs.com On Tue, Dec 8, 2020 at 10:10 PM Gertrude Namitala wrote: > Thanks

Re: [Diversity-talk] Code of conduct

Thanks Heather for starting this. I will try to be available. Kind regards, Trudy On Tue, 8 Dec 2020, 23:05 Mikel Maron, wrote: > This is great > > * Mikel Maron * +14152835207 @mikel s:mikelmaron > > > > > > > On Tuesday, December 8, 2020, 03:55:49 PM EST, Heather Leson < >

Re: [Diversity-talk] Code of conduct

Hi Heather, Thanks a lot for setting this up, I have other work commitments but I will try to see if I can move anything. As Rebecca mentioned in Geochicas we started the discussions yesterday and today this document was started. We invite all to have a look and keep the discussion and action plan

Re: [Diversity-talk] Code of conduct

This is great * Mikel Maron * +14152835207 @mikel s:mikelmaron On Tuesday, December 8, 2020, 03:55:49 PM EST, Heather Leson wrote: Great!   Editing now Hope we can have an initial chat heather Heather Leson heatherle...@gmail.com Twitter/skype: HeatherLeson Blog: textontechs.com

Re: [Diversity-talk] Code of conduct

Great! Editing now Hope we can have an initial chat heather Heather Leson heatherle...@gmail.com Twitter/skype: HeatherLeson Blog: textontechs.com On Tue, Dec 8, 2020 at 9:33 PM Rebecca Firth wrote: > Hi Heather, > > Thanks for setting that up - I'll need to jig some things around but >

Re: [Talk-at] Kartenhinweis ohne Ortsaugenschein aufgelöst

Hallo! Am 08.12.20 um 18:49 schrieb Florian Kratochwil: Beim Hinweis Nr. 2449629 (https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2449629#map=17/48.24001/16.17985=N) meldet jemand anonym, dass ein Pfad in Mauerbach bei Wien ein Privatweg sei. Ich hatte da noch die Hoffnung, dass evtl. Mapillary über die

Re: [Talk-at] Kartenhinweis ohne Ortsaugenschein aufgelöst

On Tue, 8 Dec 2020 20:50:56 +0100 Friedrich Volkmann wrote: > On 08.12.20 19:38, Stefan Tauner via Talk-at wrote: > > Insbesondere sehe ich es nicht notwendigerweise > > negativ, in dieser Form auf anonyme Hinweise zu reagieren, wenn es > > keinen Grund zur Annahme gibt, dass der Hinweis falsch

Re: [Diversity-talk] Code of conduct

Hi Heather, Thanks for setting that up - I'll need to jig some things around but really hope to be able to join that meeting. Some people had already started working on a statement to share. I am sharing here for allies to add comments they would like to raise, and to identify people who are keen

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Mapbox-GL JS version 2: vers la fin de l'Opensource sur les tuiles vectorielles

Le 08/12/2020 à 21:15, osm.sanspourr...@spamgourmet.com a écrit : > Cette annonce risque de refroidir un peu. D'autant que Mapbox avait pris soin d'embaucher un développeur du libre bien investi sur les tuiles vectorielles histoire s'assécher le marais. Alors oui OpenLayers et Leaflet sont de

[Diversity-talk] Code of conduct

Hey A few of us are going to meet this saturday about code of conduct in osm. There is a codw of conduct but we think there needs to be more. We can also touch on the diversity work that mikel shared previously. 1500 utc before the osmf board meeting at 1600 utc. Hope you can join. This will be

Re: [Talk-GB] Bridleway across field

On Tue, 8 Dec 2020, 13:18 Dave F via Talk-GB, wrote: FYI Wiltshire Council's Rights of Way Explorer is not the 'definitive map'. > It usually a misnomer. Paths are described with words in a definitive > statement. Their map is a representation of that data. Many authorities add > a caveat

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Mapbox-GL JS version 2: vers la fin de l'Opensource sur les tuiles vectorielles

Bonjour Thomas et les autres. Tu te trompes : rien n'empêche de faire un fork depuis une version pre 2.0.0. On remarqueras aussi une évolution de la spec : https://github.com/mapbox/mapbox-gl-js/tags. Et du coup on aurait des styles qui deviendraient incompatibles. Il conviendrait de voir si

Re: [Talk-at] Kartenhinweis ohne Ortsaugenschein aufgelöst

On 08.12.20 19:38, Stefan Tauner via Talk-at wrote: Insbesondere sehe ich es nicht notwendigerweise negativ, in dieser Form auf anonyme Hinweise zu reagieren, wenn es keinen Grund zur Annahme gibt, dass der Hinweis falsch ist. Es gibt nicht mehr und nicht weniger Grund anzunehmen, dass die vom

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Fwd: 2020 OSMF board election and proposed resolutions

Le 08/12/2020 à 17:56, pepilepi...@ovh.fr a écrit : Bonjour, Comme vous tous j'ai reçu ce mel Dear Voter, You are an OpenStreetMap Foundation member eligible to vote in the election for the three open positions on the Foundation Board. You will also be asked to vote on

Re: [Talk-at] Kartenhinweis ohne Ortsaugenschein aufgelöst

On 08.12.20 18:49, Florian Kratochwil wrote: User Connecticut bearbeitet offenbar in ganz D und Ö diese Hinweise und hat das sehr knapp kommentiert mit "access=private", aber den Hinweis als ungelöst belassen. Das ist das, was ich als Pacman-Mentalität bezeichne. Solche Leute – und von denen

[Talk-de] Flussrelationen: Mitglieder und deren Reihenfolge

Moin, ich hab mir im Rahmen des Schwerpunktes der Woche [0] mal die Flussrelation der Ems [1] angeschaut und mir sind zwei Fragen gekommen: Welche Segmente gehören in die Relation? Es sind weite Teile des Dortmund-Ems-Kanals auch in der Relation samt Schleusen. Diese Liniensegmente sind aber

Re: [Talk-at] opavote - osmf voting

Ja, das passt so. Es geht darum, ob die Liste angezeigt wird oder nicht. War bei mir genauso. lg Am 08.12.20 um 12:25 schrieb snup via Talk-at: ich habe diese voting testseite probiert. da funktioniert bei mir alles, nur der vote button tut nichts. weiss jmand ob das so sein soll?

Re: [Talk-at] Kartenhinweis ohne Ortsaugenschein aufgelöst

On Tue, 8 Dec 2020 18:49:28 +0100 Florian Kratochwil wrote: > Wie seht ihr das? Bin ich da zu streng / pingelig? In dem Fall deutet die Note ja sogar darauf hin, dass da überhaupt keine Brücke ist. Ich kann Armchair-mappenderweise auch keine erkennen, aber das heißt natürlich nix. Die Straße

Re: [Talk-at] PLZ und Ortsvorwahlen von Österreich

Am Mo., 7. Dez. 2020 um 12:53 Uhr schrieb grubernd : > On 06.12.20 14:19, Philipp Kolmann via Talk-at wrote: > > nachdem ich vor einiger Zeit nach einer Webseite gesucht habe, wo ich > > die Ortsvorwahlen suchen kann bzw sehe wie sich die Vorwahlen > > zusammensetzen und nichts dazu gefunden

Re: [OSM-talk] Please review "Community attribution advice” wiki page

> Rory McCann hat am 08.12.2020 18:41 geschrieben: > > On Tue, 8 Dec 2020, at 09:43, Mateusz Konieczny via talk wrote: > > Can you give an example of something that would follow > > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Community_attribution_advice > > and still would not fulfill ODBL? > >

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Fwd: 2020 OSMF board election and proposed resolutions

Le 08/12/2020 à 18:36, Vincent de Château-Thierry a écrit : > Bonsoir, > >> De: pepilepi...@ovh.fr >> C'est normal, ça ? > Oui. Dans la page en question tu peux lire : "The vote button of this test > page does not work" et il faut le prendre au pied de la lettre :) Évidemment... Merci, bonne

[Talk-at] Kartenhinweis ohne Ortsaugenschein aufgelöst

Beim Hinweis Nr. 2449629 (https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2449629#map=17/48.24001/16.17985=N) meldet jemand anonym, dass ein Pfad in Mauerbach bei Wien ein Privatweg sei. User Connecticut bearbeitet offenbar in ganz D und Ö diese Hinweise und hat das sehr knapp kommentiert mit

Re: [OSM-talk-ie] AI mapping roads released in IE

On 08/12/2020 17:34, Oisin Herriott (Insight Global Inc) via Talk-ie wrote: Hi, I never received a response about the question below.. Can I get a confirmation on the correct mailing address to use when proposing a posting to the talklist? No idea what happened, but that mail never made it

Re: [OSM-talk-ie] AI mapping roads released in IE

Yeah this is basically the right list. Lots of that FB detect stuff is rubbish. They still haven't fixed it. Lots of dreck in there. On Tue, 8 Dec 2020, at 18:34, Oisin Herriott (Insight Global Inc) via Talk-ie wrote: > Hi, > > I never received a response about the question below.. Can I get

Re: [OSM-talk] Please review "Community attribution advice” wiki page

On Tue, 8 Dec 2020, at 09:43, Mateusz Konieczny via talk wrote: > Can you give an example of something that would follow > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Community_attribution_advice > and still would not fulfill ODBL? What is and isn't allowed by the ODbL can (I think) only be answered by a

Re: [OSM-talk] Please review "Community attribution advice” wiki page

Yes, fundamentally, you're 100% correct. The ODbL licence is the thing that matters when it comes to what's legally required. And that says nothing about “device independent pixels” or “javascript popup clicks”, it only refers to the mental state of someone. The Charter of Fundamental Rights

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Fwd: 2020 OSMF board election and proposed resolutions

Bonsoir, > De: pepilepi...@ovh.fr > > C'est normal, ça ? Oui. Dans la page en question tu peux lire : "The vote button of this test page does not work" et il faut le prendre au pied de la lettre :) J'ai trouvé ça déroutant aussi, mais j'ai pu voter normalement ensuite, sur la vraie page de

[OSM-talk-fr] Mapbox-GL JS version 2: vers la fin de l'Opensource sur les tuiles vectorielles

Salut à tous, La licence suite à la sortie de Mapbox-GL JS 2.0 change https://github.com/mapbox/mapbox-gl-js/releases/tag/v2.0.0 Il va falloir envisager de passer à OpenLayers ou à une autre solution apparemment. Je me trompe? Avis? Réactions? Intéressé au regard des discussions pour avoir plus

Re: [OSM-talk-ie] AI mapping roads released in IE

Hi, I never received a response about the question below.. Can I get a confirmation on the correct mailing address to use when proposing a posting to the talklist? Thanks, Oisin From: Oisin Herriott (Insight Global Inc) Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2020 11:02 AM To: talk-ie@openstreetmap.org

[OSM-talk-fr] Fwd: 2020 OSMF board election and proposed resolutions

Bonjour, Comme vous tous j'ai reçu ce mel Dear Voter, You are an OpenStreetMap Foundation member eligible to vote in the election for the three open positions on the Foundation Board. You will also be asked to vote on three proposed resolutions. *[...]* *Test your

Re: [Talk-GB] Bridleway across field

On Tue, Dec 8, 2020 at 3:04 PM Simon Still wrote: > > I’d actually say *more* of an issue with OSM is paths that are marked that > ARE NOT a legal right of way. Around Peaslake in the Surrey Hills there > are various ‘mountain bike trails’ shown on OSM that are not rights of way > and which the

Re: [Talk-GB] Bridleway across field **Do tag for the USER**

On Tue, Dec 08, 2020 at 03:47:08PM +, David Woolley wrote: > On 08/12/2020 15:11, nathan case wrote: > > I am interested as a path I recently mapped is a PROW but is very dangerous > > to cross. It is now marked as disused:highway=path with > > access=discourged;designated but it is stilla

Re: [Talk-GB] Solar panels on Alvares House in Homerton

Hi Mat, They do indeed look like solar panels, although the images arent as clear as one would like. You can just add a single node as a solar panel (preferably with location=roof & a direction tag) or try & map the lot as an area. The number of modules is a difficult to discern. Using the

Re: [Talk-GB] Bridleway across field

This reminds me a bit of this location, also in Wiltshire: https://www.mapthepaths.org.uk/?lat=51.06209564615185=-2.0421791551466137=3=0 Note the orange diagonal line. That is the line of a bridleway according to the Wiltshire ROW data as sourced on rowmaps.com (so not necessarily the

Re: [Talk-GB] Bridleway across field

> Unless there is a sign saying "unsuitable for pedestrians, horses, and > vehicles", or similar, I would say "access=discouraged" violates "do not tag > for the renderer". The wiki specifically says that an official sign is > required before using "access=discouraged". There is a sign:

[talk-latam] Respuesta a [Ticket#2020120710000024]

Hola Mario Nos gustaría abordar algunas de las cuestiones que se han escrito tanto aquí como en otros canales para resolver estas preocupaciones y llegar a un consenso. En primer lugar, nos sentimos un poco confundidos cuando escuchamos que nuestro capítulo no ha sido responsivo. Nuestro

Re: [Talk-GB] Bridleway across field

On 08/12/2020 15:11, nathan case wrote: I am interested as a path I recently mapped is a PROW but is very dangerous to cross. It is now marked as disused:highway=path with access=discourged;designated but it is stilla PROW (byway open to all traffic in this

Re: [Talk-GB] Solar panels on Alvares House in Homerton

As an aside, I do see on RightMove that the thing that looks like a swimming pool isn'tit is a children's play area. You could check the planning permission maybe? On Tue, Dec 8, 2020 at 3:09 PM Mat Attlee wrote: > In surveying and adding Alvares House in Homerton in London, I noticed >

Re: [Talk-GB] Bridleway across field

That's a fair viewpoint and I'm open to changing my method. But what would you suggest in the situation where a PROW runs through a building(s)? Map through it as a fully-fledged footway? Doesn't matter what your abilities are, you won't be able to go through there - well unless you can pass

[Talk-GB] Solar panels on Alvares House in Homerton

In surveying and adding Alvares House in Homerton in London, I noticed that the Bing aerial photos seem to indicate solar panels on the roof though I can't find any details on them https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/882360871 Cheers ___ Talk-GB mailing

Re: [Talk-GB] Bridleway across field

> On 8 Dec 2020, at 14:20, SK53 > wrote: > Personally I do not generally map PRoWs which have no on-the-ground traces > (particularly after my experience > > in Carmathenshire in

Re: [Talk-GB] Bridleway across field

On Tue, 8 Dec 2020 at 13:18, Dave F via Talk-GB wrote: > > https://snipboard.io/scrm5R.jpg > > There you go, free of any supposed copyright infringement. Not quite. Before we're able to use any third-party data in OSM, we need to verify that it is available under a suitable licence. So you would

Re: [Talk-GB] Bridleway across field

That's very interesting Jerry, thanks. I thought the byway's reference was a bit odd actually as in it's the same as the byway that it intersects. In my experience, usually the paths I've looked at are a single line ie. a single beginning and end so maybe it has been "tacked on" to an existing

Re: [Talk-GB] Bridleway across field

Yes, these are not infrequent. We may have discussed some specific examples before, but one which comes to mind is one crossing the River Derwent at Duffield. This is marked on the definitive map and the name of a track "Save

Re: [Talk-GB] Bridleway across field

On 08/12/2020 12:36, nathan case wrote: but instead setting as disused:highway. This is what I tend to do when the PROW route is clearly inaccessible from aerial imagery (e.g. due to new buildings, or rivers). IMO, this is bad mapping. Just because one person concludes it isn't used by

Re: [Talk-GB] Bridleway across field

On 08/12/2020 12:42, Mark Lee via Talk-GB wrote: Ah sorry, I shall remove it then Robert. I have drawn it freehand based on what I'd seen on their site as a right of way. Presumably then, if there's no established path, I can never add it to OSM because the definitive map is my only source for

Re: [Talk-GB] Bridleway across field

On Tue, 8 Dec 2020 at 12:37, Dave F wrote: > On 08/12/2020 12:08, Robert Whittaker (OSM lists) wrote: > > On Tue, 8 Dec 2020 at 09:39, Mark Lee via Talk-GB > > wrote: > >> Hello. I've just added a missing public bridleway > >> (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/882278479) which is detailed on

Re: [Talk-GB] Bridleway across field

Thanks. I'll go back and have a closer look. It was part of a long ride so I didn't do much checking at the time. Mark On Tue, 8 Dec 2020, 12:30 Dave F via Talk-GB, wrote: > > > On 08/12/2020 09:36, Mark Lee via Talk-GB wrote: > > Hello. I've just added a missing public bridleway ( > >

Re: [Talk-GB] Bridleway across field

Ah sorry, I shall remove it then Robert. I have drawn it freehand based on what I'd seen on their site as a right of way. Presumably then, if there's no established path, I can never add it to OSM because the definitive map is my only source for this information. Even if I walk it and use my GPS

Re: [Talk-GB] Bridleway across field

On 08/12/2020 12:08, Robert Whittaker (OSM lists) wrote: On Tue, 8 Dec 2020 at 09:39, Mark Lee via Talk-GB wrote: Hello. I've just added a missing public bridleway (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/882278479) which is detailed on the Wiltshire Definitive Map. Generally these maps have

Re: [Talk-GB] Bridleway across field

As a public right of way, the highway exists by law - regardless of any evidence on the ground or lack thereof. I suggest not removing the section, but instead setting as disused:highway. This is what I tend to do when the PROW route is clearly inaccessible from aerial imagery (e.g. due to new

Re: [Talk-GB] Bridleway across field

I'm with you Phil but the locked gate is on a track parallel (50 yards perhaps) to where the bridleway should be. They're both shown on the definitive map so that's probably a legally blocked access. I would have thought that the farmer would have preferred me using it though than for me to

Re: [Talk-GB] Bridleway across field

On 08/12/2020 09:36, Mark Lee via Talk-GB wrote: Hello. I've just added a missing public bridleway ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/882278479) which is detailed on the WIltshire Definitive Map. It runs across a field and doesn't appear to have been in use recently, I couldn't see it on the

Re: [Talk-GB] Bridleway across field

On Tue, 8 Dec 2020 at 09:39, Mark Lee via Talk-GB wrote: > Hello. I've just added a missing public bridleway > (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/882278479) which is detailed on the > Wiltshire Definitive Map. I see that you've put source="Wiltshire Definitive Map" in the tagging. Do you have

Re: [Talk-GB] Bridleway across field

On Tue, Dec 08, 2020 at 09:36:31AM +, Mark Lee via Talk-GB wrote: > Hello. I've just added a missing public bridleway ( > https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/882278479) which is detailed on the > WIltshire Definitive Map. It runs across a field and doesn't appear to have > been in use recently,

[Talk-lv] OpenStreetMap is Having a Moment

Sveiki! Noderīgi izlasīt par Facebook, Apple, Amazon un Microsoft ietekmi: The most valuable companies in the world are treating OSM as critical > infrastructure for some of the most-used software ever written > What likely started as a conversation in a British pub between grad > students in

Re: [Talk-GB] Bridleway across field

Firstly, before worrying about mapping is to report the illegal obsruction, i.e. the locked gate to the highway authority so that action can be taken to get the problem resolved. In my experience they like a photo of the problem. Phil (trigpoint) On Tuesday, 8 December 2020, Mark Lee via

Re: [Talk-at] PLZ und Ortsvorwahlen von Österreich

Die Suche nach Ortsnamen sollte besser nicht case-sensitive sein. Um einiges interessanter ist allerdings sowieso die umgekehrte Suche nach PLZ/Vorwahl. LG Andreas ___ Talk-at mailing list Talk-at@openstreetmap.org

Re: [Talk-GB] Bridleway across field

What's the OSM policy on legal ROWs that have no physical evidence You walk along them. There is then physical evidence, and you can map it. I've done that a lot. Martin. ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org

Re: [Talk-GB] Bridleway across field

Should be recorded as per the definitive map - lots like that across welsh hilltops etc. I’ve used a gps to follow them in the fog before > On 8 Dec 2020, at 09:36, Mark Lee via Talk-GB > wrote: > > Hello. I've just added a missing public bridleway >

Re: [talk-cz] [osm_sk] Re: SotM CZ+SK 2020

Dokonce už dneska. Začínáme v 18:00 na adrese https://meet.fit.vutbr.cz/sotm. Těšíme se na vás! po 7. 12. 2020 v 20:55 odesílatel Marián Kyral napsal: > > Ahoj, > jen připomínám, je to už zítra ;-) > > Marián > > -- Původní e-mail -- > Od: Tom Ka > Komu: OpenStreetMap Czech

[Talk-GB] Bridleway across field

Hello. I've just added a missing public bridleway ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/882278479) which is detailed on the WIltshire Definitive Map. It runs across a field and doesn't appear to have been in use recently, I couldn't see it on the ground in person and I can't see it in any of the

Re: [OSM-talk] Please review "Community attribution advice” wiki page

Can you give an example of something that would follow https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Community_attribution_advice and still would not fulfill ODBL? I see no obvious loopholes there. Dec 7, 2020, 22:57 by r...@technomancy.org: > It's good to see more discussion on this. I like that this

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Tag pour une commande par téléphone ou internet 48h avant le retrait

> reservation=required > description=commande 48h avant récupération +1 > opening_hours=* "reservation by phone 48h before" ? Fonctionne aussi et même en français  La grammaire de d'opening_hours utilise des termes anglais (c'est un "langage" de programmation à destination des machines) mais