Marc Gemis schreef op 12/11/2014 om 5:34:
On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 8:36 PM, André Pirard a.pirard.pa...@gmail.com
mailto:a.pirard.pa...@gmail.com wrote:
e) the word fuzzy is removed from OSM, at least for routing, that is.
Could you be less fuzzy ? :-) and please list the actions one
On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 10:21 AM, Jakka vdmfrank...@gmail.com wrote:
Very interesting.
Something that seems easy and used from the early days of OSM is sensitive
for personal interpret.
Good link:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bicycle#Cycle_lanes_in_
oneway_motor_car_roads
image with
Tried out route planner for bikes and saw in my region that the planner
takes the wrong side of the road.
https://graphhopper.com/maps/?point=50.788276%2C3.133957point=Kortrijkstraat%2C%208930%2C%20Menin%2C%20Belgiumvehicle=bikeelevation=truelayer=Lyrk
The roundabout I will correct it to
This roundabout was already in the sytem with all the details separated
footway, cycle way, highway.
hope better link. (How taken a link of josm screen ? permalink?)
https://graphhopper.com/maps/?point=50.788276%2C3.133957point=50.794787%2C3.137348vehicle=bikeelevation=truelayer=Lyrk
Marc
I think the correct key is :
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:oneway:bicycle
Since it is standard to allow bicycles to use both direction, also in a
one-way street it's allowed unless specifically restricted.
Glenn
On 11-11-14 11:41, Jakka wrote:
Tried out route planner for bikes
Sorry but oneway=yes just means you can only drive in the direction of
the way. It has nothing to do with going opposite.
I quote: The oneway tag is used to indicate the access restriction on
highways and other linear features as appropriate. So it's an access
restriction.
On highway=cycleway
Gilbert,
Dit is geen discussie over de wegcode maar over de betekenis van tags en
het resultaat ervan. Het intereseert me zelfs niet wat de wegcode
ervan vindt in het kader van deze materie.
Ik heb het dus niet over de wegcode maar over de betekenis van de keys.
Laat dit duidelijk zijn dat
This is actually quite interesting road to dive in deeper. I notice a
few problems with this roundabout.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/26707718#map=19/50.78871/3.13953
There is no connection between Moeskroenstraat en the cycleway. This
would pop up when Validating changes before
Glenn,
ik zie nergens een cycleway op http://osm.org/go/0EgP1kjK2?m=way=109638123
? (ook n iet in JOSM)
2014-11-11 14:52 GMT+01:00 Glenn Plas gl...@byte-consult.be:
Gilbert,
Dit is geen discussie over de wegcode maar over de betekenis van tags en
het resultaat ervan. Het intereseert me
On 2014-11-11 16:49, Gilbert Hersschens wrote :
@André: pls read again (you provided the link yourself): Some tags
(such as junction
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:junction=roundabout
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:junction%3Droundabout, highway
I noticed my misinterpretation myself indeed - after the facts.
My bad. I wasn't claiming that oneway=yes doesn't apply to cyclists, I
was saying that the 'wegcode' actually allows bicycles to use the
cycleway in the opposite direction. - and that was totally wrong after
deeper researching.
So
2 problems:
You're not checking the roundabout I think we were talking about.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=17/50.78823/3.14081
Check in JOSM for the latest data. The tiles do not get regenerated at
the changeset rate. It will take some time to proliferate.
That's exactly why we talking
Hi,
highway=cycleway is distinct from another highway=* and uses its own
distinct oneway=*
oneway bicycle exceptions in the same highway are described here
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Oneway#Sub_keys_.2F_exceptions.
The mapping of cycleway=* alongside a oneway highway=* is described here
On 2014-11-11 17:57, Glenn Plas wrote :
...
That's exactly why we talking next to eachother. Jakka worked on it, I
did a few fixes + validation. Then I fixed my own mistakes in fixing
Yes, that reminds me
- look at that mistake
- I don't see any
- that's because I corrected it
Yes,
Jakka,
please do not use ways to represent lanes. The Moeskroenstraat coming from
the east (before the roundabout) should not be split until you see the
white divider at the last moment. Before that it should be tagged as
lanes=2, turn:lanes=none|slight_right or through|slight_right
I have been
On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 2:40 PM, André Pirard a.pirard.pa...@gmail.com
wrote:
Wonderful router you're showing. Does it use often updated data?
I thought the routing data was updated daily, the map is updated more
frequent. Remember that this router does not honor turn restrictions at
this
Andre,
In case you look for more routers, try this one. It's very fast, I
consider it a light weight one.
There still work to be done on it, not perfect but worth diving into it.
http://www.routino.org
Glenn
On 11-11-14 19:16, Marc Gemis wrote:
On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 2:40 PM, André
17 matches
Mail list logo
