Re: [Talk-it] Mapping campi rom

A Lecce lo mappai così: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/461169840 amenity=social_facility social_facility=shelter social_facility:for=migrant ( https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity=social%20facility?uselang=en-US ) Cosa ne pensate? Ciao, Federico

Re: [talk-ph] talk-ph Digest, Vol 132, Issue 2

HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/attachments/20190704/822d4dd6/attachment-0001.html> -- Message: 2 Date: Thu, 4 Jul 2019 18:56:45 +0800 From: Erwin Olario To: Pierre Edwin See Tiong Cc: "talk-ph@openstr

Re: [Talk-it] Mapping campi rom

Come avevo anticipato anche a me non piace "halting_site" come landuse ma, per quanto riguarda il tag building, dovrei mappare tutte le strutture e metterle in una relazione? Avevo anche pensato ad un boundary ma credo alla fine manchi sempre un'informazione. Inoltre, immagino di aver capito le

Re: [Talk-it] Flame su old_name

> On 4 Jul 2019, at 14:28, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: > > alt_name è semplicemente un nome alternativo. Non ha implicazioni di > ufficialità o uso locale. Io ho citato la definizione di alt_name che viene data sulla wiki. E’ lì che si parla espressamente di un “altro nome ufficiale” o di un

Re: [OSM-ja] Proposal for a revision of JA:Available Data

いいださん： 助言ありがとうございます。 入れ違いで、クロスポストでの投稿をしてきてしまいました。(legal-talkは過疎っていると思ったので…) そこで、talkへは議論をlegal-talkに集約することの案内、legal-talkへは返信のメールアドレスからtalkとtalk-jaを取り除くことのお願いをしてきました。 talk-jaの皆様におかれましても、先の英語メールに対してのご意見・ご感想がございましたらlegal-talkを購読の上返信していただきますようお願いいたします。 ご不便をおかけして申し訳ございません。 石野 貴之 yumean1...@gmail.com

Re: [Talk-it] Mapping campi rom

'residential=halting_site' direi di no dato che non son mai 'temporanei' bensì stabili. Più realisticamente (si mappa quel che c'è non quel che si vorrebbe): building=static_caravan -- Sent from: http://gis.19327.n8.nabble.com/Italy-General-f5324174.html

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Proposal for a revision of JA:Available Data

The previous mail was cross-posted on talk, talk-ja and legal-talk. However, I was given an advice to avoid cross-posting and aggregate the discussion on legal-talk. Please remove talk and talk-ja from the mail adress when you post your opinion. I'm really sorry for the inconvenience. Thank you!

[OSM-talk] Discussion stopped here (Re: Proposal for a revision of JA:Available Data)

Sorry for the readers of talk-ml: The previous mail was cross-posted on talk, talk-ja and legal-talk. However, I was given an advice to avoid cross-posting and aggregate the discussion on legal-talk. So, if you are interested in this topic, please subscribe legal-talk and continue conversation

[OSM-talk] Proposal for a revision of JA:Available Data

Hello, everyone. I'm from Okayama, Japan. "What kind of data can be used in OpenStreetMap?" Our community has put together common understandings about the issue on the following page. (written in Japanese) https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JA:Available_Data Recently, Tomoya Muramoto

Re: [OSM-ja] Proposal for a revision of JA:Available Data

いいだです。 投稿ありがとうございます。 クロスポストは嫌がられますし、Legal-talkだけで良いと思いますよ。 （こっち方面でつよいひとは、みんなLegal-talkみてるし反応するので） 2019年7月5日(金) 12:20 石野貴之 : > legal-talk, talkは購読中でないと投稿を受け付けないようなので、購読手続きをしてから再送します。 > > 石野 貴之 > yumean1...@gmail.com > >> ___ > Talk-ja mailing list >

[OSM-legal-talk] Proposal for a revision of JA:Available Data

Hello, everyone. I'm from Okayama, Japan. "What kind of data can be used in OpenStreetMap?" Our community has put together common understandings about the issue on the following page. (written in Japanese) https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JA:Available_Data Recently, Tomoya Muramoto

[OSM-ja] Proposal for a revision of JA:Available Data

Hello, everyone. I'm from Okayama, Japan. "What kind of data can be used in OpenStreetMap?" Our community has put together common understandings about the issue on the following page. (written in Japanese) https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JA:Available_Data Recently, Tomoya Muramoto

Re: [OSM-ja] Proposal for a revision of JA:Available Data

legal-talk, talkは購読中でないと投稿を受け付けないようなので、購読手続きをしてから再送します。 石野 貴之 yumean1...@gmail.com > ___ Talk-ja mailing list Talk-ja@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ja

Re: [OSM-talk] Reordering and rewriting Good Practice wiki page

the bing imagery is from 2016, but i live where i map.   From: Joseph Eisenberg Sent: Thursday, July 4, 2019 10:08 PM To: Yves Cc: osm Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Reordering and rewriting Good Practice wiki page   I've finished the new detailed page "Keep the History" And so I've removed the two

Re: [talk-cz] Rozcestník a bod záchrany, jako jeden nebo dva body?

Ahoj, ciste podle pravidel by to mel byt asi jeden bod, ale ja v tomhle spise zastavam nazor, ze mapuju logicke objekty, takze rozcestnik jeden bod (i kdyz jsou hned vedle sebe sloupky dva) a hned vedle druhy s emergency. Ono je pekne nemapovat pro renderer ale nektere veci se v nem resi dost

Re: [OSM-talk] Reordering and rewriting Good Practice wiki page

I've finished the new detailed page "Keep the History" And so I've removed the two paragraphs about specific JOSM plugins and a way to move a node to a new area from the Good_practice page - they are on the new page which is linked https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Keep_the_history I would

Re: [OSM-ja] Proposal for a revision of JA:Available Data

Sorry, I posted the mail without starting new lines. Please reply to this mail, not to the original one, if you have any opinions. --Posting Again-- Hello, everyone. I'm from Okayama, Japan. "What kind of data can be used in OpenStreetMap?" Our community has put together common understandings

[OSM-ja] Proposal for a revision of JA:Available Data

Hello, everyone. I'm from Okayama, Japan. "What kind of data can be used in OpenStreetMap?" Our community has put together common understandings about the issue on the following page. (written in Japanese) https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JA:Available_Data Recently, Tomoya Muramoto

Re: [OSM-talk] Reordering and rewriting Good Practice wiki page

Re: "Try to keep changesets to a manageable size, both in number of changes and geographical scope." This would be good to add to "Good changeset comments" https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments If a changeset covers a huge are or too many changes, it won't be easy to

Re: [OSM-talk] Reordering and rewriting Good Practice wiki page

You are right. I've moved "Don't map temporary events and temporary features" to it's own main heading after Verifiability. I believe "Map what's on the ground", "Don't map historic events" and "Don't map your local legislation..." are clearly related to verifiability. The later two reference

Re: [OSM-ja] 出典明記のwikiページ

いいだです。 昨晩、ふと過去のメールを見返していて、 新潟県長岡市から、航空写真を公開した旨の連絡をうけていたことを見つけました。 （完全に見逃していた。。。） OSM wikiにも追記しました。 https://www.city.nagaoka.niigata.jp/shisei/cate10/gis/27.html OSMでの追加利用許諾はまだもらっていませんが、これから問い合わせをしようと思います。 他の市町村に比べて画質はいささか落ちるようですが、 Bing等の衛星写真画像と比べるとかなりはっきり地物が写り込んでいることがわかります。

Re: [OSM-ja] 名称の次数と住所の次数

石野です。 ＞ 石川さん 新たな視点からの投稿ありがとうございます。 2019年7月5日(金) 1:08 ISHIKAWA Takayuki (Talk-ja 経由) : > こんにちは、奈良の石川です。 > > すでに talk-ja でなく talk に場を移してしまったかも知れませんが、私が talk-ja > しか購読していないので、ここに書かせて下さい。(反応が遅くてすみません。) > 実のところ、まだ始まってすらいません。下手な英語でよければ、私がtalk-jaで出た意見をとりまとめてtalkおよびlegal-talkに投稿しようと思いますがいかがでしょうか。 >

Re: [OSM-talk] Ways divided by paint?

On 04/07/19 22:23, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: sent from a phone On 4. Jul 2019, at 11:49, Snusmumriken wrote: A painted line that has the legal status of "do not cross" is a perfectly fine reason to have a separate way. it doesn’t apply to many people though, for example pedestrians or

Re: [OSM-talk] Reordering and rewriting Good Practice wiki page

On 05/07/19 05:54, Jmapb wrote: On 7/4/2019 12:40 AM, Warin wrote: On the order of things. Best to tell them what to do first. This provides some motivation. Leave 'what not to do' for last, these tend to turn people away. So I would do: 1    One feature, one OSM element 2    Good

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Attribut ref sur les ronds point : la question de Montpellier

avec un ref=* sur le rond point, pose la question : est ce que c'est la référence du rond point ou celle de la route qui la traverse? le problème de ces référence sur les routes c'est que l'on ne sait pas s'il faut les voir comme un itinéraire comme les ligne de bus par exemple ou si c'est plus

[talk-cz] Rozcestník a bod záchrany, jako jeden nebo dva body?

Jak značit bod záchrany, který je umístěný přímo na rozcestníku? Například tady Dát jako samostatný bod, nebo připojit k bodu rozcestníku? ___ talk-cz mailing list talk-cz@openstreetmap.org

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] booking=* <> reservation=*

Je pense également que réserver "booking=*" au seul site Booking n'est pas souhaitable. Il existe plein d'autres services et on est pas à l'abris qu'il y en ai un qui s'appelle "amenity" ou "building". Il faudrait à minima l'isoler dans un namespace, "reservation:booking" ou même

[Talk-Kosovo] (no subject)

___ Talk-Kosovo mailing list Talk-Kosovo@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-kosovo

Re: [Talk-GB] Importing NaPTAN Data

4 lip 2019, 19:28 od talk-gb@openstreetmap.org: > On 04/07/2019 16:39, Martin Wynne wrote: > >> On 04/07/2019 16:11, Dave F via Talk-GB wrote: >> >>> >>> In OSM we map *physical* objects only. >>> >> >> In rural areas there are many places where buses are timetabled to stop but >> where there

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Données routières ouvertes en France

10 % de rues/routes/chemins (en nombre pas en km) sans rapprochement ça ne veut pas dire qu'elles manquent dans OSM. Ça peut vouloir dire qu'elles n'ont pas de nom dans OSM. Là c'est la BANO, donc a priori les voies numérotées. A-t-on une autre statistique sur les voies non numérotées ? Je

Re: [Talk-GB] Importing NaPTAN Data

On Thu, Jul 04, 2019 at 06:49:10PM +0100, Dave F via Talk-GB wrote: > > > On 04/07/2019 16:59, Silent Spike wrote: > > > > My understanding is that `public_transport=platform` is any place where > > public transport can be accessed > > Same as bus_stop/tram_stop, you mean? > > > and should

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Données routières ouvertes en France

On 04/07/2019 12:50, Maël REBOUX wrote: Il y a cependant des collectivités locales qui mettent leur données référentielles de voies en open data. Voir sur data.gouv.fr [ https://www.data.gouv.fr/fr/search/?q=filaire+de+voies | https://www.data.gouv.fr/fr/search/?q=filaire+de+voies ] [

Re: [Talk-GB] Importing NaPTAN Data

On 04/07/2019 18:51, Dave F via Talk-GB wrote: These are still 'physical' in the sense that they exist in the timetable & Naptan documents. (Think also boundaries which don't have dashed lines painted across fields) This strikes me as a strange definition of "physical" and could cover

Re: [OSM-talk] Reordering and rewriting Good Practice wiki page

On 7/4/2019 12:40 AM, Warin wrote: On the order of things. Best to tell them what to do first. This provides some motivation. Leave 'what not to do' for last, these tend to turn people away. So I would do: 1    One feature, one OSM element 2    Good changeset comments (+Keep the history) 3 

Re: [Talk-it] Mapping campi rom

Ciao, On Thu, Jul 4, 2019 at 9:17 PM Francesco Ansanelli wrote: > Buonasera Lista, > > vorrei sapere se avete già mappato campi rom e quali tag avete utilizzato. > Ho fatto alcune ricerche su OSM e condivido l'idea di mettere > "landuse=residential", es: >

[Talk-it] Mapping campi rom

Buonasera Lista, vorrei sapere se avete già mappato campi rom e quali tag avete utilizzato. Ho fatto alcune ricerche su OSM e condivido l'idea di mettere "landuse=residential", es: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/211772563 https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/338456215 però non mi piace

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Données routières ouvertes en France

Oops, ça va mieux avec le lien : http://munin.openstreetmap.fr/osm12.openstreetmap.fr/osm104.openstreetmap.fr/bano_rapproche.html (Merci marc_marc) vincent Le 04/07/2019, 16:56 "Vincent de Château-Thierry" a écrit: Bonjour, > De: "Julien Minet" > > A voir si la complétude des rues sur OSM est

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Données routières ouvertes en France

Christian saura sans doute retrouver les statistiques sur la distance de l'habitat aux routes (l'INSEE carroie la France pour avoir la densité de population, normalement à proximité il y a des routes), globalement la couverture OSM n'est pas mauvaise, il va manquer des rues des lotissements

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Attribut ref sur les ronds point : la question de Montpellier

D'accord sur la première remarque. Pas sur la seconde car tu ne mets pas non plus la ref sur chaque nœud du reste de la route. Mettre la ref sur l'ensemble des ways du giratoire (s'il est découpé) mais pas sur les nœuds est parfaitement homogène avec les traitements de la route. Il semble

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Données routières ouvertes en France

Le 04.07.19 à 12:38, Edmond SCOUARNEC a écrit : > en ce qui concerne les départementales, > du Finistère > A lui de voir s'il peut l'intégrer qu'est-ce que cela contient en quelques mots ? quelle fraicheur et/ou fiabilité ? ces données sont aussi dans osm ? selon le cas, cela pourrait être

Re: [Talk-GB] Importing NaPTAN Data

In OSM we map *physical* objects only. What about border - especially lower administrative units and nature reserves? From a previous post: These are still 'physical' in the sense that they exist in the timetable & Naptan documents. (Think also boundaries which don't have dashed lines

Re: [Talk-GB] Importing NaPTAN Data

On 04/07/2019 16:59, Silent Spike wrote: My understanding is that `public_transport=platform` is any place where public transport can be accessed Same as bus_stop/tram_stop, you mean? and should not literally be interpreted as a physical platform then why hi-jack the word 'platform'

Re: [Talk-GB] Importing NaPTAN Data

This is getting a little bit off topic. I guess to bring things back on track, would there be any objections to an import along these lines: 1. Import data specifically for the Aberdeen admin area (ATCO code 639) 2. Import stops of type BCT ("On-street Bus / Coach / Trolley Stop.") 3.

Re: [Talk-GB] Importing NaPTAN Data

On 04/07/2019 16:39, Martin Wynne wrote: On 04/07/2019 16:11, Dave F via Talk-GB wrote: In OSM we map *physical* objects only. In rural areas there are many places where buses are timetabled to stop but where there is nothing physical -- no signpost or shelter. These are still 'physical'

Re: [Talk-ca] Problems with tagging of islands/islets in a river

I believe I found the problem. The river to the East/South didn't have a relation "outer" but a member "Grand River: outer". That wasn't the case for the East/North part. I changed that. Now I have to wait and see whether that made a difference. -st On Thu, 4 Jul 2019 at 12:39, Steffen Roller

Re: [Talk-it] Ricerca su musei OSM e statistica ufficiale

In effetti nel sito di cui ti ho dato il link vengono conteggiati i musei etichettati con il tag wikipedia che è diverso dal dire se sono mappati o meno su OSM...e da quello che ho visto una buona fetta dei musei mappati non ha il tag wikipedia ... quindi il risultato che hai ottenuto è coerente

Re: [Talk-ca] Problems with tagging of islands/islets in a river

Hi John, sounds good. Question: 1. What have you changed? I'd like to learn :-) 2. When should the change be visible online? -st On Thu, 4 Jul 2019 at 11:20, John Marshall wrote: > Done. > Steffen, if I missed any let me know. > > John > > On Thu, Jul 4, 2019 at 11:03 AM Clifford Snow >

Re: [Talk-GB] Importing NaPTAN Data

4 lip 2019, 17:11 od talk-gb@openstreetmap.org: > > In OSM we map *physical* objects only. > What about border - especially  lower administrative units and  nature reserves?___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org

Re: [OSM-talk] Ways divided by paint?

4 lip 2019, 15:20 od snusmumriken.map...@runbox.com: > On Thu, 2019-07-04 at 13:50 +0200, Mateusz Konieczny wrote: > >> I strongly disagree with this idea, >> and multiple times changed such splits >> back to one way. >> > > I would consider that as an act of vandalism by removing ground truth >

Re: [OSM-talk] Reordering and rewriting Good Practice wiki page

On 04.07.19 05:53, Joseph Eisenberg wrote: > 2 Verifiability (+Map what's on the ground, Don't map: historic > events, temporary features, local legislation etc) In my opinion, the practices that you've turned into subheadings of the verifiability section are not merely special cases of

Re: [Talk-lv] Rescuing tree import in Valmiera made by Pēteris Brūns

Fundamental and initial problem: what is the license of this data? 4 lip 2019, 16:06 od ric...@nakts.net: > On 03.07.19 12:37, Peteris Bruns wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> mainly all I can explain was done already answering to Michael at this >> thread  >>

Re: [Talk-it] Sempre a proposito di opere "monumentali"

Il 04/07/19 16:45, demon_box ha scritto: > come devo mappare secondo voi una costruzione del genere? > > > > > > > >

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Attribut ref sur les ronds point : la question de Montpellier

avoir ou pas de multiple ref n'est le soucis ref=1;2 le soucis c'est qu'il y a confusion entre un carrefour et la route. on ne duplique pas la ref de la route sur chaque noeud d'un carrefour de cette route, je trouve donc cohérent de ne pas dupliquer la ref de la route sur les ronds-point Le

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Traduire le wiki ?

Le 04.07.19 à 17:39, Julien Lepiller a écrit : > À la fin du tableau il y a en petit un lien « La traduction en français peut > être éditée ici ». C'est pas plutôt ça ? Tu as raison, ce template a encore la liste de toutes les traductions dupliqué en dur dans le template :( j'ai fais la

Re: [Talk-GB] Importing NaPTAN Data

On 04/07/2019 16:39, Martin Wynne wrote: In rural areas there are many places where buses are timetabled to stop but where there is nothing physical -- no signpost or shelter. Are these highway=bus_stop in OSM? (following a previous discussion on this list) I've used "physically_present=no"

[OSM-ja] 名称の次数と住所の次数

こんにちは、奈良の石川です。 すでに talk-ja でなく talk に場を移してしまったかも知れませんが、私が talk-ja しか購読していないので、ここに書かせて下さい。(反応が遅くてすみません。) 「ウェブサイト上の店名、住所、電話番号など」について話題に挙がっていますが、これらは data source からの次数が異なりますので、分けて考えていただきたいです。 店名や支店名といった名称は、所有者自身が命名し、現地でも自身の web

Re: [Talk-GB] Importing NaPTAN Data

On Thu, Jul 4, 2019 at 4:40 PM Martin Wynne wrote: > In rural areas there are many places where buses are timetabled to stop > but where there is nothing physical -- no signpost or shelter. > > Are these highway=bus_stop in OSM? > > The wiki for highway says "Can be mapped more rigorously using

Re: [Talk-GB] Importing NaPTAN Data

On Thu, Jul 4, 2019 at 4:10 PM Dave F via Talk-GB wrote: > > Please, please don't use public_transport=platform unless you're > actually mapping an actual, physical, raised object, similar to railway > platforms. > > It has now been regressed one stage further, being superfluously added > to

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Traduire le wiki ?

Le 04/07/2019 à 17:39, Julien Lepiller a écrit : > À la fin du tableau il y a en petit un lien « La traduction en français peut > être éditée ici ». C'est pas plutôt ça ? Je pensais plutôt à ça également Librement -- Dlareg signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Traduire le wiki ?

Le 4 juillet 2019 15:33:17 GMT+02:00, marc marc a écrit : >Le 04.07.19 à 15:27, Vincent Bergeot a écrit : >> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Key:shop#Autres >> shop=pest_control >> j'ai voulu traduire la description dans le tableau > >si cela n'a pas changé récement, le tableau reprend

Re: [Talk-GB] Importing NaPTAN Data

On 04/07/2019 16:11, Dave F via Talk-GB wrote: In OSM we map *physical* objects only. In rural areas there are many places where buses are timetabled to stop but where there is nothing physical -- no signpost or shelter. Are these highway=bus_stop in OSM? The wiki for highway says "Can

Re: [Talk-ca] Problems with tagging of islands/islets in a river

Done. Steffen, if I missed any let me know. John On Thu, Jul 4, 2019 at 11:03 AM Clifford Snow wrote: > Thanks - I'm traveling right now or I would have. > > On Thu, Jul 4, 2019 at 8:01 AM John Marshall wrote: > >> I will fix it. >> >> John >> >> On Thu, Jul 4, 2019 at 10:47 AM Clifford Snow

[Talk-gb-westmidlands] Tonight's meeting

Hi everyone I'llbe surveying the industrial estate behind Morrisons Buntsford Park Road Rgds Brian ___ Talk-gb-westmidlands mailing list Talk-gb-westmidlands@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb-westmidlands

Re: [Talk-GB] Importing NaPTAN Data

naptan:verified=no dates back to the original import in 2009 and was there to indicate the bus stop needed surveying to verify its position- when a survey was done the process was for this tag to be deleted. Might be good to adopt this process here too? Regards Brian On Thu, 4 Jul 2019 at

Re: [Talk-GB] Importing NaPTAN Data

Please, please don't use public_transport=platform unless you're actually mapping an actual, physical, raised object, similar to railway platforms. 'platform' has been misappropriated from the physical railway=platform by those who developed the PT schema to mean an arbitrary area of

Re: [talk-cz] Drobnosti na osmap.cz

On Wed, Jul 3, 2019, 15:52 Petr Vozdecký wrote: > ahoj, > hlasim poznatky po upravach ikon vrstvy fotek Fody: > - když je rozcestník "pěší" + "cyklo" + "lyžařský", tak se zobrazí vždy > ikonka pěší+lyžařský. Návrh: protože asi již složitějšáí kombinace v praxi > neexistuje (leda ještě +

Re: [Talk-ca] Problems with tagging of islands/islets in a river

Thanks - I'm traveling right now or I would have. On Thu, Jul 4, 2019 at 8:01 AM John Marshall wrote: > I will fix it. > > John > > On Thu, Jul 4, 2019 at 10:47 AM Clifford Snow > wrote: > >> The multipolygon of the river where the islands are missing appears to be >> wrong. JOSM should be

Re: [Talk-ca] Problems with tagging of islands/islets in a river

I will fix it. John On Thu, Jul 4, 2019 at 10:47 AM Clifford Snow wrote: > The multipolygon of the river where the islands are missing appears to be > wrong. JOSM should be able to fix it. > > Clifford > > On Thu, Jul 4, 2019 at 7:26 AM Steffen Roller > wrote: > >> Rendering of islands/islets

Re: [Talk-it] Nome linea elettrica che cambia

scratera wrote > ..dubito che unireti si interessi di distribuzione a 130.000 kv...si > fermna > alla rete 20KV per il resto è terna ad occuparsi del 130.000 sul > territorio > nazionale dici? se ne sei certo allora è così, in effetti non è assolutamente semplice districarsi in questo tipo di

Re: [talk-cz] Drobnosti na osmap.cz

Ahoj, tagovat co je na fotce, to jedine se pak da zpetne overit bez problemu. Z hlediska kontrol OsmHiCheck je to asi jedno pokud dane fotky existuji. Bye On Wed, Jul 3, 2019, 10:37 majkaz wrote: > Hlavně pro Toma jeden drobný dotaz k fotkám rozcestníků a jejich tagování: > > Mám brát

Re: [OSM-talk] Ways divided by paint?

On Thu, 2019-07-04 at 13:44 +, Philip Barnes wrote: > On Thursday, 4 July 2019, Snusmumriken wrote: > > On Thu, 2019-07-04 at 13:50 +0200, Mateusz Konieczny wrote: > > > I strongly disagree with this idea, > > > and multiple times changed such splits > > > back to one way. > > > > I would

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Données routières ouvertes en France

Bonjour, > De: "Julien Minet" > > A voir si la complétude des rues sur OSM est satisfaisante > en France, une idée sur ce point ? (vaste question, je serai > incapable de répondre pour la Belgique!) Pour la France on a ce graphique, très plat maintenant mais qui a beaucoup monté au fil des

Re: [Talk-it] Sempre a proposito di opere "monumentali"

...aggiungo che si tratta di una specie di portale di entrata ad uno Stadio Militare. oggi non si entra più da lì ma lateralmente ed è diventato parco pubblico. --enrico -- Sent from: http://gis.19327.n8.nabble.com/Italy-General-f5324174.html ___

Re: [Talk-it] Nome linea elettrica che cambia

..dubito che unireti si interessi di distribuzione a 130.000 kv...si fermna alla rete 20KV per il resto è terna ad occuparsi del 130.000 sul territorio nazionale -- Sent from: http://gis.19327.n8.nabble.com/Italy-General-f5324174.html ___ Talk-it

Re: [OSM-talk] Ways divided by paint?

On 04/07/2019 15:24, Mike N wrote: What if strictly following the rule of "no split ways unless physical divider" results in wildly incorrect turn-by-turn instructions? I have the same problem with the right turn lane being removed from https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/52.11366/-1.94141

Re: [Talk-ca] Problems with tagging of islands/islets in a river

The multipolygon of the river where the islands are missing appears to be wrong. JOSM should be able to fix it. Clifford On Thu, Jul 4, 2019 at 7:26 AM Steffen Roller wrote: > Rendering of islands/islets in a river > > I was missing several islands on 'my' Grand River while paddling. > I don't

[Talk-it] Sempre a proposito di opere "monumentali"

come devo mappare secondo voi una costruzione del genere?

Re: [Talk-GB] Importing NaPTAN Data

It's also useful to add shelter=yes if there is one route_ref= x;y indicating bus route nos that stop there (if indicated on the stop) CUS stops are also useful to add but omitting the highway=bus-stop tag ( you can always add the public tranpsort stop_poisition as a node on the highway). They

Re: [Talk-it] Nome linea elettrica che cambia

scratera wrote > ..dai cartelli posizionati operatore però e ASM ASM da un paio d'anni per quanto riguarda la rete elettrica è diventata Unareti S.p.a. ciao --enrico -- Sent from: http://gis.19327.n8.nabble.com/Italy-General-f5324174.html ___

Re: [OSM-talk] Ways divided by paint?

If mappers are permitted to create numerous new ways based solely on a painted surface, intersections will become completely choked with lanes and will become unmanageable. In the given example, turns were already permitted prior to the additional superfluous lanes being added. This creates

[Talk-ca] Problems with tagging of islands/islets in a river

Rendering of islands/islets in a river I was missing several islands on 'my' Grand River while paddling. I don't understand how to change the attributes of an island in order to get it properly rendered. Have a look at this example: https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=16/43.3858/-80.3649 There

Re: [OSM-talk] Ways divided by paint?

On 7/4/2019 7:50 AM, Mateusz Konieczny wrote: I strongly disagree with this idea, and multiple times changed such splits back to one way. What if strictly following the rule of "no split ways unless physical divider" results in wildly incorrect turn-by-turn instructions? For example -

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Attribut ref sur les ronds point : la question de Montpellier

Cela a déjà été discuté et je ne pense pas qu'il y a lieu de changer de position. Certains pays on des ref de carrefours, mais pas la France. Que faire quand plusieurs routes passant par un carrefour ont des ref ? Frédéric. Le 03/07/2019 à 11:21, osm.sanspourr...@spamgourmet.com a écrit :

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Attribut ref sur les ronds point : la question de Montpellier

Cela a déjà été discuté et je ne pense pas qu'il y a lieu de changer de position. Certains pays on des ref de carrefours, mais pas la France. Que faire quand plusieurs routes passant par un carrefour ont des ref ? Frédéric. Le 03/07/2019 à 11:21, osm.sanspourr...@spamgourmet.com a écrit :

Re: [Talk-lv] Rescuing tree import in Valmiera made by Pēteris Brūns

On 03.07.19 12:37, Peteris Bruns wrote: > Hi, > > mainly all I can explain was done already answering to Michael at this > thread https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/57269387#map=14/57.5362/25.4167 > > In general, I'm now not ready to check all steps required by import > procedure. Feel free

[Talk-lv] osm tikšanās Rīgā, 2019-07-11

Pēc ilga pārtraukuma, aicinām visus uz OSM tikšanos Rīgā nākamceturtdien, 2019-07-11. Papildus citām OSM tēmām, šī ir iespēja tikties ar Zverik (Ilja Zverev), bijušo maps.me izstrādātāju un vispār lielu OSM ekspertu. Ja ir kāda tēma, par kuru no viņa labprāt dzirdētu nelielu lekciju, sūtiet

Re: [OSM-talk] Reordering and rewriting Good Practice wiki page

On 04.07.19 05:53, Joseph Eisenberg wrote: I've reordered and reworded several sections of the Good practice page: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice On 04.07.2019 11:27, Frederik Ramm wrote: I would prefer if far-reaching edits to essential pages that describe a community

Re: [Talk-GB] Importing NaPTAN Data

On Tue, Jul 2, 2019 at 11:07 AM Ed Loach wrote: > highway=bus_stop > public_transport=platform > source=naptan > naptan:verified=no > name=(NaPTAN name) > naptan:AtcoCode=(whatever) > naptan:NaptanCode=(whatever) > > If the bus stop type is not MKD I add > > naptan:BusStopType=(bus stop type) >

Re: [OSM-talk] Ways divided by paint?

On Thursday, 4 July 2019, Snusmumriken wrote: > On Thu, 2019-07-04 at 13:50 +0200, Mateusz Konieczny wrote: > > I strongly disagree with this idea, > > and multiple times changed such splits > > back to one way. > > I would consider that as an act of vandalism by removing ground truth >

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Traduire le wiki ?

Le 04.07.19 à 15:27, Vincent Bergeot a écrit : > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Key:shop#Autres > shop=pest_control > j'ai voulu traduire la description dans le tableau si cela n'a pas changé récement, le tableau reprend les intitulés des pages de chaque tag via taginfo. donc la

[OSM-talk-fr] booking=* <> reservation=*

Bonjour, je fais écho ici d'une discussion qui a commencé sur la ml tagging pour indiquer qu'un POI accepte/refuse/recommande une réservation, la clef la plus courante est reservation=* un contributeur avait crée une page booking=* et l'avait ajout en recommandation sur plusieurs autres pages.

[OSM-talk-fr] Traduire le wiki ?

Bonjour, je cherche à ajouter un magasin qui lutte contre les termites ! soit https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Key:shop#Autres shop=pest_control j'ai voulu traduire la description dans le tableau et en fait je ne sais pas faire. Quand je modifie, je tombe que sur la version

Re: [OSM-talk] Ways divided by paint?

On Thu, 2019-07-04 at 13:50 +0200, Mateusz Konieczny wrote: > I strongly disagree with this idea, > and multiple times changed such splits > back to one way. I would consider that as an act of vandalism by removing ground truth information that your fellow mappers have gathered and encoded in the

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Données routières ouvertes en France

Dans mon secteur, sur le cadastre édition Etalab, ou édition Edigeo, les tronçons de voie figurent, avec leur nom (en général). Mais… il manque un certain nombre de voies mineures Mais …ce sont des tronçons qui ne sont souvent pas raccordés les un aux autres, même si au niveau géométrique c’est

Re: [Talk-it] Flame su old_name

sent from a phone > On 4. Jul 2019, at 12:49, solitone wrote: > > Non è né un altro nome “ufficiale", alt_official_name qualcuno c’è ;-) https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/alt_official_name > né un nome locale loc_name alt_name è semplicemente un nome alternativo. Non ha

Re: [OSM-talk] Ways divided by paint?

sent from a phone > On 4. Jul 2019, at 11:49, Snusmumriken wrote: > > A painted line that has the legal status of "do not cross" is a > perfectly fine reason to have a separate way. it doesn’t apply to many people though, for example pedestrians or emergency vehicles. The definition for a

Re: [Talk-it] Source dubbio

sent from a phone > On 4. Jul 2019, at 13:37, Andy Townsend wrote: > > Thanks for everyone's patience - I believe that I've now reverted the problem > changesets. Thank you very much for your help! Cheers, Martin ___ Talk-it mailing list

Re: [Talk-it] Nome linea elettrica che cambia

La linea in questione è composta da 7 fili 3 nord è una linea, 3 sud è un'altra linea, 1 in alto, si chiama cavo di guardia e serve per i fulmini. Gianfranco -- Sent from: http://gis.19327.n8.nabble.com/Italy-General-f5324174.html ___ Talk-it

Re: [OSM-talk] Ways divided by paint?

I strongly disagree with this idea, and multiple times changed such splits back to one way. Jul 4, 2019, 11:49 AM by snusmumriken.map...@runbox.com: > On Wed, 2019-07-03 at 14:03 -0600, Jack Armstrong Dancer--- via talk > wrote: > >> I've always had the impression we should not create separate

Re: [Talk-GB] Mapillary geoJSON data

My first thought is recycling points. My second is (related to the quarterly project) solar panels. On Thu, Jul 4, 2019 at 10:39 AM Gareth L wrote: > Mapillary imagery is readily available in the iD editor and also the > traffic sign detections data that they derive from it. Their computer >

  1   2   >