Die beslissing werd genomen om uniforme data in OSM te krijgen, zo dat alle
bisnummers op dezelfde manier genoteerd worden.
Het is vergelijkbaar met een aantal straatnamen die met hoofdletters in
CRAB zitten (i.p.v. enkel de eerste letter een hoofdletter).
zie de code:
Hooi Sander,
Met een "/" in plaats van een "_" zijn er geen missings meer, maar dat is
toch niet helemaal juist. Ik ga de anderen met een "_" maar laten.
Toch bedankt en groetjes.
Sus
2016-06-20 15:24 GMT+02:00 Sander Deryckere :
> Met de import hebben we geprobeerd om
Hi Kurt,
Your tool may come in handy when generating diffs because it has a
database. I deliberately did not use a database because it can be a lot of
work to set this up and I believe the AGIV CRAB data should be usable by
anyone.
The interface here is translated:
On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 11:07:38AM +0100, Ben Abelshausen wrote:
Hi Kurt,
Your tool may come in handy when generating diffs because it has a
database. I deliberately did not use a database because it can be a lot of
work to set this up and I believe the AGIV CRAB data should be usable by
Die bedenking maakte ik me gisteren ook. In het geval van Urbis hebben we
bestanden ter beschikking gesteld met een hele gemeente tegelijk en dan zit
je met 2 lagen, maar als je die straat per straat binnenkrijgt via remote
control, kan je ze toch meteen in je actieve laag binnenhalen?
Wat je wel
Wat je ook kan doen is lagen samenvoegen (merge).
Jo
Op 9 november 2013 10:04 schreef Jo winfi...@gmail.com:
Die bedenking maakte ik me gisteren ook. In het geval van Urbis hebben we
bestanden ter beschikking gesteld met een hele gemeente tegelijk en dan zit
je met 2 lagen, maar als je die
On 2013-06-01 17:41, Johan C wrote :
Will AGIV accept attribution on this
page: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Contributors in order to use
the data under ODbL?
Note that a similar problem occurs when people add OSM data to Google Maps.
You are free to copy, distribute, transmit and adapt
I was also thinking that we could put their disclaimer along with the
source mention on that page.
Also Openstreetmap data comes with no warranties anyway.
Nobody is going to follow the source chain and make a claim that data that
made its way into OSM was wrong when it came from AGIV. It will
Hi all,
Question is, if you write a tool which compares data, and people can then
choose the correct point inside both datasets, who is then the rightful
owner of the resulting dataset? Both organisations? Or all the people who
entered the correct data manually?
Another question, what's the
2013/6/1 Pieter Colpaert pieter.colpa...@okfn.org
Hi all,
Question is, if you write a tool which compares data, and people can then
choose the correct point inside both datasets, who is then the rightful
owner of the resulting dataset? Both organisations? Or all the people who
entered the
So I'll keep on walking and surveying housenumbers
m.
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 10:58 AM, Jo winfi...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm not entirely convinced those Flemish open data licenses would really
help us a lot either.
Do they need a disclaimer shown on each and every rendering of the data?
Jo
@marc: yes it's the best way to get accurate data anyway! :-)
I'm not sure about the Flemish open data licenses, Pieter should know.
Met vriendelijke groeten,
Best regards,
Ben Abelshausen
ben.abelshau...@gmail.com
http://twitter.com/xivk
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 11:10 AM, Marc Gemis
Hi Ben,
there is a clear deadline! The 14th of June they are doing the Flemish
Open Data day on which they have to show their work. That day is going
to advertise the Flemish open data licenses as well. We just need to
convince AGIV to start using the right ones:
In The Netherlands they will do something simular. Import the data on a
dedicated layer in JOSM, and then copy to the data layer and upload. France
idem (according to Jo). So still a lot of manual work.
They also told me that there will be (or is) a plugin for JOSM to connect
to datasources which
14 matches
Mail list logo