Re: [Talk-GB] Talk-GB Digest, Vol 55, Issue 44

2011-04-23 Thread Mike Harris
) ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb -- */Mike Harris/* ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo

Re: [Talk-GB] Definitive Public Right Of Way map for Northumberland

2011-04-22 Thread Mike Harris
the data in OSM. Some councils seem to have a more permissive attitude. Mike Harris mentions two councils that have no restriction on the definitive map (as long as the underlying OS map not covered) [1]. Mike, which council's are these, and are they willing to make a public statement? (An FOI can

[Talk-GB] Fwd: Re: Re: Fwd: Re: Other Routes with Public Access

2011-03-27 Thread Mike Harris
Original Message Subject:Re: Re: [Talk-GB] Fwd: Re: Other Routes with Public Access Date: Sun, 27 Mar 2011 11:30:56 +0100 From: Mike Harris m...@delco.idps.co.uk To: Dave F. dave...@madasafish.com CC: talk-GB@openstreetmap.org Dave Some

[Talk-GB] Other Routes with Public Access

2011-03-24 Thread Mike Harris
public access. Thank you for asking before taking any destructive action! Mike Harris On 23/03/2011 12:00, talk-gb-requ...@openstreetmap.org wrote: Send Talk-GB mailing list submissions to talk-gb@openstreetmap.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http

[Talk-GB] Fwd: Re: Other Routes with Public Access

2011-03-24 Thread Mike Harris
Original Message Subject:Re: Other Routes with Public Access Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2011 10:10:19 + From: Mike Harris m...@delco.idps.co.uk To: Tom Hughes t...@compton.nu CC: Mike Harris mik...@googlemail.com, talk-gb@openstreetmap.org I would assume

Re: [Talk-GB] Fwd: Re: Other Routes with Public Access

2011-03-24 Thread Mike Harris
the specific tag. The ways still have access tags such as foot, horse etc.. On 24/03/2011 10:11, Mike Harris wrote: I would assume that information that is, for example, based on personal local knowledge or on personal conversations with people

Re: [Talk-GB] Fwd: Re: Other Routes with Public Access

2011-03-24 Thread Mike Harris
On 24/03/2011 15:51, Mike Harris wrote: Good advice, Andy. I need to make more use of that source:designation key! Mike On 19:59, SomeoneElse wrote: On 24/03/2011 10:11, Mike Harris wrote: I am not insensitive to the need for OSM to remain free of any copyright or similar restrictions

[Talk-GB] OS, OSM and field boundaries

2011-03-11 Thread Mike Harris
) ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb -- */Mike Harris/* ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb

Re: [Talk-GB] Talk-GB Digest, Vol 52, Issue 2

2011-01-08 Thread Mike Harris
) ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb -- */Mike Harris/* ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb

Re: [Talk-GB] Local walking routes

2010-08-05 Thread Mike Harris
specifically waymarked (and named) route, I feel is a good candidate to record in OSM. So shout if you think I'm wrong on that one, too. Cheers David (davespod) -- */Mike Harris/* ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org http

Re: [Talk-GB] Talk-GB Digest, Vol 44, Issue 38

2010-05-27 Thread Mike Harris
://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb -- */Mike Harris/* ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb

Re: [Talk-GB] Talk-GB Digest, Vol 44, Issue 19

2010-05-13 Thread Mike Harris
) ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb -- */Mike Harris/* ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

[Talk-GB] Fwd: Re: Talk-GB Digest, Vol 44, Issue 19

2010-05-13 Thread Mike Harris
Whoops - resending as I used the wrong account at my end and got bumped by the lists moderator - silly me! Original Message Subject:Re: [Talk-GB] Talk-GB Digest, Vol 44, Issue 19 Date: Thu, 13 May 2010 15:44:31 +0100 From: Mike Harris m...@delco.idps.co.uk

Re: [Talk-GB] Definitive Ways - tagging? (was Re: Talk-GB Digest, Vol 44, Issue 19)

2010-05-13 Thread Mike Harris
write-up of the arrangements as we know them. Cheers Andy -Original Message- From: talk-gb-boun...@openstreetmap.org [mailto:talk-gb- boun...@openstreetmap.org] On Behalf Of Mike Harris Sent: 13 May 2010 9:06 AM To: talk-gb@openstreetmap.org Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] Talk-GB Digest, Vol 44

Re: [Talk-GB] Definitive Ways - tagging? (was Re: Talk-GB Digest, Vol 44, Issue 19)

2010-05-13 Thread Mike Harris
: talk-gb-boun...@openstreetmap.org [mailto:talk-gb- boun...@openstreetmap.org] On Behalf Of Mike Harris Sent: 13 May 2010 9:06 AM To: talk-gb@openstreetmap.org Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] Talk-GB Digest, Vol 44, Issue 19 Hi My understanding of PRoW law

Re: [Talk-GB] Definitive Ways - tagging? (was Re: Talk-GB Digest, Vol 44, Issue 19)

2010-05-13 Thread Mike Harris
render it, but someone else might want the info; may as well record it while you're there. Richard -- */Mike Harris/* ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb

Re: [Talk-GB] Definitive Ways - tagging? (was Re: Talk-GB Digest, Vol 44, Issue 19)

2010-05-13 Thread Mike Harris
there is a definite right to walk along (legal or permissive) are clearly separated from those which are not. Nick -- */Mike Harris/* ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb

Re: [Talk-GB] GB Chapter

2010-04-27 Thread Mike Harris
@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb -- Gregory o...@livingwithdragons.com mailto:o...@livingwithdragons.com http://www.livingwithdragons.com -- */Mike Harris/* ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org http

Re: [Talk-GB] VectorMap District: Completely crazy idea, maybe, but...

2010-04-12 Thread Mike Harris
ever to be able to match OS on field boundaries (although admittedly even auntie OS is often years out of date on these). Cheers On 11/04/2010 02:51, Dave F. wrote: Mike Harris wrote: The lack of public right of way information is disappointing - but it is within OSM's capabilities to walk