Re: [Talk-GB] Nature Reserves project

ther put a node somewhere (where?) or add a guessed polygon which folk can amend each time they visit the area (disadvantage is it gives the air of authoritative extent when rendered) yes. I would map ("exact" ;) ) approximations - with a tag note="open for harmonization

Re: [Talk-GB] Quarterly Project: Nature Reserves

Hey Dan, Dan S schrieb: 2015-11-02 11:24 GMT+00:00 tshrub : Hey Dan, Dan S schrieb: Hi all, I went to check out a local nature reserve. It's currently in OSM as a leisure=park. I would like to tag as leisure=nature_reserve, but this one is indeed also a publicly accessible park, so I

Re: [Talk-GB] Quarterly Project: Nature Reserves

e. So far its possible to add boundary=protected_area + protect_class=7 + protection_title=Ecology Park + name=Bow Creek Ecology Park ... *But* in fact: on its website the area too looks to a bigger part like a "park", with its typical nature-recreation features. So on the other h

Re: [Talk-GB] Quarterly Project: Nature Reserves

Hey Brian, > Hi tshrub > I looked at the WDPA licence from that link, I think: <http://www.unep-wcmc.org/policies/wdpa-data-licence> > abd found this in it > The WDPA Materials may not be sub-licensed in whole or in part including within Derivative Works without the prior

Re: [Talk-GB] Quarterly Project: Nature Reserves

Also isn't the tag leisure=nature_reserve? oh - a scatty annotation alongside me. sorry, yes, sure. (because the "leisure" is more unfitting for me than "landuse" ... ) regards, tshrub Regards Brian ** ** ** ** On 26 October 2015 at 12:23, tshrub mailto:my-email-co

Re: [Talk-GB] Quarterly Project: Nature Reserves

ted_area + protect_class=97 for nature reserves + protect_class=4 I still use in addition landuse=nature_reserve because of visualisation regards, tshrub ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb

[Talk-GB] Best practice to add stabilisation types to shores and banks

main object is, to mark ways with the type of shoreline stabilisations, such as „boulder-packs“ or sheet piling: tag-combination: - barrier=wall - material=stone (metal, wood, plastic) - wall=boulder (fascine, breakwater, groyne, sh

Re: [Talk-GB] Apple trees around Cambridge

er job), but can become connected therewith. Even if the trees planted are named on the labels, experience shows that plant nurseries are not infallible (we have a purported Cork Oak which is /Quercus robur/ in our local arboretum). yes. Thats our assignment than? :) best, t. J

Re: [Talk-GB] Apple trees around Cambridge

hi, SK53 schrieb: Hi Dan, I've had enough trouble with cherry trees on the north side of Cambridge: you really need flowers, leaves & fruit to be able to do them properly! Some are flowering cherries (loosely /Prunus serratula/, others are passable eaters or jam makers, so presumably cultivars

[Talk-GB] about tagging zones

Hi, what you think about the following proceeding for tagging zones of an area. Following is usable for OSM? First: in my view it would be logic, to ticket a relation with name ("name=Zone *") etc. and make it by a further parent relation to a zone ("name=Area X"). But "Disadvantages": # mor

Re: [Talk-GB] building zones

hi, Err..sorry to be dumb, sorry too! (about my dict.-english ... ) but I have read this three times and still have no idea what this is about. What problem are you trying to solve? What is a "Building Zone"? may be no lucky item: not _a_ -, but fabricate- or establish zones: question about th

[Talk-GB] building zones

hi, just to ensure, for a final answer - what you users think, we should go on with? even in mind to be penny-wise with relations, the only & best choice to declare zones of an area I see is, to give a relation to every zone and that in this kind: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Multip