Re: [Talk-GB] Bridleway across field

On Tue, 8 Dec 2020, 13:18 Dave F via Talk-GB, wrote: FYI Wiltshire Council's Rights of Way Explorer is not the 'definitive map'. > It usually a misnomer. Paths are described with words in a definitive > statement. Their map is a representation of that data. Many authorities add > a caveat

Re: [Talk-GB] Bridleway across field

On Tue, Dec 8, 2020 at 3:04 PM Simon Still wrote: > > I’d actually say *more* of an issue with OSM is paths that are marked that > ARE NOT a legal right of way. Around Peaslake in the Surrey Hills there > are various ‘mountain bike trails’ shown on OSM that are not rights of way > and which the

Re: [Talk-GB] Bridleway across field **Do tag for the USER**

On Tue, Dec 08, 2020 at 03:47:08PM +, David Woolley wrote: > On 08/12/2020 15:11, nathan case wrote: > > I am interested as a path I recently mapped is a PROW but is very dangerous > > to cross. It is now marked as disused:highway=path with > > access=discourged;designated but it is stilla

Re: [Talk-GB] Bridleway across field

route that people actually use! Nick From: nathan case Sent: 08 December 2020 15:11 To: talk-gb@openstreetmap.org Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] Bridleway across field That's a fair viewpoint and I'm open to changing my method. But what would you suggest

Re: [Talk-GB] Bridleway across field

the use of the route without a guide on their website: https://www.lancaster.gov.uk/environmental-health/health-and-safety/cross-bay-walks-guidance-for-walkers-and-organisers (sorry - I seem to have derailed the original topic). -Original Message- From: David Woolley Sent: Tuesday, December 8,

Re: [Talk-GB] Bridleway across field

On 08/12/2020 15:11, nathan case wrote: I am interested as a path I recently mapped is a PROW but is very dangerous to cross. It is now marked as disused:highway=path with access=discourged;designated but it is stilla PROW (byway open to all traffic in this

Re: [Talk-GB] Bridleway across field

but it is stilla PROW (byway open to all traffic in this case): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/93427676 -Original Message- From: Dave F via Talk-GB Sent: Tuesday, December 8, 2020 2:10 PM To: talk-gb@openstreetmap.org Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] Bridleway across field On 08/12/2020

Re: [Talk-GB] Bridleway across field

> On 8 Dec 2020, at 14:20, SK53 > wrote: > Personally I do not generally map PRoWs which have no on-the-ground traces > (particularly after my experience > > in Carmathenshire in

Re: [Talk-GB] Bridleway across field

On Tue, 8 Dec 2020 at 13:18, Dave F via Talk-GB wrote: > > https://snipboard.io/scrm5R.jpg > > There you go, free of any supposed copyright infringement. Not quite. Before we're able to use any third-party data in OSM, we need to verify that it is available under a suitable licence. So you would

Re: [Talk-GB] Bridleway across field

That's very interesting Jerry, thanks. I thought the byway's reference was a bit odd actually as in it's the same as the byway that it intersects. In my experience, usually the paths I've looked at are a single line ie. a single beginning and end so maybe it has been "tacked on" to an existing

Re: [Talk-GB] Bridleway across field

Yes, these are not infrequent. We may have discussed some specific examples before, but one which comes to mind is one crossing the River Derwent at Duffield. This is marked on the definitive map and the name of a track "Save

Re: [Talk-GB] Bridleway across field

On 08/12/2020 12:36, nathan case wrote: but instead setting as disused:highway. This is what I tend to do when the PROW route is clearly inaccessible from aerial imagery (e.g. due to new buildings, or rivers). IMO, this is bad mapping. Just because one person concludes it isn't used by

Re: [Talk-GB] Bridleway across field

On 08/12/2020 12:42, Mark Lee via Talk-GB wrote: Ah sorry, I shall remove it then Robert. I have drawn it freehand based on what I'd seen on their site as a right of way. Presumably then, if there's no established path, I can never add it to OSM because the definitive map is my only source for

Re: [Talk-GB] Bridleway across field

On Tue, 8 Dec 2020 at 12:37, Dave F wrote: > On 08/12/2020 12:08, Robert Whittaker (OSM lists) wrote: > > On Tue, 8 Dec 2020 at 09:39, Mark Lee via Talk-GB > > wrote: > >> Hello. I've just added a missing public bridleway > >> (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/882278479) which is detailed on

Re: [Talk-GB] Bridleway across field

Thanks. I'll go back and have a closer look. It was part of a long ride so I didn't do much checking at the time. Mark On Tue, 8 Dec 2020, 12:30 Dave F via Talk-GB, wrote: > > > On 08/12/2020 09:36, Mark Lee via Talk-GB wrote: > > Hello. I've just added a missing public bridleway ( > >

Re: [Talk-GB] Bridleway across field

Ah sorry, I shall remove it then Robert. I have drawn it freehand based on what I'd seen on their site as a right of way. Presumably then, if there's no established path, I can never add it to OSM because the definitive map is my only source for this information. Even if I walk it and use my GPS

Re: [Talk-GB] Bridleway across field

On 08/12/2020 12:08, Robert Whittaker (OSM lists) wrote: On Tue, 8 Dec 2020 at 09:39, Mark Lee via Talk-GB wrote: Hello. I've just added a missing public bridleway (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/882278479) which is detailed on the Wiltshire Definitive Map. Generally these maps have

Re: [Talk-GB] Bridleway across field

Sent: Tuesday, December 8, 2020 12:01 PM To: talk-gb@openstreetmap.org Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] Bridleway across field On Tue, Dec 08, 2020 at 09:36:31AM +, Mark Lee via Talk-GB wrote: > Hello. I've just added a missing public bridleway ( > https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/882278479)

Re: [Talk-GB] Bridleway across field

I'm with you Phil but the locked gate is on a track parallel (50 yards perhaps) to where the bridleway should be. They're both shown on the definitive map so that's probably a legally blocked access. I would have thought that the farmer would have preferred me using it though than for me to

Re: [Talk-GB] Bridleway across field

On 08/12/2020 09:36, Mark Lee via Talk-GB wrote: Hello. I've just added a missing public bridleway ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/882278479) which is detailed on the WIltshire Definitive Map. It runs across a field and doesn't appear to have been in use recently, I couldn't see it on the

Re: [Talk-GB] Bridleway across field

On Tue, 8 Dec 2020 at 09:39, Mark Lee via Talk-GB wrote: > Hello. I've just added a missing public bridleway > (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/882278479) which is detailed on the > Wiltshire Definitive Map. I see that you've put source="Wiltshire Definitive Map" in the tagging. Do you have

Re: [Talk-GB] Bridleway across field

On Tue, Dec 08, 2020 at 09:36:31AM +, Mark Lee via Talk-GB wrote: > Hello. I've just added a missing public bridleway ( > https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/882278479) which is detailed on the > WIltshire Definitive Map. It runs across a field and doesn't appear to have > been in use recently,

Re: [Talk-GB] Bridleway across field

Firstly, before worrying about mapping is to report the illegal obsruction, i.e. the locked gate to the highway authority so that action can be taken to get the problem resolved. In my experience they like a photo of the problem. Phil (trigpoint) On Tuesday, 8 December 2020, Mark Lee via

Re: [Talk-GB] Bridleway across field

What's the OSM policy on legal ROWs that have no physical evidence You walk along them. There is then physical evidence, and you can map it. I've done that a lot. Martin. ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org

Re: [Talk-GB] Bridleway across field

Should be recorded as per the definitive map - lots like that across welsh hilltops etc. I’ve used a gps to follow them in the fog before > On 8 Dec 2020, at 09:36, Mark Lee via Talk-GB > wrote: > > Hello. I've just added a missing public bridleway >

[Talk-GB] Bridleway across field

Hello. I've just added a missing public bridleway ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/882278479) which is detailed on the WIltshire Definitive Map. It runs across a field and doesn't appear to have been in use recently, I couldn't see it on the ground in person and I can't see it in any of the

Re: [Talk-it] Sondaggio su Field Papers

Il 28/02/20 18:09, Lorenzo Stucchi ha scritto: > Semplicemente hanno visto un tweet in cui parlavo dell’uso di Field Papers e > poi mi hanno chiesto di compilarlo e di invitare altre persone a farlo. > > A me con firefox funziona ma non in modalità in incognito, credo che l’errore > sia lì. >

Re: [Talk-it] on the field

Su geopaparazzi possono essere caricate le stesse mappe offline che vanno su oruxmap, quelle di mapsforge. Es. la mappa completa dell'Italia può essere scaricata qui [1], pesa circa 1,2 GB, contiene anche le curve di livello prese dal DTM srtm (credo). La stessa mappa (lo stesso file) può essere

Re: [Talk-it] on the field

2016-11-26 15:18 GMT+01:00 Catonano : > > Vespucci consente ance di scattare foto e scrivere note ? > > Sarebbe perfetto, nel caso > Sì, anche foto e note. Però non conosco Geopaparazzi oppure l'ultimo consigliato Oruxmaps: può darsi che offrano soluzioni alternative migliori

Re: [Talk-it] on the field

Usa Osmand oppure Oruxmaps, ci sono le mappe offline ed al rientro carichi il gpx Il 26 Nov 2016 3:10 PM, "Catonano" ha scritto: > > > Il giorno 26 novembre 2016 14:55, Luigi Toscano > ha scritto: > >> >> Io uso osmtracker o (se ho connettività e

Re: [Talk-it] on the field

Ciao Federico :-) Il giorno 26 novembre 2016 15:14, Federico Cortese ha scritto: > 2016-11-26 15:09 GMT+01:00 Catonano : > > > > Io non ho MAI connettività. Vorrei, infatti, poter caricare la mappa sul > > telefono PRIMA di partire e POI poter annotare

Re: [Talk-it] on the field

2016-11-26 15:09 GMT+01:00 Catonano : > > Io non ho MAI connettività. Vorrei, infatti, poter caricare la mappa sul > telefono PRIMA di partire e POI poter annotare punti e poligoni sulla mappa > OFFLINE > > E poi poter riversare tutto dentro a Josm quando rientro. > Scusami

Re: [Talk-it] on the field

Il giorno 26 novembre 2016 15:01, Stefano ha scritto: > > > Il giorno 26 novembre 2016 14:52, Catonano ha > scritto: > >> ma esistono soluzioni praticabili per telefoni android per raccogliere >> dati on the field ? >> >> Fra Qfield, Geopaparazzi, Qgis

Re: [Talk-it] on the field

Il giorno 26 novembre 2016 14:55, Luigi Toscano ha scritto: > > Io uso osmtracker o (se ho connettività e tempo per inserimento al volo) > vespucci. Entrambi software libero e disponibili anche su F-Droid. > Mi accorgo di esser stato sbrigativo. Io non ho MAI

Re: [Talk-it] on the field

2016-11-26 14:52 GMT+01:00 Catonano : > ma esistono soluzioni praticabili per telefoni android per raccogliere dati > on the field ? > Geopaparazzi non l'ho mai usato. Uso Osmtracker per raccogliere velocemente tracce gpx con eventuali note o foto. Vespucci è fantastico per

Re: [Talk-it] on the field

Il giorno 26 novembre 2016 14:52, Catonano ha scritto: > ma esistono soluzioni praticabili per telefoni android per raccogliere > dati on the field ? > > Fra Qfield, Geopaparazzi, Qgis mobile non riesco a farne funzionare manco > uno ! :-/ > > Geopaparazzi, secondo quanto

Re: [Talk-it] on the field

Catonano ha scritto: > ma esistono soluzioni praticabili per telefoni android per raccogliere dati on > the field ? > > Fra Qfield, Geopaparazzi, Qgis mobile non riesco a farne funzionare manco uno > ! :-/ Io uso osmtracker o (se ho connettività e tempo per inserimento al volo) vespucci.

[Talk-it] on the field

ma esistono soluzioni praticabili per telefoni android per raccogliere dati on the field ? Fra Qfield, Geopaparazzi, Qgis mobile non riesco a farne funzionare manco uno ! :-/ Geopaparazzi, secondo quanto capisco da questo filmato, richiede gvSig online e sulla Ultima Ubuntu non si installa. Si

[Talk-us] Missing Maps Field Mapping Opportunity

American Red Cross and Missing Maps need your help. Do to some staff deployments to support the global Red Cross in Vanuatu, American Red Cross is in urgent need of a volunteer to help with training and field mapping in Tanzania http://tasks.hotosm.org/project/955. We already have all of the

[OSM-talk] known problems at field paper? (stamen)

Hello, in our local bavaria mailing list a mapper showed up due to problems with field paper (stamen). Are there any known issues at the moment? Problem description: all the download etc worked fine. But the upload does not work. The mapper tried multiple scaning resolutions etc, nothing

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Walking papers / Field papers (suite)

28 février 2013 13h49 *Objet :* [OSM-talk-fr] Walking papers / Field papers (suite) Bonsoir, Merci à Cédric Viou pour sa réponse et le lien pointant vers le plugin JOSM dédié aux Walking Papers ( http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JOSM/Plugins/WalkingPapers)http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Walking papers / Field papers (suite)

-talk-fr] Walking papers / Field papers (suite) Bonsoir Ici HOT! Je me pose la même question que toi depuis quelques jours car nous utilisons massivement les walking et field papers ici, au Kenya et au Burundi. Mais pour l'instant nous les utilisons uniquement pour annoter dans le terrain. J'ai

[OSM-talk-fr] Walking papers / Field papers

Bonjour, Petit message au sujet des Walking papers / Field papers car je ne trouve rien sur le web pour m'aider. J'ai uploadé une carte (qui comporte mes annotations de terrain) sur Field Papers et je souhaiterais désormais l'afficher dans Potlatch2 ou JOSM pour pouvoir modifier la carte OSM...

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Walking papers / Field papers

Bonjour, Ça fait longtemps que je n'ai pas utilisé, mais il me semble qu'avec ça: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JOSM/Plugins/WalkingPapers je m'en étais sorti. A+ Cedric Le 28/02/2013 09:56, Thomas Williamson a écrit : Bonjour, Petit message au sujet des Walking papers / Field

Re: [Talk-us] Reply-to field in list messages

header. It would save nearly everybody from occasional frustration and frequent minor annoyance. Instead, people would inadvertantly publish private email. Actually I inadvertently published a private email when I first joined because it was not set up to reply to the list. I saw the

Re: [Talk-us] Reply-to field in list messages

On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 5:12 PM, Mike N. nice...@att.net wrote: Actually I inadvertently published a private email when I first joined because it was not set up to reply to the list. I saw the weirdness, and thought it was like another list which had a dead reply-to address and got in the

Re: [Talk-us] Reply-to field in list messages

David ``Smith'' writes: Why doesn't the talk-us list use the reply-to field so that simple replies go to the list, not just the original poster? The newbies list does that. Every other e-mail list I've ever been on does that. So why not this one? http://russnelson.com/rt.html header.

Re: [Talk-us] Reply-to field in list messages

On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 3:59 PM, David ``Smith'' vidthe...@gmail.com wrote: Why doesn't the talk-us list use the reply-to field so that simple replies go to the list, not just the original poster?  The newbies list does that.  Every other e-mail list I've ever been on does that. So why not

Re: [Talk-us] Reply-to field in list messages

On Thu, 2010-06-10 at 16:59 -0400, David ``Smith'' wrote: Why doesn't the talk-us list use the reply-to field so that simple replies go to the list, not just the original poster? The newbies list does that. Every other e-mail list I've ever been on does that. So why not this one? It's a

[Talk-us] Reply-to field in list messages

to remember that the list doesn't work normally. Besides, that still puts the OP in the to field, and just adds talk-us as a CC. That's not semantically correct most of the time. How about a poll of list members? How many of you would prefer to reply directly to a list poster, more often than

[Talk-GB] Ordnance Survey field boundaries etc. (moved from Newbies)

Phil Monger wrote: The field boundaries on 25k maps are a derivative layer based on the larger scale surveys - they come from data from as recently as 2009 and not older than 2002. You're 'avin' a larf, surely? Strictly speaking, a line on a 25k map is a linear topographical feature

Re: [Talk-ht] URGENT Haiti field requirement: FOCUS mapping efforts on ROADS the areas in south west of Port au Prince - districts of Leogane, Gressier, Grand Goave and Petit Goave.

On Mon, Feb 08, 2010 at 02:32:15PM +0100, Jan Tappenbeck wrote: add to wiki this informations ?? I had included this link in the wiki, but presumably it has been removed due to not conforming with OSM best practices -- since you can't attribute source correctly in a mosaic. Regards, --

Re: [Talk-ht] URGENT Haiti field requirement: FOCUS mapping efforts on ROADS the areas in south west of Port au Prince - districts of Leogane, Gressier, Grand Goave and Petit Goave.

All- Apologies for double emailing CET = Central European Time. No more details on this request from the field than this set of areas to focus effort on mapping roads features i imagine looking at comprehensiveness of coverage and any obstacle to traffic. I'll revert to the list if further