> From: David Litke [mailto:dwli...@comcast.net]
> Subject: Re: [Talk-us] Update on remapping
>
> I am a newbie, wonder why the current license change downtime is
> affecting data. Does the new license make some existing data illegel and
> hence they are removing it? Or are they making use of the
On Sun, Apr 1, 2012 at 6:22 PM, Richard Welty wrote:
> On 4/1/12 6:11 PM, David Litke wrote:
>>
>> I am a newbie, wonder why the current license change downtime is affecting
>> data. Does the new license make some existing data illegel and hence they
>> are removing it? Or are they making use of t
On 4/1/12 6:11 PM, David Litke wrote:
I am a newbie, wonder why the current license change downtime is
affecting data. Does the new license make some existing data illegel
and hence they are removing it? Or are they making use of the downtime
to do additional QC edits/deletions?
"illegal" is p
achment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-us/attachments/20120401/685da89a/attachment-0001.html>
--
Message: 2
Date: Sun, 1 Apr 2012 07:51:55 -0400
From: the Old Topo Depot
To: talk-us@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Talk-us] Update on remapp
I look forward to a navigable South Carolina, I look forward to a
navigable Southern California. Those (and much more other work) seem
weeks away at least, it is safe to say. Choppy waters ahead, our
next lighthouse is the future. Stay connected. Seek answers. Keep
communicating well among
On Sun, Apr 1, 2012 at 3:42 AM, James Mast wrote:
>
> So, who else here was at least somewhat successful in their objective in
> data cleanup (I still think this whole thing was kinda stupid, as I'd rather
> been fixing/adding new stuff instead of redoing stuff that others added)?
Well, my ultima
On Sun, Apr 1, 2012 at 4:42 AM, James Mast wrote:
> Well, the database has just gone read-only at about 4:08 AM EDT.
[...]
> I was even able to get in a last minute edit to save some of US-19 in West
> Virginia in a section that moonwashed tainted by deleting and retracing it.
> So, I did the same
Don't worry Mike. I have to nuke I-81 myself as it's almost all created by
Lar's from the ways to the nodes. This would be a wholesale cleanhouse with
everything I upload as V1's except for maybe a few ramps that aren't tainted
that bad to begin with. So, I wouldn't have to worry about the O
On 4/1/2012 8:07 AM, James Mast wrote:
Hopefully I can finish the I-81 rebuild off-line before the database is
live so it can be one of the first uploads.
And a small caution - if the ODBL removal bot happens to hit it before
your upload, there will be version conflicts. I have no idea on it
Perhaps a wiki page could be used to coordinate this work. There's
certainly plenty of interstate work to go around ;-)
On Sun, Apr 1, 2012 at 8:07 AM, James Mast wrote:
> I just noticed that 99% of I-81 is going to be nuked in Tennessee just
> now because of the change. Guess I found my proj
I just noticed that 99% of I-81 is going to be nuked in Tennessee just now
because of the change. Guess I found my project for the next few days till the
database is live again! Thank goodness that you can edit offline in JOSM.
Hopefully I can finish the I-81 rebuild off-line before the datab
On 4/1/2012 7:51 AM, the Old Topo Depot wrote:
I cleaned up most of I95, I20 and I26 in SC,
I saw those come through - thanks for fixing them!
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
I cleaned up most of I95, I20 and I26 in SC, but did not have time for I77
or any of the other road classes, so SC will need a lot more work.
If I77 and SC 277 can be fixed (and I'm seeing what I think are a few
bridge segments I missed on I26, darn it) at least the major roads should
route.
On S
> On 4/1/2012 6:54 AM, Mike N wrote:
> I also felt it was important to keep adding new stuff
> instead of 100% on cleanup.
> I did add new stuff as well. Mostly it was brand new sub-divisions that
> were built after the original 2007 TIGER import that I spotted when cleaning
> up other data.
On 4/1/2012 4:42 AM, James Mast wrote:
So, who else here was at least somewhat successful in their objective in
data cleanup (I still think this whole thing was kinda stupid, as I'd
rather been fixing/adding new stuff instead of redoing stuff that others
added)?
I was somewhat successful in the
James Mast wrote:
>
> Well, the database has just gone read-only at about 4:08 AM EDT. I was
> lucky enough to finish the cleanup of the entire Pittsburgh, PA area minus
> some businesses that people added that I couldn't verify since I hadn't
> been in those parts of the city before or recently.
Well, the database has just gone read-only at about 4:08 AM EDT. I was lucky
enough to finish the cleanup of the entire Pittsburgh, PA area minus some
businesses that people added that I couldn't verify since I hadn't been in
those parts of the city before or recently. So, they will get axed b
17 matches
Mail list logo
