; Well, let's just inventory Walmart's selection while we're at it.
>
>
> On Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 8:25 PM, Adam Schreiber <
> adam.schreiber+...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Perhaps shop=marijuana, marijuana:recreational=yes/no,
>> marijuana:medicinal=yes/no
Perhaps shop=marijuana, marijuana:recreational=yes/no,
marijuana:medicinal=yes/no, marijuana:paraphernalia=yes/no,
marijuana:edibles=yes/no?
Cheers,
Adam
On Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 9:00 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer
wrote:
>
> 2014/1/3 Russell Deffner
>>
>> Maybe more so if you are in Colorado, as sales
There used to be a shelters/springs data set that would probably be
useful to include.
Cheers,
Adam
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 10:59 AM, Richard Welty wrote:
> On 11/27/13 10:51 AM, Josh Doe wrote:
>
>> I agree with you. What about attributes, anything useful
>> we should import when possible? I ca
Josh,
A while ago, I had imported and simplified the ATC centerline data
from the trailhead in GA through part of VA. I stopped there as that
was where individual mappers had started to trace GPS data. This work
was done by sadam-AT.
Regards,
Adam
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 7:44 AM, Josh Doe wro
Richard,
I hope you enjoy the area. I've already done a bit of mapping at the
Fredericksburg and Spotsylvania battlefields.
Cheers,
Adam
On Feb 21, 2013 6:46 PM, "Richard Welty" wrote:
> i sent this out earlier today on conventional social networks, but i
> know a lot of you probably
> don't
Ian,
The link appears to be dead. Was the video taken down?
Cheers,
Adam
On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 10:17 AM, Ian Dees wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I saw a tweet from @USGS today mentioning that the National Map Corps are
> starting up again. If you don't know what the National Map Corps is, think
I'll have to look later when I can run Google translate on the page.
Cheers,
Adam
On Apr 10, 2012 4:37 AM, "Martijn van Exel" wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I notice a new tagging scheme for TMC codes has been proposed (in German
> only for now..)
>
> https://wiki.openstreetmap.**org/wiki/DE:Proposed_feature
Josh,
As the person that imported the NHD shoreline for most of the southern
east coast, I can tell you that I mainly tried to fix directional
errors and obvious missing features. Correcting to imagery was beyond
the scope of the effort as that was back when we were just trying to
get something w
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 6:54 PM, Phil! Gold wrote:
> * Paul Johnson [2011-06-29 14:52 -0700]:
>> On 06/29/2011 11:49 AM, Nathan Mills wrote:
>> > My personal preference is to use directional roles so that they match
>> > what is written on signage. It also avoids the inevitable "which way is
>> >
I may come up with some more.
Cheers,
Adam
> On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 7:56 AM, Adam Schreiber wrote:
>>
>> Perhaps creation of additional JOSM presets/validation tests and fixes?
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Adam
>>
>> On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 8:47 AM, Richar
Perhaps creation of additional JOSM presets/validation tests and fixes?
Cheers,
Adam
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 8:47 AM, Richard Weait wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 10:07 PM, Ian Dees wrote:
>> Hi everyone,
>> At the Google Summer of Code mentors summit this past weekend Google asked
>> us (th
On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 10:17 AM, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
> What's wrong with something like highway:forward=stop or
> highway:backward=stop for the node where one must stop?
How does that capture intersections where one of the roads entering
and exiting the junction node doesn't stop? Are you su
On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 8:19 AM, Greg Troxel wrote:
>
> Therefor I propose stop signs go on the intersection and save a lot of
> hassle with the tag
>
> highway=stop
>
> I think your proposal can work, but you need to show how e.g. to mark 2
> out of 5 roads at an intersection.
I think
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 8:46 PM, Sven Lafebre wrote:
> Most of these parks are tagged as physical areas. For example, state
> game lands are natural=wood and leisure=nature_reserve. Unfortunately,
> these tags don't always correspond to the actual land use. Moreover,
> they are really administrati
On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 10:25 PM, Richard Welty wrote:
>
> this discussion is triggered by a difference of opinion between myself and
> NE2 about
> the classification of US 301 & FL A1A between Ocala, Florida and
> Jackonsville, Florida.
> I'm bringing it up in the hopes of achieving concensus, in
On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 11:29 AM, SteveC wrote:
> I think that for your own good so it's not a surprise to people, all those
> running for the board of OSMF-US should be upfront about it. I don't think
> there's any shame in it, but I can tell you from experience that people get
> very upset if
> I accept the nomination to run for the temporary board of the US Chapter of
> OSM.
I've been an active mapper for almost 3 years. I've mapped
extensively in the Clemson, SC area and less so around my new home in
VA, but I'm working on it.
I'm a member of the GNOME foundation and have been act
On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 5:18 PM, Paul Johnson wrote:
> Apollinaris Schoell wrote:
>
>>
>> On 16 Nov 2009, at 7:14 , Anthony wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 10:05 AM, Andy Allan wrote:
I'd love to know which map has an
accurate pedestrian routing network that is collected as such a
On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 7:55 PM, Frederik Ramm wrote:
> Adam,
>
> Adam Schreiber wrote:
>>
>> I'm sorry that I'm not a database engineer. I would think that some
>> kind of block or re-direct could be made to the server responsible for
>> the segment o
On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 7:34 PM, Frederik Ramm wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Adam Schreiber wrote:
>>
>> I would hope that and in the future a mapping mirror. The database
>> ought to move to being on more than one server.
>
> I am interested to hear your proposals on confl
On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 5:44 PM, Sam Vekemans
wrote:
> Do you mean a server for viewing the tile cache right? (that holds a
> planet file & gets a second diff)
> Where osm.com /osm.us could be used and a us-custom-render of the map
> would be available as a default for people not logged in.
I wou
On Sat, Oct 3, 2009 at 12:13 PM, Dave Hansen wrote:
> Is this the most up to date way of keeping addresses?
>
>
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/House_numbers/Karlsruhe_Schema
That's the scheme I use when adding addresses. There are presets for
it in Potlatche, so I
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 1:28 PM, Paul Johnson wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-08-26 at 10:56 -0400, Adam Schreiber wrote:
>
>> To make things clear, should the place=state tag be placed on, near
>> the node for the capital city of the state?
>
> Why not closer to the geographic cente
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 10:23 AM, Richard Weait wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 8:39 AM, Lennard wrote:
>> Richard Weait wrote:
>>
>>> I think the provincial / state borders will continue to be yucky on
>>> the main map until mapnik supports rendering different style sheets
>>
>> As you guys in th
On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 3:34 PM, Frederik Ramm wrote:
> If I don't hear strong objection then I will let the automated process
> commence this weekend. It will work in small chunks, so can always be
> paused, and I will post instructions that allow you to monitor progress
> (and see which area is cu
On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 1:55 PM, Tyler wrote:
> So then if we're going to use admin levels there should be a boundary type
> since administrative clearly doesn't work. But then we're back to the
> previous discussion about creating a new tagging scheme for parks and
> reserves. At that point you ca
On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 1:47 AM, Tyler wrote:
>> If it is necessary to further classify parks in the US, one logical tag
>> scheme might be
>>
>> park=city
>> park=county
>> park=state
>> park=national
>
> I think better would be leisure=outdoor_recreation (or something similar)
> because we
On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 5:02 PM, Tyler wrote:
>> Why is landuse=forest not appropriate for parks/forests with the same uses
>> but with a "lower" administrative classification? landuse=forest is for
>> managed land with trees on it regardless of who manages it.
>
> Because they often aren't forest
On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 2:59 PM, Tyler wrote:
> Hello all,
> I've a question about mapping the different types of park. I've been using
> boundary=national_park for national parks and forests and then tagging
> national parks as landuse=nature_reserve and forests as landuse=forest I've
> also been
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 4:23 PM, Stephen Johnson wrote:
> Some of the TIGER ways and nodes for Interstates in my area are way out of
> alignment. They are all over the map if you'll forgive the pun. I have
> several GPS tracks for most of the Interstate lanes.
>
> My question is what should I ali
Also in Atlanta, there's N St. I got directions from google and
thought I was looking for North St. Man was that a big mistake.
Cheers,
Adam
On 6/4/09, Paul Johnson wrote:
> Ian Dees wrote:
>
>> Its functions are:
>> - Strip "St" suffix from grid-named streets (eg. "South 500 West")
>>
On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 7:20 PM, Theodore Book wrote:
> I have been playing around with the TIGER 2008 data, which, for some of
> the counties around Atlanta seems to be much better than the old data.
> If I import it for some of the counties, though, I would like to import
> the addresses in a fo
On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 7:53 PM, Paul Fox wrote:
> adam wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 6:04 PM, Paul Fox
> wrote:
> > > ... in my mind there's a big difference between "unpaved" and "track".
> >
> > Could you provide a photo of one of these roads?
>
> i think so. these are unpaved:
>
On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 6:04 PM, Paul Fox wrote:
> is there a way to distinguish pavement type separately from
> road classification? is there a standard tag for doing so?
surface=foo
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:surface
> in new england (and i assume in other parts of the country)
>
On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 5:43 PM, Theodore Book wrote:
> I have had some interest in my NHD conversion scripts, both from people
> interested in the NHD, and from those interested in their ability to
> specify a maximum length for an imported way. Therefore I have placed
> them in subversion at:
>
The Southeast Linux Fest [1] is going to be in Clemson, SC the weekend
of June 13. It would be awesome to have an OSM presence there. The
area is already well mapped [2] but more effort could be put in to
really make it a showcase by June. Let me know if there is anyone
interested in coming down
On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 11:19 AM, Apollinaris Schoell
wrote:
>
> On 13 Apr 2009, at 5:36 , Adam Schreiber wrote:
>
>>
>> What about:
>>
>> addr:country=us
>> addr:state=ca
>> network=us
>>
>> or
>>
>> addr:country=us
>>
On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 8:28 AM, Greg Troxel wrote:
> The US highways in California are really (I think) regular US highways,
> but CA uses a different kind of sign. So tagging then us_us_ca seems
> again like tagging for the renderer. This is sort of OK, perhaps, but
> it bothers me perhaps bec
On Sun, Apr 12, 2009 at 11:53 AM, Apollinaris Schoell
wrote:
> this is great work, signs could be a bit smaller tough.
>
> why not stick with the symbol tag? see
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/United_States_roads_tagging
> the symbols tagging should be transparent to the mappers not only to
On Sun, Apr 12, 2009 at 10:38 AM, Greg Troxel wrote:
>
> network=us_i_2 # Interstate (2 digit) us_i_3 for 3 digit
> network=us_us_2 # US Route us_us_3 for 3 digit
> network=us_ny # NY State Route
> network=us_ny_county #
>
> That looks great to me, except that us_i_2 vs us_i_3 seems like taggi
On Sun, Apr 12, 2009 at 2:38 AM, Nicholas Vetrovec wrote:
>
> Posted on the US Page to help coordinate US Interstate relations.
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Interstate_Highways_Relations
Instead of state_id=xx, I would suggest we glom onto addr:state=xx as
the recent GNIS import has done.
On Sun, Apr 12, 2009 at 9:31 AM, Richard Weait wrote:
> On Sun, 2009-04-12 at 04:39 -0500, Joseph Jon Booker wrote:
>> On Sun, 12 Apr 2009 01:54:12 -0500
>> Ian Dees wrote:
>>
>> > On Sun, Apr 12, 2009 at 1:38 AM, Nicholas Vetrovec
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> > >
>> > > Posted on the US Page to help coor
I had no problem copying nodes tags to ways with latest.
Adam
On 4/10/09, Joseph Jon Booker wrote:
> On Fri, 10 Apr 2009 11:01:08 -0500
> Ian Dees wrote:
>> There's a "copy tags" feature in JOSM that doesn't seem to work.
>> That's about the only way I know of right now.
>
> Perhaps it is simil
On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 1:28 PM, Adam Schreiber wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 12:01 PM, Ian Dees wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 10:50 AM, Adam Schreiber wrote:
>>>
>>> Is there an easy way to merge the tags from the nodes to areas that
>>
On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 12:01 PM, Ian Dees wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 10:50 AM, Adam Schreiber wrote:
>>
>> Is there an easy way to merge the tags from the nodes to areas that
>> have already been mapped? I just noticed a lot of nodes show up for
&g
On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 12:01 PM, Ian Dees wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 10:50 AM, Adam Schreiber wrote:
>>
>> Is there an easy way to merge the tags from the nodes to areas that
>> have already been mapped? I just noticed a lot of nodes show up for
&g
Is there an easy way to merge the tags from the nodes to areas that
have already been mapped? I just noticed a lot of nodes show up for
buildings at my university.
Cheers,
Adam
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreet
On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 3:29 PM, Theodore Book wrote:
> I have noticed with the new GeoNames import that a lot of places have
> appeared with a name like: "Ivy Street School (historical)" - many of
> these seem to be institutions that haven't existed for 50 years or more.
> Do we want to include t
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 10:45 AM, Ted Mielczarek
wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 9:45 PM, Richard Weait wrote:
>>
>> Dear Can-Americans,
>>
>> This is silly. Four different lines for one border.
>>
>>
>> http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=48.99906&lon=-95.15362&zoom=16&layers=B000FTF
>>
>> We're
On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 9:45 PM, Richard Weait wrote:
> Dear Can-Americans,
>
> This is silly. Four different lines for one border.
>
> http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=48.99906&lon=-95.15362&zoom=16&layers=B000FTF
>
> We're good neighbo(u)rs. We should fix our fence. Shouldn't each
> border b
On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 6:59 AM, Richard Weait wrote:
> I've adjusted the boundary=admin rendering on my tile server to make
> more sense for North America. Rendering the state / provincial borders
> at zoom 1 & 2 might be overdoing it, but at zoom 3 looks reasonable. It
> does point out a poten
On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 10:26 AM, Ian Dees wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 8:54 AM, Adam Schreiber wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 9:29 AM, Ian Dees wrote:
>> > 3. If there are already OSM features in your area for a certain node
>> > that I
>
On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 9:29 AM, Ian Dees wrote:
> 3. If there are already OSM features in your area for a certain node that I
> imported, feel free to delete my node, but please merge at least the
> gnis:feature_id tag from the GNIS data so that we can keep track of future
> name changes.
What a
e Atlanta area, that will
> take some manual correction.
>
> Adam Schreiber wrote:
>> On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 11:42 AM, Ian Dees wrote:
>>> On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 10:31 AM, Adam Schreiber wrote:
>>>> Has anyone else noticed some kind of import of park/forest
On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 11:42 AM, Ian Dees wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 10:31 AM, Adam Schreiber wrote:
>>
>> Has anyone else noticed some kind of import of park/forest data for
>> Georgia going on? Does anyone know that source of the data?
>>
>> http://
Has anyone else noticed some kind of import of park/forest data for
Georgia going on? Does anyone know that source of the data?
http://openstreetmap.org/?lat=34.043&lon=-84.233&zoom=9&layers=B000FTF
Cheers,
Adam
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@opens
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 11:31 AM, Karl Newman wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 8:21 AM, Theodore Book wrote:
>>
>> I have put the various proposals on the wiki at:
>> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/US_Forest_Service_Data
>>
>> It seems like the landuse=forest tag has a fair amount of consensu
by a national entity/bureau? Yes. Are they
operated by the same entity/bureau? No. Thus, make the distinction in
a meaningful way.
Cheers,
Adam
> --
> James Fee
> http://www.spatiallyadjusted.com/
>
>
> On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 8:40 AM, Adam Schreiber wrote:
>>
>> On T
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 10:34 AM, James Fee wrote:
> I totally agree. National Forests are administered by the Agriculture
> Department (not the park service) and are managed lands for different uses
> (timber, livestock, wildlife) as well as recreation. They are probably
> closer (feel free to
On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 10:53 AM, Rev. Theodore Book wrote:
> It looks like you are right up the road from me! I can send you the scripts
> that I used, if you like.
Sure.
>
> Adam Schreiber wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 10:37 AM, Theodore Book wrote:
>>
&
On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 10:37 AM, Theodore Book wrote:
> * In some places, a lot of work has been done manually entering water
> features. While I expect the NHD data is generally better, we have the
> tough issue of respecting other people's work (and not duplicating
> things in the database)
I
On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 4:08 PM, Minh Nguyen wrote:
> Kentucky's border along the Ohio River is one example: the border is
> defined to be the low water mark of the Ohio-Indiana-Illinois bank as of
> the 18th century [1], so it's not the centerline and not quite the
> northern riverbank. Along Ohi
Would it be accurate if a county line appears to be following a body
of water albeit in a low res linear aproximation way to move the
border to the center line of the body of water? I imagine if the
answer is yet that it would apply to state borders too?
Cheers,
Adam
___
On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 1:54 PM, Scott Atwood
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Do any of the renderer support the notion of rendering the same tag
> differently in different regions of the world?
I don't believe so. This has been brought up in the past in regards
to highway color schemes.
> Or would
On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 12:42 PM, Scott Atwood
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have noticed that for the U.S. map, state boundaries only appear at a zoom
> level 9 or higher, and at zoom levels 9 and 10 they render exactly the same
> as county boundaries. Then county boundaries disappear at zoom
On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 2:25 PM, David Carmean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Here's an example: a large portion of the trails are on top of levees around
> salt evaporation ponds around the Bay. Some of these segments are gravel
> roads
> that are 3 or 4 meters wide, where a passenger car could e
On Sun, Nov 2, 2008 at 1:51 PM, Sarah Manley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am new to OSM and wanted to ask a question about sidewalks. From my
> understanding we do no record sideways because it is assumed that all
> roads have them. In my experience, this is not true. So would we want
> to create
On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 11:08 AM, Karl Newman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Maybe it could be done like Dave handled the last import--if anyone is
> concerned about conflicts, they can handle their county themselves.
Hear Hear!
Cheers,
Adam
___
Talk-us
On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 12:21 PM, Richard Weait <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-09-25 at 12:07 -0400, Adam Schreiber wrote:
>> Richard,
>>
>> I'm curious, who is this mysterious 'we' in your announcements and
>> listings in the wiki?
>
Richard,
I'm curious, who is this mysterious 'we' in your announcements and
listings in the wiki?
Cheers,
Adam
On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 12:00 PM, Richard Weait <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> We're building a mapping party for the MSP area for next weekend, Oct
> 4-5. I'd love to have
On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 11:49 AM, Ian Dees <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 10:46 AM, Adam Schreiber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 11:12 AM, Ian Dees <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at
On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 11:12 AM, Ian Dees <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 10:02 AM, Adam Schreiber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> Would there be any interest in getting together a box of GPS devices
>> to be sent around for North America
Would there be any interest in getting together a box of GPS devices
to be sent around for North American mapping parties similar to what
they have across the pond? [1] Maybe Garmin would sponsor something?
[2]
Cheers,
Adam
[1] http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/GPS_Units_for_Loan
[2] http
On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 4:17 AM, Alex S. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Adam Schreiber wrote:
>> Is there any reason to not upload this data?
>
> This provision could be a sticking point:
> "that you use proper citation (see metadata for details) on any
> materials (d
On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 12:02 PM, Adam Killian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Adam Schreiber wrote:
>>
>> The Appalachian Trail Conservancy makes track and shelter data
>> available for download [1] under a fairly simple agreement [2].
>> Furthermore, someone has alr
The Appalachian Trail Conservancy makes track and shelter data
available for download [1] under a fairly simple agreement [2].
Furthermore, someone has already converted the data to gpx [3]. Is
there any reason to not upload this data? Has anyone been working on
the AT already?
Cheers,
Adam
[1
On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 5:38 PM, SteveC <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 8 Jul 2008, at 14:37, Adam Schreiber wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 5:30 PM, SteveC <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>> I've had a chat with jon who runs the tile server and an inte
On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 5:30 PM, SteveC <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I've had a chat with jon who runs the tile server and an interim
>> solution to getting the great lakes and US/CA state borders on the
>> map is if there are Free shapefile(s) somewhere with said stuff on it.
>>
>> Can anyone help
On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 11:48 PM, yellowbkpk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> I'm just about done importing the NHD Data into a PostGIS database and can
> begin exporting to OSM format. Is there anyone out there that has already
> imported NHD data or drawn water bodies/rivers themse
Does anyone have a good bounding box for downloading all of the US
data via osmxapi? I'm thinking of getting a Garmin GPS60CSx and would
be willing to make available the .img files. Also, if anyone knows
how to get the SRTM topographical data into a layer for a Garmin, I'd
appreciate it.
Cheers,
Are there any virtual mapping tasks that can be done remotely?
Cheers,
Adam
On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 6:42 PM, Richard Weait <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The OpenStreetmap.org project is coming to Rochester this weekend.
> We'll be improving the map of Rochester and we would love to have your
> hel
Is there a reason the NHD treats rivers as linear features instead of
areas? Is area data present for the river banks that isn't being
converted yet?
Cheers,
Adam
On Fri, May 2, 2008 at 9:46 AM, Ian Dees <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] is starting to show the data I uploaded yest
On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 9:14 PM, Adam Schreiber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 6:15 PM, Matthew Perry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Feel free to try it out and let me know how it works. The script is
> > available at
> http://perrygeo.go
es from.
This really only ought to be run for a subbasin at a time. I received
a 46 MB osm file.
Cheers,
Adam
> - matt
>
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 6:14 PM, Adam Schreiber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 6:15 PM, Matthew Perry <[EMAIL PRO
On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 6:15 PM, Matthew Perry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Feel free to try it out and let me know how it works. The script is
> available at http://perrygeo.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/gis-bin/nhd_to_osm.py
I'm running ubuntu hardy and installed every gdal related package I
could
On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 5:24 PM, Matthew Perry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 10:14 AM, Adam Schreiber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Are you able to distribute the data by county similar to the TIGER
> > import? If so, could you send me the d
Matthew,
Are you able to distribute the data by county similar to the TIGER
import? If so, could you send me the data for Oconee, Pickens and
Anderson counties in SC?
Cheers,
Adam Schreiber
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
http
On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 1:19 PM, Ian Dees <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I've had some success tagging river islands as natural=land.
> >
> > Bone
> >
>
> Thanks Bone. I tried tagging the island as natural=land to no avail. Any
> other ideas?
You could set layer = 1.
Cheers,
Adam
__
On 1/27/08, Matthew Perry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Jan 27, 2008 1:26 PM, Adam Schreiber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 1/27/08, Bone Killian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Matthew Perry wrote:
> > > > So my question's are:
> >
On 1/27/08, Bone Killian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Matthew Perry wrote:
> > So my question's are:
> > Would anyone be interested in some sort of mass upload of hydrography
> > data (to follow on the success of the TIGER import!) ?
> >
> It seems like a good idea to me.
The hydrography data incl
On Jan 23, 2008 7:11 PM, Dave Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It doesn't stop rendering or anything, but it is certainly a data
> inconsistency. It might just be easier to use Adam's data if yours is
> easy to clean out.
Who deletes that kind of stuff?
Adam
_
On Jan 18, 2008 8:31 AM, Ian Dees <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What is the source of the state borders? I've noticed that it didn't
> separate Michigan, for example.
I believe the state borders came from TIGER data. Ted, please correct
me if I'm wrong.
I'm not sure what you mean by separate Mich
On Jan 17, 2008 8:05 PM, Dave Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The JOSM validator plugin calls some of the state borders
> "self-intersecting ways". That's because the ways contain the same node
> multiple times consecutively:
> I've attached an entire OSM file showing this at the NY/PA border.
Here's for the remainder of OH.
Adam
On Jan 2, 2008 10:22 AM, Dave Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2008-01-01 at 18:34 -0500, Adam Schreiber wrote:
> > On Jan 1, 2008 6:03 PM, Dave Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > The following states n
On Jan 1, 2008 6:03 PM, Dave Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The following states need a look:
>
> NY, PA, OH, TX, VA, IL
>
> Probably Texas the most badly. The most convenient way for me to get
> changes from anyone is probably via unified (diff -u) diffs of this
> file:
>
> http://de
95 matches
Mail list logo
