Re: [Talk-us] [Imports] Uploads to City of Salisbury, MD

2012-03-23 Thread Marc Zoss
Nick, Josh In the meanwhile I have applied the changeset removing the duplicates and it seems to have finished just fine. I briefly downloaded the date again and the data now looks ok. Validator is not reporting any duplicates anymore. I also fixed the building=yes tags in the inner way of the

Re: [Talk-us] [Imports] Uploads to City of Salisbury, MD

2012-03-23 Thread Nick Chamberlain
Subject: Re: [Imports] [Talk-us] Uploads to City of Salisbury, MD Nick, Josh In the meanwhile I have applied the changeset removing the duplicates and it seems to have finished just fine. I briefly downloaded the date again and the data now looks ok. Validator is not reporting any duplicates

Re: [Talk-us] [Imports] Uploads to City of Salisbury, MD

2012-03-23 Thread Phil! Gold
* Nick Chamberlain nchamberl...@ci.salisbury.md.us [2012-03-23 11:32 -0400]: I will proceed with checking the data and add a place-node for the City. Thanks! There used to be a place node there. If I get a chance, I'll see if I can figure out when it was deleted. I think I had Salisbury

Re: [Talk-us] [Imports] Uploads to City of Salisbury, MD

2012-03-22 Thread Josh Doe
Importing data correctly is hard, especially the first time. I'm glad you've come to the list. I'd be curious to know if you didn't notice the warnings on the wiki to contact the community first; I've gone ahead and added the warning banner to the ogr2osm, shp2osm, shp-to-osm, and shape2osm pages

Re: [Talk-us] [Imports] Uploads to City of Salisbury, MD

2012-03-22 Thread Josh Doe
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 6:40 AM, Josh Doe j...@joshdoe.com wrote: On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 10:50 PM, Paul Norman penor...@mac.com wrote: If there are duplicated ways and nodes, perhaps reverting is the best option? Unfortunately I'd agree that reverting these changesets will be the easiest

Re: [Talk-us] [Imports] Uploads to City of Salisbury, MD

2012-03-22 Thread Marc Zoss
I briefly downloaded all sby:bldgtype-tagged ways and relation of Maryland through the overpass-api. Then removed the ones having only a sby:bldgtype tag, run the validator and deleted the duplicated nodes and ways. This would result in a changeset to remove the roughly 71'000 duplicates nodes

Re: [Talk-us] [Imports] Uploads to City of Salisbury, MD

2012-03-22 Thread Josh Doe
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 8:04 AM, Marc Zoss marcz...@gmail.com wrote: I briefly downloaded all sby:bldgtype-tagged ways and relation of Maryland through the overpass-api. Then removed the ones having only a sby:bldgtype tag, run the validator and deleted the duplicated nodes and ways. This

Re: [Talk-us] [Imports] Uploads to City of Salisbury, MD

2012-03-22 Thread Nick Chamberlain
Message- From: joshthephysic...@gmail.com [mailto:joshthephysic...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Josh Doe Sent: Thursday, March 22, 2012 8:51 AM To: Marc Zoss Cc: impo...@openstreetmap.org; talk-us@openstreetmap.org; Nick Chamberlain Subject: Re: [Imports] [Talk-us] Uploads to City of Salisbury, MD

Re: [Talk-us] [Imports] Uploads to City of Salisbury, MD

2012-03-22 Thread Marc Zoss
: Thursday, March 22, 2012 8:51 AM To: Marc Zoss Cc: impo...@openstreetmap.org; talk-us@openstreetmap.org; Nick Chamberlain Subject: Re: [Imports] [Talk-us] Uploads to City of Salisbury, MD On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 8:04 AM, Marc Zoss marcz...@gmail.com wrote: I briefly downloaded all sby:bldgtype

Re: [Talk-us] [Imports] Uploads to City of Salisbury, MD

2012-03-22 Thread Mike N
On 3/22/2012 9:12 AM, Nick Chamberlain wrote: I was getting a proxy error and the uploads were timing out when I attempted to upload the entire batch. This is a common problem with uploading large changesets with JOSM, where upload failures result in a partial upload. We're hesitant to put

Re: [Talk-us] [Imports] Uploads to City of Salisbury, MD

2012-03-22 Thread Nick Chamberlain
: Thursday, March 22, 2012 9:28 AM To: Nick Chamberlain; Josh Doe Cc: impo...@openstreetmap.org; talk-us@openstreetmap.org Subject: Re: [Imports] [Talk-us] Uploads to City of Salisbury, MD Nick and Josh thanks for the clarification on your upload strategy. With previous large uploads I have experience

Re: [Talk-us] [Imports] Uploads to City of Salisbury, MD

2012-03-22 Thread Josh Doe
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 10:52 AM, Nick Chamberlain nchamberl...@ci.salisbury.md.us wrote: Mark, if you could commit the remove duplicates changeset, that'd be great.  I will do my best to check if the issues are resolved, and will gladly accept any guidance on the best ways to do so.  Thanks.

Re: [Talk-us] [Imports] Uploads to City of Salisbury, MD

2012-03-22 Thread Josh Doe
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 8:49 PM, Josh Doe j...@joshdoe.com wrote: On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 10:52 AM, Nick Chamberlain nchamberl...@ci.salisbury.md.us wrote: Mark, if you could commit the remove duplicates changeset, that'd be great.  I will do my best to check if the issues are resolved, and

Re: [Talk-us] [Imports] Uploads to City of Salisbury, MD

2012-03-21 Thread Marc Zoss
Dear Nick I would strongly advise to review and revise you conversion scripts. The move to select and delete these duplicated ways with JOSM seems a bit risky. However for the already uploaded data you possibly don't have much choices. Give it a go by using the following in JOSM's find

Re: [Talk-us] [Imports] Uploads to City of Salisbury, MD

2012-03-21 Thread Paul Norman
If there are duplicated ways and nodes, perhaps reverting is the best option? From: Marc Zoss [mailto:marcz...@gmail.com] Subject: Re: [Talk-us] [Imports] Uploads to City of Salisbury, MD Dear Nick I would strongly advise to review and revise you conversion scripts. The move to select