On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 11:43 AM, Martijn van Exel m...@rtijn.org wrote:
Weighing in late here (sorry!), Scout US is currently not using OSM
addresses for search and geocoding.
Might want to turn that on so OSM overrides whatever database it's
currently checking. I haven't intensively used
On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 9:35 AM, Peter Dobratz pe...@dobratz.us wrote:
I agree with the sentiment in this wiki page that I quoted here. I think
that if there is only 1 POI that occupies the building, then that is best
indicated by putting the tags for the POI on the building polygon. If you
How about this: particularly in the case of two businesses within one
building polygon,
create non-building area's for the business tags. Then you get the sense
of scale of the business,
and preserve the free tagging of the building polygon.
___
On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 10:29 AM, Clifford Snow cliff...@snowandsnow.us
wrote:
On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 9:35 AM, Peter Dobratz pe...@dobratz.us wrote:
I agree with the sentiment in this wiki page that I quoted here. I think
that if there is only 1 POI that occupies the building, then that is
On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 6:04 PM, Bryce Nesbitt bry...@obviously.com wrote:
This seems to be tagging for the renderer which is not a good idea. If
the only thing occupying the building is a single POI, then put the POI
tags on the closed Way for the building outline. By adding a new object
Weighing in late here (sorry!), Scout US is currently not using OSM
addresses for search and geocoding.
Martijn
On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 2:19 AM, Hans De Kryger hans.dekryge...@gmail.com
wrote:
Does anyone know if osm navigation apps can route you to your location
using area's tagged with a
This seems to be tagging for the renderer which is not a good idea. If
the only thing occupying the building is a single POI, then put the POI
tags on the closed Way for the building outline. By adding a new object
(Node) for the POI, you are also going against the One feature, one OSM
On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 1:02 PM, Peter Dobratz pe...@dobratz.us wrote:
On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 7:58 PM, Greg Morgan dr.kludge...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 4:23 AM, Mike N nice...@att.net wrote:
...
The addr:housenumber doesn't render anyway if the
building has also been
On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 7:58 PM, Greg Morgan dr.kludge...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 4:23 AM, Mike N nice...@att.net wrote:
...
The addr:housenumber doesn't render anyway if the
building has also been tagged as another POI that renders.
I've solved this problem by putting
On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 4:23 AM, Mike N nice...@att.net wrote:
On 2/4/2015 11:25 PM, Greg Morgan wrote:
addr:housenumber contains both the number
and the building letter in the same field. The map is useful because
you can find the building. How have other people tried to handle these
On February 4, 2015 10:25:02 PM CST, Greg Morgan dr.kludge...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 1:33 PM, Darrell Fuhriman darr...@garnix.org
wrote:
It seems to be addr:unit, though it’s not widely used. It’s what
I’ve been
using, though.
I punted. When Josm added a preset that included addr:flats, then I
started using that tag. Right or wrong I figured most of the other
tags are Euro-English coloured, so to speak, that it did not mater if
I used addr:flats verses addr:unit.
__
On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 5:23 AM, Mike N nice...@att.net wrote:
On 2/4/2015 11:25 PM, Greg Morgan wrote:
addr:housenumber contains both the number
and the building letter in the same field. The map is useful because
you can find the building. How have other people tried to handle these
On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 7:53 AM, Brad Neuhauser brad.neuhau...@gmail.com
wrote:
Including a unit number in the house number is incorrect and potentially
confusing. There are house numbers that have a prefix or suffix as part of
the house number, that's a different thing. It just depends on how
On 2/4/2015 11:25 PM, Greg Morgan wrote:
addr:housenumber contains both the number
and the building letter in the same field. The map is useful because
you can find the building. How have other people tried to handle these
situations?
I haven't tried in any meaningful way. It's too early
On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 1:33 PM, Darrell Fuhriman darr...@garnix.org wrote:
It seems to be addr:unit, though it’s not widely used. It’s what I’ve been
using, though.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:addr:unit
d.
On Feb 3, 2015, at 12:28, Paul Johnson ba...@ursamundi.org wrote:
What's
On February 3, 2015 2:39:42 PM CST, Clifford Snow cliff...@snowandsnow.us
wrote:
On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 12:37 PM, Paul Johnson ba...@ursamundi.org
wrote:
Wonder if we could get this added to the address presets, as this
(at
least for the US) is a pretty big deal between office towers,
What's the correct tag for unit number, anyway? This is driving me insane
since it's making it impossible to complete mapping the caravan site I live
in to a level of completeness that you can navigate by without trying to
find the unit numbers (which, stupidly, are all on the utility pedestals
On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 12:37 PM, Paul Johnson ba...@ursamundi.org wrote:
Wonder if we could get this added to the address presets, as this (at
least for the US) is a pretty big deal between office towers, apartment
buildings, trailer parks, and almost every other situation where you have
It seems to be addr:unit, though it’s not widely used. It’s what I’ve been
using, though.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:addr:unit
d.
On Feb 3, 2015, at 12:28, Paul Johnson ba...@ursamundi.org wrote:
What's the correct tag for unit number, anyway? This is driving me insane
since
Wonder if we could get this added to the address presets, as this (at least
for the US) is a pretty big deal between office towers, apartment
buildings, trailer parks, and almost every other situation where you have
multiple tenants on the same cadastre lot...
On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 2:33 PM,
I use the same tag (addr:unit) been using it mostly for retail areas with
suite numbers. Haven't used it anywhere else yet.
On Feb 3, 2015 1:40 PM, Clifford Snow cliff...@snowandsnow.us wrote:
On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 12:37 PM, Paul Johnson ba...@ursamundi.org wrote:
Wonder if we could get this
That would depend on the navigation app in question, wouldn't it? If
we mappers include more data, well structured, complete and up to
date, app developers will be more inclined / motivated to make their
apps work with it, I would think.
I think, based on your email, that you and I are mapping
Mkgmap will search for an entrance=main, then an entrance=yes, and lastly
use the building's centroid.
On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 4:21 AM Hans De Kryger hans.dekryge...@gmail.com
wrote:
Does anyone know if osm navigation apps can route you to your location
using area's tagged with a full address? I
I don't think the issue would be routing so much as finding the location. I
just checked OsmAnd to see if it could find a near by apartment complex where
the grounds are tagged with, among other tags addr:housenumber=*,
addr:street=*, landuse=residential and name=*. The buildings on it are
25 matches
Mail list logo