020, 17:56 użytkownik Brian M. Sperlongano <
> zelonew...@gmail.com> napisał:
>
>> I downloaded and made a test edit (adding an address to a local POI) with
>> maps.me just now to understand how it works. It does at least make you
>> log in to OSM. I entered in a com
I downloaded and made a test edit (adding an address to a local POI) with
maps.me just now to understand how it works. It does at least make you log
in to OSM. I entered in a comment on the change, however, I note that
maps.me overwrote my user-entered comment with a generic comment in the
Hello,
I've been working to improve various pages on the Wiki. I've encountered
inconsistencies in how the "area" and "relation" icons are used in the wiki
documentation of boundary relations. It's not clear which of the two icons
should be used when describing tags that may be applied to
This is not OSM's problem to solve.
Ancient web browser slowly becomes unusable = expected behavior.
On Fri, Oct 6, 2023, 7:26 AM Martin Trautmann wrote:
> On 23-10-06 12:55, Tom Hughes via talk wrote:
> > No it was released in June 2020. October 2021 was the last
> > security patches.
> >
> >
On Tue, Oct 25, 2022 at 1:45 PM Colin Smale wrote:
> Are underground pipelines and electricity transmission cables just as
> controversial? They are covered over, built on, and completely unobservable
> from the surface. They may also have been taken out of service many decades
> ago.
>
In the
On Tue, Oct 25, 2022 at 4:37 AM Frederik Ramm wrote:
> in the spirit of friendly collaboration I would say that a limited amount
> of
> stuff-that-should-not-be-in-OSM can be *tolerated*. If someone does a
> lot of good work for OSM otherwise and would really like to record an
> ancient former
On Sun, Oct 30, 2022 at 9:00 PM Minh Nguyen
wrote:
> Vào lúc 07:11 2022-10-30, Greg Troxel đã viết:
> > But then the company doing the editing should document which company's
> > imagery and which revision year they are using. Things should be as
> > transparent as possible, and this doesn't
Navigational landmarks while hiking.
On Wed, Jan 18, 2023, 10:17 PM john whelan wrote:
> Perhaps you could expand on the benefits of mapping them?
>
> Thanks John
>
> On Wed, Jan 18, 2023, 10:09 PM stevea, wrote:
>
>> I'd like to say "oh, please..." because this seems a bit harsh. But I
>>
On Sun, Apr 30, 2023 at 1:06 PM Courtney
wrote:
> This conversation has opened up important new questions. Why is the main
> "Talk" channel the only one that is producing pushback? Why is it the only
> one that is producing such a negative tone?
>
> I don't understand the degree of ire and
I agree with the proposed edits.
On Sat, Feb 11, 2023 at 12:58 PM Mateusz Konieczny via talk <
talk@openstreetmap.org> wrote:
> Errata: paragraph 4 from the bottom should be
>
> "There is no point in manual drudgery here, with values clearly
> replaceable by better matches."
>
> sorry, I copied
Looks like most of these have been cleaned up but there's a couple left:
https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1qU8
On Thu, Feb 2, 2023 at 11:13 AM Dave F via talk
wrote:
> Hi
>
> You may wish to take a look at these changesets by a single contributor to
> decide if you think these are dubious
I would caution against hyper-simplifying the combativeness of the mailing
lists as "cultural differences". I can think of several German participants
on Slack and Discord that dispel this stereotype. Similarly, I can think
of several American commenters who are notoriously abrasive on the
On Wed, May 3, 2023 at 3:38 PM Mike Thompson wrote:
> On Wed, May 3, 2023, 1:00 PM Brian M. Sperlongano
> wrote:
>
>> I would caution against hyper-simplifying the combativeness of
>> the mailing lists
>>
> I am not sure using a term such as "combative"
On Mon, Sep 5, 2022 at 12:00 PM Tobias Knerr wrote:
> On 03.09.22 at 12:52, Simon Poole wrote:
> > Anyway IMHO this would seem to make more sense as a maproulette
> > challenge or osmose warning than a bulk edit given the number is quite
> > manageable and at least some of the objects can
Since there seems to be community consensus for the removal, I have
notified the main proponent at:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/130249355
And also opened a matching thread on the community forum.
On Tue, Jun 27, 2023 at 6:07 AM Andy Townsend wrote:
> On 25/06/2023 00:02, Bria
All,
I fixed this boundary relation and also one neighboring town (Wheeling, IL)
using the Cook County, Illinois GIS as the data source, and re-used all of
the original boundary relations. Unfortunately it appears that all of Cook
County needs to be updated to reflect the county GIS data (found
I see.
Considering that, I've reverted my changes.
On Tue, Aug 18, 2020 at 9:41 PM 80hnhtv4agou--- via Talk-us <
talk-us@openstreetmap.org> wrote:
> i was told i could not use do to licence GIS to.
>
>
>
> Tuesday, August 18, 2020 8:38 PM -05:00 from Brian M. Sp
pted to contact the original mappers?
>
> We have a few mappers in Canada who have been mapping for more than ten
> years.
>
> John
>
> On Sun, Nov 15, 2020, 23:28 Brian M. Sperlongano
> wrote:
>
>> Hello neighbors to the north,
>>
>> I have b
It seems that OSM has a an architectural problem with over-large relations?
>
+1
The Tongass National Forest [1] was recently mapped with great detail. It
comprises most of the Alaska panhandle and all of its islands and inlets.
The relation has 28,000 members and contains over 2 million nodes.
Given this, can you comment specifically on an example? OSM way and photo
below:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/199230893
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?focus=photo=WgHheFQe7tkY-5yEbWchbA=57.6457275332997=11.96102332764884=17
Should that way get tagged with any of the following:
1) foot =
20 matches
Mail list logo
