Vào lúc 05:42 2023-06-27, Yves via talk đã viết:
That would be again discussing with the proponent, as Brian started.
Taginfo chronology already show one mass edit and revert, best to make
sure there's not another waste of energy beforehand.
The mass edit and revert were performed by the same
That would be again discussing with the proponent, as Brian started.
Taginfo chronology already show one mass edit and revert, best to make sure
there's not another waste of energy beforehand.
Yves
Le 27 juin 2023 12:46:50 GMT+02:00, Marc_marc a écrit :
>Le 27.06.23 à 12:27, Yves via talk a
Since there seems to be community consensus for the removal, I have
notified the main proponent at:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/130249355
And also opened a matching thread on the community forum.
On Tue, Jun 27, 2023 at 6:07 AM Andy Townsend wrote:
> On 25/06/2023 00:02, Brian M.
Le 27.06.23 à 12:27, Yves via talk a écrit :
Le 25 juin 2023 01:02:04 GMT+02:00, "Brian M. Sperlongano"
a écrit :
And indeed, nine months later, we see that not only has the work not gotten
done, but while we all squabbled away with our pet views about automated
editing, we find that we
Le 25 juin 2023 01:02:04 GMT+02:00, "Brian M. Sperlongano"
a écrit :
>
>And indeed, nine months later, we see that not only has the work not gotten
>done, but while we all squabbled away with our pet views about automated
>editing, we find that we agreed to nothing, and the mapper has quietly
On 25/06/2023 00:02, Brian M. Sperlongano wrote:
And indeed, nine months later, we see that not only has the work not
gotten done, but while we all squabbled away with our pet views about
automated editing, we find that we agreed to nothing, and the mapper
has quietly continued to add this
Jun 25, 2023, 03:08 by marc_m...@mailo.com:
> Le 25.06.23 à 01:02, Brian M. Sperlongano a écrit :
>
>> nine months later, we see that not only has the work not gotten done, but
>> while we all squabbled away with our pet views about automated editing, we
>> find that we agreed to nothing,
On 5/9/22 17:10, Minh Nguyen wrote:
Vào lúc 09:57 2022-09-03, Tomas Straupis đã viết:
2022-09-03, št, 19:17 Mateusz Konieczny via talk rašė:
as sole user of service=driveway2 declared that they are using it
for all
highway=service where no other service=* value fits, it can be cleanly
Le 25.06.23 à 01:02, Brian M. Sperlongano a écrit :
nine months later, we see that not only has the work not
gotten done, but while we all squabbled away with our pet views about
automated editing, we find that we agreed to nothing, and the mapper has
quietly continued to add this nonsense tag
On Mon, Sep 5, 2022 at 12:00 PM Tobias Knerr wrote:
> On 03.09.22 at 12:52, Simon Poole wrote:
> > Anyway IMHO this would seem to make more sense as a maproulette
> > challenge or osmose warning than a bulk edit given the number is quite
> > manageable and at least some of the objects can
10 matches
Mail list logo
