Re: [3.0.2.5] Bugs with creation of encrypted mail from original base

Hello testers; ZW> Hello all! ZW> I was asked to decide either creation of new account or use backup ZW> copy of previous data. Of course, I select retrieving from backup, ZW> and then AV appeared: Same here, but with an additional error when selecting the .tbk backup file (not an AV) ZW> ,

Re: The Bat! 3.0.2.5 Rush is now available

On Fri, 5 Nov 2004 21:26:45 -0500, Allie Martin wrote: > The spelling is definitely wrong. :) > > I'm not sure what they really wish to put there since, even with correct > settings, it doesn't make much sense to me. > > It could be meant to be 'Other Settings' or 'Miscellaneous' where the > set

Re: The Bat! 3.0.2.5 Rush is now available

On Friday, November 05, 2004 at 7:31:09 PM [GMT -0500], Julien Ranc wrote: > I have a strange new entry into "Options / Preferences" called "Anothe > Setings" What is this for ?? Are you sure of the spelling of these > options The spelling is definitely wrong. :) I'm not sure what they really

3.0.2.5: Account filters "corrupted" by Common filters

Hello all, I'll try to be as brief as possible by skipping some details and/or minor steps. I must start by saying that until yesterday (Friday) I had never before "played" with Common filters. Last night (a few hours ago) I upgraded to v3.0.2.5 and the first time I launched it I noticed that mo

[3.0.2.5] Bugs with creation of encrypted mail from original base

Hello all! I tested encryption new feature in TB! 3.0.2.5 Pro version and have bad impressions from this experience. Starting from 3.0.2.4 as original, I created backup of all settings, accounts, address books etc. Then, according to Maxim's advice, I remove The Bat! completely from my computer.

Re: Common sub-filters behave as filters

Hello MAU, > I have added BT report: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=4021 Tested again with v3.0.2.5 and I can fully confirm the behaviour. -- Best regards, Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain) Using The Bat! v3.0.2.5 on Windows 2000 5.0 Service Pack 4

Re: The Bat! 3.0.2.5 Rush is now available

Hello Dierk, Friday, November 5, 2004, 11:46:33 PM, you wrote: DH> I'd really like to see an option later on to enable message base DH> encryption without having to do a clean install. I agree -- Best Wishes, Mark using The Bat! Version 3.0.2.4 Rush MyMacros 1.11

Re: The Bat! 3.0.2.5 Rush is now available

Hello testers, 9> Hello All, 9> The Bat! 3.0.2.5 Rush is now available from 9> http://www.ritlabs.com/en/tbbeta/ I have a strange new entry into "Options / Preferences" called "Anothe Setings" What is this for ?? Are you sure of the spelling of these options ;-) -- /

Re: The Bat! 3.0.2.5 Rush is now available

Hi 9Val, On Saturday, November 6, 2004 00:24 your local time, which was Friday, November 5, 2004 at 22:24 my local time, 9Val 9Val [9] wrote; 9> [*] IMAP: Fine-tune option 'Use precise counters' 9> First tune option is suitable for IMAP users which have permanent and 9> fast enough connection to

The Bat! 3.0.2.5 Rush is now available

Hello All, The Bat! 3.0.2.5 Rush is now available from http://www.ritlabs.com/en/tbbeta/ Here is a short list of changes: [*] Message base and configuration data encryption can be now activated for Professional Edition (see comments below) [*] Scheduler: Automatic view for currently

Re: The Bat! 3.0.2.5 Rush is now available

Hello 9Val! On Friday, November 5, 2004 at 11:24:20 PM you wrote: > [*] Message base and configuration data encryption can be now > activated for Professional Edition (see comments below) From what I've seen in Maxim's note (cited by you) I'd say this is a little bit useless at the m

The Bat! 3.0.2.5 Rush is now available

Hello All, Sorry, if it will be duplicate The Bat! 3.0.2.5 Rush is now available from http://www.ritlabs.com/en/tbbeta/ Here is a short list of changes: [*] Message base and configuration data encryption can be now activated for Professional Edition (see comments below) [*] Schedule

Re: IMAP: Optimum configuration

Hello Martin, IMAP Server: uw-imap Server OS: don't know, perhaps RedHat 6.?? Network: LAN(office)/DialUp 21.6kbits(home) TB! version: latest Automatically connect to server: At startup [ /X] (office/home) When account is selected [ ] For managing folders [ ] With any co

testing 1 2 3

Hello TBBETA, Just testing a new account. -- Best regards,Tony. _ The Bat! v3.0.2.4 Rush 05/11/2004 at 17:24 UTC 2ØØ4 - AWB Current beta is 3.0.2.4

Re: Imagequality

Hei, Lars Sölter wrote: > But having a state of the art preview option inside the attachment > tabs of The Bat! would be fine too. Yeah, that would be fine. I think there should be standard routines available which do not just a "resize", but a "resample" (speaking in the words of IrfanView, imh

Re: To, CC, BCC Fields

Hello Graham, >> This is a long standing issue but, on the other hand, there is an >> alternative that many people forget about. > > No we don't - but this mechanism is also flawed in that:- > - You cannot paste addresses separated with newlines > - you cannot move /copy LDAP searched for entries

Re: To, CC, BCC Fields

Hello MAU > This is a long standing issue but, on the other hand, there is an > alternative that many people forget about. No we don't - but this mechanism is also flawed in that:- - You cannot paste addresses separated with newlines - you cannot move /copy LDAP searched for entries into you per

Re: To, CC, BCC Fields

Hello Graham, >> I find the same behavior in the To and BCC fields as well. > >> Can anyone confirm? > Yes I can - it is "standard" behaviour - and it is irritating. I'd > like to see the whole addressing / address editing issue re-engineered > as a coordinated beta program This is a long standi

Re: IMAP: Optimum configuration

Allie, On 05-11-2004 14:02, you [AM] wrote in : >> - this must mean that the folders are not actually sync'ed until >> they're selected. AM> This is true if you have the folders set not to sync or the periodic AM> checking is disabled. Or, that I am faster moving to anothe

Re: IMAP: Optimum configuration

On Friday, November 05, 2004 at 7:39:52 AM [GMT -0500], Peter Fjelsten wrote: > If I move a message from Folder 1 to Folder 2 it now looks like this: > Folder 1 10 <9> > Folder 2 10 <11> The move is carried out server side with the local cache being oblivious of what happened. The same happens

Re: IMAP: Optimum configuration

Allie, On 05-11-2004 13:21, you [AM] wrote in : AM> You now go to another location, start TB! there and the local cache AM> for the folder still contains those messages you deleted. As a AM> result, the local cache contains more messages than are actually on AM> the server.

Re: IMAP: Optimum configuration

On Friday, November 05, 2004 at 7:15:49 AM [GMT -0500], Peter Fjelsten wrote: AM>> Actually, it's the other way around. is the number of messages on AM>> the server and which hasn't yet been fully sync'd with what's local. > I believe you - I just find it strange that there would be less e-mail

Re: IMAP: Optimum configuration

Allie, On 05-11-2004 13:04, you [AM] wrote in : AM> The more information you retrieve about a message, the more AM> bandwidth is being used. So for slow connections, you should AM> minimize what you retrieve in order to see what's on the server for AM> reading. That makes s

Re: IMAP: Optimum configuration

On Friday, November 05, 2004 at 2:02:17 AM [GMT -0500], Peter Fjelsten wrote: > [x] Check mailbox at start-up -> I don't think these > [x] Periodical checking each [5] minutes -> actually do anything? The folder refreshing every x minutes simply does a server count refresh. Check m

Re: IMAP: Optimum configuration

On Friday, November 05, 2004 at 3:47:52 AM [GMT -0500], Peter Fjelsten wrote: >>> 9Val explained this to me yesterday: "It retrieves information about >>> all message parts (if it is multipart), and therefore knows about >>> has message attachments or not" KR>> Why would one not want this? > Idu

Re: To, CC, BCC Fields

Hello Avi > I find the same behavior in the To and BCC fields as well. > Can anyone confirm? Yes I can - it is "standard" behaviour - and it is irritating. I'd like to see the whole addressing / address editing issue re-engineered as a coordinated beta program -- regards, Graham Usin

To, CC, BCC Fields

This strange behavior might have existed for a while, but I only noticed it today (in 3.0.2.4). I pasted a long series of comma-separated email addresses into the CC field. The strange thing is that whenever I click my mouse into that field with the purpose of editing the addresses, TB always goes

Re: IMAP: Optimum configuration

Keith, On 05-11-2004 09:29, you [KR] wrote in : KR>>> 2.[X] Retrieve message structures together with message KR>>> headers >> 9Val explained this to me yesterday: "It retrieves information about all >> message parts (if it is multipart), and therefore knows about has >

Re[2]: IMAP: Optimum configuration

Hello all, Friday, November 5, 2004, Bernd Distler wrote: > [ ] When browsing messages, retrieve only message text > [ ] except messages smaller than [ ] K Bytes --->> Where can i find this option? > [X] Use precise counters (needs fast connection) --->> Where can i find this option? this is

Re: IMAP: Optimum configuration

Hello, Peter. On Friday, November 5, 2004, 1:02:03 AM, you wrote: KR>> Like Michael and Bernd, I wasn't able to find these, either. I KR>> had a little trouble tracking down some of the others, as well, KR>> since some are out of sequence. > These are only available in the daily build from yeste

Re: IMAP: Optimum configuration

Keith, On 05-11-2004 08:53, you [KR] wrote in : KR> Michael Acklin wrote: >> These I->[ ] When browsing messages, retrieve only message KR> text >> Could ->[ ] except messages smaller than [ ] K Bytes >> Not Find ->[ ] Use precise counters (needs fast co