Hello everyone,
the search function in v3.5 is achingly slow compared to v3.0.2.10. I just
made a test, I searched my tbbeta folder with currently about 5500 mails
for the word utility. It took 3.0.2.10 about 5 seconds to search the
folder. Same test with v3.5 (search any part) took well over 1
Hello Martin Schoch everyone else,
on 21-Mai-2005 at 08:21 you (Martin Schoch) wrote:
I really don't like if there is a two-class system with testers -
some getting recent versions, others not so recent one...
Whats the problem with that? The official version is 3.5 at the moment,
there *is*
Hello Martin Schoch everyone else,
on 21-Mai-2005 at 10:26 you (Martin Schoch) wrote:
But as far as I see at least two users (are they called
super-beta-testers) have this version.
Yes, they are superior beings, above human.
You have read my previous message. But did you understand it?
If
Thomas,
On 21-05-2005 04:32, you [TF] wrote in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
PF Common lore dictates that deleting all TB!-related registry keys
TF That's my question: Which keys are there, except for the one I mention
TF above?
Personally I would search for all keys or data containing ritlabs and
bat
Alexander,
On 21-05-2005 08:29, you [ASK] wrote in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
ASK Confirmations similar comparisons?
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
greeting Best regards /greeting
author Peter Fjelsten /author
thebat version 3.5.0.11 Pro /thebat versionextras MyGate, AVG /extras
env. ~11 POP3, 2
Hi Alexander,
On Saturday, May 21, 2005 at 08:29:54 GMT +0200, 10:29 my local time,
you wrote about Search performance of v3.5:
made a test, I searched my tbbeta folder with currently about 5500 mails
for the word utility. It took 3.0.2.10 about 5 seconds to search the
folder. Same test
Hello Alexander,
Saturday, May 21, 2005, 8:29:54 AM, you wrote:
ASK the search function in v3.5 is achingly slow compared to v3.0.2.10.
Confirmed. Even searching text only takes much longer than before.
I didn't mind Copernic Desktop can't index The Bat! messages because TB's
search is fast
Hi Alexander,
In the message mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] which was
apparently written on Saturday, May 21, 2005, 7:29:54 AM. I believe you wrote:
ASK Confirmations similar comparisons?
I complained about the search speed a while back.. Its exceedingly
slow.
--
Best regards,
Liz
On Saturday, May 21, 2005, 08:29, Alexander S. Kunz wrote:
the search function in v3.5 is achingly slow compared to v3.0.2.10.
Confirmations similar comparisons?
Confirmed and acknowledged by 9Val off list, as I wrote in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
,- [ 9Val ]
| Actually current search uses
I tried to delete it there - but got the error message, that the
folder doesn't exist on the server (of course because I deleted it).
So I couldn't delete the folder in the list
Works here OK, Martin.
--
Regards,
Clive Taylor
Hello Peter Fjelsten everyone else,
on 21-Mai-2005 at 10:36 you (Peter Fjelsten) wrote:
ASK Confirmations similar comparisons?
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
It does not stall for me. Its just s...l...o...w...
--
Best regards,
Alexander (http://www.neurowerx.de - ICQ 238153981)
Deliplayer2 is
Hello Mark Partous everyone else,
on 21-Mai-2005 at 10:55 you (Mark Partous) wrote:
ASK the search function in v3.5 is achingly slow compared to v3.0.2.10.
I didn't mind Copernic Desktop can't index The Bat! messages because TB's
search is fast enough.
Google Desktop can index TB messages
Hello Martin Schoch everyone else,
on 21-Mai-2005 at 10:53 you (Martin Schoch) wrote:
If you get a message from a dev please test if the bug you had is fixed
with the daily build [URL], would you return to the old version after you
tested it?
So why don't you do it?
Ehhh? Did you
Hello Martin,
Martin Schoch wrote (in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Delete icons disappears:
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Confirmed.
Restore problems:
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Did you use internal backup? So I'm not able to test whether it's
reproducible here (I for mine don't trust the internal backup,
Hello Peter,
Much easier. Open Explorer, so to address bar and enter '%TEMP%' as
location (without single quotes). You'll be taken into your temp dir
immediately.
One of the first things I do after installing Windows is to create a
Temp directory (in a separate partition or drive to SYTEM one
Hello Peter,
User Interface:
===
'Watch folders' not displayed in message list context menu
Special/Watch Replies In.
See mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat! v3.5 on Windows 2000 5.0 Service Pack 4
Hello Mark,
M You know what I've done. I have replied in English. I don't think I can
M trust any of you
M
You forgot to quote my ;-). When I wrote that I knew you were joking
and I was too.
Now I'm sorry I wrote that message. :-(
As I said, I knew and understood you were joking and so was
Did you terminated ThaBat and started it again - the deleted folder
appears again in the list.
Yes, I've just restarted TB and the folder wasn't there. I also
checked the server and it was deleted. So it looks as if TB is working
as planned here. Sorry.
--
Regards,
Clive Taylor
TheBat!:3.5
Hello Liz,
M I don't know if I should trust whatever you say in here ;-)
http://babelfish.altavista.com/tr
:) is always worth it
As I have said in another message, I knew Mark was joking and so was I.
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat! v3.5 on Windows
Hello Martin,
If I click on the left side in the list on a account name - not
used icons in the standard tool are grayed out - that's ok.
Funny: The icon Delete disappears...
I think I had not seen this before, but I can confirm this _today_.
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial
Hello Ian A. White everyone else,
on 21-Mai-2005 at 12:53 you (Ian A. White) wrote:
I asked about the version because there was a promised version on the
Monday (that is last Monday) after 3.5 was released.
Yes I know. That announcement was made by Stefan Tanurkov on TBUDL, and he
made
On Saturday, May 21, 2005, 12:18, Alexander S. Kunz wrote:
Google Desktop can index TB messages with a plugin
Really? Where do I find such a plugin?
--
Regards,
Marcus Ohlström
Using The Bat! v3.5 on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 4
PGP Public Key at
Hello Marcus Ohlström everyone else,
on 21-Mai-2005 at 13:15 you (Marcus Ohlström) wrote:
Google Desktop can index TB messages with a plugin
Really? Where do I find such a plugin?
We've had a conversation on TBUDL about it a couple of days ago. It started
with in msgid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Saturday, May 21, 2005, 13:25, Alexander S. Kunz wrote:
The plugin is not yet available on the GDS plugin page, but you can
download it here:
http://www.vgirlos2.narod.ru/GoogleDesktopSearchTheBatInstaller.exe
Thanks! I'll check it out in a few days when I will have some spare
time.
--
Hello MAU,
Saturday, May 21, 2005, 1:00:31 PM, you wrote:
If I click on the left side in the list on a account name - not
used icons in the standard tool are grayed out - that's ok.
Funny: The icon Delete disappears...
M I think I had not seen this before, but I can confirm this _today_.
Hello MAU,
On Saturday, May 21, 2005 at 12:32:49 PM MAU [M] wrote:
Much easier. Open Explorer, so to address bar and enter '%TEMP%' as
location (without single quotes). You'll be taken into your temp dir
immediately.
M One of the first things I do after installing Windows is to create a
M
Hello Peter Hampf everyone else,
on 21-Mai-2005 at 22:40 you (Peter Hampf) wrote:
Why does TB handle this message as if it were a reply to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]?
Thats the nearest correct reference MID I'd say, so TB picks it and shows
the new message beneath this reference. I thinks that the
Hello Martin,
Martin Schoch wrote (in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Why don't you trust it - it's to buggy?
I trust my backup more, than the internal.
So it's something for the bug list then.
Maybe, but I can't confirm any of them.
No On-The-Fly Pwd installation:
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'm not
Hello Ian!
On Thursday, May 19, 2005, 4:16 PM, you wrote:
MB I wonder whether anyone besides you and me is experiencing these, Ian.
MB They're very strange and random for me.
It could be that users get so used to AV's with The Bat! that when
they come across one and picking OK clears it and
On Sat 21-May-05 1:42am -0500, Alexander S. Kunz wrote:
Fixes and changes are compiled into daily builds
and everyone can get them.
I check for the daily builds here:
http://www.ritlabs.com/download/files3/the_bat/beta/daily.txt
The last one is dated 7.05.2005 - that's batspeak for
May 7th -
On Sat 21-May-05 9:13pm -0500, I wrote:
On Sat 21-May-05 1:42am -0500, Alexander S. Kunz wrote:
Fixes and changes are compiled into daily builds
and everyone can get them.
I check for the daily builds here:
http://www.ritlabs.com/download/files3/the_bat/beta/daily.txt
The last one is
Hi Gary,
On Friday, May 20, 2005, you wrote:
Hi Jonathan,
On Fri, 20 May 2005 09:39:44 -0500 UTC (5/20/2005, 9:39 AM -0500 UTC my
time), Jonathan Angliss wrote:
J Sure, and if all clients/servers worked in RFC compliance, we would
J never have any of these issues.
yes, just look at how
32 matches
Mail list logo
