Het was op vrijdag 2 september 2005 om 5:18 uur dat jij iets schreef over
'reply with quoted text' :
Hoi Dwight,
DAC> have suddenly discovered that highlighted text is not being quoted,
DAC> either when select from menu or when simply use F4
not confirmed: did this using mouse-select and r
Installed the new MSI (officially released by RL). Restored just one
account - with the least number of messages - from backup. Searching
the same directory with less than 2,000 messages in both Non-OTFE and
OTFE, here is the comparison:
Non-OTFE:
o Search starts after about 1 second
o Searc
On Thursday, September 1, 2005, 10:18:43 PM, Dwight A Corrin wrote:
> have suddenly discovered
look at this. forgot to drag this to alternate smtp server and the
fastmail message got delivered. hopefully this and the other I sent
replying to myself will also make it
--
Dwight A. Corrin
928 S Br
On Thursday, September 1, 2005, 10:18:43 PM, Dwight A Corrin wrote:
> have suddenly discovered that highlighted text is not being quoted,
> either when select from menu or when simply use F4
sorry. noticed after I wrote that message was html, and I do recall
reading something about that already.
Hello MAU,
On Thursday, September 1, 2005, at 16:08:54[GMT [EMAIL PROTECTED] (which was
22:08 where I live) MAU wrote at mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
MAU> Seems just fine to me. See attached PNG.
I'm not so lucky, attached is what looked on mine.
--
Best regards,
Bobi Jam
TB! 3.60.07 on Windows XP 5.
have suddenly discovered that highlighted text is not being quoted,
either when select from menu or when simply use F4
--
Dwight A. Corrin
928 S Broadway
Wichita KS 67211
316.303.1411 fax 316.265.7568
dcorrin at fastmail.fm
Using The Bat! 3.60.07 on Windows XP version 5,1
_
Hello Dwight!
On Thursday, September 01, 2005, 8:45 PM, you wrote:
> does anyone know whether 3.60.07 is what was announced this afternoon
> or whether there are further changes?
Are you on their mailing list, Dwight? Here's a c&p of the change-log
they announced in their newsletter, which I rec
does anyone know whether 3.60.07 is what was announced this afternoon
or whether there are further changes?
--
Dwight A. Corrin
928 S Broadway
Wichita KS 67211
316.303.1411 fax 316.265.7568
dcorrin at fastmail.fm
Using The Bat! 3.60.07 on Windows XP version 5,1
_
Hello Ian,
Thursday, September 1, 2005, 7:57:23 PM, you wrote:
IAW> If you go to a folder and pick the folder, then tabbing takes you to
IAW> the message list, then the message preview, through any links in the
IAW> message preview, to any attachments, somewhere I cannot see, then the
IAW> quick s
Hello Maxim,
Maxim Masiutin wrote (in ):
> currently it is Kaspersky who develop the plugin for The Bat!
Thanks for information!
> However, for normal operation you will either have to use On-The-Fly
> encryption of The Bat! or configure the antivirus to not disable
> residental checking og the
On Thursday, September 1, 2005 @ 3:07:17 PM [-0700], Greg Strong wrote:
> Confirm?
Confirmed.
--
Matt
Current beta is 3.60.07 forerunner | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.
Hello Boris,
Thursday, September 01, 2005, 11:43:53, you wrote:
>>I opend a topic in Kasperskys forum and hope that many users will
>>support me:
>>http://forum.kaspersky.com/index.php?act=ST&f=16&t=4257&st=0#entry22780
Thank you for opening this topic, currently it is Kaspersky who develop the
Hello Hendrik,
Hendrik Oesterlin wrote (in ):
>> Reason: If I want to scan a folder in TheBat! for viruses the following
>> happens: First mail will be exported into a temp file, then KAV scans
>> this file and after this, it will be deleted and the next mail will be
>> exported and so on.
> Was
Good day, Stuart.
SH> WIBNI there were an option in the colour group setting to make the
SH> highlight bar transparent (an therefore just show the bounding box)
SH> when a message with CG options set was selected?
My Vote!!!
--
WBR, Vladimir 'insider' Prohorov
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[email o
Hello Curtis & Michael,
On 01 September 2005, 10:47 you wrote:
>> Messages aren't threaded when receiving messages into local cache
>> Threading only occurs after switching between folders. See attached
>> images. Possibly won't notice this if you keep TB! open all day long.
>> Can anyone confir
Hello Stuart,
> WIBNI there were an option in the colour group setting to make the
> highlight bar transparent (an therefore just show the bounding box)
Support from here, too!
--
Vili
Current beta is 3.60.07 forerunner | 'Using TBBETA
Hello Stuart Hemming,
on Thursday, September 1, 2005 at you wrote:
> Is it just me or do other people find it really awkward when a message
> is highlighted in the message list that the colour information is
> masked by the highlight?
> WIBNI there were an option in the colour group setting to
Hello all,
Thursday, September 1, 2005, Henk M. de Bruijn wrote:
>> when I decrypt OpenPGP message via "Tools | Privacy | Decrypt", there
>> is no problem, message is decrypted. But when I use "Tools | Privacy |
>> Decrypt and Save" new message is created, but not decrypted.
> At my end the progr
On Thu, 1 Sep 2005, at 14:50:40 [GMT +0200] (which was 14:50 where I
live) Marek Mikus wrote:
> Hello,
> when I decrypt OpenPGP message via "Tools | Privacy | Decrypt", there
> is no problem, message is decrypted. But when I use "Tools | Privacy |
> Decrypt and Save" new message is created, but no
Hello Stuart,
Thursday, September 1, 2005, 9:59:04 AM, you wrote:
SH> Is it just me or do other people find it really awkward when a message
SH> is highlighted in the message list that the colour information is
SH> masked by the highlight?
SH> WIBNI there were an option in the colour group settin
Is it just me or do other people find it really awkward when a message
is highlighted in the message list that the colour information is
masked by the highlight?
WIBNI there were an option in the colour group setting to make the
highlight bar transparent (an therefore just show the bounding box)
w
Dear Stuart,
@1-Sep-2005, 09:29 -0500 (01-Sep 15:29 UK time) Stuart Cuddy [SC] in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Marck:
MDP>> I changed nothing. The filter was "OR sender CONTAINS
MDP>> @underscore.org.uk". That means the filter was corrupt when
MDP>> repasted. I wonder if this is a symptom of the
Hello Marck,
Thursday, September 1, 2005, 8:57:24 AM, you wrote:
MDP> I changed nothing. The filter was "OR sender CONTAINS
MDP> @underscore.org.uk". That means the filter was corrupt when repasted.
MDP> I wonder if this is a symptom of the underlying problem?
I see. I just realized that what I a
Hello Marek,
>> One very minor 'annoyance'. I always do a Custom install so I can only
>> install Core. When doing this I noticed that install wizards told me the
>> it would need 13 KB (only 13 KB?) to install Core. I don't recall if
>> this was right, or not, in previous msis.
>
> probably addi
Hello Alexey,
M>> I don't have an example with "nested attachments" at the moment. But I
M>> did yesterday and it showed fine here.
>
> Look in the attachment. It is an excellent example to test "nested
> attachments"
> behavior.
Seems just fine to me. See attached PNG.
--
Best regards,
Migu
Dear Stuart,
@1-Sep-2005, 08:39 -0500 (01-Sep 14:39 UK time) Stuart Cuddy [SC] in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Marck:
MDP>> This was the original filter:
SC> Have you seen Vili's post about continue processing. When I paste
SC> you filters none of them have continue processing set.
(See my rep
Hello Marck,
Thursday, September 1, 2005, 8:22:15 AM, you wrote:
SC>> IMAP or POP?
MDP> POP. There's a surprise!
SC>> Do you have more specific examples?
MDP> This was the original filter:
Have you seen Vili's post about continue processing. When I paste you
filters none of them have continue
Dear Vili,
@1-Sep-2005, 09:17 -0400 (01-Sep 14:17 UK time) Vili [V] in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Marck:
...
>> They work neither automatically on mail receipt nor manually.
>> Can anybody confirm this? A pretty serious bug IMO.
V> I know, you are not a rookie, but is not it possible that yo
Dear Stuart,
@1-Sep-2005, 07:31 -0500 (01-Sep 13:31 UK time) Stuart Cuddy [SC] in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Marck:
MDP>> They work neither automatically on mail receipt nor manually.
MDP>> Can anybody confirm this? A pretty serious bug IMO.
SC> IMAP or POP?
POP. There's a surprise!
SC> Do
Peter,
On 31-08-2005 18:27, you [PH] wrote in
:
PH> he's talking about a different bug.
Yes. I was.
I posted it as it might have some to do with the other bug.
--
Best regards
Peter Fjelsten
3.60.07 Pro
~12 POP3, 4 IMAP (MailMax 5.5) & 1 IMAP (Exchange 6.5), 175K msgs.
Windows XP
Hello Marck,
> Okay - let's bring this one up again. I just added an "OR" condition
> to an old filter and messages that used to be intercepted by that
> filter ended up in my spam bucket (unfiltered).
> Looking deeper, I find that, starting today and since making that
> change to that one filter
Hello Curtis,
Thursday, September 1, 2005, 7:51:43 AM, you wrote:
C> Hmmm. Did you run the filters again?
C> What happens if you manually assign the colour?
The saga continues. They have all gone back to the red color group.
I must be missing something, either that or IMAP has something against
"Boris Anders" wrotes on 01/09/2005 at 18:36:11 +1100
subject "JFYI Kaspersky Antivirus plugin for The Bat!" :
> Maxim Masiutin wrote (in ):
>> "Kaspersky Internet Security 2006" Antivirus will include plugin for
>> The Bat!, please see the attached image.
> Opinion: I'm using KAV 6.0.13.195 (T
Hello, Alexander,
Wednesday, August 31, 2005, you wrote:
>> Right-click on your name which is shown as
>> From:Roelof Otten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (E-mailaholics International)
>> and select "Reply to this address".
>> TB will insert "Roelof Otten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (E-mailaholics
>> Int
Hello, Peter,
Wednesday, August 31, 2005, you wrote:
RO>> Not sure what you mean,
PH> he's talking about a different bug.
No, Roelof was right, I was talking about not substituting %Organisation
macro in the message body with Organization filled in Account properties or
in the folder "Identity"
Hello,
when I decrypt OpenPGP message via "Tools | Privacy | Decrypt", there
is no problem, message is decrypted. But when I use "Tools | Privacy |
Decrypt and Save" new message is created, but not decrypted.
--
Thanks and Bye,
Marek Mikus
Czech support of The Bat!
http://www.thebat.cz
Using t
On Thursday, September 01, 2005, at 07:42 AM, Stuart Cuddy
wrote:
> Hmm, I made this change and when my reply arrived it was colored
> correctly so I thought the problem was solved. So I tried refiltering
> this whole conversation and it goes like this. All message colors are
> changed to the corr
On Thursday, September 01, 2005, at 07:26 AM, Stuart Cuddy
wrote:
> Yes it all depends on how you do things. I always read my messages
> from tbbeta by viewing "Unread Messages Only" so I don't have any
> big jumps from message to message and can usually see when a green
> color group is in the qu
Hello Curtis,
Thursday, September 1, 2005, 4:42:44 AM, you wrote:
C> Initially for an IMAP header update, TB! only sees the part.txt
C> attachment and enables the attachment icon in the list. When you load
C> the message and TB! realizes that it's just digitally signed, it removes
C> the attachmen
Hello Marck,
Thursday, September 1, 2005, 6:39:42 AM, you wrote:
MDP> They work neither automatically on mail receipt nor manually.
MDP> Can anybody confirm this? A pretty serious bug IMO.
IMAP or POP? Do you have more specific examples?
--
Best regards,
Stuartmail
Hello Curtis,
Thursday, September 1, 2005, 4:59:21 AM, you wrote:
C> Though it's a tad less useful than when I used to use the ticker. I
C> landed on this your message and the colouring didn't show since the
C> message is selected. I could have jumped to the next unread somewhere
C> further down t
Hello Stuart,
A reminder of what Stuart Cuddy typed on:
Thursday, September 01, 2005 at 07:26:09 GMT -0500
C>> For first filter:
C>> reply-to header contains 'tbudl@'
C>> and header does not match 'in-reply-to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
SC> I will give this a try, although it is partially my intent
Dear Michael,
@20-Aug-2005, 01:30 +0200 (20-Aug 00:30 UK time) Michael Schneider
[MS] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to George:
>> I've noticed a strange thing. While I tested search, a new message
>> had come. But instead of being filtered it stayed in the Inbox.
>> When I run refilter, the filte
On 8/31/05, Simon Fincham wrote:
> In the main this is working well, no major issues.
Unless the search engine stops hanging on OTFE searches that work fine
with non-OTFE, then I would not consider any release to be "working
well, no major issues". The failure of the search engine to function
in O
On Wednesday, August 31, 2005 at 7:59:12 AM [GMT -0500], Stuart Cuddy
wrote:
> Welcome to the world of color. :)
Hey, hey, hey. :)
Though it's a tad less useful than when I used to use the ticker. I
landed on this your message and the colouring didn't show since the
message is selected. I could
On Wednesday, August 31, 2005 at 2:16:27 PM [GMT -0500], Martin Webster
wrote:
> Messages aren't threaded when receiving messages into local cache
> Threading only occurs after switching between folders. See attached
> images. Possibly won't notice this if you keep TB! open all day long.
> Can an
On Wednesday, August 31, 2005 at 1:40:51 PM [GMT -0500], Stuart Cuddy
wrote:
> Also noticed it does to happen with normal attachments just with the
> part.txt attachments.
Another thing. In the IMAP fine tune options, enable 'retrieve message
structures together with message headers' and see if t
On Wednesday, August 31, 2005 at 1:40:51 PM [GMT -0500], Stuart Cuddy
wrote:
> Also noticed it does to happen with normal attachments just with the
> part.txt attachments.
I've always noticed this to be the case and rather appreciate this. Most
times (for me, it's actually all the times) when the
Hello all,
Thursday, September 1, 2005, MAU wrote:
> Pro installed and working fine here.
> One very minor 'annoyance'. I always do a Custom install so I can only
> install Core. When doing this I noticed that install wizards told me the
> it would need 13 KB (only 13 KB?) to install Core. I don'
Hello Maxim,
> Could you please try 3.60 MSIs:
>
> http://www.ritlabs.com/download/files3/the_bat/intpack.msi
> http://www.ritlabs.com/download/files3/the_bat/beta/thebat_home_3-60.msi
> http://www.ritlabs.com/download/files3/the_bat/beta/thebat_pro_3-60.msi
>
Pro installed and working fine here.
Hello Bobi,
> But when the msg tab contains another attachment (like forwarding another
> forwarding message, some of my friends like to do this way), the attachment
> pane (which I set the attachment to displayed as pane) does not displayed in
> the tab area as it should be.
>
I don't have an ex
Hello Charlene,
> Same luck (zero, impair, manque)
Where have I heard that before? ;-)
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat! v3.60.07 on Windows XP 5.1 Service Pack 2
Current beta is 3.60.07 forerunne
9/1/2005 4:39 AM
Hi Bobi,
On 8/31/2005 Bobi Jam wrote:
BJ> But when the msg tab contains another attachment (like forwarding another
BJ> forwarding message, some of my friends like to do this way), the attachment
BJ> pane (which I set the attachment to displayed as pane) does not displayed in
B
Hello Boris,
Boris Anders wrote (in ):
> Kaspersky or Ritlabs?
I opend a topic in Kasperskys forum and hope that many users will
support me:
http://forum.kaspersky.com/index.php?act=ST&f=16&t=4257&st=0#entry22780
--
Regards,
Boris Anders, http://www.batboard.de
Hello Maxim,
Maxim Masiutin wrote (in ):
> "Kaspersky Internet Security 2006" Antivirus will include plugin for
> The Bat!, please see the attached image.
Opinion: I'm using KAV 6.0.13.195 (TB! 3.0.1RC6) and can say, that this
PlugIn is completly useless!!!
Reason: If I want to scan a folder in
55 matches
Mail list logo
