Vili wrote:
No. I completely understand. And that is my WHOLE point: you have
great experience with Voyager if you use a HDD, and not running from a
USB stick. If you can. A _completely different_ experience. That is
what I tried to say. (Even if you optimize the stick to speed.)
Are
5/12/2007 7:10 PM
Hi Vili,
On 5/12/2007 Vili wrote:
V No. I completely understand. And that is my WHOLE point: you have
V great experience with Voyager if you use a HDD, and not running from a
V USB stick. If you can. A _completely different_ experience. That is
V what I tried to say.
Hello mfas,
Thursday, May 10, 2007, 2:53:03 PM, you wrote:
Hello tbbeta,
Have any of you tried running Voyager within a Private disk file
run from a USB drive.
http://www.dekart.com/products/encryption/private_disk_mf/
or
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/products/pd/
For me it has solved
Vili wrote:
you have the exact same reasons with your 'usb-enclosed' HDD.
...maybe even worse, given that write-back for USB flashdrives isn't
quite as optimistic as with HDDs (including those 'usb-enclosed').
:)) I dont know this stuff, all I am seeing is that with a USB stick,
it takes
Hello tbbeta,
Have any of you tried running Voyager within a Private disk file
run from a USB drive.
http://www.dekart.com/products/encryption/private_disk_mf/
or
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/products/pd/
For me it has solved the speed and connect/dissconnect issues.
--
Best regards,
mfas
Vili wrote:
you have the exact same reasons with your 'usb-enclosed' HDD.
...maybe even worse, given that write-back for USB flashdrives isn't
quite as optimistic as with HDDs (including those 'usb-enclosed').
:)) I dont know this stuff, all I am seeing is that with a USB stick,
it
Vili wrote:
I dont know... I dont _totally_ agree... Even in WinXP, you can
optimize a stick for performance, but if writing is delayed and for
some reason you have got a power failure... Or I just dont trust MS to
let them manage delayed writing :))
you have the exact same
Vili wrote:
I dont know... I dont _totally_ agree... Even in WinXP, you can
optimize a stick for performance, but if writing is delayed and for
some reason you have got a power failure... Or I just dont trust MS to
let them manage delayed writing :))
you have the exact same reasons
I've noticed an appreciable slow down when trying to print out an
email with this latest release. Time from invoking the print command
till the print window appears is 20-25 seconds whereas in previous
versions it was 5 or less.
Anyone else notice this phenomenon?
--
ò.ó Nick
Danger
[MUA: TB!
this... 1-2 sec and printing starts. I am running
Voyager from an USB2 external 2.5, 40 GB Hitachi HDD (my old laptop
HDD).
(What I observed is, that running Voyager from a USB stick is just not
the way to go...)
--
Vili
Current beta
5/7/2007 2:35 PM
Hi Vili,
On 5/7/2007 Vili wrote:
V (What I observed is, that running Voyager from a USB stick is just not
V the way to go...)
Unless you use Win2K. 8-]}
--
Take Care,
Paul
Voyager v.3.95.06 on Win2k SP4-Rollup1 5.0.2195
No IMAP OTFE
V (What I observed is, that running Voyager from a USB stick is just not
V the way to go...)
Unless you use Win2K. 8-]}
I dont know... I dont _totally_ agree... Even in WinXP, you can
optimize a stick for performance, but if writing is delayed and for
some reason you have got a power
Hello List,
Printing of .EML files is not possible:
1.) create some .eml file on your desktop (Message-Save As)
2.) open this .EML file by double clicking
3.) click Print button: nothing happens
4.) clock Message-Print: nothing happens
5.) press Ctrl+P: not the opened .EML message is printed
Hello all,
Monday, June 12, 2006, Hendrik Oesterlin wrote:
Printing of .EML files is not possible:
1.) create some .eml file on your desktop (Message-Save As)
2.) open this .EML file by double clicking
3.) click Print button: nothing happens
4.) clock Message-Print: nothing happens
5
Marek Mikus wrote on 12/06/2006 at 21:15:55 +1100
subject 3.80.06: Printing of .EML files is not possible :
Printing of .EML files is not possible:
1.) create some .eml file on your desktop (Message-Save As)
2.) open this .EML file by double clicking
3.) click Print button: nothing happens
Hello Liste,
Could anyone confirm this bug?
https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=2291
--
Sincerely
Hendrik Oesterlin - email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Jabber-IM: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ICQ 215599852 - MSN [EMAIL PROTECTED] - YIM moimeme666fr - AIM moimeme666fr
TheBat! 3.71.03 and Regula Anti-Spam Plugin
Hello Detective Roger,
Sunday, March 19, 2006, 11:58:00 PM, you wrote:
RP Font layout\Default font:
RP Font Courier New
RP Style Regular
RP Size 10
I changed the default font from Courier Bold 11 to Courier New Regular
10 and by magic I can now print with v3.72.04! Thank you!
Hello Richard,
Monday, March 20, 2006, 9:19:52 AM, you wrote:
RP Font layout\Default font:
RP Font Courier New
RP Style Regular
RP Size 10
I changed the default font from Courier Bold 11 to Courier New Regular
10 and by magic I can now print with v3.72.04! Thank you!
Of
Hello Stuart,
Monday, March 20, 2006, 10:30:46 AM, you wrote:
BT Just changed to your settings and I still can print OK, so it isn't
BT just that.
I would have guessed I had (have) a bad Courier font file vs. Courier
New . . . but Courier worked fine in 3.71.03.
--
Best regards,
Richard Newman
Hi Richard,
On Sat, 18 Mar 2006 09:52:56 -0500 (9:52 AM here), Richard Newman [RN]
wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
RN I am continuing to get miniscule, postage-stamp size pages when
RN printing from v3.72.04. This began with v3.71.01. This does not
RN happen when using v3.71.03, or earlier
Hello Richard,
Saturday, March 18, 2006, 4:52:56 PM, among other things, you wrote:
RN Hello Batpeople,
RN I am continuing to get miniscule, postage-stamp size pages when
RN printing from v3.72.04. This began with v3.71.01. This does not happen
RN when using v3.71.03, or earlier, on exactly
Hello Goncalo,
Saturday, March 18, 2006, 8:34:43 PM, you wrote:
GF My question is, was it with a different set of accounts or did you
GF replicate your installation in the new machine?
About half of the accounts that were on the first machine were on
the second machine. I did not
hi richard,
I am continuing to get miniscule, postage-stamp size pages when
printing from v3.72.04. This began with v3.71.01. This does not happen
when using v3.71.03, or earlier, on exactly the same files.
i've not experienced this with TB but something similar did once occur to me
when
v3.71.03 via .msi. No
problem with the printing.
3) I replaced the .exe with 3.72.04 and got the same shrunken printing
problem as the attached.
Smile! Because I think you are not totally alone.
I was able to replicate your problem. Well, not identical but quite
similar.
Please see the attached PDF
. The result was the printing problem no longer
happened in HTML printing but continued happening in text printing but
only after the second document.
For the heck of it, my tbuser.old file is attached in the event that
someone wants to look at it.
Thanks for the idea.
--
Best regards,
Richard Newman
Hello MAU,
Sunday, March 19, 2006, 1:34:45 PM, you wrote:
M Smile! Because I think you are not totally alone.
:-))
M I was able to replicate your problem. Well, not identical but quite
M similar.
Quite similar.
M So yes, there is something strange, peculiar or however you want to
M call it,
Hello mark,
Sunday, March 19, 2006, 1:18:35 PM, you wrote:
md i don't specifically recall the cause of the problem or the
md solution but think it had to do with a printer font mismatch where
Changing fonts had no difference. Thanks for the idea.
--
Best regards,
Richard Newman
Hello Goncalo,
Saturday, March 18, 2006, 8:34:43 PM, you wrote:
GF TB settings. It must be something specific to your setting that
GF nobody else is using. I had a problem with the TB's backup system
Makes sense. I have 23 pages of screen shots from Bat Preferences and
not sure how many you'd
Hello Richard,
M So yes, there is something strange, peculiar or however you want to
M call it, with TB's 'print engine'.
Yep and it's a change from 3.71.03
Not in my case because I got the same bad results with 3.71.03
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat!
Hello Zygmunt,
Sunday, March 19, 2006, 6:17:54 PM, you wrote:
ZW Have you looked at Message / Print Setup / Font layout / Default font?
That is the same Courier.
ZW Is the printer the default one in Windows?
Yes and same thing happens in non-default printers. Fineprint is
my normal
Hello Richard,
On Monday, March 20, 2006, 12:38:18 AM, among other things, you wrote:
RP I am just making a stab in the dark, but perhaps your user.def file
RP has become corrupt; I know it does have items in it which refer
RP to printing.
RN Well I let TB
RN create a new user.def. The result
Hello Paul,
Thursday, March 16, 2006, 6:06:59 PM, you wrote:
PVN the printer from WordPerfect the problem reappeared. I sold her a new
See mine on v3.72.04 (beta) printing remains unusable. The problem
occurs on four printers only with Bat versions higher than 3.71.03.
It does not happen
Hallo Richard,
On Sat, 18 Mar 2006 09:52:56 -0500GMT (18-3-2006, 15:52 +0100, where I
live), you wrote:
RN I am continuing to get miniscule, postage-stamp size pages when
RN printing from v3.72.04. This began with v3.71.01. This does not happen
RN when using v3.71.03, or earlier, on exactly
Recently, Richard Newman squawked:
Hello Batpeople,
I am continuing to get miniscule, postage-stamp size pages when
printing from v3.72.04.
Can not confirm.
Prints exactly as I want, all across the page, stem to stern
on WinME using a Brothers MFC640CW printer device.
--
Regards,
Robert D
Hello Richard Newman everyone else,
on 18-Mrz-2006 at 15:52 you (Richard Newman) wrote:
I am continuing to get miniscule, postage-stamp size pages when
printing from v3.72.04. This began with v3.71.01. This does not happen
when using v3.71.03, or earlier, on exactly the same files.
I just
On 18/3/2006 at 9:52:56 AM [GMT -0500], Richard Newman wrote:
I am continuing to get miniscule, postage-stamp size pages when
printing from v3.72.04.
Can't confirm here. I'm printing with an HP 990Cxi, and I also have
FinePrint installed.
--
-= Curtis =-
The Bat! v3.72.04 (Beta) / http
In reply to mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :
RN Hello Batpeople,
RN I am continuing to get miniscule, postage-stamp size pages when
RN printing from v3.72.04. This began with v3.71.01. This does not
RN happen when using v3.71.03, or earlier, on exactly the same files.
RN I have three times
Hello Goncalo,
Saturday, March 18, 2006, 5:21:13 PM, you wrote:
GF That's really odd! Have you tried on a different system?
No . . . but I will in a bit. Although, I would guess that this
anomoly is system specific because no one else has been able to
confirm. At the same time, it is also TB bug
the problem (per attached) on four printers.
2) I removed the installation and installed v3.71.03 via .msi. No
problem with the printing.
3) I replaced the .exe with 3.72.04 and got the same shrunken printing
problem as the attached.
--
Best regards,
Richard Newman
Hi Richard,
In reply to mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :
GF That's really odd! Have you tried on a different system?
RN No . . . but I will in a bit. Although, I would guess that this
RN anomoly is system specific because no one else has been able to
RN confirm. At the same time, it is also TB bug
3/16/2006 6:02 PM
Hi Richard,
On 3/16/2006 Richard Newman wrote:
RNGood try and they are correct. Thanks.
I once had a similar problem with a customer using WordPerfect 8 on a
Canon 5100 printer. The fix was to uninstall the printer and
WordPerfect and totally clean out the registry and
Hello Batpeople,
I still am totally illegible printed documents from 3.72.01/.02 per
the attached. I have not problem with the same documents printed from
3.71.03.
Before trying 3.72.02, I completely uninstalled The Bat! I remove all
data. I removed all references in the registry to The Bat and
Hello Richard,
Unlikely I'll get a confirmation because no one could confirm in
3.72.01. And, I'll at a loss as to how to fix other than just
continuing use of 3.71.03.
I'm afraid you are right, prints fine here.
The thing is that I seem to recall I had that problem a long time ago,
but I
Hello MAU,
Thursday, March 16, 2006, 2:16:42 PM, you wrote:
M I assume you have checked the settings in Message/Print Setup, are
M they the same that in 3.71.03? They should be, but one never knows.
Good try and they are correct. Thanks.
--
Best regards,
Richard Newman
Hello vitalie,
Monday, March 13, 2006, 11:43:43 AM, you wrote:
vv umm... a consequence of trying to fix the old bug with large
vv printouts by globally scaling the printed page?
Are you confirming?
Otherwise, without any confirmations to date, I will probably have to
do a full uninstall, clean
Hello Goncalo,
Monday, March 13, 2006, 2:55:59 AM, you wrote:
GF Can you downgrade? Maybe it some sort of conflict between the latest
GF version of your driver/TB!
I am using 3.71.01 now with no problems.
--
Best regards,
Richard Newman
hi,
Friday, March 10, 2006, 8:46:35 PM, you wrote:
V3.72.01 prints a page in an unreadable area the size of a postage
stamp.
Confirmation?
umm... a consequence of trying to fix the old bug with large printouts by globally scaling the printed page?
--
regards,
vitalie
In reply to mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :
RN Hello Goncalo,
RN Saturday, March 11, 2006, 5:03:18 AM, you wrote:
GF Check the Printer setup. Maybe they changed something that isn't
GF recognizable in the latest version thus producing that weird
GF layout.
RN Nothing visible there. Changed font
Hello Goncalo,
Sunday, March 12, 2006, 4:05:15 AM, you wrote:
GF Check to see if the printer isn't set to produce a % of the real size.
GF I'm just shooting in the dark... Try to upgrade/downgrade your printer
GF drivers.
Good thoughts but . . . set to produce 100% and latest drivers on
three
In reply to mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :
GF Check to see if the printer isn't set to produce a % of the real size.
GF I'm just shooting in the dark... Try to upgrade/downgrade your printer
GF drivers.
RN Good thoughts but . . . set to produce 100% and latest drivers on
RN three printers!
Can you
Hello Richard,
Friday, March 10, 2006, 7:46:35 PM, you wrote:
RN V3.72.01 prints a page in an unreadable area the size of a postage
RN stamp.
RN Confirmation?
Not here. No problem with printing html-messages so far, either.
--
Best Wishes,
Mark
using
The Bat
In reply to mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :
RN Hello Mary,
RN Friday, March 10, 2006, 3:03:12 PM, you wrote:
MB In case the interaction with the printer software matters: mine is an
MB HP Laserjet 1300.
RN Exact same thing happens whether I print to a LaserJet 2300d, InkJet 2230 or
RN FinePrint. So it
Hello Goncalo,
Saturday, March 11, 2006, 5:03:18 AM, you wrote:
GF Check the Printer setup. Maybe they changed something that isn't
GF recognizable in the latest version thus producing that weird
GF layout.
Nothing visible there. Changed font settings. Some weird results.
--
Best regards,
Hello Batpeople,
V3.72.01 prints a page in an unreadable area the size of a postage
stamp.
Confirmation?
--
Best regards,
Richard Newman
---
Using The Bat! v3.72.01 (Beta) on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2
on a Pentium
Hello Richard!
On Friday, March 10, 2006, 12:46 PM, you wrote:
V3.72.01 prints a page in an unreadable area the size of a postage
stamp.
Confirmation?
Can't confirm. The message from you printed out over about 3/4 of an 8
1/2 x 11 sheet. From Rich Text View, using 8 pt. Arial Black.
--
Hello Mary,
Friday, March 10, 2006, 1:58:31 PM, you wrote:
MB Can't confirm. The message from you printed out over about 3/4 of
MB an 8 1/2 x 11 sheet. From Rich Text View, using 8 pt. Arial Black.
Strange, I had to go back to 3.71.01 to get normal size from
plain text.
--
Best regards,
Richard
On Friday, March 10, 2006, 12:46:35 PM, Richard Newman wrote:
V3.72.01 prints a page in an unreadable area the size of a postage
stamp.
Confirmation?
not here. prints fine.
--
Dwight A. Corrin
928 S Broadway
Wichita KS 67211
316.303.1411 fax 316.265.7568
dcorrin at fastmail.fm
Using IMAP
, indeed. I am printing just fine in plain text, also,
with Lucida Sans Typewriter 12 pt.
--
Best regards,
Mary
The Bat 3.72.01 (Beta) on Windows XP 5.1 2600 Service Pack 2
Current beta is 3.72.01 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http
Hello Mary,
Friday, March 10, 2006, 2:13:11 PM, you wrote:
MB It is strange, indeed. I am printing just fine in plain text, also,
MB with Lucida Sans Typewriter 12 pt.
Attached PDF Mary1 is of what I get with 3.72.01 and Mary2 is what
I get with 3.71.01. Guess I'll just wait for 3.72.02
--
Best
Hello Richard!
On Friday, March 10, 2006, 1:33 PM, you wrote:
MB It is strange, indeed. I am printing just fine in plain text, also,
MB with Lucida Sans Typewriter 12 pt.
Attached PDF Mary1 is of what I get with 3.72.01 and Mary2 is what
I get with 3.71.01. Guess I'll just wait for 3.72.02
I
Hello Mary,
Friday, March 10, 2006, 3:03:12 PM, you wrote:
MB In case the interaction with the printer software matters: mine is an
MB HP Laserjet 1300.
Exact same thing happens whether I print to a LaserJet 2300d, InkJet 2230 or
FinePrint. So it doesn't seem like the printer software.
--
Best
Hello Jon,
Thursday, February 23, 2006, 4:35:33 PM, you wrote:
JP Thank you Mark. I filed a BT (inadvertently 3 times!!! oops.) Please
JP support the correct one at:
JP https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=5711
Due to problems (changes) with the [name]server of my provider I haven't
received
On Thursday, February 23, 2006, 9:28:32 AM, Mark Partous wrote:
MP Hello Jon,
MP Concerning 3.71.03,
MP Thursday, February 23, 2006, 2:47:13 PM, you wrote:
JP I thought this was resolved earlier, but the problem seems to be back.
JP The font becomes extremely large when printing a html message
On Thursday, February 23, 2006, 8:28:32 AM, Mark Partous wrote:
Alas, confirmed! (cc-d to Beta List)
confirmed, although not for plain text as well this time.
--
Dwight A. Corrin
928 S Broadway
Wichita KS 67211
316.303.1411 fax 316.265.7568
dcorrin at fastmail.fm
Using IMAP with The Bat!
Hello Jon,
Concerning 3.71.03,
Thursday, February 23, 2006, 2:47:13 PM, you wrote:
JP I thought this was resolved earlier, but the problem seems to be back.
JP The font becomes extremely large when printing a html message. A
JP single page became seven pages upon printing.
Alas, confirmed
Hello Dwight,
Thursday, February 9, 2006, 10:06:38 PM, you wrote:
DAC On Thursday, February 9, 2006, 2:20:07 PM, George M. Menegakis wrote:
Confirmed and not only in HTML. I had the same problem trying to
print a text message.
DAC comfirmed, about one line a page, in huge letters
As far as
[Reply to: George M. Menegakis · 2006-02-09 · 21:20 h (CET)]
Hello, George!
I'm having problems printing from .08. HTML messages that printed
yesterday in .07 hang the program. The same as text blow up to
large type and an exorbitant number of pages (like 88 instead of 2
or 3).
Anyone
On Wednesday, February 8, 2006, 5:47:08 PM, Richard Newman wrote:
I'm having problems printing from .08. HTML messages that printed
yesterday in .07 hang the program. The same as text blow up to
large type and an exorbitant number of pages (like 88 instead of 2
or 3).
confirmed. I tried
Hello Zygmunt Wereszczynski
Friday, February 10, 2006 - 6:13:28 PM you wrote:
---
Subject: .08 Printing Problems
---
ZW Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ZW Received: from inas014.isp.belgacom.be (localhost [127.0.0.1])
ZW
Hello Richard,
Thursday, February 9, 2006, 1:47:08 AM, you wrote:
Hello Batpeople,
I'm having problems printing from .08. HTML messages that printed
yesterday in .07 hang the program. The same as text blow up to large
type and an exorbitant number of pages (like 88 instead of 2 or 3
On Thursday, February 9, 2006, 2:20:07 PM, George M. Menegakis wrote:
Confirmed and not only in HTML. I had the same problem trying to
print a text message.
comfirmed, about one line a page, in huge letters
--
Dwight A. Corrin
928 S Broadway
Wichita KS 67211
316.303.1411 fax 316.265.7568
Hi Richard Newman,
Wednesday, February 8, 2006
you let us know -possibly edited- :
Anyone else having these problems?
Same here, your mail would have been printed on 16 pages.
:(
--
kind regards
Charlene Ferrara
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Using The Bat! v3.70.08 Qigong (Beta) on
Windows XP
Hi Richard Newman,
Wednesday, February 8, 2006
you let us know -possibly edited- :
I'm having problems printing from .08. HTML messages that printed
yesterday in .07 hang the program
HTML doesn't crash TB here, but I would need tons of paper and gallons
of ink if I really would print some
Hallo Marc,
On Fri, 10 Feb 2006 19:03:27 +0100GMT (10-2-2006, 19:03 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
M Confirmed also with Windows 98 (text message) ...
M Best regards,
M Marc SEGERS - Brussels - Belgium
moderator
Note: This moderator's interjection is a note to all readers and not
just to
Hallo Marc,
On Fri, 10 Feb 2006 19:03:27 +0100GMT (10-2-2006, 19:03 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
ZW Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ZW Received: from inas014.isp.belgacom.be (localhost [127.0.0.1])
moderator
Note: This moderator's interjection is a note to all readers and not
just to the
Hello Batpeople,
I'm having problems printing from .08. HTML messages that printed
yesterday in .07 hang the program. The same as text blow up to large
type and an exorbitant number of pages (like 88 instead of 2 or 3).
Anyone else having these problems?
--
Best regards,
Richard Newman
Hello Richard,
A reminder of what Richard Newman typed on:
Wednesday, February 08, 2006 at 18:47:08 GMT -0500
RN I'm having problems printing from .08. HTML messages that printed
RN yesterday in .07 hang the program. The same as text blow up to large
RN type and an exorbitant number
Hello,
when I print plaintext message, all macros (From, To, Subject, Date)
are printed with no problems.
But when I printed HTML mail now, TB prints first row with From only
and HTML mail continues immediatelly.
Anybody can confirm please?
--
Thanks and Bye,
Marek Mikus
Czech support of The
Hallo Marek,
On Wed, 12 Oct 2005 13:10:12 +0200GMT (12-10-2005, 13:10 +0200, where
I live), you wrote:
MM when I print plaintext message, all macros (From, To, Subject, Date)
MM are printed with no problems.
Confirmed.
MM But when I printed HTML mail now, TB prints first row with From only
MM
Hello Marek,
But when I printed HTML mail now, TB prints first row with From only
and HTML mail continues immediatelly.
Anybody can confirm please?
Nope. Send me in private the mail in Unix mailbox format as attach, to
try.
--
Vili
Hello Vili,
Sunday, September 25, 2005, 4:13:53 PM, you wrote:
Just in case, try the newest FP 5.45.
No difference in behavior. Still can't print from Message View.
So, you print from the search window, and you got an AV?
Yes, that has been happening for sometime. Now that behavior exists
Hello Richard,
Sunday, September 25, 2005, 4:13:53 PM, you wrote:
Just in case, try the newest FP 5.45.
No difference in behavior. Still can't print from Message View.
So, you print from the search window, and you got an AV?
Yes, that has been happening for sometime. Now that behavior
?
All give me an AV.
Try to uninstall and reinstall FP.
Uninstalled. Removed all settings too. Reinstalled. Same problem.
Or if you put TB .05 back, it does not give you any AV?
Now .05 is performing the same way as .07 -- AVs when printing from
message view. Went back to v3.60.05
you AV? Or all of them give you
AV?
All give me an AV.
Try to uninstall and reinstall FP.
Uninstalled. Removed all settings too. Reinstalled. Same problem.
Or if you put TB .05 back, it does not give you any AV?
Now .05 is performing the same way as .07 -- AVs when printing from
message
Hello Vili,
Monday, September 26, 2005, 1:17:57 PM, you wrote:
V Message view: you mean when you open the mail in a separate window,
V right?
Correct.
V What happens if you change the printer where the FP pages will be
V printed to (right click on the FP printer, Printing references
Hello Richard,
Monday, September 26, 2005, 1:17:57 PM, you wrote:
V Message view: you mean when you open the mail in a separate window,
V right?
Correct.
V What happens if you change the printer where the FP pages will be
V printed to (right click on the FP printer, Printing
Hallo Richard,
On Mon, 26 Sep 2005 13:59:57 -0400GMT (26-9-2005, 19:59 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
V Results?
RNAn AV!
RN Best regards,
RN Richard Newman
RN ---
RN Using The Bat!3.61.07 Echo (Beta)
moderator
Note: This
Hello Richard,
Friday, September 23, 2005, 4:06:57 PM, you wrote:
Tell me more about it! Which version of FP you have?
FinePrint 5.41. I have never had any other problem with FinePrint
with any other software. If I go back to 3.61.05 . . . my only
printing problem happens printing
Hello Vili,
Friday, September 23, 2005, 4:06:57 PM, you wrote:
Tell me more about it! Which version of FP you have?
FinePrint 5.41. I have never had any other problem with FinePrint
with any other software. If I go back to 3.61.05 . . . my only
printing problem happens printing the opened
Hello Mary,
Friday, September 23, 2005, 9:21:12 PM, you wrote:
I think it does. I think you should add a BT note to your issue report
at http://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=5133
and put this information in.
Shall do.
--
Best regards,
Richard Newman
Hello Maxim,
Friday, September 23, 2005, 11:19:46 AM, you wrote:
[-] AV on printing
Still getting AVs in message view mode but not when viewing message
on master menu. I am able to sometimes print once from message
view and on printing it leaves message view and returns to master
view. I
Hello Richard!
On Friday, September 23, 2005, 12:01 PM, you wrote:
[-] AV on printing
Still getting AVs in message view mode but not when viewing message
on master menu. I am able to sometimes print once from message
view and on printing it leaves message view and returns to master
Hello Mary,
Friday, September 23, 2005, 1:26:31 PM, you wrote:
I am not sure that I understand your terminology: message view mode
and master view and master menu.
By master view and/or master menu, I meant what you are properly
referring to as the Preview Pane.
By message view mode, I
On Friday, September 23, 2005, 12:34:21 PM, Richard Newman wrote:
I get an AV when I try to print from message view.
can't confirm
--
Dwight A. Corrin
928 S Broadway
Wichita KS 67211
316.303.1411 fax 316.265.7568
dcorrin at fastmail.fm
Using The Bat! 3.61.07 Echo (Beta) on Windows XP
Hello Mary,
I can print your message to me fine from the Preview Pane. I get an
AV when I try to print from message view.
Then I cannot confirm.
Me neither... I dont use preview neither.
--
Vili
Current beta is 3.61.07 (Echo) |
with
FinePrint.
This behavior did start with FinePrint in printing the
results of searches several months ago. I've been living with that.
The new problem seems to be an extension that is a significant
inconvenience for me . . . in that it eliminates my preferred
printer.
Does
Packard Laserjet 1300.
This problem has never happened in prior versions/betas with
FinePrint.
I am sure it is a a change in TB!'s code that has changed the way TB!
interacts with your preferred printer.
This behavior did start with FinePrint in printing the
results of searches several
.
But: the behaviour that you describe has never happened.
This behavior did start with FinePrint in printing the results of
searches several months ago. I've been living with that. The new
problem seems to be an extension that is a significant inconvenience
for me . . . in that it eliminates my
Hello Richard,
Friday, September 23, 2005, 5:52:26 PM, you wrote:
It happens to me when I use my preferred printer (FinePrint)
I am using FinePrint, and cannot duplicate your problem.
--
Best regards,
Dwightmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello Batpeople,
I'm getting a variety of AV messages when attempting to print from the
main menu or with a message open. The latest is:
Access violation at address 74756120. Read address 74756120.
--
Best regards,
Richard Newman
101 - 200 of 251 matches
Mail list logo
