>> I use a common sent box (and trash) and so I can clean them all at
>> once. I parked some sent messages for future resending
>> When I cleaned out via the virtual folder, everything went including the
>> parked messages
>> Confirmations anyone?
>> Thanks
IP> Confirmed. Regular "Delete" brings
>> I use a common sent box (and trash) and so I can clean them all at
>> once. I parked some sent messages for future resending
>> When I cleaned out via the virtual folder, everything went including the
>> parked messages
>> Confirmations anyone?
>> Thanks
IP> Confirmed. Regular "Delete" brings
> I use a common sent box (and trash) and so I can clean them all at
> once. I parked some sent messages for future resending
> When I cleaned out via the virtual folder, everything went including the
> parked messages
> Confirmations anyone?
> Thanks
Confirmed. Regular "Delete" brings up confirm
I use a common sent box (and trash) and so I can clean them all at once. I
parked some sent messages for future resending
When I cleaned out via the virtual folder, everything went including the parked
messages
Confirmations anyone?
Thanks
--
Rick
"The government has ceased to function; the corp
I have had this problem constantly (but randomly) since moving to windows 8 x64
I will create several common virtual folders and they disappear. I have not
been able to pin it down as to whether or not it may only be shutting down and
opening the program, changing login profiles or rebooting
I rebuild a virtual folder that shows all parked and flagged messages. The
quick filter does not work for any of the predefined settings. The advanced
filter works, but there is some strange behavior if you try to delete a block
or condition
Confirmations?
--
Rick
". . . in America, we have a
>Searching is not working in Virtual Folders. I noticed this in the last beta
>and am not sure how long this has been going on. It seems to work correctly if
>you start a search in one folder and PICK the others that match the VF criteria
I have added this to bug tracker
https://www.ri
[In Reply to: »Rick« · 2012-10-23 · 19:01 h (CET)]
Moin, Rick et al.!
> Searching is not working in Virtual Folders.
Confirmed (The Bat! 5.3.2.4).
Cheers!
VA
- --
Volker Ahrendt | q...@ahrendt.net | The /\^o^/\! [Pro] 5.3.2.4 (BETA)
Operating System: Windows 7 Professional [Build 7
Searching is not working in Virtual Folders. I noticed this in the last beta
and am not sure how long this has been going on. It seems to work correctly if
you start a search in one folder and PICK the others that match the VF criteria
Confirmations?
--
Rick
Leave not a rack behind. We are such
Hello Tbbeta,
When I attempt a virtual folder the search completes immediately and
says Search finished, nothing was found.
The virtual folder contains folder from multiple accounts.
Confirmations?
--
Best regards,
Tony mailto:t...@parkinch.co.uk
The Bat! 5.0.36.2 w
Hello Carsten,
Thursday, November 3, 2011, 12:15:46 PM, you wrote:
CGS> Virtual folders are one of the reasons I am still using TB4. But due to a
different problem:
Since we had major virtual folders fixes in The Bat! v5.0.30, do you
still experience any unfixed issues?
--
B
m> Hello all,
m> can anyone confirm that Viewmodes still don't work when applied to a
m> virtual folder (v5.0.22.2)?
m> Here, I observe that Viewmodes attached to a VF don't survive a program
m> restart. They are applied correctly before but after program restart
m> default Viewmode restored.
Hello All,
As an experiment I have set up a gmail account accessed by TB and have tried
to attach virtual folders to two of the folders synchronised with the gmail
account. However these virtual folders vanish when TB is closed.
Is this working as designed?
--
Best regards
> ok, turns out it had just been a fluke: Virtual Folders are unreliable
> as ever, currently there are even some messages showing up as unread
> in the VF that are no longer in the shadowed folder (which has been
> compacted) at all.
Virtual folders are one of the reasons I am sti
Guten Morgen,
MM> Unfortunately, virtual folders at present only scan local cache of
MM> IMAP folders, i.e. what has been aready downloaded from a server.
I figured as much, but then why doesn't the search work when the
watched folder is set to "Download: Get entire mess
Hello all,
Monday, October 17, 2011, Maxim Masiutin wrote:
> Hello Alto,
> Unfortunately, virtual folders at present only scan local cache of
> IMAP folders, i.e. what has been aready downloaded from a server. As a
> temporary work around, we can recommend you to open "Mana
Dear Max,
@17-Oct-2011, 19:00 +0300 (17-Oct 17:00 here) Maxim Masiutin [M] in
mid:235525925.20111017190...@ritlabs.com said to Alto:
M> Unfortunately, virtual folders at present only scan local cache of
M> IMAP folders,
...
How does this impact the mail ticker (virtual) folder? I have ha
Hello Alto,
Unfortunately, virtual folders at present only scan local cache of
IMAP folders, i.e. what has been aready downloaded from a server. As a
temporary work around, we can recommend you to open "Manage IMAP
Folders" (Alt+F7) and select full download mode to download message
h
Hi,
No idea what happened but all VF are empty after I imported TBK file
to newly installed TB!.
All messages received before recovery are not shown in VF ; new
messages that were just downloaded has shown up correctly.
To get messages visible in VF I had to deselect and select agai
Guten Morgen,
ok, turns out it had just been a fluke: Virtual Folders are unreliable
as ever, currently there are even some messages showing up as unread
in the VF that are no longer in the shadowed folder (which has been
compacted) at all.
So, no change.
--
MfG,
Alto
Hi,
I just noted something interesting:
I have a IMAP folder into which incoming messages are moved by
server-side filtering. On the local TheBat installation, I created a
handful of virtual folders that are filtered from it.
Up until now, new messages were registered in the base folder, but
Hello Paul,
On Thu, 11 Aug 2011 18:26:29 -0400 GMT (12/Aug/11, 5:26 AM +0700 GMT),
Paul Van Noord wrote:
aas>> I must say I reverted from Version 5 back to Version 4.2.44.2 due
aas>> to dysfunctional VF, or to be more precise: dysfunctional MailTicker
aas>> window (which is likewise a virtual fol
A Bat-fellow, Paul Van Noord,
wrote on Thursday, 11th August 2011 at 18:26:29 (GMT -0400),
which was Friday 0:26 a.m. in Bratislava --
> Neither myself or my customers use the Ticker. It is just too easy
> to [Alt]+[Tab] when the wings are flapping.
Huh? ;-) I couldn't live without the MailTick
8/11/2011 6:23 PM
Hi Aam,
On 8/11/2011 a...@avenarius.sk wrote:
aas> A Bat-fellow, Paul Van Noord,
aas> wrote on Thursday, 11th August 2011 at 11:51:15 (GMT -0400),
aas> which was 17:51 in Bratislava --
>>> Not here, I'm afraid: In v4 a VF worked correctly exactly once, right
>>> after it had
A Bat-fellow, Paul Van Noord,
wrote on Thursday, 11th August 2011 at 11:51:15 (GMT -0400),
which was 17:51 in Bratislava --
>> Not here, I'm afraid: In v4 a VF worked correctly exactly once, right
>> after it had been created. If TB was shut down and started again, the
>> VF became empty (0 messag
8/11/2011 11:50 AM
Hi Alto,
On 8/10/2011 Alto Speckhardt wrote:
AS> Not here, I'm afraid: In v4 a VF worked correctly exactly once, right
AS> after it had been created. If TB was shut down and started again, the
AS> VF became empty (0 messages.) It stayed empty, too, regardless of what
AS> was
pty, too, regardless of what
> was selected or refiltered.
> In v5, a VF is not automatically updated, but as soon as I select the
> parent folder, it is, and the messages that are filtered into it once
> stay there for the future.
> At least, that's how VF behave on my machines
Hello Alto,
On Wed, 10 Aug 2011 20:49:49 +0200 GMT (11/Aug/11, 1:49 AM +0700 GMT),
Alto Speckhardt wrote:
TF>> They are (were?) very useful in v4, as they updated automagically.
AS> Not here, I'm afraid: In v4 a VF worked correctly exactly once, right
AS> after it had been created. If TB was sh
Hi Alto,
TF>> They are (were?) very useful in v4, as they updated automagically.
> Not here, I'm afraid: In v4 a VF worked correctly exactly once, right
> after it had been created. If TB was shut down and started again, the
> VF became empty (0 messages.) It stayed empty, too, regardless of wh
Hi Thomas,
TF> They are (were?) very useful in v4, as they updated automagically.
Not here, I'm afraid: In v4 a VF worked correctly exactly once, right
after it had been created. If TB was shut down and started again, the
VF became empty (0 messages.) It stayed empty, too, regardless of what
Hello Alto,
On Wed, 10 Aug 2011 09:45:01 +0200 GMT (10/Aug/11, 14:45 PM +0700 GMT),
Alto Speckhardt wrote:
>> After about 30s the message count was updated to a correct number but
>> after another 3-4 minutes they all had 0 count again.
AS> Virtual Folders are only updated af
Hi,
> I did run 5.0.22.7 over 4.2.44.2 and all VF went 0 after TB!'s start.
> After about 30s the message count was updated to a correct number but
> after another 3-4 minutes they all had 0 count again.
Virtual Folders are only updated after the "parent" folder ha
Hi Maxim,
> The Bat! 5.0.22.7 (ALPHA) is available at
> http://www.ritlabs.com/download/files3/the_bat/a-5/tb50227.rar
I did run 5.0.22.7 over 4.2.44.2 and all VF went 0 after TB!'s start.
After about 30s the message count was updated to a correct number but
after another 3-4 minutes they all h
> restart. They are applied correctly before but after program restart
m> default Viewmode restored.
This is not only in Virtual folders. This happens to me in 2 accounts that
forward copies from other accounts for testing. I use a filter to set the color
for each message depending on who sen
Hello all,
can anyone confirm that Viewmodes still don't work when applied to a
virtual folder (v5.0.22.2)?
Here, I observe that Viewmodes attached to a VF don't survive a program
restart. They are applied correctly before but after program restart
default Viewmode restored.
Best regards,
mse
> Hello,
> anybody can confirm, that VFs are not updated, nor automatically, nor
> manually?
Confirmed
--
Rick
People are like stained glass windows: They sparkle and shine when the sun is
out,
But when the darkness sets in, their true beauty is revealed only if there is a
light shining from
Hello Marek,
Thursday, June 23, 2011, 10:15:26 AM, you wrote:
> Hello,
> anybody can confirm, that VFs are not updated, nor automatically, nor
> manually?
Confirmed.
--
Best regards,
Tonymailto:t...@parkinch.co.uk
The Bat! 5.0.14
__
Hello Marek,
Thursday, June 23, 2011, 11:15:26 AM, among other things, you wrote:
MM> anybody can confirm, that VFs are not updated, nor automatically, nor
MM> manually?
Confirmed.
I have several VF's attached to the TBBeta requests and sometimes a message
will appear in more than one VF.
Hello Marek,
MM> Hello,
MM> anybody can confirm, that VFs are not updated, nor automatically, nor
MM> manually?
I can confirm that. At least in some parts. The manual refresh doesn't
work for months. The automatic refresh works sometimes but I have no
idea when and why.
Some illustration: I ge
Hello,
anybody can confirm, that VFs are not updated, nor automatically, nor
manually?
--
Thanks and Bye,
Marek Mikus
Czech support of The Bat!
http://www.thebat.cz
Using the best The Bat! 5.0.14.2
under Windows 7 6.1 Build 7601 Service Pack 1
with MyMacros,XMP,AnotherMacros, AntispamSniper v
Hi RS,
> The Bat! 5.0.12.11 (BETA) is available at
> http://www.ritlabs.com/download/files3/the_bat/a-5/tb501211.rar
Installed 5.0.12.11 and database from a TBK file.
Filtering on VF (e-mail address filtering) gave e-mails from other
people in the folder as well. If that message was read it
Hi RS,
> The Bat! 5.0.12.11 (BETA) is available at
> http://www.ritlabs.com/download/files3/the_bat/a-5/tb501211.rar
Installed 5.0.12.11 and database from a TBK file.
Filtering on VF (e-mail address filtering) gave e-mails from other
people in the folder as well. If that message was read it
Hi,
1.STARS IN A NAME
When editing VF properties I always get a message that name is
improper - because it contains characters '*' (* GIVEN_NAME *). Star
is automatically added while VF is created and every time I need to
manually remove them before saving.
2. RE-FILTERING
Re-filter
The 3d argument is, of course, true. In more than one sense.
TheBat! has superior filtering, and the virtual folders are just
great! - That's my favourite argument for TB!.
This argument doesn't appear to be true for v5 any more, though.
The main reason I came to TB! in 1999 was that it
On Sat, 30 Apr 2011 14:37:23 +0200, Mark Partous wrote:
>Now you can call me whatever you want, I won't react anymore:
>someone has to stop this pointless conversation.
6) If you're starting to suspect you have no longer control over the
conversation or feel you're are in danger of losing the pl
Hello Arjan,
Saturday, April 30, 2011, 2:02:50 PM, you wrote:
AdG> 5) The best method to defend yourself against what is in yout eyes
AdG> unjust or unfair criticism is to put the motives of the critic in
AdG> question.
Why should I defend myself for something I am not responsible for?
It is no
On Sat, 30 Apr 2011 13:41:56 +0200, Mark wrote:
>Let's conclude that part of this thread by adding that these reactions
>invariably are given in answer to postings made by what in (y)our language
>is called an "azijnpisser", a translation from the French "pisse-vinaigre".
5) The best method t
Hello Arjan,
Saturday, April 30, 2011, 12:29:05 PM, you wrote:
AdG> Over the years I've learned that Beta! Fanboy's reactions fall into 3
AdG> rather stereotypical categories:
Let's conclude that part of this thread by adding that these reactions
invariably are given in answer to postings mad
On Fri, 29 Apr 2011 11:33:31 -0500, Dwight wrote:
>>>Some of their implementations are superior to anything else out there
>> Yes, we've all heard that before. More than once...
>and it continues to be true.
Yes.
Over the years I've learned that Beta! Fanboy's reactions fall into 3
rather
On Fri, 29 Apr 2011 14:17:35 -0400, Rick wrote:
>I am curious. You complain a lot about the Bat.
No, I don't.
>Are you reporting the issues that bother you,
I did report the rather outdated Help file more than 2 years ago,
without any hope of RL taking care of it. Now, out of curiosity,
I in
Hi,
J> If they can't fix the basic things that I purchased the product
J> for, I will be forced to leave. That's a challenge to the
J> development team. But, I don't think they really care about one
J> user leaving
They ought to. There aren't so many left.
--
MfG,
Alto
ccasions. The
filtering and virtual folders are superior to any other client. However, this
release is really bad.
Yes, of course we are reporting the issues. It's just that all my "reported"
issues were found in the 5 Beta. I never thought they would put out for
general rele
>>Some of their implementations are superior to anything else out there
> Yes, we've all heard that before. More than once...
I am curious. You complain a lot about the Bat. Are you reporting the issues
that bother you, getting confirmations and entering them in the bug tracker?
--
Rick
When y
Hello Arjan,
Friday, April 29, 2011, 2:40:54 PM, you wrote:
AdG> Yes, we've all heard that before. More than once...
Alas, that too! And it didn't help anything or anyone (except perhaps
yourself) then either.
--
Best Wishes,
Mark
using
The Bat! Version 4.2.44.
On Friday, April 29, 2011, 7:40:54 AM, Arjan de Groot wrote:
>>Some of their implementations are superior to anything else out there
> Yes, we've all heard that before. More than once...
and it continues to be true.
--
Dwight A. Corrin
316.303.9385 phone ahead to fax
dcorrin at fast
On Thu, 28 Apr 2011 15:36:27 -0400, Rick wrote:
>They rewrote the program and are fixing bugs as fast as they can
Yes, it's just the same old story with a long grey beard. They are
reworking the program, they are trying hard to fix bugs and while they
do that are introducing new bugs at at least
> I don't blame the programmers. I think management needs to be changed.
I believe that the the management DOES some of the programming. A little
kindness is in order. They rewrote the program and are fixing bugs as fast as
they can Some of their implementations are superior to anything else ou
ning.
I'm not moaning, this is a show stopper. I don't know why I should
"up"grade to v5 if virtual folders (which I use a lot) don't update
automatically.
In order to make message counts display correctly (a basic
requirement), I suggest to just ask some college students to
> I can see that you're tackling some pretty major issues but please
> also spend some time on virtual folder updating and negative counts.
> It would stop a lot of us moaning.
Agreed. All the issues I see on this list worked fine in release 4.
Release 5 should have never gone out the door. It
Hello Maxim,
> The Bat! 5.0.9.6 (BETA) is available at
> http://www.ritlabs.com/download/files3/the_bat/a-5/tb5096.rar
I can see that you're tackling some pretty major issues but please
also spend some time on virtual folder updating and negative counts.
It would stop a lot of us moaning.
--
Be
Hello Marek,
Monday, April 18, 2011, 1:06:31 PM, you wrote:
> Hello,
> since 5.0.8.1 all virtual folders are updated for me correctly, anybody can
> confirm?
Can not confirm. I am running 5.0.8.1 and my virtual folder unread counts are
always wrong. Also, my tabs don't work
Hello Marek,
Monday, April 18, 2011, 6:06:31 PM, you wrote:
> Hello,
> since 5.0.8.1 all virtual folders are updated for me correctly, anybody can
> confirm?
Not confirmed. I have a number of virtual folder watching a regular
folder and picking out different messages. If I mark the me
lunes, 18 abr 2011 at 19:06, it seems you wrote:
> since 5.0.8.1 all virtual folders are updated for me correctly, anybody can
> confirm?
They update correctly. But they have one problem yet.
https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=8559
--
/\/ Using The Bat! 5
Hello Marek,
Monday, April 18, 2011, 7:06:31 PM, among other things, you wrote:
MM> Hello,
MM> since 5.0.8.1 all virtual folders are updated for me correctly, anybody can
MM> confirm?
Partly. If an unread message appears in more than one virtual folder, the
folder in focus upda
Peter,
On 18-04-2011 20:02, you wrote in :
> On 18-04-2011 19:06, you wrote in :
>> since 5.0.8.1 all virtual folders are updated for me correctly, anybody can
>> confirm?
> So far it looks good here.
Not any more.
--
Best regards
Peter Fjelsten
5.0.8.1 (BETA) Pro
Howdy,
On 4/18/2011, 12:06 PM, Marek Mikus wrote in
> Hello,
> since 5.0.8.1 all virtual folders are updated for me correctly, anybody can
> confirm?
I've had one which stayed "Bolded as if there were unread messages, had to
restart TB to get it to refresh. :(
-
Marek,
On 18-04-2011 19:06, you wrote in :
> since 5.0.8.1 all virtual folders are updated for me correctly, anybody can
> confirm?
So far it looks good here.
--
Best regards
Peter Fjelsten
5.0.8.1 (BETA) Pro MyGate, RSS
4 IMAP (Courier) & 1 IMAP (Fastmail), 1 POP3 My
Hello,
since 5.0.8.1 all virtual folders are updated for me correctly, anybody can
confirm?
--
Thanks and Bye,
Marek Mikus
Czech support of The Bat!
http://www.thebat.cz
Using the best The Bat! 5.0.8.1 (BETA)
under Windows 7 6.1 Build 7601 Service Pack 1
with MyMacros,XMP,AnotherMacros
Listmembers:
While we're at it discussing issues with Virtual Folders, I would like
to call attention to an issue I'm continually having with TB's folder
selection method. Every folder is selected individually for things such
as maintenance, back up and selection of where to look
On Thursday, March 31, 2011 at 00:49 Marek Mikus wrote:
> There are 23 messages displayed in VF, all were received today, but
> Total counter displays 8.
I'm also experiencing problems with VF counters. I have one that
displays all items that are marked. There are 10 messages in the folder,
yet t
Hello all,
Thursday, March 31, 2011, Marek Mikus wrote:
> I have VF with this setting:
> There are 23 messages displayed in VF, all were received today, but Total
> counter displays 8.
I have restarted TB, there are 29 read messages displayed, but TB displays
1 message in Unread counter and VF c
> Hello all,
> Thursday, March 17, 2011, Marek Mikus wrote:
>> Hello,
>> it seems VFs are working for me in 5.0.0.150, anybody can confirm?
> well, this VF is not updated correctly today, strange :-(
I am getting problems here too. My VF is showing the correct number of messages
but there are "
Hello all,
Thursday, March 17, 2011, Marek Mikus wrote:
> Hello,
> it seems VFs are working for me in 5.0.0.150, anybody can confirm?
well, this VF is not updated correctly today, strange :-(
--
Bye
Marek Mikus
Czech support of The Bat!
http://www.thebat.cz
Using the best The Bat! 5.0.0.150
jueves, 17 mar 2011 at 16:30, it seems you wrote:
> well, no AV here after deleting until now
If I delete more than one message at a time I got normally no AV. I
got one Index out of bounds when I deleted all the messages in the VF
at the same time.
Date: 17
Hello all,
Thursday, March 17, 2011, NetVicious wrote:
>> it seems VFs are working for me in 5.0.0.150, anybody can confirm?
> Confirmed here partially. When a message is marked as read on the VF
> the message on the real folder it's marked too..
> But when I try to delete it from the VF I
jueves, 17 mar 2011 at 14:44, it seems you wrote:
> Hello,
> it seems VFs are working for me in 5.0.0.150, anybody can confirm?
Confirmed here partially. When a message is marked as read on the VF
the message on the real folder it's marked too..
But when I try to delete it from the VF I got
Hello Marek,
Thursday, March 17, 2011, 2:01:16 PM, you wrote:
> Hello all,
> Thursday, March 17, 2011, Tony Hoare wrote:
>> Not completely. They seem to update when TB is loaded but after that
>> they do not update. Try marking a watched message as read. No update
>> in VF.
> I have VF monitori
Hello all,
Thursday, March 17, 2011, Tony Hoare wrote:
> Not completely. They seem to update when TB is loaded but after that
> they do not update. Try marking a watched message as read. No update
> in VF.
I have VF monitoring "todays messages" in whole account and it is updated
for me whole day,
Hello Marek,
Thursday, March 17, 2011, 1:44:17 PM, you wrote:
> Hello,
> it seems VFs are working for me in 5.0.0.150, anybody can confirm?
Not completely. They seem to update when TB is loaded but after that
they do not update. Try marking a watched message as read. No update
in VF.
Still it's
Hello,
it seems VFs are working for me in 5.0.0.150, anybody can confirm?
--
Thanks and Bye,
Marek Mikus
Czech support of The Bat!
http://www.thebat.cz
Using the best The Bat! 5.0.0.150 BETA
under Windows 7 6.1 Build 7601 Service Pack 1
with MyMacros,XMP,AnotherMacros, AntispamSniper v 3.2.6.4
> Hello,
> I do not want to bug anybody again, but virtual folders are still not
> fully working, probably more than half year. Nor automatic nor manual
> refresh works, virtual folder displays negative numbers in "Unread
> column" etc.
> https://www.ritlabs.com
Hello,
I do not want to bug anybody again, but virtual folders are still not
fully working, probably more than half year. Nor automatic nor manual
refresh works, virtual folder displays negative numbers in "Unread
column" etc.
https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=8439
https://www.ritl
> Cannot confirm that. Deleting from virtual folders has always worked on my
> machine during beta series .
> Best regards,
> mse
Well, it's not straight forward, but something triggers it. It's like half time
it's not working and right now it's working (I re
Hello otrov,
> This was at least happening in previous version also. I can't delete messages
> in virtual folders
Cannot confirm that. Deleting from virtual folders has always worked on my
machine during beta series .
Best regards,
mse
--
Using The Bat! v5.0.0.135 BETA with Germ
This was at least happening in previous version also. I can't delete messages
in virtual folders
Current beta is 5.0.0.135 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
domingo, 16 ene 2011 at 21:36, it seems you wrote:
> how could they work, if they do not refresh? ;-)
The show the messages they should show on each start but do not
refresh.
So they're semi-working ;-)
--
/\/ Using The Bat! 5.0.0.129 BETA Professional OTFE
wi
Hello all,
Sunday, January 16, 2011, NetVicious wrote:
> sábado, 15 ene 2011 at 21:10, it seems you wrote:
>> please fix virtual folders, they are not working during whole alpha and
>> betatest.
> They work, but they do not refresh until you restarts TB!
how could they wo
sábado, 15 ene 2011 at 21:10, it seems you wrote:
> please fix virtual folders, they are not working during whole alpha and
> betatest.
They work, but they do not refresh until you restarts TB!
--
/\/ Using The Bat! 5.0.0.129 BETA Professional OTFE
with iK
Hello all,
Saturday, January 15, 2011, Stefan Tanurkov wrote:
> So, please post your showstoppers as replies to this message and we
> will deal with them asap. Please don't forget to add a BT link, too.
> Thank you!
please fix virtual folders, they are not working during w
Hi Marek,
> virtual folders do not work completely, can not be refreshed and do
> not refresh automatically yet
..and they do not work on IMAP.
--
Best wishes
Miroslav
BAT-MAIL.DE.VU - http://bat-mail.de.vu
Current beta is 4.
Hello all,
Sunday, November 14, 2010, Peter Hampf wrote:
> "Mark messages read" (ctrl+m) does not work on virtual folders anymore.
> https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=8162
virtual folders do not work completely, can not be refreshed and do not
refresh automatically yet
Hi all,
on Wed, 3 Mar 2010 20:16:27 +0100GMT I wrote:
PM> in the latest Voyager the auto-refresh of virtual folders doesn't work
PM> any more. In addition, the keyboard shortcuts for refreshing VFs (esc
PM> or ctrl+R) don't work either. The only way to get a "Refresh
Hi all,
in the latest Voyager the auto-refresh of virtual folders doesn't work
any more. In addition, the keyboard shortcuts for refreshing VFs (esc
or ctrl+R) don't work either. The only way to get a "Refresh" is the
right-click menu.
The keyboard shortcuts for "Mark
martes, 18 nov 2008 at 10:36, it seems you wrote:
> Any Hints welcome.
Select the folder and press ESC. It should refresh it.
--
/\/ Using The Bat! 4.0.34.22 (ALPHA) Professional
/ \ / \ / Windows XP (5.1.2600 Service Pack 3)
/\/ e t \/ i c i
Guten Tag The Bat! Beta,
since a lot of Versions, i see that MsgCounts in Subfolders of Common
Virtual Folders are not updated - you have to do a manual Refresh.
This is how my MsgBase looks like:
Anlagen:
1) 20081118-Refresh MsgCount Common Virtual.png (3968 Byte, IrfanView PNG
File)
I
Hello all,
I have encountered a huge bug in virtual folders. Can't say from which
version it exists, but until recently everything seemed to be fine.
The problem is that folders watched by virtual folders are taken from
wrong account.
Suppose I have two accounts one of which contains vi
I've got another one:
TB doesn't memorize the last position in Virtual Folders. Reproducable:
- create a virtual folder that only contains flagged messages
- Select a message in this Virtual Folder
- Select a different folder, and select a non-flagged message there
- Select virtual fo
Guten Tag The Bat! Beta,
Virtual Subfolders are not refreshed,
where i see unread Messages in Subfolders, they are already read in
Mainfolder - this did not happen to be recently
If i mark 1 Message Read in Subfolder and mark Unread again, it appears
in Main Folder - as expected.
Anlagen:
1
Guten Tag The Bat! Beta,
after moving Messages from Common Virtual Folder to other Folder, i got
2 Zombie Messages, which show up "No Messages loaded" when selected and
could not be copied, moved, deleted in any way.
Database reorg didn't help, manual refreshing the Folder with "Refresh"
did he
Hello Peter,
> I found, that my Virtual Folders lost the entries of the folders they
> are applied to. Refresh only works from the context menu, ctrl+R or
> ESC don't work any more. Auto-refresh doesn't work either. Only here?
No. I confirm that.
--
Vili
The Bat 3.99.6 on
1 - 100 of 199 matches
Mail list logo
