Re: Mysterious wish-list (was: (No Subject))

1999-11-20 Thread Paula Ford
On Saturday, November 20, 1999, Alexander V. Kiselev wrote: > ... Mr. Leschinsky is *not* working on the above-noted wishlist > currently, therefore the only wishlist there exists for the time being > is the official one at RIT labs. Does "currently" mean that Alex is not working on it for now o

Navigating Folders (Was: Re: %Cursor)

1999-11-20 Thread Paula Ford
On Saturday, November 20, 1999, Marck D. Pearlstone wrote: > I have new mail shown on the ticker and the ticker enabled... > Then, I simply press the space bar to page through my new mail. > Regardless of which folder it resides in. Viewing from the ticker > takes care of grouping

Re[4]: %Cursor

1999-11-20 Thread Marck D. Pearlstone
On 20 November 1999 at 07:28, [EMAIL PROTECTED] told the list: t> Saturday, November 20, 1999 Watcher>> I would still like to find a keystroke that is convenient Watcher>> (Ctrl-anything is less than convenient) to simply walk Watcher>> through all of my messages letting my emailer fin

Re: (SOT) Moo-ah, Met-ah, Med-ah and all related things...

1999-11-20 Thread Alexander V. Kiselev
Hi there! On 20 Nov 99, at 14:39, tracer wrote about "Re[2]: (SOT) Moo-ah, Met-ah, Med-ah": > who has any details about what will be in v2?? RIT labs:-))) SY, Alex (St.Petersburg, Russia) -- Thought for the day: You cannot have a baby in one month by getting nine women pregnant. ---

Re: (No Subject)

1999-11-20 Thread Alexander V. Kiselev
Hi there! On 20 Nov 99, at 3:20, Steve Lamb wrote about "Re: (No Subject)": > > But the people who are in need of that filter probably donot know how > > to make one. Maybe steve can post one (g) > Hey, Steve, this was great! Just look here: > Filter / Incoming mail / New > > Name: RM: S

Re: (SOT) Moo-ah, Met-ah, Med-ah and all related things...

1999-11-20 Thread Alexander V. Kiselev
Hi there! On 19 Nov 99, at 17:52, Steve Lamb wrote about "Re: (SOT) Moo-ah, Met-ah, Med-ah an": > > Your machine is three days fast and I can never find your messages > > until after someone has replied already and I go looking. Kindly > > check. ;-) Okay, okay, it's been mea culpa:-) Just

Re: Mysterious wish-list (was: (No Subject))

1999-11-20 Thread Alexander V. Kiselev
Hi there! On 20 Nov 99, at 9:37, Thomas Fernandez wrote about "Re[2]: (No Subject)": > This is why I was wondering whether we should put it on that > mnysterious wish-list. Anyway, I domn't want to start the whole thread > all over again. First of all, RIT labs maintain the wishlist based

Re[2]: (SOT) Moo-ah, Met-ah, Med-ah and all related things...

1999-11-20 Thread tracer
Saturday, November 20, 1999 Hello Thomas, Saturday, Saturday, November 20, 1999, you wrote: Thomas> Hi Steve, Thomas> on Saturday, November 20, 1999, 8:37:02 AM GMT+0800, Steve Lamb wrote: SL>> MUA stands for Mail Use Agent or Messaging User Agent. MTA is for Mail SL>> Transfer agent. T

Re[3]: %Cursor

1999-11-20 Thread tracer
Saturday, November 20, 1999 Hello Watcher, Saturday, Saturday, November 20, 1999, you wrote: (snip) Watcher> I would still like to find a keystroke that is convenient Watcher> (Ctrl-anything is less than convenient) to simply walk through all of Watcher> my messages letting my emailer find the

Re: (SOT) Moo-ah, Met-ah, Med-ah and all related things...

1999-11-20 Thread Alexander V. Kiselev
Hi there! On 19 Nov 99, at 17:37, Steve Lamb wrote about "Re: (SOT) Moo-ah, Met-ah, Med-ah an": > >> The text editor would then not implement a spell check but, > > > The only programs under WinDOS that do exactly this (but > > leave no choice to the users) is... guess what? Office+Outlook

Re: Mysterious wish-list (was: (No Subject))

1999-11-20 Thread Alexander V. Kiselev
Hi there! On 20 Nov 99, at 11:28, Paula Ford wrote about "Re: Mysterious wish-list": > > ... Mr. Leschinsky is *not* working on the above-noted wishlist > > currently, therefore the only wishlist there exists for the time being > > is the official one at RIT labs. > > Does "currently" mean

Re: (SOT) Moo-ah, Met-ah, Med-ah and all related things...

1999-11-20 Thread Nick Danger
In Reference to "(SOT) Moo-ah, Met-ah, Med-ah and all related things..." From Steve Lamb: SL> Friday, November 19, 1999, 5:40:07 PM, Thomas wrote: >> Hi Alexander, >> on Tuesday, November 23, 1999, 9:23:01 AM GMT+0800, Alexander V. Kiselev wrote: >> [...] >> Your machine is three days fast and

Re: (No Subject)

1999-11-20 Thread Ali Martin
Hi all, Steve Lamb wrote: > Friday, November 19, 1999, 11:10:13 PM, tracer wrote: >> But the people who are in need of that filter probably donot know how >> to make one. Maybe steve can post one (g) > Filter / Incoming mail / New > Name: RM: Steve Lamb (RM means ReMove) > Source Folder: Inb

Re[2]: %Cursor

1999-11-20 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hallo Christopher, On Saturday, November 20, 1999, 7:38:16 PM (GMT+0800), Christopher J. Trybowski wrote: CJT> On Thursday, November 18, 1999 Thomas Fernandez wrote: >> I motion to change that. I don't need a cursor command if I have to >> hit TAB three or four times, or use the mouse anyway. T

Re: (No Subject)

1999-11-20 Thread Steve Lamb
Friday, November 19, 1999, 11:10:13 PM, tracer wrote: > But the people who are in need of that filter probably donot know how > to make one. Maybe steve can post one (g) Filter / Incoming mail / New Name: RM: Steve Lamb (RM means ReMove) Source Folder: Inbox Filtering String #1: String: [EMAIL P

Re: %Cursor

1999-11-20 Thread Christopher J. Trybowski
On Thursday, November 18, 1999 Thomas Fernandez wrote: > I motion to change that. I don't need a cursor command if I have to > hit TAB three or four times, or use the mouse anyway. The cursor > should go were the %Cursor command says it should start. > Does anybody second the motion, so we can p

Re: (SOT) Moo-ah, Met-ah, Med-ah and all related things...

1999-11-20 Thread Steve Lamb
Friday, November 19, 1999, 5:40:07 PM, Thomas wrote: > Hi Alexander, > on Tuesday, November 23, 1999, 9:23:01 AM GMT+0800, Alexander V. Kiselev wrote: > [...] > Your machine is three days fast and I can never find your messages > until after someone has replied already and I go looking. Kindly >

serious filtering problem

1999-11-20 Thread Adam Gołębiowski
Welcome, Today I checked my mail, and while it should filter it, two of filters didn`t work, I got smth like . I made temp filter that filters mail that wasn`t filtered to another folder, and it worked. Why it doesn`t want to filter it to proper folder? any suggestions? /Adam +

Re[2]: (No Subject)

1999-11-20 Thread tracer
Sunday, November 21, 1999 Hello Steve, Saturday, Saturday, November 20, 1999, you wrote: Steve> Friday, November 19, 1999, 11:10:13 PM, tracer wrote: >> But the people who are in need of that filter probably donot know how >> to make one. Maybe steve can post one (g) Steve> Filter / Incoming m

Re[2]: (SOT) Moo-ah, Met-ah, Med-ah and all related things...

1999-11-20 Thread tracer
Sunday, November 21, 1999 Hello Alexander, Saturday, Saturday, November 20, 1999, you wrote: Alexander> Hi there! Alexander> On 20 Nov 99, at 14:39, tracer wrote Alexander> about "Re[2]: (SOT) Moo-ah, Met-ah, Med-ah": >> who has any details about what will be in v2?? Alexander> RIT labs:

Re[2]: (SOT) Moo-ah, Met-ah, Med-ah and all related things...

1999-11-20 Thread tracer
Sunday, November 21, 1999 Hello Alexander, Saturday, Saturday, November 20, 1999, you wrote: Alexander> Hi there! Alexander> On 19 Nov 99, at 17:52, Steve Lamb wrote Alexander> about "Re: (SOT) Moo-ah, Met-ah, Med-ah an": >> > Your machine is three days fast and I can never find your mess

Re[2]: (No Subject)

1999-11-20 Thread tracer
Sunday, November 21, 1999 Hello Ali, Saturday, Saturday, November 20, 1999, you wrote: Ali> Hi all, Ali> Steve Lamb wrote: >> Friday, November 19, 1999, 11:10:13 PM, tracer wrote: >>> But the people who are in need of that filter probably donot know how >>> to make one. Maybe steve can post

Re[5]: %Cursor

1999-11-20 Thread tracer
Sunday, November 21, 1999 Hello Marck, Sunday, Sunday, November 21, 1999, you wrote: Marck> On 20 November 1999 at 07:28, [EMAIL PROTECTED] told the list: t>> Saturday, November 20, 1999 Watcher>>> I would still like to find a keystroke that is convenient Watcher>>> (Ctrl-anything is les

Re: Navigating Folders (Was: Re: %Cursor)

1999-11-20 Thread Marck D. Pearlstone
On 20 November 1999 at 17:54, [EMAIL PROTECTED] told the list: >> I have new mail shown on the ticker and the ticker enabled... >> Then, I simply press the space bar to page through my new mail. >> Regardless of which folder it resides in. Viewing from the ticker >> takes care of grouping all ne

HTML viewing problem

1999-11-20 Thread Mike Liddekee
I'm having some difficulty and I'm not sure if its the application or my setup. I've been using TheBat since about v1.34 and am currently using v1.38b2. Anyway my problem is when i receive an HTML message it appears to show up fine but if it contains images, all that displays is a box w/ a excla

Where is v1.37?

1999-11-20 Thread Ralf Buschmann
Hi all, I see that some people on this list are already using a beta version of v1.38. Well, was v1.37 never released to the public? The RIT Labs server has only v1.36. What am I missing? Ralf. -- BackMagic: Disaster Recovery & Cloning für Windows 9x http://www.backmagic.de -- -

Hi, and a few questions

1999-11-20 Thread Deryk Lister
Hello all, After a few days of setting up, I'm starting to get used to The Bat and decided it was a good time to join the mailing list. I have a couple of questions to start with: I'm using version 1.36, and I noticed from Betanews that version 1.38 beta 2 is out. I wonder if anyone would be ki

Re: Hi, and a few questions

1999-11-20 Thread Alexander V. Kiselev
Hi there! On 20 Nov 99, at 20:50, Deryk Lister wrote about "Hi, and a few questions": > Next question is to do with replying. I noticed that when > you reply to another reply eg. RE: Subject it becomes RE[2]: > Subject. I've never noticed the [2] in other email clients, > and it seems to u

Re: Re[2]: (SOT) Moo-ah, Met-ah, Med-ah and all related things...

1999-11-20 Thread Alexander V. Kiselev
Hi there! On 21 Nov 99, at 2:55, tracer wrote about "Re[2]: (SOT) Moo-ah, Met-ah, Med-ah": > >> who has any details about what will be in v2?? > > Alexander> RIT labs:-))) > you mean we have to feed them vodka to tell us?? Well, it's a good idea (tm):-) SY, Alex (St.Petersburg, Russia) -

Re: Where is v1.37?

1999-11-20 Thread Alexander V. Kiselev
Hi there! On 20 Nov 99, at 21:47, Ralf Buschmann wrote about "Where is v1.37?": > I see that some people on this list are already using a beta version of > v1.38. Well, was v1.37 never released to the public? The RIT Labs server > has only v1.36. What am I missing? Absolutely nothing:-) 1.3

Re: (SOT) Moo-ah, Met-ah, Med-ah and all related things...

1999-11-20 Thread Alexander V. Kiselev
Hi there! On 21 Nov 99, at 2:47, tracer wrote about "Re[2]: (SOT) Moo-ah, Met-ah, Med-ah": > >> Pst... ask him how the weather is. :) > > Alexander> Well, -5 (C), if you *really* wanted to know. And the wild polar > Alexander> bears walking here and there:-)) Growling and eating peopl

Re: HTML viewing problem

1999-11-20 Thread Alexander V. Kiselev
Hi there! On 20 Nov 99, at 14:43, Mike Liddekee wrote about "HTML viewing problem": > I'm having some difficulty and I'm not sure if its the application or > my setup. I've been using TheBat since about v1.34 and am currently > using v1.38b2. Anyway my problem is when i receive an HTML mes

Re: Hi, and a few questions

1999-11-20 Thread Deryk Lister
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hi Alexander, On Saturday 20/11/99 at 21:10, you wrote: >> Next question is to do with replying. I noticed that when >> you reply to another reply eg. RE: Subject it becomes RE[2]: >> Subject. > Add the %SINGLERE macro to your templates. Excellent! I'm defi

Re: Hi, and a few questions

1999-11-20 Thread Deryk Lister
> This post also serves as a test for PGP signature, so excuse the size :P Ooh... it says that the signature is invalid... I also noticed one of the dashes in my text sig has turned into a space :-) After experimenting it seems to be a bug when you have 3 dashes before a sig. Deryk -- ---

Re: (No Subject)

1999-11-20 Thread Ali Martin
Hi all, tracer wrote: Ali>> You know Steve, despite our differences on certain issues and our Ali>> heated debates, on and off list that often disintegrate into Ali>> behavioral issues and personal attacks , I've never Ali>> thought of constructing one of the above on you. Strange perhaps, but

Re: Hi, and a few questions

1999-11-20 Thread Ali Martin
Hi all, Deryk Lister wrote: >> This post also serves as a test for PGP signature, so excuse the size :P > Ooh... it says that the signature is invalid... > I also noticed one of the dashes in my text sig has turned into a > space :-) After experimenting it seems to be a bug when you have 3 >

Re: Hi, and a few questions

1999-11-20 Thread Deryk Lister
Hi Ali, On Saturday 20/11/99 at 23:28, you wrote: > Just thought I'd let you know this since you seem to wish to place > three dashes which will serve no function other than cosmesis. Two > dashes rather than three will be cosmetic as well as functional. :) I thought there were 3, but the PGP pu

Re: Hi, and a few questions

1999-11-20 Thread Alexander V. Kiselev
Hi there! On 20 Nov 99, at 21:48, Deryk Lister wrote about "Re: Hi, and a few questions": > Ooh... it says that the signature is invalid... > I also noticed one of the dashes in my text sig has turned into a > space :-) After experimenting it seems to be a bug when you have 3 > dashes befor

Clicking on a sender w/ alt & bringing back everyone else

1999-11-20 Thread Douglas Hinds
Hello all fellow TBUDL members, Today's tip mentioned clicking on a sender w/ alt to see all that senders messages - like clicking on the sender column, except all other message are no longer visible. It worked fine. But I found nothing in the help file anything telling me how to bring the rest

Re: Clicking on a sender w/ alt & bringing back everyone else

1999-11-20 Thread Ali Martin
Hi all, Douglas Hinds wrote: > Today's tip mentioned clicking on a sender w/ alt to see all that > senders messages - like clicking on the sender column, except all > other message are no longer visible. It worked fine. > But I found nothing in the help file anything telling me how to bring >

Re: Clicking on a sender w/ alt & bringing back everyone else

1999-11-20 Thread Jack LaRosa
Hi Douglas Saturday, November 20, 1999, you wrote to the list: DH> Hello all fellow TBUDL members, DH> Today's tip mentioned clicking on a sender w/ alt to see all that DH> senders messages - like clicking on the sender column, except all DH> other message are no longer visible. It worked fine

Re: Clicking on a sender w/ alt & bringing back everyone else

1999-11-20 Thread Jack LaRosa
Hi Ali Saturday, November 20, 1999, you wrote to the list: AM> Hi all, AM> Douglas Hinds wrote: >> Today's tip mentioned clicking on a sender w/ alt to see all that >> senders messages - like clicking on the sender column, except all >> other message are no longer visible. It worked fine. >

Re: Clicking on a sender w/ alt & bringing back everyone else

1999-11-20 Thread Ali Martin
Hi all, Jack LaRosa wrote: >>> Today's tip mentioned clicking on a sender w/ alt to see all that >>> senders messages - like clicking on the sender column, except all >>> other message are no longer visible. It worked fine. >>> But I found nothing in the help file anything telling me how to b

Re: (SOT) Moo-ah, Met-ah, Med-ah and all related things...

1999-11-20 Thread Steve Lamb
Saturday, November 20, 1999, 7:08:41 AM, Alexander wrote: > Nope, PMMail will work with English only (well, actually I don't > know, but it *definitely* won't work with Russian, it's got > defective code that won't accept anything then western unicode > script correctly, and for Russian one need

Re: (No Subject)

1999-11-20 Thread Steve Lamb
Saturday, November 20, 1999, 7:10:34 AM, Alexander wrote: > Hi there! > On 20 Nov 99, at 3:20, Steve Lamb wrote > about "Re: (No Subject)": 3:20am... >> String: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Location: kludges Present: yes > Any wonder I'd typo it? :)

Re: (No Subject)

1999-11-20 Thread Steve Lamb
Saturday, November 20, 1999, 3:11:27 PM, Ali wrote: > explanation of the findings and the implications etc. They expect it > then and there. See what I'm getting at? I have to do that, explaining > the same things, day in and day out. I certainly do. In my 3 years of tech support at a small

Re: Hi, and a few questions

1999-11-20 Thread Steve Lamb
Saturday, November 20, 1999, 3:37:50 PM, Deryk wrote: > I thought there were 3, but the PGP put an extra one in :) In other > words, I'm doing that already. > Thanks for the tip though, it seems to be yet another interesting > feature that's either undocumented or else well hidden PGP escape

Re[2]: (SOT) Moo-ah, Met-ah, Med-ah and all related things...

1999-11-20 Thread tracer
Sunday, November 21, 1999 Hello Alexander, Sunday, Sunday, November 21, 1999, you wrote: Alexander> Hi there! Alexander> On 21 Nov 99, at 2:47, tracer wrote Alexander> about "Re[2]: (SOT) Moo-ah, Met-ah, Med-ah": >> >> Pst... ask him how the weather is. :) >> >> Alexander> Well, -5