Re: Displaying Digest results in line

2000-01-29 Thread Allie Martin
On Sun, 30 Jan 2000 10:32:43 +0800, Thomas Fernandez wrote: > Excuse my asking, but is it possible with TB to send multiple > different messages as MIME attachments of the same message? I'd be > interested to learn how to do that. Yes. Just select all the messages that you wish to MIME f

Re: Success with Japanese

2000-01-29 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hallo John, On Sun, 30 Jan 2000 12:28:41 +0900 GMT (30.01.2000, 11:28 +0800 GMT), John De Hoog wrote: JDH>You are fortunate because The Bat! supports Chinese. I look forward JDH>to Japanese support in the near future. Too optimistic? A double-sided sword. TB by itself does not know Big

Re: RFC2369 (was:Re: Test message)

2000-01-29 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hallo Steve, On Sat, 29 Jan 2000 21:12:21 -0800 GMT (30.01.2000, 13:12 +0800 GMT), Steve Lamb wrote: SL> Prolly. Of course, while we're at it let's remove all the other machine SL> readable headers as well. Reply-to, reference, in-reply-to, x-sender, etc, SL> etc, etc. :) You win. ;-) --

Re: RFC2369 (was:Re: Test message)

2000-01-29 Thread Steve Lamb
On Sun, Jan 30, 2000 at 03:34:02AM +0800, Thomas Fernandez wrote: > SL> Why not both until that time? It is always good to have the machine > SL> readable information there. :P > Wouldn't that be even more KB's coming down the old DUN connection? Prolly. Of course, while we're at it

Re[2]: Success with Japanese

2000-01-29 Thread John De Hoog
Thomas Fernandez wrote... JDH>> Using The Bat! in conjunction with a program called NJWin (also JDH>> known as NJStar CJK), I am now able to use the program acceptably JDH>> with Japanese. I can read Japanese messages in both the preview and TF> Do I understand correctly that you are using

Re: Displaying Digest results in line

2000-01-29 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hallo Alexander, On Sun, 30 Jan 2000 03:55:41 +0300 GMT (30.01.2000, 08:55 +0800 GMT), Alexander V. Kiselev wrote: [...] AVK> Digests are quite useful, although I myself usually prefer to receive the mailing AVK> lists traffic not in digest form. For example, suppose you need to send AVK> some

Re: Success with Japanese

2000-01-29 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hallo John, On Sun, 30 Jan 2000 07:49:53 +0900 GMT (30.01.2000, 06:49 +0800 GMT), John De Hoog wrote: JDH> Using The Bat! in conjunction with a program called NJWin (also JDH> known as NJStar CJK), I am now able to use the program acceptably JDH> with Japanese. I can read Japanese messages

Re[2]: Success with Japanese

2000-01-29 Thread John De Hoog
Keith Russell wrote... KR> You must have missed my suggestion to this effect the other day, John. KR> Sorry...it might have saved you some time. I would very much like to KR> see your Japanese encoding, if you don't mind sending it to me and KR> telling me how you got it in the headers. Although

Re: Red Folders As Seen on Screenshots ?

2000-01-29 Thread Nick Andriash
On Saturday, January 29, 2000, 5:48:05 PM, Allie Martin wrote: > That's my postulate as to what may have happened. Hence, I > think that it's always better to thread by references. :) Ok, I'll give that a try and see what difference it makes. If I remember correctly though, I tried that a while

Re: RFC2369 (was:Re: Test message)

2000-01-29 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hallo Steve, On Sat, 29 Jan 2000 07:59:09 -0800 GMT (29.01.2000, 23:59 +0800 GMT), Steve Lamb wrote: >> (I really like the "subscribe" information, as the header will be received >> only by people who are subscribed already. ) SL> Really? Let me forward you a message from one of my lists a

Re: Success with Japanese

2000-01-29 Thread Keith Russell
Hello, fellow Bat-lovers. On Saturday, January 29, 2000, 3:49:53 PM, John wrote: JDH> Hello, Bat users, JDH> Using The Bat! in conjunction with a program called NJWin (also JDH> known as NJStar CJK), I am now able to use the program acceptably JDH> with Japanese. I can read Japanese mess

Re: CNTL-F4 as "reply to sender"

2000-01-29 Thread Allie Martin
On Sat, 29 Jan 2000 18:34:36 +0700, tracer wrote: >> You know, I've never seen quicksearch. *shrug* > I only get it if by accident press the wrong key ROTFLMAO! -- CU, Allie ... Using The Bat! v1.39 «‡» Windows NT4.0 (Service Pack 6) --- ** Macintosh: Machine Always Crashes

Re: Red Folders As Seen on Screenshots ?

2000-01-29 Thread Allie Martin
On Sat, 29 Jan 2000 17:25:29 -0800, Nick Andriash wrote: > A bit off topic here Allie, but your message just came in all by itself, > and wasn't threaded to my original. I have my view options set to display > all, sort by creation time, and view thread by subject. This combination > has been wor

Re[2]: Found a bug

2000-01-29 Thread tracer
Hello Syafril Hermansyah, On GMT your local time, which was Friday, January 28, 2000, 3:58:09 PM (GMT+0700) my local time, Syafril Hermansyah wrote: > Hello tracer, t>> Oddly enough before when I located a Thai font I could receive Thai t>> but not type it... > You need IME for this. > I gue

Re[2]: CNTL-F4 as "reply to sender"

2000-01-29 Thread tracer
Hello Steve Lamb, On GMT your local time, which was Friday, January 28, 2000, 6:52:06 AM (GMT+0700) my local time, Steve Lamb wrote: > Thursday, January 27, 2000, 3:32:41 PM, Tom wrote: >> Remappable keystrokes can't come too soon! Turning off quicksearch >> entirely is my most desired feature

Re: Red Folders As Seen on Screenshots ?

2000-01-29 Thread Nick Andriash
On Saturday, January 29, 2000, 5:09:25 PM, Allie Martin wrote: > That million dollar question was asked before and no one > offered an answer. I'm still waiting for an answer myself. Perhaps > it's a special effect? I'd be curious to know... the have it displayed in a couple of areas, so

Re: Displaying Digest results in line

2000-01-29 Thread Allie Martin
On Sat, 29 Jan 2000 16:44:14 -0800, Tom Plunket wrote: > Never bothered to check, but they didn't show up as tabs, only as > attachments to the right of the "main" message that had the index. > Then you had to double click each one to read it; quite a pain to > double-click, close window, scroll

Re: Red Folders As Seen on Screenshots ?

2000-01-29 Thread Allie Martin
On Sat, 29 Jan 2000 16:29:02 -0800, Nick Andriash wrote: > I think this question may have been asked before, but I've never read an > answer. I was just browsing RITLabs home page and noticed on their screens > shots of TB, some red coloured folders along with the traditional yellow > and blue on

Re: Displaying Digest results in line

2000-01-29 Thread Allie Martin
On Sat, 29 Jan 2000 23:50:52 +, Marck D. Pearlstone wrote: > Except that what is being requested here is the opposite. Those of us > who have been on the list a while know that the lack of proper Mime > Digest support is one of Alex's chief complaints and his main reason > for staying

Re: Displaying Digest results in line

2000-01-29 Thread Alexander V. Kiselev
Hi there! On 29 Jan 00, at 23:50, Marck D. Pearlstone wrote about "Re: Displaying Digest results in li": > Except that what is being requested here is the opposite. Those of us > who have been on the list a while know that the lack of proper Mime > Digest support is one of Alex's chief

TB and PGP

2000-01-29 Thread Nick Andriash
Anyone know how I can get TB to correctly identify the version of PGP I use when encrypting/signing messages? It always shows it as an International one, and doesn't reflect the actual version number. I have to use PGP Tray in order for the correct version to be displayed. This question has also

Re: Displaying Digest results in line

2000-01-29 Thread Tom Plunket
MDP> Except that what is being requested here is the opposite. Those of us MDP> who have been on the list a while know that the lack of proper Mime MDP> Digest support is one of Alex's chief complaints and his main reason MDP> for staying with the 'P' program. It's pretty much tops on

Red Folders As Seen on Screenshots ?

2000-01-29 Thread Nick Andriash
I think this question may have been asked before, but I've never read an answer. I was just browsing RITLabs home page and noticed on their screens shots of TB, some red coloured folders along with the traditional yellow and blue ones. Anyone know the significance of the red folders? Nick --

Re: Displaying Digest results in line

2000-01-29 Thread Marck D. Pearlstone
Hi Allie, On 29 January 2000 at 08:03:31 GMT -0500 (which was 13:03 where I live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote and made these points: >> I am switching from Eudora to The Bat. I receive a php mailinglist >> in digest form. It displayed in the message in Eudora, but in The >> Bat it is displaying

Re: Solution to %DATE and %TIME macro problem.

2000-01-29 Thread Alexander V. Kiselev
Hi there! On 29 Jan 00, at 23:30, Michael Heydekamp wrote about "Re: Solution to %DATE and %TIME macro": > AVK> So in your template you are now able to write something like: > > AVK> On %SUBPATT="2", when it was %SUBPATT="3" on your > AVK> local clock -- and you live in timezone GMT%SUBPAT

Re: Solution to %DATE and %TIME macro problem.

2000-01-29 Thread Allie Martin
On Sat, 29 Jan 2000 23:30:02 +0100, Michael Heydekamp wrote: > Any idea how to get the correct timezone (EST is not a very meaningful > indication to me) in the template in such cases? > Can we be sure to *always* find the correct timezone in one of the > "Received:" headers? All that c

Re: Solution to %DATE and %TIME macro problem.

2000-01-29 Thread Michael Heydekamp
Hello Alexander, on Mon, 13 Dec 1999, at 23:48:25 sender's local time (timezone UTC+0300), Alexander V. Kiselev wrote: >> AM> THE FINAL RESULT: >> AM> >%SETPATTREGEXP="(?m-s)Date\:\s*?((.*?[\d]{4})\s*?([\d]{0,2}\:[\d]{0,2}\:[\d]{0,2})\s*?(.*))"%REGEXPMATCH="%HEADERS" [snip] AVK> So in your t

Success with Japanese

2000-01-29 Thread John De Hoog
Hello, Bat users, Using The Bat! in conjunction with a program called NJWin (also known as NJStar CJK), I am now able to use the program acceptably with Japanese. I can read Japanese messages in both the preview and popup windows, can read most subject lines and other header informatio

Re[2]: Digest (01/29/2000 06:00) (#2000-331)

2000-01-29 Thread Tony Boom
This message: 29/01/2000 18:03 GMT. Hello Marilyn, Saturday, January 29, 2000, 1:55:18 PM, you wrote: MHP> When I go to Account > Properties> I don't find Options and I don't MHP> find any little box that says "Periodical checking each." All I find MHP> is an "Edit User" form. What's the prob

Re: Default e-mail Program?

2000-01-29 Thread Andrew K. Lovetski
Hello, The Bat Users! AMA> Does anyone know how to make The Bat! check to see if it is the AMA> default e-mail program? It would always ask me, but one time I told AMA> it not to ask anymore thinking it would automatically make itself AMA> the default e-mail program. Is there a registry e

Re: RFC2369 (was:Re: Test message)

2000-01-29 Thread Keith Russell
Hello, fellow Bat-lovers. On Saturday, January 29, 2000, 8:59:09 AM, Steve wrote: SL> Friday, January 28, 2000, 8:19:17 PM, Thomas wrote: >> (I really like the "subscribe" information, as the header will be received >> only by people who are subscribed already. ) SL> Really? Let me forward

Re: RFC2369 (was:Re: Test message)

2000-01-29 Thread Steve Lamb
Friday, January 28, 2000, 8:19:17 PM, Thomas wrote: > (I really like the "subscribe" information, as the header will be received > only by people who are subscribed already. ) Really? Let me forward you a message from one of my lists and see what headers you get compared to you being subscri

Re: Signature Thing Frustration

2000-01-29 Thread Steve Lamb
Friday, January 28, 2000, 8:16:53 PM, Paula wrote: > Why can't I get my signature to cut at the -- in replies the way it > should? I put -- before the signature, but TB doesn't seem to > want to keep the space in there consistently. Help. Put it in your template. It keeps it from there. --

Re: Selecting quoted portion of a reply

2000-01-29 Thread Steve Lamb
Friday, January 28, 2000, 7:52:42 PM, Thomas wrote: SL>> Not only that but Kludges is called RFC822 headers there. Odd. > Everywhere now, except in the Main Menu under View, I think. Hmm. And filters. -- Steve C. Lamb | I'm your priest, I'm your shrink, I'm your

Re: Digest (01/29/2000 06:00) (#2000-331)

2000-01-29 Thread Fred Weissman
> Hello list, > Friday, January 28, 2000, 6:01:40 PM, you wrote: lmtdc>> I can't answer the MAPI part but go to Account > Properties > Options, lmtdc>> tick the little box that says 'Periodical checking each' and tell it how lmtdc>> often you want it to auto check for mail. > When I go to Acco

Re[2]: Digest (01/29/2000 06:00) (#2000-331)

2000-01-29 Thread Pasquale J. Festa Sr.
Hello Marilyn, January 29, 2000, 8:55:18 AM, you wrote: MHP> Hello list, MHP> Friday, January 28, 2000, 6:01:40 PM, you wrote: lmtdc>> I can't answer the MAPI part but go to Account > Properties > Options, lmtdc>> tick the little box that says 'Periodical checking each' and tell it how lmtdc>

Problem with Sorting office

2000-01-29 Thread Shanmugam Ganeshkumar
Hi TB users, I have been evaluating TB for qutie some time and will be moving to that very soon (currently I'm on Pine). During these days I fond a major problem. When ever I create a filter and close down the program they are gone. I have to do it again (absurd). I have protected the account

Re: Digest (01/29/2000 06:00) (#2000-331)

2000-01-29 Thread Marilyn H. Pukmel
Hello list, Friday, January 28, 2000, 6:01:40 PM, you wrote: lmtdc> I can't answer the MAPI part but go to Account > Properties > Options, lmtdc> tick the little box that says 'Periodical checking each' and tell it how lmtdc> often you want it to auto check for mail. When I go to Account > Pro

Re: Displaying Digest results in line

2000-01-29 Thread Allie Martin
On Sat, 29 Jan 2000 07:13:11 -0500, L Berk wrote: > I apologize if this is a repeat sending. > I am switching from Eudora to The Bat. I receive a php mailinglist > in digest form. It displayed in the message in Eudora, but in The > Bat it is displaying as a series of attachments with names such

Displaying Digest results in line

2000-01-29 Thread L Berk
I apologize if this is a repeat sending. I am switching from Eudora to The Bat. I receive a php mailinglist in digest form. It displayed in the message in Eudora, but in The Bat it is displaying as a series of attachments with names such as php.73111. Is there a way to get the whole thing to disp

Re: Signature Thing Frustration

2000-01-29 Thread Januk Aggarwal
Hello Paula, On Friday, January 28, 2000 at 23:16:53 GMT -0500 (which was 8:16 PM where I live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] typed: > Hello All, > Why can't I get my signature to cut at the -- in replies the way it > should? I put -- before the signature, but TB doesn't seem to > want to keep the spa