On Thursday, July 20, 2000, 7:34:28 PM, Clif Oliver wrote:
Two problems that I experience. First, all the headers are included when
you save messages *.msg.
CO Sorry, I don't understand. Why is this a problem? This is what TB
CO *should* be doing.
All of the headers are included when you
Hi Clif,
On Thu, 20 Jul 2000 22:48:09 -0700GMT (21/07/2000, 13:48 +0800GMT),
Clif Oliver wrote:
[...]
CO So a message from [EMAIL PROTECTED] comes in, I see it in my Inbox, read
CO it and simply want to file it as part of the project's e-mail. What I
CO am *supposed* to do is ctl-V or Move to
On Thursday, July 20, 2000, 8:18:56 PM, Januk Aggarwal wrote:
Two problems that I experience. First, all the headers are included when
you save messages *.msg.
CO Sorry, I don't understand. Why is this a problem? This is what TB
CO *should* be doing.
All of the headers are included when
Hello Jamie,
On Thursday, July 20, 2000 at 20:21:01 GMT +0100 (which was 12:21 PM
where I live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] typed:
Thankfully TB! can only send plain text mail. This is probably TB!'s
greatest feature as it is real plain text not rich text. TB! can
however receive html mail.
Title: Proof of TB/HTML compatibility
Proof of TB/HTML compatibility
This message is just a proof that TB can send HTML messages if you do it right.
Created on ... July 20, 2000
Hello, the Bat! list recipients,
Friday, July 21, 2000, Januk Aggarwal wrote to Jamie Dainton about
Plain Text Vs Html:
JA Proof of TB/HTML compatibilityProof of TB/HTML compatibility
A nice illustration to the cause of my dislike to HTML messages.
--
Best regards,
Oleg Zalyalov.
Hello Oleg,
On Friday, July 21, 2000 at 12:06:23 GMT +0500 (which was 12:06 AM
where I live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] typed:
JA Proof of TB/HTML compatibilityProof of TB/HTML compatibility
A nice illustration to the cause of my dislike to HTML messages.
Well, I tried to make it as disgusting
On Friday, July 21, 2000, 12:36:32 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
nnn I have found some threading is totally out of whack -- totally unrelated
nnn messages appear under one thread -- they are not from mailing list, from
nnn different senders with different subjects, etc.
Yes, very strange
Hello Marck D. Pearlstone,
On Fri, 21 Jul 2000 00:34:32 +0100 GMT your local time,
which was Friday, July 21, 2000, 6:34:32 AM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Marck D. Pearlstone wrote:
Hi Ben,
On 21 July 2000 at 17:07:59 GMT -0600 (which was 00:07 where I
live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote and made
On Friday, July 21, 2000, 1:06:59 AM, Marck D. Pearlstone wrote:
MDP You can configure the exact layout of a saved message
MDP there. The release notes on TBBETA have called it "Save Template" and
MDP I have been looking all over for a way of stashing templates to disk!
MDP The veil is
Hi Nick,
On 21 July 2000 at 01:52:49 GMT -0700 (which was 09:52 where I
live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote and made these points on the subject
of "Archiving old mail messages":
NA Is there some way to eliminate all of the above headers being
NA included... through use of the Save Message template
Hello Tom,
On Montag, 17. Juli 2000 at 19:06:02 you wrote:
TW When I klick on the "Send queued mail" button and the above error
TW occurs it is not possible to send afterwards. To be precise, when
TW klicking that button again the dialogue "nothing to send" appears.
Perhaps this is
Recently, someone posted the shortcut to reorganize account folders.
Will someone please repost this shortcut.
Thanks,
Ron
--
--
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation
Hi Ron,
On 22 July 2000 at 20:35:32 GMT -0400 (which was 01:35 where I
live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote and made these points on the subject
of "Reorganize Account Folders":
RC Recently, someone posted the shortcut to reorganize account folders.
RC Will someone please repost this shortcut.
Hi Marck, Nick and others,
What is needed is a new option - to save multiple messages to a
single file.
This is a wish-list issue :-)
I have no idea what you guys are whining about. ;-) TB can do this
now. I've just use ctrl-+ to expand this whole thread from Lawrence
down, select all of
Hi Ming-Li,
On 21 July 2000 at 06:20:01 GMT -0700 (which was 14:20 where I
live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote and made these points on the subject
of "Archiving old mail messages":
What is needed is a new option - to save multiple messages to a
single file.
This is a wish-list issue :-)
ML I
On Friday, July 21, 2000, 6:50:20 AM, Marck D. Pearlstone wrote:
MDP I never need to do this - I just took Nick's word for it that it
MDP didn't happen... that'll teach me to check.
Well, I must admit that I _am_ at fault... I was only going by what the
originator of this thread was
JA This message is just a proof that TB can send HTML messages if you
JA do it right.
TB With all due respect, it was proof of The Bats ability to send an
TB attachment.
What's the distinction then between an HTML message and an HTML
attachment, then, if the entire message body is in the HTML
Yesterday morning as I was reading a message, a dialog box appeared
and announced that the "messages.tbi" file was corrupt and I should
run chkdsk. (Windows NT 4, SP 5.)
I closed all my apps, rebooted, and during the boot chkdsk ran (I
guess WinNT sensed that it needed to be run?). During the
CO What would be ideal is if, when I do that, a filter would say,
CO hey! This is from xyz.com domain. And then put it in the project
CO folder rather than the Trash folder.
Actually, this sort of thing could be generally useful.
Imagine if the TB! developers allowed you to essentially define
Hi Marck,
I keep them all and have 64k+ in my message base at present. IMHO
The best method for handling high volume folders to have come up
so far is to have a main and archive folder and let a filter copy
incoming mail to both. Give the "main" folder a size or time
limit to keep the
Hi Orson,
On 21 July 2000 at 09:05:08 GMT -0700 (which was 17:05 where I
live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote and made these points on the subject
of ""Corrupt" TBI file -- should I use a backup?":
OK I've been using The Bat! for the past 24 hours since getting the
OK message without any problems, but
What's the distinction then between an HTML message and an HTML
attachment, then, if the entire message body is in the HTML and TB!
strips the tags to show you the message in each case? IOW, looked
like an HTML message to me...
DH Very easy: Just turn off the "View HTML Messages". You
Hi Tom,
On 21 July 2000 at 09:31:45 GMT -0700 (which was 17:31 where I
live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote and made these points on the subject
of "Filtering trash":
TP Imagine if the TB! developers allowed you to essentially define the
TP action that the delete key took (esp. by allowing it to fire
On Fri, 21 Jul 2000 09:44:38 -0700, Tom Plunket wrote:
DH Very easy: Just turn off the "View HTML Messages". You should see
DH now the plain text and a tab for the HTML version. I use two
DH instances of TB!, one at work with view HTML as standard turned off
DH (my annoying colleagues use OE
Hi Ming-Li,
On Thu, 20 Jul 2000 07:58:43 -0700, you wrote:
ML This is very strange. I imported all my mail from OE to The Bat not
ML too long ago (around late May or early June), and I'm sure all the
ML headers are imported intact. (I've just checked some of my old mail
ML to be sure.)
ML Are
Hello Thomas,
Thursday, July 20, 2000, 11:15:04 PM, you wrote:
TF Hi Clif,
TF On Thu, 20 Jul 2000 22:48:09 -0700GMT (21/07/2000, 13:48 +0800GMT),
TF Clif Oliver wrote:
TF [...]
CO So a message from [EMAIL PROTECTED] comes in, I see it in my Inbox, read
CO it and simply want to file it as
Hi Marck,
On Fri, 21 Jul 2000 17:32:18 +0100, you wrote:
MDP .tbi files will recreate on-the-fly if ever any are missing. If you
MDP are doubtful of the integrity of any of these - delete them. They will
MDP be rebuilt.
And the Flagging, color groups, memos, ... are lost!?
cu,
Dirk
--
Hi SyP,
On 21 July 2000 at 00:38:55 GMT +0200 (which was 23:38 where I
live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote and made these points on the subject
of ""Corrupt" TBI file -- should I use a backup?":
DH And the Flagging, color groups, memos, ... are lost!?
MDP It shouldn't be. The TBI files are only the
ACM Most mailers send two messages, i.e., the html message and a
ACM plain text version. Are you sure that TB! actually displays the plain
ACM text message by stripping the HTML stuff out and reformatting?
Ya pretty sure. A lot of mail that I seem to get doesn't have the
text version
MDP of ""Corrupt" TBI file -- should I use a backup?":
DH And the Flagging, color groups, memos, ... are lost!?
MDP It shouldn't be. The TBI files are only the indexes to the mail-base.
MDP They speed up access to the TBB data content. The TBB files are where
MDP the actual data is held.
S
Hello Tony,
On Friday, July 21, 2000 at 09:31:44 GMT +0100 (which was 1:31 AM
where I live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] typed:
This message: 21/07/2000 09:28 GMT.
Hello Januk,
With all due respect, it was proof of The Bats ability to send an
attachment.
Nope... there is a difference. If you
Hello Tom,
On Friday, July 21, 2000 at 16:57:54 GMT -0700 (which was 4:57 PM
where I live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] typed:
ACM Most mailers send two messages, i.e., the html message and a
ACM plain text version. Are you sure that TB! actually displays the plain
ACM text message by
Ya pretty sure. A lot of mail that I seem to get doesn't have the
text version also, it's just an HTML-only message.
JA I don't get enough HTML mail to make the distinction. However, I can tell
JA you that the message in my outbox and in my sent folder both had the plain
JA text part.
34 matches
Mail list logo
