Re: TB Hangs on Fetch

2002-05-04 Thread Roelof Otten
Hello Lynn, On Fri, 3 May 2002 17:40:47 -0700GMT (4-5-02, 2:40 +0200GMT, where I live), you wrote: LT That leaves what to do about purging/compressing the trash LT folder. LT The paths all seem to be correct in TB's configuration and LT also in the registry. I'm still hoping someone will know

Re[2]: The bat is a virus. goodbye

2002-05-04 Thread Alexis Haeringer
Bonjour Michael, Mercredi, le 01 mai 2002 à 23h44 [GMT -0700] (ce qui correspond à 08h44 ici où j'habite), Michael L. Wilson =[MLW] a écrit à [EMAIL PROTECTED] : MLW Microsoft Product for email, so to keep the discussion going, I have no MLW choice but Eudora. no you could try pocomail

Annoying address book limitation

2002-05-04 Thread Miguel A. Urech
Hello all, Up to now I had only used AB to include names and e-mail addresses. Yesterday I decide to start using it to include some other details like home or business addresses, phone numbers, etc., and I was completely annoyed when I saw I could not copy/paste from an e-mail (either in preview

Re: A lot of questions on various subjects

2002-05-04 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Peter, @04 May 2002, 05:11:17 +0200 (04:11 UK time) Peter Fjelsten wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To me this indicates that the name is not extracted right (I am not complaining about your work, just trying to help you help

OT: FTP clients

2002-05-04 Thread Kai Göing
Hi: I am looking for an FTP client that is basically as small, stable and fast as TB and offers a lot of functionality. Bloatware clients like SmartFTP or WS_FTP Pro are therefore out of the question for me. I've been evaluating several clients like AbsoluteFTP 2.01 (www.vandyke.com),

Re: Annoying address book limitation

2002-05-04 Thread Tim
On Saturday, 4 May 2002, Miguel A. Urech wrote: MAU I don't know if this has been reported or dealt with in this list MAU before, I must admit I didn't even look in the archives. I don't know if it's been reported. I've never reported it, but I have (in the privacy of my own home) called down

Re: OT: FTP clients

2002-05-04 Thread Miguel A. Urech
Hello Kai, What is your favorite FTP client? WS_FTP Pro, since many years ago :-) Using the classic interface and not the Explorer one, though. -- Best regards, Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain) Using The Bat! v1.60c Current

Re: A lot of questions on various subjects

2002-05-04 Thread Peter Fjelsten
Marck, On 04-05-2002 11:41, you wrote: M Yes - means navn: is the first line in the message. Use this M instead: Yepee, thanks. -- greeting Best regards /greeting author Peter Fjelsten /author thebat version 1.60c /thebat version os Windows XP 5.1/os

Re: Message Flag

2002-05-04 Thread Marcus Ohlström
On Saturday, May 4, 2002, 11:51, 3w wrote: Some of you send messages which are flagged in a special way - I don't know how to explain it better than 'envelope with small circle and kind of ok-sign in it'. I can't read the mail, it's not shown in the preview window. Why? Because you are

Re: OT: FTP clients

2002-05-04 Thread Lars Geiger
Hi Kai, On Saturday, May 4, 2002 at 11:37:13 [GMT +0200], you wrote: KG What is your favorite FTP client? FileZilla from http://sourceforge.net/projects/filezilla. It's small, fast, stable, constantly improving *and* free (GPL). It has been my FTP client of choice for some time now. --

Re: Message Flag

2002-05-04 Thread Roelof Otten
Hello 3w, On Sat, 4 May 2002 11:51:21 +0200GMT (4-5-02, 11:51 +0200GMT, where I live), you wrote: 3 Some of you send messages which are flagged in a special way - I 3 don't know how to explain it better than 'envelope with small 3 circle and kind of ok-sign in it'. I can't read the mail, it's 3

Re: Annoying address book limitation

2002-05-04 Thread Dierk Haasis
Hello Tim! On Saturday, May 4, 2002 at 11:58:30 AM you wrote: My response is: Many people post complaining about the editor. The replies can usually be summarised as Get used to it, you'll love it. That is, change yourself not the software, which is essentially what the quote above is

Re: OT: FTP clients

2002-05-04 Thread Georg A. Krohg
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 KG I am looking for an FTP client that is basically as small, stable and KG fast as TB and offers a lot of functionality. Bloatware clients like snip I'm using good, old and free LeechFTP (http://stud.fh-heilbronn.de/~jdebis/leechftp/). Your

Re: OT: FTP clients

2002-05-04 Thread Geoff Lane
On 04 May 2002, 10:37, Kai Göing wrote: I am looking for an FTP client that is basically as small, stable and fast as TB and offers a lot of functionality. Bloatware clients like SmartFTP or WS_FTP Pro are therefore out of the question for me. I've been evaluating several clients like

Re[2]: Message Flag

2002-05-04 Thread 3w
Thanks for the help, now I can read them. :-) Will try to follow the discussion more detailled so I don't miss those important subjects. greets, 3w Saturday, May 4, 2002, 12:28:02 PM, you wrote: RO Hello 3w, RO On Sat, 4 May 2002 11:51:21 +0200GMT (4-5-02, 11:51 +0200GMT, where I RO live),

Re[2]: Message Flag

2002-05-04 Thread 3w
How can I get version 1.60i? The official version is 1.60h. Saturday, May 4, 2002, 12:13:57 PM, you wrote: MO On Saturday, May 4, 2002, 11:51, 3w wrote: Some of you send messages which are flagged in a special way - I don't know how to explain it better than 'envelope with small circle and

Re: Message Flag

2002-05-04 Thread Marcus Ohlström
On Saturday, May 4, 2002, 12:53, 3w wrote: How can I get version 1.60i? The official version is 1.60h. http://www.ritlabs.com/ftp/pub/the_bat/beta/ -- Regards, Marcus Ohlström Using The Bat! v1.60i on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 2 PGP Public Key at

Re[2]: Message Flag

2002-05-04 Thread 3w
Thanks, that was fast! BTW, works perfect. ;-) cu, 3w Saturday, May 4, 2002, 12:59:47 PM, you wrote: MO On Saturday, May 4, 2002, 12:53, 3w wrote: How can I get version 1.60i? The official version is 1.60h. MO http://www.ritlabs.com/ftp/pub/the_bat/beta/

Re: OT: FTP clients

2002-05-04 Thread Dave Conroy
Hi Georg, Saturday, May 4, 2002, 11:40:22 AM, you wrote: KG I am looking for an FTP client that is basically as small, stable KG and fast as TB and offers a lot of functionality. For my own web sites, I usually use the built in FTP of GoLive 5 as it's easy to set up, fast and stable.

Re[2]: Message Flag

2002-05-04 Thread 3w
How can I get version 1.60i? Do I have to subscribe on a sort of beta-distribution list? The official version still is 1.60h. 3w Saturday, May 4, 2002, 12:13:57 PM, you wrote: MO On Saturday, May 4, 2002, 11:51, 3w wrote: Some of you send messages which are flagged in a special way - I

Re: OT: FTP clients

2002-05-04 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Georg, @04 May 2002, 12:40:22 +0200 (11:40 UK time) Georg A. Krohg wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] KG I am looking for an FTP client that is basically as small, stable and KG fast as TB and offers a lot of functionality.

Re: Message Flag

2002-05-04 Thread Marcus Ohlström
Could not sent this message to the list because the word subs***be was one of the first few lines. Maybe if I enter some empty lines here: On Saturday, May 4, 2002, 12:47, 3w wrote: How can I get version 1.60i? Do I have to subscribe on a sort of beta-distribution list? The official

Re: Message Flag

2002-05-04 Thread Marcus Ohlström
On Saturday, May 4, 2002, 12:47, 3w wrote: How can I get version 1.60i? Do I have to subscribe on a sort of beta-distribution list? The official version still is 1.60h. Join TBBETA, send a mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Regards, Marcus Ohlström Using The Bat! v1.60i on Windows 2000 5.0

Wrong mailbox

2002-05-04 Thread Fr van Limpt
Saturday, May 4, 2002, Hello udlers, I just sent myself a test message that I found back in my Netscape Comm. inbox, instead of my TB! inbox!! Must have been messing around somewhere in my account settings, but cannot figure out where. Anyone a hint? ;-/ Hope to read you ... ;-\ Fré.

Re: S/MIME standards was: Re: Anti-Virus

2002-05-04 Thread Michael Disabato
Friday, May 3, 2002, 7:08:22 AM, Mandara scribbled: MR I still don't know why the two implementations should be MR incompatible, but they are. I can S/MIME sign using either one, MD They weren't. This is a bug that has been reported. M Hm, no, it refers to normal S/MIME implementation/standard

Re: Bug? -- 1.60 Inbox-Known Deletion Causes Filtering Error

2002-05-04 Thread Mike Smith
At Saturday, May 4, 2002, 4:15:31 AM, role+the wrote: Hi, I think the old bug-reporting changed, but I can't find or remember where it goes now, so herewith my findings... Just upgraded to 1.60h, running NT4. I found I couldn't move the Inbox - Known folder into a sub-folder, and it's

Re: Wrong mailbox

2002-05-04 Thread Roelof Otten
Hello Fré, On Sat, 4 May 2002 15:44:09 +0200GMT (4-5-02, 15:44 +0200GMT, where I live), you wrote: FvL I just sent myself a test message that I found back in my FvL Netscape Comm. inbox, instead of my TB! inbox!! Must have been FvL messing around somewhere in my account settings, but cannot FvL

Re[2]: List footer: Adding one

2002-05-04 Thread role+the_bat
... in this case especially: The place where to report bugs properly. Wouldn't that be a good idea? Just a thought that came up because lots of people lately ask, how to report bugs: MDP I've done it. The footer's a bit long now, but what the heck! MDP

Re: Annoying address book limitation

2002-05-04 Thread Jonathan Angliss
On Sat, 4 May 2002, Miguel A. Urech wrote: Hello all, Up to now I had only used AB to include names and e-mail addresses. Yesterday I decide to start using it to include some other details like home or business addresses, phone numbers, etc., and I was completely annoyed when I saw I could

Re[2]: Bug? -- 1.60 Inbox-Known Deletion Causes Filtering Error

2002-05-04 Thread role+the_bat
MS Is the known filter set to active? Nope - wasn't beforehand, and still isn't. I hadn't realised how reliant I'd become on my handful of filters over the months (years?) now that everything's being dumped in the same folder, it's much harder to keep track!! -- Best regards, James

Re: OT: FTP clients

2002-05-04 Thread Jonathan Angliss
On Sat, 4 May 2002, Kai Göing wrote: Hi: I am looking for an FTP client that is basically as small, stable and fast as TB and offers a lot of functionality. Bloatware clients like SmartFTP or WS_FTP Pro are therefore out of the question for me. I've been evaluating several clients like

Re[2]: Bug? -- 1.60 Inbox-Known Deletion Causes Filtering Error

2002-05-04 Thread Lynna Lunsford
Hello Mike, Saturday, May 4, 2002, 6:31:01 AM, you digitally penned the following; MS At Saturday, May 4, 2002, 4:15:31 AM, role+the wrote: Hi, I think the old bug-reporting changed, but I can't find or remember where it goes now, so herewith my findings... Just upgraded to 1.60h,

Re: Message Flag

2002-05-04 Thread Jonathan Angliss
I'm guessing you're meaning the envelop is marked with a S/MIME signature. Not everybody on the list uses them, so I'm guessing only some of them appear with it on. There has been a long thread over the last couple of days (and probably before) about TB! and S/MIME. Unfortunately I cannot guide

Re[2]: Wrong mailbox

2002-05-04 Thread Lynna Lunsford
Hello Roelof, Saturday, May 4, 2002, 6:36:13 AM, you digitally penned the following; RO Hello Fré, RO On Sat, 4 May 2002 15:44:09 +0200GMT (4-5-02, 15:44 +0200GMT, where I RO live), you wrote: FvL I just sent myself a test message that I found back in my FvL Netscape Comm. inbox, instead of

Templates for Groups

2002-05-04 Thread joeo
Hi, I have defined a group with two address in the group. I have defined a New Message and a Forward templates for the group name. The New Message Template works but the Forward template doe NOT work. I am forwarding using the group name - all entries. Any help will be appreciated. Using THE

Re: S/MIME standards was: Re: Anti-Virus

2002-05-04 Thread Jonathan Angliss
On Sat, 4 May 2002, Michael Disabato wrote: snip I can confirm this. I've tried reading a message originated from Outlook and TheBat! 1.60c. The implementations are mutually incompatible. So much so, that Outlook will not even recognize that the message from TB! was even signed. The

Re[2]: Wrong mailbox

2002-05-04 Thread Jonathan Angliss
On Sat, 4 May 2002, Lynna Lunsford wrote: If you don't want Netscape checking your e-mail you will have to go into the Netscape Mail e-mail account settings and deselect the box where it says to check mail every ?? Minutes. If you don't, then anytime you open the program it will

Re[2]: Bug? -- 1.60 Inbox-Known Deletion Causes Filtering Error

2002-05-04 Thread Jonathan Angliss
On Sat, 4 May 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: MS Is the known filter set to active? Nope - wasn't beforehand, and still isn't. I hadn't realised how reliant I'd become on my handful of filters over the months (years?) now that everything's being dumped in the same folder, it's much harder

Re: OT: FTP clients

2002-05-04 Thread Costas Papadopoulos
I am looking for an FTP client that is basically as small, stable and fast as TB and offers a lot of functionality. SmartFTP. Free, well supported (not that you would need much support) and excellent performance. -- Best regards, Costasmailto:[EMAIL

Re[2]: OT: FTP clients

2002-05-04 Thread Ken Marilyn
Hello Jonathan, Take a look at CuteFTP and CuteFTP Pro. I really like it. www.cuteftp.com/products/cuteftp/index.shtml Best Regards, KennyB www.runnerduck.com Saturday, May 4, 2002, 7:41:00 AM, you wrote: On Sat, 4 May 2002, Kai Göing wrote: Hi: I am looking for an FTP client that is

Re: OT: FTP clients

2002-05-04 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Costas, @04 May 2002, 18:14:56 +0300 (16:14 UK time) Costas Papadopoulos wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] I am looking for an FTP client that is basically as small, stable and fast as TB and offers a lot of functionality.

Re[2]: TB Hangs on Fetch

2002-05-04 Thread Lynn Turriff
Yes! That seems to have done it! You guys have been great, I don't think I've ever fixed anything so quickly using a list group. I'll hang around, just in case I can return the favour, unlikely as that seems ;-) Many thanks! Lynn Saturday, May 4, 2002, 1:16:33 AM, you wrote: RO Hello

Re: List footer: Adding one

2002-05-04 Thread Dierk Haasis
Hello role+the! On Saturday, May 4, 2002 at 4:36:45 PM you wrote: Just to let you know ... that site causes my browser (Opera v6) to report the CA-chain as being incomplete. All browsers will do this. Maxim (or Stefan) wrote that we should ignore it. -- Dierk Haasis http://www.Write4U.de

Re: Annoying address book limitation

2002-05-04 Thread Melissa Reese
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Saturday, May 04, 2002, at 3:36:49 AM PST, Dierk Haasis wrote: Tim: My response is: Many people post complaining about the editor. The replies can usually be summarised as Get used to it, you'll love it. That is, change yourself not the

Sending individual messages to group members

2002-05-04 Thread Geoff Lane
Using The Bat! v1.60c on Windows NT 4.0 Build 1381 Service Pack 6 I'm sure that I've seen this topic come up before -- but I couldn't find an answer by searching my archive. I have an Address Book group to which I add contacts as the working day progresses. At the end of the day, I want to send

Feature suggestion

2002-05-04 Thread Peter Fjelsten
TheBat-users, Wouldn't it be nice if one could set the language for the spell checker in the address book? This way, it would check against English when one is writing English recipients, Danish for Danish recipinets, etc. [I know of ALT+H+L+1/2/3/etc] -- greeting Best regards /greeting

Re: Annoying address book limitation

2002-05-04 Thread Peter Fjelsten
Melissa, On 04-05-2002 18:52, you wrote: M When new TB! users complain about the TB! editor not working M normally, I can only hope that soon, they will realize that there M are different questions to ask. They may - as it happened with me - be M very pleasantly surprised with what can be

Re: Sending individual messages to group members

2002-05-04 Thread Costas Papadopoulos
Hello Geoff, Saturday, May 4, 2002, 7:56:13 PM, you wrote: When I send a message to the group, TB generates one message that lists every member of the group in the To: field. For reasons of confidentiality, this is the last thing that I want. Additionally, I don't want to place the

TheBat does not fully render HTML messages

2002-05-04 Thread Mark Knipfer
I am noticing in the HTML messages that I receive not all HTML parts of the message is rendering, such as graphics and other parts of the HTML message. The same message appears to render fine in Microsoft Outlook Express 6.0 and Netscape Communicator 4.79 Messenger. Is this a known TheBat! HTML

Re: TheBat does not fully render HTML messages

2002-05-04 Thread Lynna Lunsford
Hello Mark, Saturday, May 4, 2002, 9:26:22 AM, you digitally penned the following; MK I am noticing in the HTML messages that I receive not all HTML parts of MK the message is rendering, such as graphics and other parts of the HTML MK message. The same message appears to render fine in

Re: TheBat does not fully render HTML messages

2002-05-04 Thread Joseph N.
Probably the parts that you are not seeing are not embedded in the message. Many commercial HTML messages link to a server for graphics (as well as, occasionally, for other purposes such as web bugs). TB!'s native viewer will not D/L from the Internet the way that OE and NS do; in the minds of

Archiving mail

2002-05-04 Thread Paul Shave
In Outlook, you can auto-archive mailbox folders, according to criteria you set, eg more than 60 days old. The archived data goes to a separate .pst file, which you can open in Outlook alongside your regular mail. This is very useful if you need to refer back to an old message. Can The Bat do

Re: Feature suggestion

2002-05-04 Thread Jernej Simoni
Hello Peter, 04. maj 2002, 19:00:47, you wrote: PF Wouldn't it be nice if one could set the language for the spell PF checker in the address book? This way, it would check against English PF when one is writing English recipients, Danish for Danish recipinets, PF etc. Look at the %lang

Re: TheBat does not fully render HTML messages

2002-05-04 Thread Jan Rifkinson
Hello Mark At 1:26 PM on Saturday, May 04, 2002 you wrote the following about [TheBat does not fully render HTML messages]: Mark I am noticing in the HTML messages that I receive not Mark all HTML parts of the message is rendering, such as Mark graphics and other parts of the HTML message. The

Re: Archiving mail

2002-05-04 Thread Joseph N.
You can archive in at least four ways using TB!. One way is to keep the messages in the active message bases. That's the way a lot of users on this list do it; they have tens of thousands of messages. TB! could be unique in its ability to handle that type f load in a stable way. A variation

Re: Wrong mailbox

2002-05-04 Thread Fré van Limpt
(mess. written on Netsc. Comm. in order to follow TBUDL thread) Hello Lynna, You wrote: If you don't want Netscape checking your e-mail you will have to go into the Netscape Mail e-mail account settings and deselect the box where it says to check mail every ?? Minutes. I did and it didn't

Re: Wrong mailbox

2002-05-04 Thread Fré van Limpt
(mess. written on Netsc. Comm. in order to follow TBUDL thread) Hello Jonathan, You wrote Or delete the account information... that'll stop it checking all together Well' I tried already: didn't work!! :-\ I'll repeat all the steps anyway, thanks. Fré

Re[2]: Archiving mail

2002-05-04 Thread Paul Shave
Thanks Joseph, that's helpful. On 04 May 2002 at 18:53:52 you wrote: JN A variation on that is to move the messages to a separate set of JN folders, perhaps with a different user name. That way, they would JN remain in the .TBB format, but not be on your screen or available all JN the time.

Re: Wrong mailbox

2002-05-04 Thread Fré van Limpt
Hello Roelof, (mess. written on Netsc. Comm. in order to follow TBUDL thread) You wrote I don't see any problem with that. It only means that you've collected your e-mail with Netscape instead of TB. Why didn't you expect that? For the following reason. Since the moment I installed TB! (15

Re[2]: Templates for Groups

2002-05-04 Thread joeo
Hi Roelof, Yes, there is a forwarding template for the members of the group, however, the members template is not used either. It is using the account/folder template. If I delete the account/folder forwarding template, then it will not use ANY forwarding template that I have

Re: Wrong mailbox

2002-05-04 Thread Mrten
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Om 20:16 op zaterdag 4 mei 2002, Fré van Limpt: I did and it didn't make any difference. I ticked ' 0 ' (as a synonym for 'never'), which was replaced by '15' (seems to be a standard setting) ! :-/ there is a checkbox before that particular

TB! v1.60i

2002-05-04 Thread Luc
Good evening list, Has anybody had bad experiences with TB! v1.60i ? -- Best regards, Luc mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Powered by The Bat! version 1.60c with Windows 2000 (build 2195), version 5.0 and using the best

Re[3]: Archiving mail

2002-05-04 Thread Joseph N.
Here are two different ways. Which one to use depends on how often you will want to archive your mail and refer to the messages. 1. A separate account: A. Create a new account. Go into Options/Network Administration. B. Go into the Groups tab. Create a group comprising your current

Re: TB! v1.60i

2002-05-04 Thread Lynna Lunsford
Hello Luc, Saturday, May 4, 2002, 10:58:22 AM, you digitally penned the following; L Good evening list, L Has anybody had bad experiences with TB! v1.60i ? Skipped I and went straight to J. -- Regards, Lynnamailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat!1.60j

Re: Quick Template problem...?

2002-05-04 Thread Tim Musson
Hey Marck, My MUA believes you used Ritlabs SecureBat! (v1.60d/iKey1000) to write the following on Friday, May 3, 2002 at 10:43:32 PM. MDP -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 MDP Hi Tim, MDP @04 May 2002, 22:26:28 -0400 (03:26 UK time) Tim Musson wrote in MDP [EMAIL

Re: TB! v1.60i

2002-05-04 Thread Luc
Good evening Lynna, It was foretold that on 5-5-2002 @ 23:07:20 GMT-0800 (which was 9:07:20 where I live) Lynna Lunsford wrote and spread these wise comments on TB! v1.60i: snipped a bit LL Skipped I and went straight to J. But that is still beta, isn't it? -- Best regards, Luc

Question about mailto and spaces

2002-05-04 Thread Costas Papadopoulos
I'm trying to include the following text in my signature: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=Send%20PGP%20Key When I put this in a Quick Template, the '%20' script ends up in the final message as a plain '20' and is not translated to a space character. Any ideas as to what I'm doing wrong? --

Re: Question about mailto and spaces

2002-05-04 Thread Melissa Reese
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Saturday, May 04, 2002, at 1:16:36 PM PST, Costas Papadopoulos wrote: I'm trying to include the following text in my signature: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=Send%20PGP%20Key When I put this in a Quick Template, the '%20' script ends up

Re[2]: TB! v1.60i

2002-05-04 Thread Lynna Lunsford
Hello Luc, Saturday, May 4, 2002, 12:06:07 PM, you digitally penned the following; L But that is still beta, isn't it? Well, I admit the download link was on the beta site but at one point I thought that moderators said that these letter series a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, i, j were bug - fixes

Re: Templates for Groups

2002-05-04 Thread Roelof Otten
Hello joeo, On Sat, 04 May 2002 14:34:09 -0400GMT (4-5-02, 20:34 +0200GMT, where I live), you wrote: j Yes, there is a forwarding template for the members of the group, j however, the members template is not used either. It is using the j account/folder template. If I delete the

1.60j Rar file corrupted?

2002-05-04 Thread Melissa Reese
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello, I use PowerArchiver for all my zipping and unzipping of various compressed files. It usually has no trouble with .rar archives. However... Today, I downloaded the TB! 1.60j .rar file from the TB! beta ftp site (twice - just to be sure that

Re: 1.60j Rar file corrupted?

2002-05-04 Thread Lynna Lunsford
Hello Melissa, Saturday, May 4, 2002, 12:37:39 PM, you digitally penned the following; MR Done. -- 5/4/2002 1:17 PM MR Warning: 1 error(s) found in the archive: tb160j.rar MR Any ideas? MR Melissa I downloaded the same file and used the free program Ultimate Zip to open it and its working

Re: Quick Template problem...?

2002-05-04 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Tim, @04 May 2002, 15:54:52 -0400 (20:54 UK time) Tim Musson wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] %WRAPPED=%Quotes%Cursor MDP NB: %WRAPPED=%Quotes will only wrap the first paragraph of the MDP quotes... I wondered about that, is

Re: 1.60j Rar file corrupted?

2002-05-04 Thread Ben Mills
Saturday, May 4, 2002, 4:37:39 PM, you wrote: MR Today, I downloaded the TB! 1.60j .rar file from the TB! beta ftp site MR (twice - just to be sure that it wasn't a problem caused during MR download). When I try to extract the executable from the .rar archive, MR nothing shows up in the

Re: Feature suggestion

2002-05-04 Thread Roelof Otten
Hello Peter, On Sat, 4 May 2002 20:12:01 +0200GMT (4-5-02, 20:12 +0200GMT, where I live), you wrote: PF Could you tell me how to include a template in another template (without PF the first template is set in the second)? That would be using quick templates. Create a quick template (Options -

Re: Sending individual messages to group members

2002-05-04 Thread Roelof Otten
Hello Geoff, On Sat, 4 May 2002 17:56:13 +0100GMT (4-5-02, 18:56 +0200GMT, where I live), you wrote: GL Additionally, is it possible to create an outgoing filter that moves GL the recipient from pending to the notified group? Since Costas answered your other question I'll address this one.

Re: Feature suggestion

2002-05-04 Thread Peter Fjelsten
Roelof, On 04-05-2002 22:55, you wrote: R Create a quick template with the same contents as your current new R message account template. (Call it general-new) Now delete your R account template for new messages and replace it with a template that R only has %QInclude=general-new in it as first

Re[2]: 1.60j Rar file corrupted?

2002-05-04 Thread Lynna Lunsford
Hello Ben, Saturday, May 4, 2002, 1:03:21 PM, you digitally penned the following; MR # MR Testing archive: tb160j.rar -- 5/4/2002 1:17 PM MR # MR Testing file: thebat.exe MR -- CRC ERROR BM Both 160i and

Re: 1.60j Rar file corrupted?

2002-05-04 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Melissa, @04 May 2002, 13:37:39 -0700 (21:37 UK time) Melissa Reese wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] I use PowerArchiver for all my zipping and unzipping of various compressed files. It usually has no trouble with .rar

Re: 1.60j Rar file corrupted?

2002-05-04 Thread Jernej Simoni
Hello Melissa, 04. maj 2002, 22:37:39, you wrote: MR I use PowerArchiver for all my zipping and unzipping of various MR compressed files. It usually has no trouble with .rar archives. MR However... Does it support RAR v3 archives? All the newer RARs are made with RAR 3, and you need at least

Re: 1.60j Rar file corrupted?

2002-05-04 Thread Shauna Scott
Hello Ben, Saturday, May 4, 2002, 3:03:21 PM, you wrote: Both 160i and 160j are corrupted. No recovery record and Winrar can't fix it. Check your Winrar version - the 1.60 files only work with the most recent version. I had no trouble extracting 1.60j -- Best regards, Shauna

Re[3]: 1.60j Rar file corrupted?

2002-05-04 Thread Ben Mills
Sunday, May 5, 2002, 5:10:40 AM, you wrote: LL I have a copy, if you want me to e-mail it to you let me know. Sure. Send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so it won't get lost in my list account. Thanks, Ben -- Benmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: 1.60j Rar file corrupted?

2002-05-04 Thread Melissa Reese
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Saturday, May 04, 2002, at 2:03:21 PM PST, Ben Mills wrote: Both 160i and 160j are corrupted. No recovery record and Winrar can't fix it. I downloaded and installed UltimateZip (thanks Lynna!), and it didn't complain when I tried to extract

Re: Feature suggestion

2002-05-04 Thread Roelof Otten
Hello Peter, On Sat, 4 May 2002 23:02:46 +0200GMT (4-5-02, 23:02 +0200GMT, where I live), you wrote: PF I cannot get %LANGUAGE=DA under an AB entry to work (when another PF template is in effect for, e.g. the account). Is this to be expected? No, that's not to be expected. The AB template will

Re: 1.60j Rar file corrupted?

2002-05-04 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Ben, @04 May 2002, 17:03:21 -0400 (22:03 UK time) Ben Mills wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] MR Testing file: thebat.exe -- CRC ERROR Both 160i and 160j are corrupted. No recovery record and Winrar can't fix

Re[2]: 1.60j Rar file corrupted?

2002-05-04 Thread Ben Mills
Saturday, May 4, 2002, 5:20:38 PM, you wrote: MDP -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- MDP Hash: SHA1 MDP Hi Ben, MDP @04 May 2002, 17:03:21 -0400 (22:03 UK time) Ben Mills wrote in MDP [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] MR Testing file: thebat.exe -- CRC ERROR Both

Re: 1.60j Rar file corrupted?

2002-05-04 Thread Melissa Reese
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Saturday, May 04, 2002, at 2:36:34 PM PST, Melissa Reese (that's me!) wrote: I think the issue must be what Jernej and Marck mentioned - PA and WinRar not being able to deal with the new Rar format (I've just written to PA support to see if

Re: TB! v1.60i

2002-05-04 Thread Gene Gough
This message (below) is marked INVALID SIGNATURE. The next one is not marked. Sunday, May 5, 2002, 3:07:20 AM, Lynna wrote: Hello Luc, Saturday, May 4, 2002, 10:58:22 AM, you digitally penned the following; L Good evening list, L Has anybody had bad experiences with TB! v1.60i

Re: TB! v1.60i

2002-05-04 Thread Gene Gough
This message, (below) sent at almost the same time a previous is NOT marked INVALID SIGNATURE Sunday, May 5, 2002, 4:20:46 AM, Lynna wrote: Hello Luc, Saturday, May 4, 2002, 12:06:07 PM, you digitally penned the following; L But that is still beta, isn't it? Well, I admit the

OT: FTP Directory Access Question

2002-05-04 Thread Kai Göing
Hi: I have the following problem: I have a link on my web site that points to a directory (/vault/) on the FTP server. When clicking on that link I would like the browser to show the contents of that FTP directory so that any stuff stored in there can be downloaded via WWW. However, whenever I

Re[2]: TB! v1.60i

2002-05-04 Thread Lynna Lunsford
Hello Gene, Saturday, May 4, 2002, 3:19:05 PM, you digitally penned the following; GG Hi Lynna, GG I was not concerned about the signature but was wondering how the GG messages that had the exact same time stamp on them could be different GG in the valid test.. I now suspect it was just that

Re: 1.60j Rar file corrupted?

2002-05-04 Thread Adam
I got this: -- tb160h.rar does not appear to be a valid archive! Current Ver: 1.60i FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com

Re: 1.60j Rar file corrupted?

2002-05-04 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Adam, @05 May 2002, 21:10:46 -0400 (02:10 UK time) Adam wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] I got this: -- tb160h.rar does not appear to be a valid archive! [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL

Re[3]: connection centre

2002-05-04 Thread Adam
On Sat, 4 May 2002, Ben Mills wrote: Saturday, May 4, 2002, 12:30:33 AM, you wrote: At the top your your screen, click account then click view log. A Nope. That isn't the Log that appears in Connection Centre. View log A just views addresses. That one has an icon, BTW, easy

Re: 1.60j Rar file corrupted?

2002-05-04 Thread tracer
Hello Adam, On Sat, 4 May 2002 21:10:46 -0400 (EDT) GMT your local time, which was Sunday, May 5, 2002, 8:10:46 AM (GMT+0700) my local time, Adam wrote: I got this: -- tb160h.rar does not appear to be a valid archive! This same complaint has been on this list before

Re[2]: Templates for Groups

2002-05-04 Thread joeo
Hi Roelof, Saturday, May 04, 2002, 4:34:57 PM, you wrote: In that case I think that you've got multiple entries in the address book with the same address. Otherwise TB gives preference to the templates in this order: personal, address book group, folder, account. When you've got two

Bold bug

2002-05-04 Thread Adam
Anyone notice any new bugs? I might have found one. Text stays bold arbitrarily. Have they tweaked the new features yet, other than making Menu Navigator disappear even though it remains selected? I would like to try a beta. But I'm told there are no betas, is that true?

Re: Bold bug

2002-05-04 Thread Mark Knipfer
On Saturday, May 4, 2002, 9:59:04 PM, Adam wrote: A Text stays bold arbitrarily. Please provide me the information on this one, I don't know where you mean the text stays bolded. A Have they tweaked the new features yet, other than making Menu A Navigator disappear even though it remains

Connection Centre window throws off Windows Alt+Tab window toggle

2002-05-04 Thread Mark Knipfer
Is there a way in TheBat! to show a mail check is occurring when the Connection Centre hidden? The Connection Centre window opens/closes all the time and this is starting to throw off the window toggle (Alt+Tab) in Windows. I currently have the Connection Center hidden, but if there is also a

Re: Bold bug

2002-05-04 Thread Adam
On Sat, 4 May 2002, Mark Knipfer wrote: On Saturday, May 4, 2002, 9:59:04 PM, Adam wrote: A Text stays bold arbitrarily. Please provide me the information on this one, I don't know where you mean the text stays bolded. In your list of messages, they start out bold. Unread. And then

  1   2   >