Re: HTML Filter

2002-09-13 Thread Jonathan Angliss
Hi Sudip, On Fri, 13 Sep 2002 11:35:26 +0545, you wrote: HTML is put into emails in two main ways (that I know of), inline, and via attachment. You can filter for inline by searching the kludges for Content-Type: text/html...you cannot search for it if it is done via attachment as TB!

Re[2]: Moved

2002-09-13 Thread Mark Wieder
Thursday, September 12, 2002, 8:31:01 PM you wrote: JH However, it has always worked better for me to put my local provider's JH name in as the SMTP server. So, for my old connection, the SMTP server JH read: smtp.sweetwaterhsa.net and the POP3 server was fastmail.fm. Try checking your

Re: Moved

2002-09-13 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo Jeanny, On Fri, 13 Sep 2002 02:23:13 UTGMT (13-9-02, 4:23 +0200GMT, where I live), you wrote: JH I moved and have a new cable internet provider. When I try to JH check mail with TB!, it wants do connect to my old ISP. Tell it not to use a dial-up connection. Options - Network and

Re: Mangled attachments

2002-09-13 Thread Dierk Haasis
Hello Eddy! On Thursday, September 12, 2002 at 9:38:37 PM you wrote: In the case of JPEG attachments, clicking the little tab at the bottom of the window that allows you to view the image results in nothing but a blank pane when the attachment is corrupt. I've seen that with Eddy's zipped

Re: Mangled attachments

2002-09-13 Thread Dierk Haasis
Hello Technology! On Friday, September 13, 2002 at 12:23:19 AM you wrote: Agreed, but would it not have the same effect when the message is being reconstructed in Eudora, Outlook, Outlook Express, Pegasus, Netscape Maill, or SOME other program? Not necessarily; that is the fun part about

Re: Mangled messages

2002-09-13 Thread Dierk Haasis
Hello Adam! On Friday, September 13, 2002 at 12:11:38 AM you wrote: 1) NTFS 2) In message body 3) Mime 64 4) AVG / Linux box (no firewall on client) I don't suffer it: 1) FAT32 (SCSI) 2) in separate directory 3) MIME 64 4) no resident virus scanner or firewall 5) Trillian running (Since

Re: Mangled messages

2002-09-13 Thread Dierk Haasis
Hello Technology! On Friday, September 13, 2002 at 12:47:56 AM you wrote: Oh. OK, but that's for outbound files, isn't it? I've never had a problem sending a file. Mime64. I've yet to see an attachment not encoded this way; Mac will by default use MacBinary in conjunction with MIME 64 (I

Re: Help with kill filter please?

2002-09-13 Thread Dierk Haasis
Hello mm! On Friday, September 13, 2002 at 3:05:07 AM you wrote: Can anyone here help? You can filter for the string in Body. although I won't do it because false positives are likely. -- Dierk Haasis http://www.Write4U.de http://Interest.Write4U.de/pongo PGP keys available:

Re: Mangled attachments

2002-09-13 Thread Thomas F.
Hello Dierk, On Fri, 13 Sep 2002 09:40:46 +0200 GMT (13/09/02, 14:40 +0700 GMT), Dierk Haasis wrote: DH I am quite sure that my RAM is perfectly in order So is mine. This is not a RAM problem, as everybody who tested the files in question comes to the same results. DH 1. Where do you all

Re: Mangled attachments

2002-09-13 Thread Thomas F.
Hello Adam, On Thu, 12 Sep 2002 22:58:23 +0100 GMT (13/09/02, 04:58 +0700 GMT), Adam Rykala wrote: AR Perhaps everybody who has this problem does have mismatched memory AR - because I don't see a lot of other people suffering from it. It was a first for me, and for others. It is definitely the

Re: Mangled attachments

2002-09-13 Thread Thomas F.
Hello Adam, On Thu, 12 Sep 2002 23:37:24 +0100 GMT (13/09/02, 05:37 +0700 GMT), Adam Rykala wrote: AR TB! on C drive or another drive? AR Spaces in folder name (here its d:\TheBat) I am using Win98 with TB on C:\ drive (standard installation). AR There MUST be a common thread here! The

Re: Help with kill filter please?

2002-09-13 Thread Thomas F.
Hello mm, On Thu, 12 Sep 2002 21:05:07 -0400 GMT (13/09/02, 08:05 +0700 GMT), mm Meister wrote: mM I was directed to this list by an automatic bot at bat ;] That's nice. :-) Which bot was it? mM really nice kill filter. It's easy to get to, and allows killing by mM word or phrase in the body

Re: Mangled messages

2002-09-13 Thread Thomas F.
Hello Dierk, On Fri, 13 Sep 2002 09:47:12 +0200 GMT (13/09/02, 14:47 +0700 GMT), Dierk Haasis wrote: DH I don't suffer it: Does that mean the picture shows up with no errors in TB's internal viewer? Then I may have forwarded it the wrong way - please ask Eddy to send you the zip file. --

Re: Mangled attachments

2002-09-13 Thread Adam Rykala
Quoting Thomas F. [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hello Adam, AR I haven't seen it, and I send and receive a lot of mail and a LOT AR of attachments. Maybe someone can send you the file. Yeah thats not a bad idea. Use the email address in my sig... a -- [ Adam Rykala ] [ www.new-wales.net ]

Re: Mangled messages

2002-09-13 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo Adam, On Thu, 12 Sep 2002 23:11:38 +0100GMT (13-9-02, 0:11 +0200GMT, where I live), you wrote: AR Some questions that spring to mind are AR 1) FAt/FAT32 or NTFS? AR 2) Storing attachments in seperate drectory or in message AR 3) Encoding AR 4) Virus checker / firewall? AR As a test

Re: Mangled attachments

2002-09-13 Thread Adam Rykala
Quoting Thomas F. [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hello Adam, AR There MUST be a common thread here! The common thread here is that it will happen to anybody who cares to try it out with the files that Eddy sends. It has nothing to do with hardware. Try it out yourself. ;-) As the man said,

Re: Help with kill filter please?

2002-09-13 Thread Thomas F.
Hello Meister, On Fri, 13 Sep 2002 15:08:32 +0700 GMT (13/09/02, 15:08 +0700 GMT), Thomas F. wrote: mM really nice kill filter. It's easy to get to, and allows killing by mM word or phrase in the body of the email message. TF In TB, check out Account / Sorting Office / Selective Download.

Re: Mangled attachments

2002-09-13 Thread Thomas F.
Hello Adam, On Fri, 13 Sep 2002 09:25:15 +0100 GMT (13/09/02, 15:25 +0700 GMT), Adam Rykala wrote: The common thread here is that it will happen to anybody who cares to try it out with the files that Eddy sends. It has nothing to do with hardware. Try it out yourself. ;-) AR As the man

Re: Mangled messages

2002-09-13 Thread Dierk Haasis
Hello Thomas! On Friday, September 13, 2002 at 10:20:02 AM you wrote: Does that mean the picture shows up with no errors in TB's internal viewer? Then I may have forwarded it the wrong way - please ask Eddy to send you the zip file. You got me wrong. With the zipped file you send me I got

Re: Mangled attachments

2002-09-13 Thread Dierk Haasis
Hello Thomas! On Friday, September 13, 2002 at 10:13:17 AM you wrote: AR There MUST be a common thread here! The common thread here is that it will happen to anybody who cares to try it out with the files that Eddy sends. 1. there *must* be a common denominator. 2. Hopefully it's *not*

Re: Moved

2002-09-13 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Jeanny, 13-Sep-2002, (04:31 UK time) Jeanny House said: Now, I live in a new city and my ISP is charter.net. I tried setting the SMTP to charter.net and leaving the POP3 server as fastmail.fm. The Bat! kept trying to contact

Re[2]: Mangled attachments

2002-09-13 Thread Anselm Buehling
Hi There must be a common denominator for this problem, perhaps we should start again and do what we learned in University: Analyze (from Greek for taking apart) the problem step by step. Seems very reasonable to me, so let's go! 1. Where do you all store your attachments, in separate

Expanded Tree view by default?

2002-09-13 Thread Tony Brookes
I view messages by reference in folders but all I see is the root message and the plus sign indicating replies. Is there any way I can force the view to be expanded by default? I use the CTRL and right arrow key to get the folder expanded but it's an extra and laborious process in busy

Re: Mangled attachments

2002-09-13 Thread Dierk Haasis
Hello Thomas! On Friday, September 13, 2002 at 10:43:33 AM you wrote: Maybe someone could donate some temporary webspace or ftp space where this file could be uploaded to, so that everybody who wants to try can just download it? ;-) As I've already put up a small page dedicated to The Bat!

Re: Mangled attachments

2002-09-13 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Thomas, @13-Sep-2002, 15:43 +0700 (09:43 UK time) Thomas F. [T] in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: AR As the man said, Bring it on T Maybe someone could donate some temporary webspace or ftp space T where this file could be

Re: Expanded Tree view by default?

2002-09-13 Thread Lars Geiger
Hi Tony, On Friday, September 13, 2002 at 10:21:29 [GMT +0100], you wrote: TB I view messages by reference in folders but all I see is the root TB message and the plus sign indicating replies. TB Is there any way I can force the view to be expanded by default? Not by default, but you can use

Re: Mangled attachments

2002-09-13 Thread Lars Geiger
Hi Marck, On Friday, September 13, 2002 at 10:21:46 [GMT +0100], you wrote: T [...] some temporary webspace or ftp space where this file could be T uploaded to, so that everybody who wants to try can just download T it? ;-) MDP Done! See http://www.silverstones.com/message.zip. Nope. Are you

Re: Mangled attachments

2002-09-13 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Lars, @13-Sep-2002, 11:33 +0200 (10:33 UK time) Lars Geiger [LG] in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: MDP Done! See http://www.silverstones.com/message.zip. LG Nope. Are you sure about the filename? Not in the least! See

Re: Mangled attachments

2002-09-13 Thread Dierk Haasis
Hello Anselm! On Friday, September 13, 2002 at 11:20:28 AM you wrote: Separate directory. Just changed settings to message body to check that out. So, it doesn't matter how attachments are stored? Firewall: ZA (not loaded today). Virus Scanner: AntiVir. Rambooster (OK, OK, I'll kick that

Re[2]: Mangled attachments

2002-09-13 Thread vlk
-- Message from: Marck D Pearlstone [EMAIL PROTECTED] 13. september 2002, 11:40:33 AM: -- MDP See http://www.silverstones.com/messages.zip. MarthaLiving.jpg looks like

Re: Expanded Tree view by default?

2002-09-13 Thread Tony Brookes
Lars Geiger recently typed, LG Not by default, but you can use CTRL* (on the numerical keypad) to LG expand all threads. Thanks. I'll try that one - missed it in the help! Time to get it put on the wishlist ;-) Tony Brookes [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Mangled attachments

2002-09-13 Thread Thomas Martin
Hello Thomas, i follwed the thread a time. I had the same problems some months ago. My solution was to switch off the stealph mode in my Sygate firewall. I dont know which firewall is running in this case...perhaps it helps. -- Ciao Thomas Mailer: The Bat!1.62/Beta5 System: Windows XP

Re: Re[2]: Mangled attachments

2002-09-13 Thread Adam Rykala
Hi guys Great idea putting the message store in a zip - a suggestion though. Is there anyone who can set up an auto responder that sens out the one message with the corrupt image...? Mainly because I want to see if there is a difference between the message store version and a forwarded one -

Re: Mangled attachments

2002-09-13 Thread Dierk Haasis
Hello vlk! On Friday, September 13, 2002 at 12:06:20 PM you wrote: MarthaLiving.jpg looks like not completely downloaded picture from web - probably sent before completed. Perfectly right, I hadn't looked for that the last time I inspected it. But that wouldn't explain why DOCs are also

Re: Mangled attachments

2002-09-13 Thread Dierk Haasis
Hello Marck! On Friday, September 13, 2002 at 11:40:33 AM you wrote: See http://www.silverstones.com/messages.zip. I put it up, too: http://Software.Write4U.de. As I found out that way the site had been mysteriously disappeared during one of my clean-ups lately. -- Dierk Haasis

Re: Mangled messages

2002-09-13 Thread Alain de Gevigney
Hello Mark, On Thu, 12 Sep 2002 at 18:14:49 [GMT -0700] (which was 03:14 where I live) you wrote: MW It might be worth trying to rename a copy (did I remember to say a MW copy?) of the tbb file as a uue file and try opening it with winzip or MW something. That would remove TB from the picture

Re: Mangled attachments

2002-09-13 Thread Lars Geiger
Hi Dierk, On Friday, September 13, 2002 at 12:23:34 [GMT +0200], you wrote: DH And since the JPEG itself is correctly shown within IrfanView and DH PhotoPaint I'd say the file itself has correct headers and therefore DH should be shown in TB! except it is a format not yet known by TB! DH (i.e.

Re[2]: Mangled attachments

2002-09-13 Thread vlk
-- Message from: Dierk Haasis [EMAIL PROTECTED] 13. september 2002, 12:23:34 PM: -- DH And since the JPEG itself is DH correctly shown within IrfanView and PhotoPaint I'd

Re: Mangled attachments

2002-09-13 Thread Allie C Martin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 In [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], Dierk Haasis [DH] wrote:' DH Perfectly right, I hadn't looked for that the last time I DH inspected it. But that wouldn't explain why DOCs are also DH corrupted, or why the JPEG can be seen with TB! when

Re: Mangled attachments

2002-09-13 Thread Dierk Haasis
Hello Lars! On Friday, September 13, 2002 at 12:49:26 PM you wrote: But when I forward the message to myself, I receive a longer file which can be decoded correctly and then shows the complete image, without the corruption at the bottom. That seems to me to point towards some bug in TB!'s

Re: Mangled attachments

2002-09-13 Thread Dierk Haasis
Hello Allie! On Friday, September 13, 2002 at 1:22:17 PM you wrote: When I try to open the image in Paint Shop Pro, I get a 'this is not a valid jpeg/jfif file' message. If I open it with my default viewer, PMView, it opens OK, but in the status bar is the message 'Invalid Marker Length'.

Re[2]: Mangled attachments

2002-09-13 Thread Bill Blinn, Technology Editor
It seems that Dierk Haasis said ... No problems with zip files, so far. D Haven't I seen this right at the beginning? Can anyone confirm? I can't recall a specific problem with a zip file -- it's certainly rare, but probably possible. Using The Bat! v1.61 on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195

Re: TB! freezes when in Start menu

2002-09-13 Thread Art Moore
On Thursday, September 12, 2002, 4:52:59 PM, Mark Wieder wrote: MW Art- MW Check the shortcut in the Startup folder - try adding the /minimize MW command line argument if it's not already there. No joy, Mark; TB! still won't respond to a minimize command until I shut it down and restart it.

Re: Mangled attachments

2002-09-13 Thread Lars Geiger
Hi Dierk, On Friday, September 13, 2002 at 13:34:46 [GMT +0200], you wrote: But when I forward the message to myself, I receive a longer file which can be decoded correctly and then shows the complete image, without the corruption at the bottom. DH That seems to me to point towards some bug

Re: Mangled attachments

2002-09-13 Thread Dierk Haasis
Hello Lars! On Friday, September 13, 2002 at 2:03:49 PM you wrote: Maybe I was a bit unclear here, but the file is corrupt when it is saved to disc. The internal viewer wasn't involved in my tests. But the same file which results in a corrupt JPEG when saved to disc is forwarded correctly

Re[2]: Mangled attachments

2002-09-13 Thread Bill Blinn, Technology Editor
Here are some observations (and some files to look at). First, the files: You will find these files at ftp://ftp.blinn.com/thebat/. I think there is a low limit on how many anon ftp users can be connected simultaneously. * Ray4x6.tif: Single standard TIFF that somehow became a

No wrapping of sigatures

2002-09-13 Thread Peter Fjelsten
TheBat-users, I have a signature the inserted randomly from a file. It is set to wrap. Sometimes it doesn't. Does anybody have any suggestions? The Template line: tagline %qinclude=cookiesfilwrapped /tagline QT=cookiesfilwrapped: %wrapped='%COOKIE=C:\Documents and Settings\Peter

Details on why some attachments are corrupt (Was: Mangledattachments)

2002-09-13 Thread Eddy
First, I've requested that the 'messages.zip' file be removed from any sites where it has been published; I never intended that particular file to be widely available (it was a forward of a forward of forward and potentially contained email addresses which I wouldn't want to be responsible for