Hello Martin,
On Fri, 25 Jun 2004 23:53:39 +0100UTC Martin Webster wrote:
MW> The only application I can think of (that works with Windows and Mac) is
MW> Mulberry.
Did you ever ran Mulberry on a Mac? Not one Mac user will accept its UI.
Not even me, and I'm a techie. Their IMAP capabilities are
Hello Alex,
On Fri, 25 Jun 2004 15:08:02 -0400UTC Alex Ezell wrote:
>> I guess not as it is, but I'm not sure. It's just that I never saw
>> anyone using a Mac on the TB! lists... ;-)
Here's one :).
AE> No, it's a Windows application only. Having said that, there is
AE> VirtualPC for Mac which
Hello Adam,
On Fri, 25 Jun 2004 15:23:44 -0230UTC Adam wrote:
>> I've made a filter who deletes the mails of peoples I know they are spammers. The
A> The power of thy sword is the mightiest that elvish men have beheld.
It makes me wonder how big that sword needs to be? Most of the times,
spamme
Hello Sacksa,
On Fri, 25 Jun 2004 12:19:59 -0500UTC [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
scc> I have used The Bat very happily for a few years on our PC-type computers.
scc> Now that we are in the market for a Mac/Apple computer, is The Bat
scc> compatible with Mac/Apple computers?
No, but you can run any
C2>> The filters for setting up virtual folders seem to permit a
C2>> message to reside in only one virtual folder at any one time,
C2>> despite the filter parameters meeting the requirements of several
C2>> virtual folders.
C2>> Any way of getting a message to appear in more than one virtual fold
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Alex,
On 25 June 2004, 15:08 -0400 (20:08 local time) Alex Ezell [AE] in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
scc>>> Otherwise, what do Mac/Apple users use for e-mail?
>> I don't know either as I'm using The Bat! under Win98SE... :-)
AE> Typical
On Friday, June 25, 2004, 2:57:00 PM, Peter wrote:
scc>> I have used The Bat very happily for a few years on our PC-type computers.
scc>> Now that we are in the market for a Mac/Apple computer, is The Bat
scc>> compatible with Mac/Apple computers?
> I guess not as it is, but I'm not sure. It's ju
Hi sacksa,
on Fri, 25 Jun 2004 12:19:59 -0500GMT, you wrote:
scc> I have used The Bat very happily for a few years on our PC-type computers.
scc> Now that we are in the market for a Mac/Apple computer, is The Bat
scc> compatible with Mac/Apple computers?
I guess not as it is, but I'm not sure.
Hi Avi!
Friday, June 25, 2004, 1:19:59 PM, you wrote:
s> what do Mac/Apple users use for e-mail?
AOL?
--
Cheers!
Maggie
Current version is 2.11.02 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat
I have used The Bat very happily for a few years on our PC-type computers.
Now that we are in the market for a Mac/Apple computer, is The Bat
compatible with Mac/Apple computers? If not, are there any plans to make
it compatible? Otherwise, what do Mac/Apple users use for e-mail?
--
Avi
Avra
Hello Roelof,
Friday, June 25, 2004, 10:41:34 AM, you wrote:
M>> On my laptop, neither of the commands works. They do nothing it seems.
M>> I am sorting by References.
> That's a known issue, since you're supposed to use the * on the
> numerical keypad and that's lacking on (most) laptops.
Wit
Hello Jan,
Friday, June 25, 2004, 9:31:44 AM, you wrote:
> On my system, shortcut * no longer opens all msgs in
> folder.
> Can anyone confirm?
I can kind of confirm. I certainly notice occasionally I ^* to open
all threads, and TB fails to respond to that. And it stays that way
till I close a
Hello WilWilWil,
Friday, June 25, 2004, 5:03:27 AM, you wrote:
> I've made a filter who deletes the mails of peoples I know they are spammers. The
The power of thy sword is the mightiest that elvish men have beheld.
> filter works well but I manage 8 accounts in TB. I don't want to create this
Friday, June 25, 2004, 10:27:30 AM, you wrote:
MR> BTW, this message should be in utf-8, so you can check my assumption on
MR> it..
Yes, and thanks for the pointer... it is now doing it my way. I did not
realize that it used the HTML editor settings for utf-8 even when you tell it
to use plain t
Maggie,
Friday, June 25, 2004, 7:42:51 PM, you wrote:
M> OK. I hadn't tried doing Ctrl+Shift+Fn+0 -
Ctrl+Alt+Fn+0, not Shift, at least not on mine..
M> If I hold Ctrl+Shift+Fn then tap the 0, it rather seems to work like a
M> toggle here on the Toshiba. But trying to get all the fingers in
M> p
Hello Roelof,
Friday, June 25, 2004, 3:11:34 PM, you wrote:
R>>> <*> closes all threads on my system. <*>
R>>> opens them.
M>> On my laptop, neither of the commands works. They do nothing it seems.
M>> I am sorting by References.
R> That's a known issue, since you're supposed to use the * on th
The filters for setting up virtual folders seem to permit a message to
reside in only one virtual folder at any one time, despite the filter
parameters meeting the requirements of several virtual folders.
Any way of getting a message to appear in more than one virtual folder
at the same time?
Als
Hello Richard,
Friday, June 25, 2004, 10:20:17 AM, you wrote:
M>> Aha! OK. Just for the heck of it, I tried Fn+0 (zero) where the
M>> asterisk is on the numeric keypad and none of the combinations worked
M>> with that. But thank you for your explanation. :)
R> Surprise, surprise - I tried Fn+
On Thursday, 24 Jun 2004 15:29 [-0400] Lou Yovin wrote:
..
LY> Except for some email that has headers that force black on white.
LY> They always seem to contain something like:
LY>
LY> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
LY> or
LY> Content-type: text/html; charset=utf-8
LY>
LY> Is there some
Maggie,
Friday, June 25, 2004, 6:18:08 PM, you wrote:
M> Aha! OK. Just for the heck of it, I tried Fn+0 (zero) where the
M> asterisk is on the numeric keypad and none of the combinations worked
M> with that. But thank you for your explanation. :)
Surprise, surprise - I tried Fn+0 with Ctrl> a
Hello Frank,
On Thu, 24 Jun 2004 22:24:11 +0200 GMT (25/06/2004, 03:24 +0700 GMT),
Frank Sproede wrote:
FS> IBTD. "Content-Disposition: inline" means, that the MUA should display the
FS> content inline and not as an attachment.
I see. I didn't know that. If so, it's a bug and should be reported.
Hello Jan,
On Fri, 25 Jun 2004 08:01:44 -0400 GMT (25/06/2004, 19:01 +0700 GMT),
Jan Rifkinson wrote:
JR> On my system, shortcut * no longer opens all msgs in
JR> folder.
It's crtl-* (no shift) over here that works fine, as it always has.
--
Cheers,
Thomas.
Moderator der deutschen The Bat! Be
Hello Roelof,
M>> On my laptop, neither of the commands works. They do nothing it seems.
M>> I am sorting by References.
R> That's a known issue, since you're supposed to use the * on the
R> numerical keypad and that's lacking on (most) laptops.
Aha! OK. Just for the heck of it, I tried Fn+0 (z
Hallo Maggie,
On Fri, 25 Jun 2004 09:05:29 -0400GMT (25-6-2004, 15:05 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
R>> Yep. <*> closes all threads on my system. <*>
R>> opens them. Though I continuously mix up those two, I wouldn't be
R>> surprised that this is as it always has been.
M> On my laptop, neithe
Hello Roelof and Jan,
Friday, June 25, 2004, 8:32:19 AM, you wrote:
JR>> On my system, shortcut * no longer opens all msgs in
JR>> folder.
JR>> Can anyone confirm?
R> Yep. <*> closes all threads on my system. <*>
R> opens them. Though I continuously mix up those two, I wouldn't be
R> surprised
Hallo Jan,
On Fri, 25 Jun 2004 08:01:44 -0400GMT (25-6-2004, 14:01 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
JR> On my system, shortcut * no longer opens all msgs in
JR> folder.
JR> Can anyone confirm?
Yep. <*> closes all threads on my system. <*>
opens them. Though I continuously mix up those two, I wo
On my system, shortcut * no longer opens all msgs in
folder.
Can anyone confirm?
Thanks,
--
Jan Rifkinson
Ridgefield, CT USA
TB! V2.12 Beta/1/W2K_SP3
ICQ 41116329
Current version is 2.11.02 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.c
Hello Nick,
Thursday, June 24, 2004, 11:40:06 PM, you wrote:
NO> Hi All (again),
NO> Still working out some issues with TB! v2. Does v2 come with an
NO> anti-spam plug-in by default? Specifically one that would add to the
NO> subject line "intercepted as spam" any message it found as suspiciou
> I've made a filter who deletes the mails of peoples I know they are spammers. The
> filter works well but I manage 8 accounts in TB. I don't want to create this
> filter 8 times. Because if I have to edit the rule, I will have to do this 8
> times ! Is there a way to make a kind of "Super" filter
I've made a filter who deletes the mails of peoples I know they are spammers. The
filter works well but I manage 8 accounts in TB. I don't want to create this
filter 8 times. Because if I have to edit the rule, I will have to do this 8
times ! Is there a way to make a kind of "Super" filter who is
30 matches
Mail list logo
