On Wednesday, July 7, 2004 @ 11:11:50 PM, Zonnet wrote:
[snips]
MicCullen>> Attachments should stay exactly where they were before being
Zonnet> attached - ie, where I put them to begin with.
Zonnet> The original stay were it was and a copy of the send attachment is stored
Zonnet> by the BAT.
Y
Hi Allie,
On Wednesday, July 7, 2004 21:08 your local time, which was Thursday,
July 8, 2004 at 03:08 my local time, Allie Martin [AM] wrote;
AM> c) support for colour coding messages or support for extra flags apart
AM> from the basic read/unread forward/redirected flags. Currently all
AM> other
Hi 9Val
-
On Thu, 8 Jul 2004, at 23:01:23 [GMT +0300] (which was 1:01 PM where I
live) you wrote:
> Well, at home I'm working with IMAP at 21.6Kbit dial-up. So speed is a
> really *big* issue for me. And I prefer to use TB! without any
> synchr
Hello Kevin,
KA> Actually, all the IMAP servers are local on gig ethernet. Speed is not
KA> an issue. I will admit some of the speed issues are the result of my
KA> TB settings. I have had so many problems with IMAP synchronizations, I
KA> finally flush all the caches on exit so, on the resultant
On Thursday, July 8, 2004, 2:43 PM, you wrote:
EvD> I've installed TB! on my account on an XP machine.
EvD> Until now I'm the only one that uses the machine.
EvD> How can I set up the machine so that 2 people with separate log-in
EvD> names can both run TB! as an registered program?
I do that
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Edgar,
On 08 July 2004, 20:43 +0200 (08/07/200419:43 local time) Edgar van Dijk
[EVD] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
EVD> But when it is running it is an Unregistered version.
EVD> How can I set up the machine so that 2 people with separ
Hi Allie Martin
-
On Thu, 8 Jul 2004, at 12:38:35 [GMT -0500] (which was 10:38 AM where
I live) you wrote:
> Kevin Amazon wrote:
> I think he's more thinking about simply changing a POP to an IMAP
> account. TB! autocreates corresponding IMAP folders
Hello All,
I've installed TB! on my account on an XP machine.
Until now I'm the only one that uses the machine.
Now I've added an other user account to the Machine.
When that user logs in she can starts TB! But it will ask for a
new account and for the place to save the files.
But when it is run
Hello Allie,
On Thu, 8 Jul 2004 12:38:35 -0500 UTC, Allie Martin wrote:
AM> When I watch TB! do a single task, it's very fast. However, when I
AM> request a message body, I often have to wait a while at work while TB!
AM> completes what's already queued to be done.
I was about to say something a
Hello Spike,
On Thu, 8 Jul 2004 12:24:07 -0500 UTC, Spike wrote:
S> Hello hasan,
h>> My assistant use outlook 2003. When they reply h> outlook removes the
h>> "fw" from the subject of the replied mail. Result is that h> the
h>> message is not threaded properly. h> Anyway around it. h> --
There
ON Thursday, July 8, 2004, 7:27:07 PM, you wrote:
C> Can you explain more explicitly *what* exactly you are doing?
C> Do I understand you properly that adding a few spaces and a line feed at
C> the end of the message body avoids the problem described in
Hi Cyrille,
Actually I make the changes a
Hi,
When I leave TB open for a while, it doesn't seem to update its inbox listing
automatically when new messages arrive on the server. If I select another
folder, then select the inbox again, it updates the index for the folder and
displays a bunch of new messages.
I haven't yet determined what
Kevin Amazon wrote:
> 1. The conversion facility to transfer a POP3 message to IMAP
> "should be" nothing more than a drag and drop from one folder to
> another.
I think he's more thinking about simply changing a POP to an IMAP
account. TB! autocreates corresponding IMAP folders on the server and
Hello Zonnet,
Thursday, July 8, 2004, 11:57:57 AM, you wrote:
CMG>> If X-ray doesn't end a message with \r\n.\r\n
CMG>> it's broken :/
> That might be true but it is strange that if you change something in the
> msg ( I usually add a few spaces and a Cr/lf) it works fine.
> I have learned to lif
Hello hasan,
h> My assistant use outlook 2003. When they reply h> outlook removes the
h> "fw" from the subject of the replied mail. Result is that h> the
h> message is not threaded properly. h> Anyway around it. h> --
One easy solution - get your assistant OFF (out of) the Outhouse and
into The B
> Hello Admin,
> On Thu, 8 Jul 2004 09:47:45 +0100 UTC, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
aacu>> If I change to IMAP (all are currently POP3) will I compromise any of
aacu>> that functionality - I earn my living using TB!
> If you earn your living using TB!, are you sure that you want to make
> that depe
Hello Allie,
On Wed, 7 Jul 2004 21:11:16 -0500 GMT (08/07/2004, 09:11 +0700 GMT),
Allie Martin wrote:
>> Anyway, the above description of your steps worked great; my
>> question is ... how does one back-out of the end result, i.e.,
>> return to where ALL messages are listed again versus just the
Hello Robin Anson,
As it seems no one else wants to even address this issue (which seems
to be leading me AWAY from TB!) I will respond to your input.
RA> The best approach I can think of would be to create a filter to
RA> save the attachments to a particular directory.
This would be a solution
Hi Charles M. Gerungan
-
On Thu, 8 Jul 2004, at 18:33:24 [GMT +0200] (which was 9:33 AM where I
live) you wrote:
> If you earn your living using TB!, are you sure that you want to make
> that depend on beta software? IMAP support is constantly being wo
Hello Admin,
On Thu, 8 Jul 2004 09:47:45 +0100 UTC, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
aacu> If I change to IMAP (all are currently POP3) will I compromise any of
aacu> that functionality - I earn my living using TB!
If you earn your living using TB!, are you sure that you want to make
that depend on beta
Marten Gallagher, [MG] wrote:
> The reason for possibly changing to IMAP is:
> ISP is prepared to install IMAP.
> and
> I can then do all the manipulation wheh I am (frequently) away from
> the office and the main machine.
> But.. as I said - I cannot afford screw ups becasue IMAP in the event
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
***^\ ."_)~~
~( __ _"o Was Thu, 8 Jul 2004, at 14:46:06 +0200,
@ @ when Jurgen Haug wrote:
> Hello jan,
> Thursday, July 8, 2004, 2:34:02 PM, you wrote:
>> have you considered starting a separate smilie list?
> good idea! i will
Hi David Boggon
-
On Thu, 8 Jul 2004, at 17:31:58 [GMT +1000] (which was 12:31 AM where
I live) you wrote:
> um, my German isn't what it used to be ... how comes there isn't an
> equivalent site in English? could the authors stretch to a translated
>
Hi Mike Smith
-
On Thu, 8 Jul 2004, at 08:29:57 [GMT +0100] (which was 12:29 AM where
I live) you wrote:
> Hi Kevin
KA>> Most of the feature list works as advertised. I think you will be
KA>> extremely happy with TB if you have some patience and willing
Hi,
I get a lot of emails, to some of which my assistants reply. I thread messages
by subject so that when one of my guys replies, I know that the mail has been
replied and I move it. However some emails are forwarded and the bat shows
fw: what ever the subject it. My assistant use outlook 2003. Wh
Hello jan,
Thursday, July 8, 2004, 2:34:02 PM, you wrote:
> have you considered starting a separate smilie list?
good idea! i will join it ;-)
--
Regards,
:Jurgen_Haug:
"She was only a telegrapher's daughter, but she did-it-ah-did-it!"
Using The Bat! v2.12 Beta/7, Opera v7.52.3834 on Win.
have you considered starting a separate smilie list?
--
Jan Rifkinson
Ridgefield, CT USA
TB! V2.12 Beta/6/W2K_SP4
ICQ 41116329
Current version is 2.11.02 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
ON Thursday, July 8, 2004, 12:01:00 AM, you wrote:
CMG> Nothing much to confirm. If X-ray doesn't end a message with \r\n.\r\n
CMG> it's broken :/
Hi Charles,
That might be true but it is strange that if you change something in the
msg ( I usually add a few spaces and a Cr/lf) it works fine.
I h
Dear Anubhav,
@8-Jul-2004, 12:44 +0530 (08-Jul 08:14 UK time) Anubhav Roy said:
> what does macro CC="" (Additional CC recipient)
> mean..
> how to put to use ?
It has two uses. The one you illustrate is used to add addresses to
a CC list. The format you really need is %CC on its own, which will
> Hi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> -
> On Thu, 8 Jul 2004, at 00:42:44 [GMT +0100] (which was 4:42 PM where I
> live) you wrote:
>>> However, total IMAP functionality
>>> isn't quite there yet...
> Most of the feature list works as advertised. I think you will be
Hello David,
On Thu, 8 Jul 2004 17:31:58 +1000GMT(08.07.2004, 09:31 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
> um, my German isn't what it used to be ...
what a pity ;-)
perhaps you can get answered your question here:
Visit The Bat! Users' Unofficial Help Forum http://the-bat-forums.donzeigler.com
--
Hallo Roelof,
RO> Read and write online? Web based or something like that? Wit server
RO> based filtering?
Yep. Using GMX Pro Account.
RO> Are discussing a pop3 account at IMAP?
RO> The pop3 protocol doesn't offer any instruments to address server side
RO> folders, with IMAP should do thaty per
Hello Drago,
> yeah i know but with manual backup i intend to forget, i did try Karen's
> Replicator but couldnt backup all the files if The Bat! was running, im
> currently looking for another automated backup program
Try Second Copy 2000 (www.centered.com).
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech (
Hi Feli & others,
in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote:
FW> have a look at http://www.batworld.de/ or
FW> http://www.thebatworld.de/
um, my German isn't what it used to be ... how comes there isn't an
equivalent site in English? could the authors stretch to a translated
page?
--
David
_
Hi Kevin
KA> Most of the feature list works as advertised. I think you will be
KA> extremely happy with TB if you have some patience and willing to put
KA> in the time to learn.
KA> Hope this helps.
Very much so! Your postings have been very helpful to me in reading.
One of the problems Ive been
thanks for yr suggestion..
some further clarifications required :
what does macro CC="" (Additional CC recipient)
mean..
how to put to use ?
i hope my name figures at the bottom of the mail..
as gmail account is not config in bat so name cannot be customised ..
On Wed, 7 Jul 2004 19:28:26 -0700,
Hello,
Using TB 2.10.03, XP
I have an error message "List index out of bound(1)"
when I scroll through the message list with the vertical arrows.
This is not systematic, but at least once a day.
The message appears only once, but then the icons that show the attached files
disappear in the small
37 matches
Mail list logo
