Re: Spam Shredder w/TB!

2004-12-24 Thread John Phillips
Hi Darrin, On Thu, 23 Dec 2004, at 13:22:01 [GMT-0800] (which was Fri, 8:22:01 Australian Eastern Time) you wrote: Access to Updated Databases As new spam originators are identified, Webroot adds them to the anti-spam database and offers you the opportunity to update your Spam Shredder

Re[2]: Dispatch mail on the server

2004-12-24 Thread Ben Allen
Howdy Alexander, Thursday, December 23, 2004, 1:46:03 PM, Alexander wrotened: Alexander Hello Ben Allen everyone else, Alexander on 23-Dez-2004 at 09:47 you (Ben Allen) wrote: wrotened Alexander ...interesting verb form... :-) Its called Rohopiticus form -- Have Fun, | | |en is

Re: G-Mail... Again!

2004-12-24 Thread Tony Boom
Hello Thomas, A reminder of what Thomas Fernandez on TBUDL typed on: 24 December 2004 at 02:56:17 GMT +0100 TF I just don't like them to parse my emails for marketing purposes. I'm not sure they do. Everyone keeps on about G-Mail adverts etc. and I can't remember ever seeing any or

Re: G-Mail... Again!

2004-12-24 Thread Allie Martin
On Thursday, December 23, 2004 at 11:39:14 PM [GMT -0500], Watcher wrote: I've been looking at Thunderbird, looks fine but I ca't see why you would want to have it AND TB... Just curious. Long and bitter battles with TB! IMAP. I have it working reasonably well at home here. Annoying problems

Re: G-Mail... Again!

2004-12-24 Thread Allie Martin
On Friday, December 24, 2004 at 4:57:28 AM [GMT -0500], Tony Boom wrote: Take a look at the adverts you get tagged onto the bottom of TBOT Yahoo posts. Practice good e-mail security and you won't see them. ;) -- Cheers, -= Allie =- . Overload--core meltdown sequence initiated.

Re: G-Mail... Again!

2004-12-24 Thread Mary Bull
Hello Allie! On Friday, December 24, 2004, 5:18 AM, you wrote: Take a look at the adverts you get tagged onto the bottom of TBOT Yahoo posts. Practice good e-mail security and you won't see them. Allie, what do you mean? I thought those came with the territory on TBOT. With people whose cut

Re: G-Mail... Again!

2004-12-24 Thread Allie Martin
On Friday, December 24, 2004 at 6:25:13 AM [GMT -0500], Mary Bull wrote: Practice good e-mail security and you won't see them. Allie, what do you mean? If you PGP/MIME or S/MIME sign your messages to TBOT, the ads will not appear as footers. -- Cheers, -= Allie =- . Oxymoron: Too Many

Re: G-Mail... Again!

2004-12-24 Thread Mary Bull
Hello Allie! On Friday, December 24, 2004, 5:30 AM, you wrote: Practice good e-mail security and you won't see them. Allie, what do you mean? If you PGP/MIME or S/MIME sign your messages to TBOT, the ads will not appear as footers. Ah! Okay, thanks a mil!! I shall put that into my TBOT

Re[2]: G-Mail... Again!

2004-12-24 Thread Andreas Schwartmann
Hi, Bat folks, on Fri, 24 Dec 2004 at 06:30:28 GMT -0500 (which was Friday, December 24, 2004, 12:30 where I live) Allie Martin wrote the following lines regarding G-Mail... Again!: AM On Friday, December 24, 2004 at 6:25:13 AM [GMT -0500], Mary Bull AM wrote: Practice good e-mail security

Re: G-Mail... Again!

2004-12-24 Thread Peter Fjelsten
Thomas, On 24-12-2004 02:58, you [TF] wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: TF It's a marketing technique. (snip) My point exactly regarding all you wrote. I would never want an account there as I see a large potential for data mining and advertising run amok. Not to mention I have concerns about

Re: G-Mail... Again!

2004-12-24 Thread Mary Bull
Hello Andreas! On Friday, December 24, 2004, 6:01 AM, you wrote: How can I do that via template? Is it enough to include %SIGNCOMPLETE in my message template? Yes. That's all you need, if you have OpenPGP enabled in Account/Properties/Options (main window). I just added it to my Reply and

Re: Dispatch mail on the server

2004-12-24 Thread Henk de Bruijn
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Fri, 24 Dec 2004 09:53:57 +GMT (24-12-2004, 10:53 +0100, where I live), Ben Allen wrote: ...snip wrotened Alexander ...interesting verb form... :-) Its called Rohopiticus form Btw, I uninstalled Poptray, the Bat! is working great! Thanks

Re: G-Mail... Again!

2004-12-24 Thread Sean Rima
Hello Tony, Thursday, December 23, 2004, 7:09:18 PM, you wrote: Hello Leif, A reminder of what Leif Gregory on TBUDL typed on: 23 December 2004 at 19:22:40 GMT +0100 Q Also, what's the address of the TB! archives, Gmail and the other Q one? Talking of which, I now have another

Re: G-Mail... Again!

2004-12-24 Thread Alexander S. Kunz
Hello Thomas Fernandez everyone else, I promised myself to not get into such a discussion again, but there I go... :-) on 24-Dez-2004 at 02:53 you (Thomas Fernandez) wrote: I just don't like them to parse my emails for marketing purposes You can't do a thing about it. Problem is *sending* a

Re[2]: G-Mail... Again!

2004-12-24 Thread Andreas Schwartmann
Hi, Bat folks, on Fri, 24 Dec 2004 at 06:10:54 GMT -0600 (which was Friday, December 24, 2004, 13:10 where I live) Mary Bull wrote the following lines regarding G-Mail... Again!: MB Hello Andreas! MB On Friday, December 24, 2004, 6:01 AM, you wrote: How can I do that via template? Is it

Re: G-Mail... Again!

2004-12-24 Thread Mica Mijatovic
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 ***^\ ._)~~ ~( __ _o Was another beautiful day, Fri, 24 Dec 2004, @ @ at 13:07:34 +, when Sean Rima wrote: Hello Tony, Hello Leif, Q Also, what's the address of the TB! archives, Gmail and the other Q one? Talking of

Re:G-Mail... Again!

2004-12-24 Thread Watcher
Hello Tony, On Fri, 24 Dec 2004, at 09:57:28 [GMT +] (10:24 AM here) you wrote: TF I just don't like them to parse my emails for marketing purposes. I'm not sure they do. Everyone keeps on about G-Mail adverts etc. and I can't remember ever seeing any or anything else untoward.

Re: G-Mail... Again!

2004-12-24 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Watcher, On Fri, 24 Dec 2004 10:25:42 -0500 GMT (24/12/2004, 22:25 +0700 GMT), Watcher wrote: TF I just don't like them to parse my emails for marketing purposes. I'm not sure they do. http://www.theregister.co.uk/2004/04/08/gmail_germany/ And on https://gmail.google.com/ they say:

Re: G-Mail... Again!

2004-12-24 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Allie, On Thu, 23 Dec 2004 21:10:27 -0500 GMT (24/12/2004, 09:10 +0700 GMT), Allie Martin wrote: It's a marketing technique. [...] Gmail doesn't need to advertise, you do it all for them. AM Hmmm. You seem to be unto something there. I can certainly see that AM working very well as it

Re: G-Mail... Again!

2004-12-24 Thread Allie Martin
On Friday, December 24, 2004 at 8:39:03 AM [GMT -0500], Alexander S. Kunz wrote: I just hate it that *google* earns money by scanning *my* mails and showing text relevant ads to the recipient (if he/she uses the web interface and not POP3, ok, noticed...). Someone out there is earning money

Re[2]: Dispatch mail on the server

2004-12-24 Thread Ben Allen
Howdy Henk, Friday, December 24, 2004, 12:49:12 PM, Henk wrotened: Henk ...snip wrotened Alexander ...interesting verb form... :-) Its called Rohopiticus form Henk Btw, I uninstalled Poptray, the Bat! is working great! Thanks again. Was TB! not working properly then? Or was it not... I

Re: G-Mail... Again!

2004-12-24 Thread Chris
Allie Martin @ 2004-Dec-24 6:30:28 AM G-Mail... Again! mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] If you PGP/MIME or S/MIME sign your messages to TBOT, the ads will not appear as footers. That may work on TBOT, but not on other Yahoo Group lists. People using other e-mail clients, especially Outlook Express,

Re: G-Mail... Again!

2004-12-24 Thread Tony Boom
Hello Andreas, A reminder of what Andreas Schwartmann on TBUDL typed on: 24 December 2004 at 15:11:05 GMT +0100 AS Well, let' see, if it works here, too. :-) It did. -- Best regards,Tony. _ Message composed

Re: G-Mail... Again!

2004-12-24 Thread Tony Boom
Hello Watcher, A reminder of what Watcher on TBUDL typed on: 24 December 2004 at 16:26:36 GMT +0100 W They make money on it or they would't do it, simple as that. So you get up for work every day, do a hard days work whatever it is and you don't expect to get paid for it? How many

Re: G-Mail... Again!

2004-12-24 Thread Tony Boom
Hello Allie, A reminder of what Allie Martin on TBUDL typed on: 24 December 2004 at 19:05:41 GMT +0100 AM This isn't making much sense. AM I pay my ISP so that I can get Internet connectivity to view your AM messages. They make money off doing that. My agreement to pay my ISP AM has nothing

Re: G-Mail... Again!

2004-12-24 Thread Tony Boom
Hello Chris, A reminder of what Chris on TBUDL typed on: 24 December 2004 at 19:56:20 GMT +0100 C People C using other e-mail clients, especially Outlook Express, freak out when C they get a PGP/MIME message. Ah bless :) -- Best regards,Tony.

Re: Dispatch mail on the server

2004-12-24 Thread Henk de Bruijn
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Fri, 24 Dec 2004 18:25:53 +GMT (24-12-2004, 19:25 +0100, where I live), Ben Allen wrote: Henk Btw, I uninstalled Poptray, the Bat! is working great! Thanks again. Was TB! not working properly then? Or was it not... I missed that TB was

Re: G-Mail... Again!

2004-12-24 Thread Mica Mijatovic
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 ***^\ ._)~~ ~( __ _o Was another beautiful day, Fri, 24 Dec 2004, @ @ at 13:55:11 -0500, when Chris wrote: Allie Martin: If you PGP/MIME or S/MIME sign your messages to TBOT, the ads will not appear as footers. That may work

Re: G-Mail... Again!

2004-12-24 Thread Alexander S. Kunz
Hello Allie Martin everyone else, on 24-Dez-2004 at 19:04 you (Allie Martin) wrote: I don't see the difference from a money-making POV. Yahoogroups is an ad driven service that is offered at no cash cost to users. Yahoo makes money off the messages you send to TBOT. shrug If there's a

Re: G-Mail... Again!

2004-12-24 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Tony, On Fri, 24 Dec 2004 20:11:21 + GMT (25/12/2004, 03:11 +0700 GMT), Tony Boom wrote: W They make money on it or they would't do it, simple as that. TB So you get up for work every day, do a hard days work whatever it TB is and you don't expect to get paid for it? No, I understand

Re: G-Mail... Again!

2004-12-24 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Allie, On Fri, 24 Dec 2004 13:04:30 -0500 GMT (25/12/2004, 01:04 +0700 GMT), Allie Martin wrote: AM I don't see the difference from a money-making POV. Yahoogroups is an AM ad driven service that is offered at no cash cost to users. Yahoo AM makes money off the messages you send to TBOT.

Re: G-Mail... Again!

2004-12-24 Thread Allie Martin
On Friday, December 24, 2004 at 11:50:40 PM [GMT -0500], Thomas Fernandez wrote: Right, it's up to you. I myself prefer to pay for a good service rather than allow them to parse my email so they can personalise ads. The problem is that when you agree to them parsing your email so *you* get a

Re: G-Mail... Again!

2004-12-24 Thread Allie Martin
On Friday, December 24, 2004 at 11:56:06 PM [GMT -0500], Thomas Fernandez wrote: The first difference is that Yahoo adds random ads, while Gmail parses your emails to add personalised ads that are relevant to you. The second difference is that for public mailing lists, I would have little

Re: IMAP folders disappear

2004-12-24 Thread ken green
I'm having folders disappear. [...] Any ideas? Anyone? -- Best regards, kenmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html