Re: automatically archiving the Inbox

On Fri 21 January 2005, 14:20:00 +1000, Chris wrote: > Yes. But you can configure every other folder individually to override > the account wide settings. An alternative approach would be to create a new folder, called say Inbox2, and automatically move all received emails from Inbox to Inbox2. Th

Re[2]: automatically archiving the Inbox

Chris, Thursday, January 20, 2005, 10:20:00 PM, you wrote: C> Yes. But you can configure every other folder individually to C> override the account wide settings. In that case, I am going to stick with manual filtering. Setting up all of those overrides is too much work for me. Thanks Chris fo

Re: automatically archiving the Inbox

Mike F @ 2005-Jan-20 9:39:45 PM "automatically archiving the Inbox" > However, does this mean that if I purge a folder other than my > Inbox, its messages will go to the same folder I am using for my > Inbox archive? I am asking because I don't see anything in Account > Pr

Re[2]: automatically archiving the Inbox

Chris, Thursday, January 20, 2005, 9:11:46 PM, you wrote: C> Right-click on Inbox and go to properties. Check the box by "Keep C> messages in base for (days)" and enter 60. Then, open your account C> properties. Go to "Deletion." Under "Alternate Deletion," select C> "Move to the specified folder

Re: automatically archiving the Inbox

Mike F @ 2005-Jan-20 6:52:14 PM "automatically archiving the Inbox" > I have a "read messages" filter that moves messages in my Inbox that > are more than 60 days old to an archive folder. The filter is active > but it only works when I manually re-filter my Inbox. Is ther

Re: Default template for "send mail" from other applications via MAPI?

Hi On Sunday 16 January 2005 at 3:32:30 AM, in , Thomas Fernandez wrote: > Hello MFPA, > On Sat, 15 Jan 2005 17:00:51 + GMT (16/01/2005, 00:00 +0700 GMT), > MFPA wrote: R> If i enter the adressee, nothing changes - the template for R> the adress book entry i

Re: automatically archiving the Inbox

Hello Mike, On Thu, 20 Jan 2005 18:52:14 -0500 GMT (21/01/2005, 06:52 +0700 GMT), Mike F wrote: MF> I have a "read messages" filter that moves messages in my Inbox that MF> are more than 60 days old to an archive folder. The filter is active MF> but it only works when I manually re-filter my Inb

Re: SOT: Xray or Hamster for X-Received-By header

Hello Gerard, On Thu, 20 Jan 2005 20:27:56 +0100 GMT (21/01/2005, 02:27 +0700 GMT), Gerard wrote: G> I have not tried Hamster myself but Xray is brilliantly easy to use. I will try Xray first, because Hamster is a fully-grown mail server, I understand. That would be an overkill. G> Once you hav

Re: I have returned

On Thursday, January 20, 2005 at 5:14:52 PM [GMT -0500], Peter Fjelsten wrote: > I think you may misunderstand (I must have been unclear). I have set > the key <'> to move to the next unread message (PowerPro translates > this to the different keystrokes I have set in TB!). This does not > interfe

automatically archiving the Inbox

Hello, I have a "read messages" filter that moves messages in my Inbox that are more than 60 days old to an archive folder. The filter is active but it only works when I manually re-filter my Inbox. Is there some way to make this filter run automatically? I know it is recommended to keep the si

Re: I have returned

Allie, On 20-01-2005 22:09, you [A] wrote in : >> Do as I do. Use PowerPro to get all the different keyboard shortcuts >> to respond to '. A> That works well until I wish to really do a quick search and instead of A> 'n' appearing as it should in the quick search string ent

Re: I have returned

Hi Peter Fjelsten, On 20/01/2005 12:17 PM, you wrote: > Do as I do. Use PowerPro to get all the different keyboard shortcuts to > respond to '. That works well until I wish to really do a quick search and instead of 'n' appearing as it should in the quick search string entry field, I keep going

Re: Mail created date & time

Hello Chris, Thursday, January 20, 2005, 10:20:55 AM, you wrote: C> Hopefully this one has worked :-) You got it... Thanks. -- __ TBUDL/BETA/DEV/TECH Lists Moderator / PGP 0x6C0AB16B ( ) ( ___)(_ _)( ___) TBUDP Wiki Site: http://www.PCWize.com/thebat/tbudp )(__ )__

Re[3]: Mail created date & time

Hi Andrew, On Thursday, January 20, 2005 15:08 your local time, which was 20:08 my local time, Andrew Andrew [A] wrote; A> 2) Are you accidentally parsing out headers from these particular A> emails with your mail server? Some spam or header rule? I do have SPAM rules, but I've only been running

Re[2]: Mail created date & time

Hello Chris, Thursday, January 20, 2005, 2:24:58 PM, you wrote and sent the following: > What do people think? 1) They are generating wrong headers... but maybe not since I think 2 is more likely. 2) Are you accidentally parsing out headers from these particular emails with your mail server? So

Re: I have returned

Chris, On 20-01-2005 20:30, you [C] wrote in : C> Finally, most developers consider it either bad taste or a violation C> of open-source licenses to look at code and then re-implement the C> same functionality. Maybe they could have a small sneak peek... :) -- Best regar

Re: SOT: Xray or Hamster for X-Received-By header

ON Thursday, January 20, 2005, 5:59:32 PM, you wrote: TF> Thanks. Which one do you think is easier to set up? All I want to do TF> is add one header. Hi Thomas, I have not tried Hamster myself but Xray is brilliantly easy to use. Once you have set it up between TB! and the outside world creatin

Re: Re: I have returned

Peter Fjelsten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on 2005-Jan-20 at Thu PM 12:17:51 EST, wrote: > Yes. But it should be pretty easy for RitLabs to look at the source for > Thunderbird (it being open) and pore over what _they_ have done to get > it all to work as well (?) as it does. :) It may be possible for

Re: Mail created date & time

Hi Chris, On Thursday, January 20, 2005 17:16 our local time, Chris Weaven [CW] wrote; >> Didn't come through, obviously. But what I would be more interested in >> is the headers of that message rather than a screenshot. Especially >> the Date header. CW> I forgot that TBUDL doesn't allow any at

Re[2]: Mail created date & time

Hello Chris, Thursday, January 20, 2005, 12:16:31 PM, you wrote and sent the following: > I've already written to them twice including a screen print. They said > they couldn't open the attachment (.png) for security reasons, so I have > to write to them and print out a copy of the screen print :

Re: Mail created date & time

Hi all, The original quoted text below was written on 20/01/2005 17:16 my local time; Apologies about the missing cut marks. I didn't notice to start with, but when I change identities in Thunderbird, it removes it!? Current version is 3.0.1.33 |

Re: I have returned

Allie, On 20-01-2005 17:24, you [A] wrote in : A> Keyboard navigation is nice and easy. I hit 'n' to move to the next A> unread message. It's very awkward leaving the letter 'n' to hit A> 'CTRL+]'. Do as I do. Use PowerPro to get all the different keyboard shortcuts to resp

Re: Mail created date & time

Hi Thomas, The original quoted text below was written on 20/01/2005 16:56 my local time; I can imagine that their date stamp is not according to the RFC. As I'm sure most of their mail is system generated, I suspect something is missing somewhere. Didn't come through, obviously. But what I woul

Re: I have returned

Chris Weaven said the following on 01/20/2005 10:52: If I were to be totally honest here, the only thing I'm really missing from TB! is templates. Working with Thunderbird and IMAP with server side filtering for a few months now has made me realise that I'm not as reliant on TB! as I thought I w

Re: SOT: Xray or Hamster for X-Received-By header

Hello Gerard, On Thu, 20 Jan 2005 17:01:37 +0100 GMT (20/01/2005, 23:01 +0700 GMT), Gerard wrote: TF>> My question: Should I look at Xray or Hamster to achieve that task? G> It depends. If you want to add this header on the basis of the e-mail address it G> has been send to, then yes you could

Re: Mail created date & time

Hello Chris, On Thu, 20 Jan 2005 16:11:23 + GMT (20/01/2005, 23:11 +0700 GMT), Chris Weaven wrote: CW> I've approached the organisation in question and they assure me that the CW> date is included in all their outgoing mail. CW> So why do I not receive it and why is it only from this one loc

Re: I have returned

Hi Allie, The original quoted text below was written on 20/01/2005 16:32 my local time; ThunderBird's filter matching and actions options aren't as numerous as with TB!. However, ThunderBird's works while TB!'s is problematic and often doesn't work. As a result despite all of TB!'s fancy filterin

Re: I have returned

Hi Chris Weaven, On 20/01/2005 04:29 AM, you wrote: > Obviously I miss lots of features within TB!, especially templates and > certain aspects of filtering, but I'm able to carry out server side > filtering which has cushioned the blow somewhat. I forgot about filtering. How could I?! :) The

Re: I have returned

Hi Roman Katzer, On 19/01/2005 11:13 PM, you wrote: > I'm curious. What do you see as the most important advantages and > disadvantages of both clients? What do you like most and least about both? My sentiments are based on my being a full IMAP user: ThunderBird is simpler so more attention is

Mail created date & time

Hi all, I've a question regarding the 'Created Date & Time' within emails. I receive periodic emails from one of my bank accounts and when they come through, there is no created date or time in them. I sort my mail by created date, but because these mails don't have a created date, they're not s

Re: SOT: Xray or Hamster for X-Received-By header

ON Thursday, January 20, 2005, 4:29:20 PM, you wrote: TF> My question: Should I look at Xray or Hamster to achieve that task? Hi Thomas, It depends. If you want to add this header on the basis of the e-mail address it has been send to, then yes you could use both. If you want to filter somethin

SOT: Xray or Hamster for X-Received-By header

Hello tbudl, This is only slightly OT, because it wouldn't be if TB had the option to add headers to incoming mails. And it has to do with the filtering system. I want to add an X-Received-By header to each mail received, showing the account it come in on for some filtering action. (For those who

Re: I have returned

Hi, The original quoted text below was written on 19/01/2005 22:33 my local time; I tried Thunderbird for about two months. I am back to the bat. Great program. I must confess, I've been using Thunderbird for about 2-3 months now. The main reason for this is that I personally find IMAP support