Re[2]: Edit received messages

2001-05-07 Thread George F Schoelles
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hello Thomas, Sunday, May 06, 2001, 9:25:17 AM, you wrote: T No; many people think it would be unethical to edit received messages. T Since a workaround is available (the one you are using), I don't quite T see the point either. ;-) That is dumb! Who owns

Re[2]: Warning! First worm that hits TB! too...

2001-04-29 Thread George F Schoelles
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hello Marck, Saturday, April 28, 2001, 7:22:11 PM, you wrote: Ai (http://www.viruslist.com/eng/viruslist.asp?id=4188key=100013100072 ). Ai /Worm info MDP 1) This was all you needed to post to the list. MDP 2) It was posted last week - did you check

Re[2]: Auto-wraping of quoted text on reply ?

2001-04-22 Thread George F Schoelles
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hello Alexander, Sunday, April 22, 2001, 7:14:39 AM, you wrote: AL Maybe a stupid question but why would I want to include cookies in AL an email?? Not the kind of cookie as you are thinking, but a line of text in your E-mail with a bit a poignant

Re[3]: PGP advice

2001-04-21 Thread George F Schoelles
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hello Shauna, Saturday, April 21, 2001, 3:36:26 PM, you wrote: SS -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- SS Hash: SHA1 SS Hello All SS So, as you can see, instead of doing the work I should be doing, I've SS downloaded and installed PGP 6.5.8ckt build 05. The

Re[2]: Website

2001-04-01 Thread George F Schoelles
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hello Thomas, Saturday, March 31, 2001, 11:22:48 PM, you wrote: T Have you tried with the triple "w", i.e. www.ritlabs.com instead of T just ritlabs.com ? yeah, that's not it. - -- Best regards, George mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Website

2001-03-31 Thread George F Schoelles
Hello Bat_Users, I've been getting "DNS error" whenever I try to check the ritlabs home page. Has the site changed or is it gone? I like to check it for updates and such whenever I can. -- Best regards, George mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re[2]: Website

2001-03-31 Thread George F Schoelles
Hello Brian, Saturday, March 31, 2001, 5:12:52 AM, you wrote: BC You're hitting the right address, right? BC http://www.ritlabs.com/the_bat/ BC http://www.ritlabs.com/the_bat/beta.html ritlabs.com is not even resolving, which leaves nothing to trace. -- Best regards, George

Re[2]: Website

2001-03-31 Thread George F Schoelles
Hello Dierk, Saturday, March 31, 2001, 5:21:43 AM, you wrote: DH No problem with this URL: http://www.ritlabs.com/ DH - -- DH Dierk Haasis Nope, still no resolution. -- Best regards, George mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** *Thawte

Re[2]: Website

2001-03-31 Thread George F Schoelles
Hello Ben, Saturday, March 31, 2001, 6:03:53 AM, you wrote: BM www.ritlabs.com works here. If all else fails you can try BM http://198.63.208.135 . Yeah, the IP works, so I wonder why my Nameserver is not keeping it. -- Best regards, George mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re[2]: New version

2001-03-02 Thread George F Schoelles
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hello Reuven, Friday, March 02, 2001, 6:23:08 AM, you wrote: R I just downloaded and installed the beta version 1.51. From the first R glance I couldn't see any difference. What is indeed R better/improved/new in 1.51? The installer tells you of changes

Re: Move Rule //1/Outbox to //2/Outbox?

2001-02-22 Thread George F Schoelles
Hello Tim, Thursday, February 22, 2001, 5:29:13 AM, you wrote: TM The ISP I connect to most (netzero) at home blocks port 25 (no SMTP TM sending), so I can't connect to smtp.myrealbox.com when dialed in TM there. I have found that I can move mail from my TM \\PrimaryAccount\Outbox to

Re[3]: PGP 7.0.3

2001-02-15 Thread George F Schoelles
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hello Wolfgang, Thursday, February 15, 2001, 3:39:48 AM, you wrote: WK I'm still using 6.0.2i. Any arguments why I should upgrade? 6.0x has many security concerns that have been addressed in the upgrades through 6.5.8. I'm not about to take the list in that

Re[3]: PGP 7.0.3

2001-02-14 Thread George F Schoelles
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hello Ryan, Wednesday, February 14, 2001, 4:52:19 PM, you wrote: RP All you have to do is to click on the PGP taskbar icon and say RP encrypt/sign current window. Works like a charm. I just assigned new compatible hot-keys. - -- Best regards, George

Re: Getting Norton to see TB!

2001-02-13 Thread George F Schoelles
Hello Yuki, Tuesday, February 13, 2001, 4:50:12 AM, you wrote: YT I'm running Norton 2001 AV, but I cannot get it to "see" TB!, so I cannot YT configure it to check e-mail as it comes in. TB! is my default mailer, and YT is listed that way in MSIE's Tools/Internet Options/Programs page. But

Re: Moving TB! among computers, keeping current on computer(s)

2001-02-04 Thread George F Schoelles
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hello Mark, Sunday, February 04, 2001, 11:18:59 AM, you wrote: MK I installed TheBat! 1.49 to C:\TheBat directory. I am wanting to move MK TheBat! 1.49 to another computer. Can I just back up C:\TheBat MK directory and use REGEDIT to export the following

Re[3]: Moving Folders

2001-01-26 Thread George F Schoelles
Hello Ben, Friday, January 26, 2001, 6:09:18 AM, you wrote: BP That seems to work when moving them to a different order, but when I want to BP move a folder to a "Sub Folder" located within another folder, it doesn't BP seem to work for me. Use Ctl+Alt+drag -- Best regards, George

Re[2]: Quick Search closing

2001-01-23 Thread George F Schoelles
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hello Brian, Tuesday, January 23, 2001, 5:22:10 AM, you wrote: ACM Ah, I see. I think that this window is peculiar to TB!. Anyone ACM else have a take on this? BC I would say the PGPlog window is particular to PGP and is only called BC by TB!. I remember

Re[2]: Quick Search closing

2001-01-23 Thread George F Schoelles
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hello Brian, Tuesday, January 23, 2001, 5:53:14 AM, you wrote: BC Allie's key isn't unknown, in my case, and renaming pgplog.exe to BC pgplog.ex! isn't a solution. When I do that, then TheBat! informs me BC with a pop up dialog which states: BC 'Can't

Re[2]: Quick Search closing

2001-01-23 Thread George F Schoelles
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hello Brian, Tuesday, January 23, 2001, 6:07:37 AM, you wrote: BC To the contrary, it seems like the dialog was added in order to BC prevent problems in the event that pgplog.exe couldn't be found. What version of PGP are you using? - -- Best regards,

Re: PGP, PGPlog and TB! [Was: Quick Search closing]

2001-01-23 Thread George F Schoelles
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hello Brian, Tuesday, January 23, 2001, 7:03:43 AM, you wrote: GFS What version of PGP are you using? BC 6.5.8. Same thing happened with 6.0.2 I believe. You're using 7.x so BC you're probably using PGPtray, which doesn't show that information in BC the

Re[2]: PGP, PGPlog and TB! [Was: Quick Search closing]

2001-01-23 Thread George F Schoelles
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hello Brian, Tuesday, January 23, 2001, 7:29:01 AM, you wrote: BC I don't think so. I just did this the other day, and, besides, Allie's BC is doing the same thing. TB!'s PGP plug-in is _obviously_ looking for BC pgplog.exe. BC When you had 6.5.8 installed,

Re[2]: PGP, PGPlog and TB! [Was: Quick Search closing]

2001-01-23 Thread George F Schoelles
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hello Brian, Tuesday, January 23, 2001, 8:12:51 AM, you wrote: BC I upgraded to 6.5.8 in order to get the new Hotkeys functionality BC (because I don't use message preview in TB!) so that I didn't have to BC open a message, then hit Esc, then hit Ctrl+Shift+D

Re[2]: PGP 6.5.8 and The Bat! integration

2001-01-23 Thread George F Schoelles
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hello Mike, Tuesday, January 23, 2001, 6:43:54 PM, you wrote: MY I have the batpgp*.dll files in my PGP directory, and that works. That's fine for 2 through 6.x because they are in the path. However this is not so in 7.x and above. - -- Best regards,

Re[2]: PGP 6.5.8 and The Bat! integration

2001-01-23 Thread George F Schoelles
Hello Mike, Tuesday, January 23, 2001, 7:50:14 PM, you wrote: MY Since the original question dealt with 6.5.8 my answer to Satori MY stands. Try moving batpgp65.dll to your PGP directory. Correct, just keeping all informed. I did not mean this as a correction, but as an amplification. --

Re[2]: Like Notepad with word-wrap...

2001-01-21 Thread George F Schoelles
Hello Marck, Sunday, January 21, 2001, 3:17:24 AM, you wrote: MDP Let's move this thread to TBTECH now. It's become very circular and MDP RFC centric. No more on TBUDL please. I'm done with it. I think both our points and feelings were made with-out possible resolution. -- Best regards,

Re[2]: Like Notepad with word-wrap...

2001-01-21 Thread George F Schoelles
Hello Marck, Sunday, January 21, 2001, 2:45:21 AM, you wrote: MDP Simple. George changed the subject. I was talking to George, not you. MDP He stipulated that formatting could be constant without hard returns. MDP That is not the case. Different recipients *see* differently formatted MDP

Re[4]: Like Notepad with word-wrap...

2001-01-20 Thread George F Schoelles
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hello David, Saturday, January 20, 2001, 8:11:44 AM, you wrote: DB AFAIK in e-mail programs it is recommended by RFCs and part of the DB netiquette that hard returns are added by the e-mail programs at about DB 70 characters a line. This is e.g. helpful for

Re[4]: Like Notepad with word-wrap...

2001-01-20 Thread George F Schoelles
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hello Nebula, Saturday, January 20, 2001, 11:16:59 AM, you wrote: N if you want non-wrapped Text then write it in Notepad (or something leike N that) and save it as .txt, This is a knee jerk work around. How about giving the user the option to use hard

Re[2]: Like Notepad with word-wrap...

2001-01-20 Thread George F Schoelles
Hello Thomas, Saturday, January 20, 2001, 11:30:43 AM, you wrote: DB AFAIK in e-mail programs it is recommended by RFCs and part of the DB netiquette that hard returns are added by the e-mail programs at about DB 70 characters a line. This is e.g. helpful for quoting. GFS But at what point the

Re[2]: Like Notepad with word-wrap...

2001-01-20 Thread George F Schoelles
Hello Mike, Saturday, January 20, 2001, 11:48:32 AM, you wrote: GFS This is a knee jerk work around. How about giving the user the GFS option to use hard returns or not. MY Standards are not knee-jerk reactions. If you insist on sending MY unformatted e-mails, don't be upset with the

Re[2]: Like Notepad with word-wrap...

2001-01-20 Thread George F Schoelles
Hello Marck, Saturday, January 20, 2001, 11:55:33 AM, you wrote: GFS This is a knee jerk work around. How about giving the user the GFS option to use hard returns or not. MDP There is no choice. Hard returns get used at some point. At least in MDP TB that point is "up front". In all

Re[2]: Like Notepad with word-wrap...

2001-01-20 Thread George F Schoelles
Hello Marck, Saturday, January 20, 2001, 11:55:44 AM, you wrote: GFS But at what point the Hard Returns are inserted is the problem. GFS I propose the Hard Returns are not inserted until the E-mail is GFS sent thus cutting off many other formatting problems as with PGP GFS and such. MDP That

Re[2]: Like Notepad with word-wrap...

2001-01-20 Thread George F Schoelles
Hello Mike, Saturday, January 20, 2001, 1:10:31 PM, you wrote: MY Being able to switch the formatting from during-the-edit to MY prior-to-send may be simple, or it may require a second complete edit MY module. In either case, I, for one, don't think it is worth the MY effort. I'd like to go on

Re[2]: PLEASE MAKE NEXT BUILD DO THIS

2001-01-18 Thread George F Schoelles
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hello solid, Thursday, January 18, 2001, 3:38:02 PM, you wrote: ss what you mean ? ss I still don't understand ? Outlook has an auto-magic filter creation utility that uses the selected E-mail as an example and shucks it of to trash can of choice. - --

Re[2]: Filter Stings

2001-01-15 Thread George F Schoelles
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hello Thomas, Sunday, January 14, 2001, 8:32:09 PM, you wrote: T Januk didn't mean to scare you off of filters. He's just your average T genius and didn't think mortals find it a bit on the complicated side. T But he's a nice guy, too, and always willing to

Re[4]: Filter Stings

2001-01-15 Thread George F Schoelles
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hello OK3, Monday, January 15, 2001, 6:42:03 AM, you wrote: GFS Having said that I wanted to enter the ORBS blocked IP address's into GFS my filters. Though I'm not sure how to do that using one filter with GFS many address's, where only only one need exist.

Re[4]: Filter Stings

2001-01-15 Thread George F Schoelles
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hello OK3, Monday, January 15, 2001, 6:42:03 AM, you wrote: O TB! is able to save much time for you if you invest some time in O learning it first. This is a luxury I can not afford. However, a book I could tote around while working would be helpful

Re[2]: Filter Stings

2001-01-15 Thread George F Schoelles
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hello Thomas, Monday, January 15, 2001, 6:51:47 AM, you wrote: George Having said that I wanted to enter the ORBS blocked IP address's into George my filters. Though I'm not sure how to do that using one filter with George many address's, where only only one

Re[6]: Filter Stings

2001-01-15 Thread George F Schoelles
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hello OK3, Monday, January 15, 2001, 7:24:57 AM, you wrote: O Go to the Alternatives tab in filter properties and add set. GFS So the alternatives will be acted on individually? I ask because the GFS help file lacks in this area and it looks the same. O

Filter Stings

2001-01-14 Thread George F Schoelles
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hello Bat_Users, I need a wild card filter string that just selects all messages entering the inbox of one account. I've tried "*" which doesn't seem to work. - -- Best regards, George mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re[2]: Filter Stings

2001-01-14 Thread George F Schoelles
Hello Januk, Sunday, January 14, 2001, 1:03:46 PM, you wrote: JA For example, if I was searching a dictionary file where each word is JA on a single line, I could find all 13 letter words by simply using a JA regexp like: '^.{13}$' Or all words with more than 13 letters could JA be found with

MAPI

2001-01-14 Thread George F Schoelles
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hello Bat_Users, Just started having TB149 Lock up after a program made MAPI call. Was working fine under 149f. were there any TBmapi changes? - -- Best regards, George mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re[2]: Moving Folders

2001-01-12 Thread George F Schoelles
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hello Thomas, Thursday, January 11, 2001, 8:10:00 PM, you wrote: ML What's the problem? You can't move folders around with alt+dragging? GFS Correct, no key + mouse operation will work, TF I undersatand this to mean: no (key + mouse) operation, rather than:

Re: MAPI Calls?

2001-01-12 Thread George F Schoelles
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hello Gerry, Friday, January 12, 2001, 5:33:58 AM, you wrote: GD Hello Everyone! GD It is my understanding that I can "communicate with TB! GD programmatically by calling MAPI functions using "TBMAPI.DLL". GD Does anyone have any knowledge as to what calls

Re[2]: MAPI Calls?

2001-01-12 Thread George F Schoelles
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hello A, Friday, January 12, 2001, 5:57:26 AM, you wrote: GFS 1 TB must be open for mapi to work as with ant mapi mail client. ACM Are you sure about this? I just did an MAPI call with TextPad which ACM launched TB! and opened a new message. Or am I

Re[4]: MAPI Calls?

2001-01-12 Thread George F Schoelles
Hello Gerry, Friday, January 12, 2001, 6:12:24 AM, you wrote: GFS It launched TB which is open, right? And it was my understanding you GFS did not want to open TB, hence my suggestion. GD I personally don't mind having TB! already open. Ooops sorry ~;-| -- Best regards, George

Re[2]: Moving Folders

2001-01-12 Thread George F Schoelles
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hello Thomas, Friday, January 12, 2001, 6:24:48 AM, you wrote: TF Wait... alt+mouse is supposed to move the folder only up and down the TF folder tree. TF To make the folder a subfolder of another folder, another combo is TF needed - which alludes me at the

Re[2]: Multiple email everything.

2001-01-12 Thread George F Schoelles
Hello Olivier, Friday, January 12, 2001, 5:43:24 PM, you wrote: OR I have at current not found an SMTP server which I can access, from OR wherever I connected from (i.e. whatever ISP's I'm using). and send OR the mails through with any of 20 or so different "FROM" addresses OR (which include

Moving Folders

2001-01-11 Thread George F Schoelles
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hello Bat_Users, Back to the folder thread, I was wondering were the bat keeps its folder information. In as that the structure is in the folders on disk, though changes there are not recognized by The Bat. Also none of the ctrl or alt + Drag options seem

Re[2]: Moving Folders

2001-01-11 Thread George F Schoelles
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hello Ming-Li, Thursday, January 11, 2001, 8:29:06 AM, you wrote: Also none of the ctrl or alt + Drag options seem to work for me. ML What's the problem? You can't move folders around with alt+dragging? Correct, no key + mouse operation will work, - --

Re: s/mime access violation

2001-01-10 Thread George F Schoelles
Hello Peter, Wednesday, January 10, 2001, 1:22:57 AM, you wrote: PK any hints? (all certs present, S/MIME activated (switches don't PK matter), PGP not activated ...) Were the certificates you are encrypting to properly exported with the ability of encryption enabled? -- Best regards,

Re: OT question about PGP

2001-01-10 Thread George F Schoelles
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hello Dave, Wednesday, January 10, 2001, 4:59:19 PM, you wrote: DG 2) Does anyone have any suggestions for very basic introductory DG material on PGP? Try http://mccune.cc/PGP.htm , He has many links and a lot of info. - -- Best regards, George

Re: s/mime access violation

2001-01-10 Thread George F Schoelles
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hello Peter, Wednesday, January 10, 2001, 8:02:33 AM, you wrote: PK do you have a file present in your mail directory called SMIMERND.BIN? PK I'm missing this random seed file, The Bat! doesn't create it by PK itself (it should as stated by the developers),

Re[3]: OT: review Rebel Email Clients: The Bat!

2001-01-09 Thread George F. Schoelles
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hello David, Tuesday, January 09, 2001, 4:37:04 AM, you wrote: DB 09 January 2001 12:35:11GMT. Our favourite e-mail client had 28 votes. DB All tried and stuck. I made the vote count 29. DB The other choice was Pegasus. 208 votes and the majority tried it

Re[2]: slow spell check

2001-01-07 Thread George F. Schoelles
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hello Marck, Sunday, January 07, 2001, 2:23:12 AM, you wrote: MDP British English, language pack installed, automatic checking = 1 MDP second to do a manual check. I haven't noticed any degradation in MDP spell check speeds. PIII 750 128mb OS as

Re: Preview messages on server?

2001-01-07 Thread George F. Schoelles
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hello Gerry, Sunday, January 07, 2001, 7:53:49 AM, you wrote: GD Is there a way in TB! to view the messages on the mail sever GD without having to actually retrieve them? I know that I can just GD bring in the headers if I want, but I would rather just view

Re[2]: Preview messages on server?

2001-01-07 Thread George F. Schoelles
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hello Thomas, Sunday, January 07, 2001, 10:02:11 AM, you wrote: TF Well. I used Pine for this until I discovered the Mail Dispather TF (Account / dispatch Mail on Server). You see what messages have come TF in from who under what subjects, and can the view

Re: annoying multi-line cookie protocol

2001-01-07 Thread George F. Schoelles
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hello Charlie, Monday, January 01, 2001, 12:45:53 PM, you wrote: CL to me, it seems like a PITA that mult-line cookies need this '/n' to CL signify a carriage return. If i download or create a big text file of CL quotes, Seems to me leaving it up to

Re: NO Ticker as default folder setting

2001-01-07 Thread George F. Schoelles
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hello Douglas, Sunday, January 07, 2001, 4:12:13 PM, you wrote: DH And THAT Bat! folk, is the reason for this post: IS there a way to DH set NO TICKER as the default folder setting? I've right clicked on the ticker and chose _Hide_. But I may have

Editing

2001-01-07 Thread George F. Schoelles
Hello Bat_Users, Something I miss from Eudora 3.x was the ability to edit a received message before saving it. Is this something I can do in The Bat or is this a good request. -- Best regards, George mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re[2]: Editing

2001-01-07 Thread George F. Schoelles
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hello A., Sunday, January 07, 2001, 6:39:14 PM, you wrote: AGSAA However there are two workarounds available: - Drag or copy the AGSAA message to the Outbox and set the Draft flag manually. ACM Do you have to set the draft? ACM I just drag it to the outbox,

Re[2]: slow spell check

2001-01-06 Thread George F. Schoelles
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hello Jan, Saturday, January 06, 2001, 4:31:10 PM, you wrote: Charlie [..] has anyone else noticed that the wait after initial Charlie selection of spell checking is becoming longer with each Charlie new version. [...] JR I checked your msg in about one

Re[4]: slow spell check

2001-01-06 Thread George F. Schoelles
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hello Charlie, Saturday, January 06, 2001, 5:43:00 PM, you wrote: GFS I noticed that the suggestion list is very slow when right clicking on GFS an error. Cc Right clicking the suggestion list does have unpredictable results for Cc me too. How do you find

Re[2]: slow spell check

2001-01-06 Thread George F. Schoelles
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hello A., Saturday, January 06, 2001, 7:26:28 PM, you wrote: ACM Personally, I found that the spell checker speeded up a lot when I ACM installed the language pack. Shouldn't think I'd need it on the English version.!? - -- Best regards, George

Re[2]: Multiple email everything.

2001-01-05 Thread George F. Schoelles
Hello Jamie, Friday, January 05, 2001, 12:09:36 AM, you wrote: JD A more windows orientated solution is to install NT and a windows JD based smtp server. Apart from BackOffice server I've never tried this JD method. I have also seen smtp servers that can be installed in 98/NT/2K. Have yet to

Re[2]: Sig

2001-01-04 Thread George F. Schoelles
Hello Ming-Li, Thursday, January 04, 2001, 8:29:24 AM, you wrote: ML In case you haven't found this out yourself: you may use the %cookie ML macro to (randomly) rotate those "lines of wisdom" in your sig. ML There's no need to cramp them all into a few lines, and people can ML still see them

Sig

2001-01-02 Thread George F. Schoelles
Hello Batters, 3 lines now! PS: I think the respondents/ Commenters have wasted more bandwidth than my signature ever will. -- Best regards, George mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Thawte authorized WOT Notary ICQ: 122492 "The right of the people to be

Re: Sig

2001-01-02 Thread George F. Schoelles
Hello George, Tuesday, January 02, 2001, 5:33:36 AM, you wrote: GFS Hello Batters, GFS 3 lines now! GFS PS: I think the respondents/ Commenters have wasted more GFS bandwidth than my signature ever will. Ooops that didn't work, "O" Well I'll keep working with that templat.

Re[2]: Plain text by default?

2001-01-02 Thread George F. Schoelles
Hello Tony, Tuesday, January 02, 2001, 3:48:47 AM, you wrote: TB As Thomas said, most people pay for their connection by the minute. TB Part of the reason I don't subscribe to the mindless free for all that TB abound on most news groups. This is no longer true. Bandwidth is not of much

Re[2]: Now that I finally can delete attachments without fear....

2001-01-02 Thread George F. Schoelles
Hello Dierk, Tuesday, January 02, 2001, 1:35:01 PM, you wrote: DH BTW, HTML is not intended as a *formatting* language; let me think, DH why don't we use Postscript ;-). Actually if you talk to the creators at ncsa.uiuc.edu, they will tell you in no uncertain terms that HTML is a formatting

Re: PGP

2001-01-01 Thread George F. Schoelles
Hello Remi, Monday, January 01, 2001, 3:33:48 AM, you wrote: RP That PGP thing looks very unfriendly to me. I would appreciate some help. -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- What version of PGP and Windows are you using? - -- Best regards, Georgemailto:[EMAIL

Re[2]: Plain text by default?

2001-01-01 Thread George F. Schoelles
Hello Tony, Sunday, December 31, 2000, 6:55:27 AM, you wrote: TB With all due respect George and I don't mean to be derogatory in any TB way but is it absolutely necessary to use such a large PGP signature TB and such a big multi line quote with every single message to the list? TB

Re[2]: Plain text by default?

2001-01-01 Thread George F. Schoelles
Hello A., Monday, January 01, 2001, 12:58:23 PM, you wrote: ACM I am therefore requesting that for these lists, TBUDL and TBBETA, you ACM cut down the length of your signatures and please realize that there are ACM practical issues of wasted bandwidth behind such a request and that we ACM

Re[2]: Plain text by default?

2001-01-01 Thread George F. Schoelles
Hello Marck, Monday, January 01, 2001, 4:47:51 PM, you wrote: MDP This is a list with rules. If you repeatedly flout those rules, MDP eventually you're going to offend someone, and eventually a moderator MDP will have to intervene to reenforce the list rules. Irregardless, the only

Re[2]: Now that I finally can delete attachments without fear....

2000-12-31 Thread George F. Schoelles
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hello Dierk, Sunday, December 31, 2000, 2:03:31 AM, you wrote: DH And where do *you* get your statistics made up? Or are you actually DH subscribed to *all* lists so you can rightfully make the statement DH above? Actually my statistics are coming from

Re[2]: Outgoing attachments

2000-12-31 Thread George F. Schoelles
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hello Nick, Sunday, December 31, 2000, 11:06:28 AM, you wrote: NA Yes, I understand the logic now, thanks to you and Marck. I just wish TB! NA wouldn't be so ambiguous in their use of language. I now have the option NA "Bind attachments..." checked, but I

Re[2]: Outgoing attachments

2000-12-31 Thread George F. Schoelles
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hello Marck, Sunday, December 31, 2000, 11:48:33 AM, you wrote: MDP Just a quick note to point out that this "bad wrapping" is caused by MDP PGP. When used with TB, it is best to turn off PGP's line wrapping MDP completely since TB does its' own

Re[3]: Outgoing attachments

2000-12-31 Thread George F. Schoelles
Hello George, Sunday, December 31, 2000, 5:16:08 PM, you wrote: MDP Just a quick note to point out that this "bad wrapping" is caused by MDP PGP. When used with TB, it is best to turn off PGP's line wrapping MDP completely since TB does its' own line break formatting before PGP MDP

Re[2]: Outgoing attachments

2000-12-31 Thread George F. Schoelles
Hello Nick, Sunday, December 31, 2000, 5:36:05 PM, you wrote: NA Just curious George, but how did you manage to PGP sign only your portion of NA the above message, and not the quoted material? NA In any case, what Marck was referring to was your PGP wrap setting. Because NA the TB! Editor is

Re[2]: Outgoing attachments

2000-12-31 Thread George F. Schoelles
Hello Marck, Sunday, December 31, 2000, 7:59:31 PM, you wrote: MDP On 01 January 2001 at 17:51:27 -0800 (which was 01:51 where I MDP live) George F. Schoelles wrote and made these points: GFS 3 I have it set for 6 columns greater and still have the problem. MDP "It"? TB or PGP

Re: FaxNow ! and MAPI...

2000-12-30 Thread George F. Schoelles
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hello Stefano, Saturday, December 30, 2000, 8:48:52 AM, you wrote: SZ I'm using FaxNow 2000 (http://www.redrocksoftware.com/uk/index.htm) SZ with The Bat (latest beta)(i'm sending FAX via email with MAPI SZ compliant email program) but FaxNow tell me there

Re[2]: FaxNow ! and MAPI...

2000-12-30 Thread George F. Schoelles
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hello Stefano, Saturday, December 30, 2000, 9:12:12 AM, you wrote: SZ Now i have shutdown the bat, copied tbmapi.dll into winnt\system32 SZ directory, and restarted it, but Faxnow still doesn't "see" it SZ Any idea ? You still have said nothing of your

Re[2]: FaxNow ! and MAPI...

2000-12-30 Thread George F. Schoelles
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hello Stefano, Saturday, December 30, 2000, 10:40:05 AM, you wrote: SZ W2k tell me that mapi32.dll is 1.0.2536.0 version :-? try typing fixmapi at the command prompt. - -- Best regards, Georgemailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *

MAPI

2000-12-26 Thread George F. Schoelles
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hello Bat users, New Mapi error since installing 148f: "The ordinal 17 could not be located in the dynamic link library MAPI32.dll" Any thoughts on fixing this? - -- Best regards, George mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] * *

Request or am I missing it

2000-12-24 Thread George F. Schoelles
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hello Bat_Users, I don't see it, so I'll ask for a _compress folders on exit_ that probably links with empty trash on exit. Thanks for the ear. - - -- Best regards, George mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] * * *

Re: Opinion: Blind Copy emails should warn / not allow reply to original recipient

2000-12-23 Thread George F. Schoelles
Hello Mike, Saturday, December 23, 2000, 6:32:47 AM, you wrote: MH Caution! You have included [EMAIL PROTECTED] as a recipient MH of this reply. You were sent a Blind Copy of an email sent MH to him/her. Are you sure that you want to do this? I concur that this would be a cool

Re[3]: Opinion: Blind Copy emails should warn / not allow reply to original recipient

2000-12-23 Thread George F. Schoelles
Hello Michael, Saturday, December 23, 2000, 7:37:29 AM, you wrote: MSG All recipients keeping their copy status would not really remove the MSG problem. There would still be people seeing the message who MSG shouldn't. A warning would be a better way so that the replier could MSG then make

Re: strange antivirus message issue

2000-12-23 Thread George F. Schoelles
Hello Jason, Saturday, December 23, 2000, 2:50:14 PM, you wrote: JO "Norton Antivirus has detected the virus in: Have you recently turned on E-mail virus detection in NAV or made some E-mail address or NAV settings that would cause a change? -- Best regards, George

(No Subject)

2000-12-19 Thread George F. Schoelles
Hello Bat Users, I have two areas I need assistance. 1. I'm receiving errors saying my E-mail program is not installed properly when I try to launch mail to URL's. Probably a registry hack I can't find. 2. The bat tends to lock

Oops no subject

2000-12-19 Thread George F. Schoelles
Hello The Bat Users, Before I get pounced upon I apologize for not using a subject in the previous E-mail. -- Best regards, George mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] * * * === Thawte authorized WOT Notary ICQ: 122492 *

/installmapi switch

2000-12-19 Thread George F. Schoelles
Hello Jamie, Tuesday, December 19, 2000, 5:24:05 AM, you wrote: JD You probably need to use the /installmapi switch to update the mapi JD subsystem. If you've already done this then there might be a Win2K Just tried it and problem still exists. I'll work it out sooner or later -- Best

Re: Bug confirmation (maybe)

2000-12-19 Thread George F. Schoelles
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hello Arthur, Tuesday, December 19, 2000, 7:26:16 AM, you wrote: AW Up through 1.47, I did get network hangs on checking the mail. If I then AW pressed "Cancel", the small dialog box that previously was hung on AW "Connecting to host" would then remain hung

(No Subject)

2000-12-14 Thread George F. Schoelles
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hello Bat Users, Is there a way to modify/Add X-Headers in The Bat! - -- Best regards, George mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: 2.6.2 Comment: Use PGP to protect your rights and authenticity

(No Subject)

2000-12-14 Thread George F. Schoelles
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Is there a manual other than the help-file? - -- Best regards, George mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: 2.6.2 Comment: Use PGP to protect your rights and authenticity Comment: KeyID:

Re: Help file (Look you can type a subject in.)

2000-12-14 Thread George F. Schoelles
Hello Jamie, Thursday, December 14, 2000, 7:43:23 AM, you wrote: JD Not at the moment. I'm gradually trying to compile a sort of help file JD from the archives. I'm trying to find a good amount of non-copyrighted JD regular expression manuals. Currently I'm thinking of using the Linux JD man

Re[2]: (No Subject)

2000-12-14 Thread George F. Schoelles
Hello A., Thursday, December 14, 2000, 3:15:38 PM, you wrote: GFS Is there a way to modify/Add X-Headers in The Bat! ACM You could add it as a comment. ACM %Comment="X-Header here" Were would this go? In a template or.? -- Best regards, Georgemailto:[EMAIL

Re[2]: smapi

2000-12-12 Thread George F. Schoelles
Hello A., Tuesday, December 12, 2000, 4:08:03 AM, you wrote: cool feature. -- Best regards, Georgemailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- -- View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com To send a

Re[2]: smapi

2000-12-11 Thread George F. Schoelles
Hello Kari, Monday, December 11, 2000, 9:26:20 AM, you wrote: KJ -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- KJ Hash: SHA1 KJ Hello George, KJ On Sun, 10 Dec 2000, at 16:19:10 h [GMT -0800] KJ you wrote this about "smapi": GFS Hello The Bat, GFS GFS Well I have searched the Web home for The Bat and

Re[2]: smapi

2000-12-11 Thread George F. Schoelles
Hello Marck, Monday, December 11, 2000, 6:52:55 PM, you wrote: MDP -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- MDP Hash: SHA1 MDP Hi George, MDP On 12 December 2000 at 18:26:11 -0800 (which was 02:26 where I MDP live) George F. Schoelles wrote and made these points: GFS No, and how rude of you

(No Subject)

2000-12-10 Thread George F. Schoelles
I'm trying to run BattleMail Kung-Fu and am receiving an smapi logon error (won't accept password). Which I never had a problemwith under Eudora. Any ideas? -- Best regards, George mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] * * * === Thawte

  1   2   >