Sunday, October 22, 2000, 6:37:43 PM, scriptur:
> Date: Sun, 22 Oct 2000 06:43:11 -0700
> From: Ming-Li <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: Slow when downloading mai
> On Saturday, October 21, 2000, 3:17:24 PM, Britta wrote:
>>> BTW, Britta, I found all your messages coming in broken with the
>>
Friday, October 13, 2000, 10:01:24 AM, scriptur:
> (#2000-414) - Topics This Issue:
...
> Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2000 20:40:13 -0700
> From: Januk Aggarwal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: Multi-user environment
>(was: Re: Another question on filters and templates)
I read that thread and Januk
Wednesday, October 04, 2000, 4:49:16 PM, Januk scripsit:
> Hello Krister,
...
>> I think it would be convenient to have the possibility in the bat
>> to add urls to favorites/bookmarks/whathaveyou, this way you don't
>> have to save a whole message just in order to get the web address
>> of
Sunday, October 01, 2000, 4:33:56 PM, A. Curtis Martin scripsit:
J>>| Action(s) | in the Sorting Office / Filters menu:
J>> [checkbox] Create a copy of message in another folder
> When I select a folder in another account and hit OK, the destination
> folder selection field remains blank. Howe
Friday, September 29, 2000, 7:37:22 PM, scriptur:
> Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2000 15:07:04 +0200
> From: Roel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: mailto:[link] opens active folder's template instead of general
>account template
>> Any mistake in my settings maybe?
> under account-settings, check the
Hello TBUDL,
I am having problems to set the following | Action(s) | in the
Sorting Office / Filters menu:
[checkbox] Create a copy of message in another folder
Can anyone confirm that selecting a destination folder by using the
Browsing [tree-symbol] button does NOT work? Mine does allow b
Hi there,
I consider this problematic (if not actually a bug): when clicking a
mailto:[link]
on a web page open in my browser (Opera 4.02), TB would open a message
window with the Message template of the particular folder
"open"(activated) at that time. This can't be the idea.
Any
Thursday, September 28, 2000, 10:01:43 AM, scriptur:
Better than spamming the list. Nick already said "uncle" for all of us. ;-)
TF>> I learned this from a Canadian friend of mine: "to say uncle" means
TF>> the same as "to give up". Someone will repeat something, or lock his
TF>> arms aroun
Wednesday, September 27, 2000, 7:53:18 PM, scriptur:
> Better than spamming the list. Nick already said "uncle" for all of us. ;-)
Except for the ones who don't ...get it.
Must for sure be one of those Regular Expressions... :-)
--
Best,
Marc
v1.46c W95B PII266
- always late due to receivi
Wednesday, September 27, 2000, 9:14:30 AM, scripsi:
>>> What seems to be lacking is the option to delete Actions (or Tasks, if
>>> you will) from the queue _before actually connecting_. You can do it
>>> once you've confirmed connecting, but if you've noticed by then that
>>> it's the wrong a
Wednesday, September 27, 2000, 9:14:30 AM, scripsi:
> My question remains: has anyone got the same problem (or do you folks
> never accidentally want to fetch mail from the wrong accounts maybe?)
> and is there a workaround in the Connections or Network Settings?
Sorry - in addition to my prev
Wednesday, September 27, 2000, 1:42:57 AM, scriptur:
> From: Paula Ford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: Question about connections queue
>> What seems to be lacking is the option to delete Actions (or Tasks, if
>> you will) from the queue _before actually connecting_. You can do it
>> once
Hi List,
I sometimes erroneously hit the Get New Mail button not realizing that
I'm within the wrong one of my multiple accounts (i.e. the one I don't
want to connect to); the Connecting to... pop-up appears etc., and _on
from that point_, checking that account's mail will be in the queue,
no m
Marck D. Pearlstone scripsit:
> 3) dealing with digests - yet another question
...
>> This is the very same problem that will occur with digests. What you'd
>> have to do JM, is to manually copy and paste the desired text block in
>> your reply message. Paste using the 'paste as quote' opti
So I'll continue manually cutting and pasting from my non-MIME
digests. That's alright... - unless, of course, someone comes up with
a filtering (or RegEx) rule for taking out the delimiters.
(Or is that nonsense, from a technical point of vies? See, I don't
understand yet on which
Marck D. Pearlstone kindly responded:
J>> ... I must confirm replying by Select All and F4 does not do the
J>> trick: it does _not_ override the signature delimiters.
> No ... and It shouldn't. Why would you want to anyway? A reply should
> always be to a single message. A message ends at th
Scripsi:
> ...
>
> Hello List, I can't hide my lack of ba(t)sic knowledge here,
BUT I have been checking the Archives since, and I must confirm
replying by Select All and F4 does not do the trick: it does _not_
override the signature delimiters.
> It turns out that when replying
Monday, September 25, 2000, 9:21:12 PM, scriptur:
> Special Issue (#2000-343) - Topics This Issue:
...
> 6) dealing with digests
...
Hello List, I can't hide my lack of ba(t)sic knowledge here, but I
have noticed that the string "-- ", is sometimes called a standard
signature delim
Monday, September 25, 2000, 9:21:12 PM, scriptur:
Tmtdc> Special Issue (#2000-343) - Topics This Issue:
Tmtdc> 11) "HELP!
Tmtdc> Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2000 14:35:07 -0400
Tmtdc> From: Jan Rifkinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Tmtdc> Subject: "HELP!
Tmtdc> I don't
Tmtdc>
Hello Gerd,
scripsis:
Tmtdc> Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2000 18:29:25 +0200
Tmtdc> From: Gerd Ewald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Tmtdc> Tmtdc> [excellent description snipped]
>> Note that you'll have two copies of the message, one with the ad and
>> one without. When you've confirmed that you've got all the para
Hello List,
Rev.Bob'Bob'scripsit:
>> as you seem to be an egroups - subscriber anyway, you may wanna
>> check the following message
>> http://www.egroups.com/message/thebat-dt/1764?threaded=1 from the
>> German BATlist.
RBBC> Brilliant! Got it to work with very little trouble. Thank you
> From: "Rev. Bob 'Bob' Crispen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Scripsis:
> Now that egroups.com has moved the ad that appears on all their "free"
> lists to the top of the message where it's even more annoying than it
> was before, has anybody worked out a way to filter that junk out of
> incoming text mess
Hello list,
so sorry for posting this on-list:
I am NOT receiving any list digest since
18 june, and I can't believe that's O.K.
--
Best regards,
Marc mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
--
View the TBUDL archive at h
Friday, June 02, 2000, 9:59:14 PM, scripsi:
J> Hello - I'd be glad to find some help regarding a new
J> problem I have sort of accidentally created by _dele-
J> ting_ the one account (out of four) which I had given
J> administrative rights;
...
J> Any suggestions welcome!
O.K., here's an auto-su
Hello - I'd be glad to find some help regarding a new
problem I have sort of accidentally created by _dele-
ting_ the one account (out of four) which I had given
administrative rights; all of this after some messing
around in finding the best arrangements for a multi-
user environment on one PC,
25 matches
Mail list logo
