X
Eudora Light 3.0
Eudora Pro 4.0
Pegasus Mail 3.0
Becky! Internet Mail 1.26
AL-Mail32 1.11
2002 operates in a very different way and needs no changes to settings
in The Bat.
John Rainer
Current Ver: 1.61
FAQ: http://
options are at
http://www.microsoft.com/windows/lifecycleconsumer.asp There are a
number of W2K questions and answers at the foot of the page relating
to business use.
John Rainer
Current Ver: 1.61
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com
Friday, March 22, 2002, 9:00:41 PM, you wrote:
R> Hi John
R> On Fri, 22 Mar 2002 20:56:59 +GMT
R>(which was 22/03/2002, 21:56 +0100GMT for me),
R> you wrote:
JR>> Do I have the first bug or is this a feature? I launch The Bat from a
JR>> shortcut on the quicklaunch bar in XP Pro (using
'classic' layout),
with The Bat set to run maximised. When I do this with 1.6 the whole
task bar disappears, leaving a gap at the bottom of the screen, and I
get some really wierd screen corruption when alt-tabbing between apps.
When launched from a shortcut elsewhere, it seems to
as I can see and I can live without them
for the sake of autodeleting infected mail.
John Rainer
--
Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailt
works in XP, btw, if you run the symevent
update file before rebooting after installation.
John Rainer
--
Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
Wednesday, January 02, 2002, 11:24:09 PM, you wrote:
DAC> On 28 Dec 2001, 10:47:54 AM, John Rainer wrote:
>> The email scanner in 2002 works in a very different way to earlier
>> versions and needs no email client configuration. The only automatic
>> function seems to be a
Wednesday, January 02, 2002, 12:19:27 AM, you wrote:
ACM> @ 19:05:47 + [ Tue, 1 Jan 2002], John Rainer [JR] thoughtfully
ACM> wrote the following:
ACM> ...
JR>> Re the stuff on Norton and XP below: (related to Norton AV 2002
JR>> and the loss of the autodelete funct
f the retail 2002 that was
there before!
My mail downloads are now fully automatic but I've disabled all the
scheduled tasks just in case there is still a problem with Symevent.
John Rainer
Friday, December 28, 2001, 8:22:47 PM, you wrote:
JR> Friday, December 28, 2001, 6:45:55 PM, you wrot
w has the 365 days of updates of the retail 2002 that was
there before!
My mail downloads are now fully automatic but I've disabled all the
scheduled tasks just in case there is still a problem with Symevent.
John Rainer
Friday, December 28, 2001, 8:22:47 PM, you wrote:
JR> Friday, Decembe
t is just plain irritating in day to day
use - I just there was a switch to make it behave in a more
conventional fashion and keep everyone happy.
John Rainer
--
Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL
Bat to friends who are accustomed
to the ease of use of more run of the mill mail programs.
My suggestion would be a configurable option so that the editor can
behave either way - this would satisfy both camps. The auto-wrap
feature as it stands is just not good enough, imho.
John Rainer
Friday, December 28, 2001, 6:45:55 PM, you wrote:
S> John, your observations of NAV2002 seem to be exactly the same as my
S> observations. I think the autodelete function is not there, at least
S> I have not seen the option. Like you, the autorepair does not seem to
S> work.
S> I'd be interes
pplementary function,
and relying instead on the resident scanner. Seems to ignore the point
of why some users want to use email scanning but there you go.
John Rainer
--
Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mai
That's odd - 2001 is working fine for me on W2K
John Rainer
Friday, November 16, 2001, 4:44:13 PM, you wrote:
This was my experience also. Norton AV2002 does seem to protect
the_Bat but not AV2001.
--
Have a great day,
Sam
> i have installed norton antiviral 2001, activate
No argument there! :o) Customisable toolbars still is a long awaited
NA> improvement to the GUI, but we've had to take a back seat to HTML and a
NA> Calculator. ;o(
Seconded - plus the ability to lock the damn things - I always seem
to have the knack of inadvertently dragging
Saturday, October 20, 2001, 1:06:38 AM, Peter Meyns wrote:
PM> I'm not sure what msimn is, but it is obviously not OE.
Actually, msimn.exe _is_ the OE executable. :)
John Rainer
--
Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dut
Thursday, October 18, 2001, 7:11:06 PM, you wrote:
SH> On Thu, 18 Oct 2001 at 18:52:41 GMT +0100 (10/19/2001 12:52 AM where
SH> you think I live) "John Rainer"=[JR] typed the following :
JR>> We can't use forwarding as the Reply-to address gets screwed and
JR>
Thursday, October 18, 2001, 7:11:06 PM, you wrote:
SH> On Thu, 18 Oct 2001 at 18:52:41 GMT +0100 (10/19/2001 12:52 AM where
SH> you think I live) "John Rainer"=[JR] typed the following :
JR>> A recent upgrade to Mailsweeper, which I think is part of, or
JR>> asso
ocked and how to get
around the problem? We can't use forwarding as the Reply-to address
gets screwed and senders don't always include their email address in
the body text.
Thanks
John Rainer
--
Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.d
this feature makes it so much easier. I know people who on being sent
an unsolicited 5mb attachment will just moan about their phone bill
and sit there while it downloads!
My thoughts would be to stick to the current arrangement but to bear
in mind the Bat customer base are a pretty varied lot and
JL> Hello John,
JL> Monday, May 07, 2001, 10:36:13 AM, you wrote:
>> I was quite happy with the old progress bar and now it has been
>> replaced by something hideously ugly
JL> In my opinion the CC is a significant improvement to TB. I found the
JL> old progress bar to be next to useless. If yo
-del to get rid of it.
I'm using The Bat on W2K, and am using Norton AV, which has been
working largely ok with this program for at least 12 months.
Thanks
John Rainer
--
__
Archives : <http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com>
Moderators
s full of advanced
topics is in itself a barrier to asking the more simple questions. I
think the proposal to have two lists is a good one.
For the benefit of any straw poll, I do not see any problems in having
two groups. I'll probably subscribe to both, read the beginner's one
in detai
is bread and butter to many
of you but this kind of thing is rather difficult when you're doing it
just once to set the program up rather than administering a system
where it is a routine day in, day out task. I just set up all my
filters from guesswork until they worked ok. There's an awf
me - I
assume as a result of using a mail virus scanner.
John Rainer
--
--
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wait until all the mail delivery is
finished before reading it. If it can be changed, that would be
welcomed!
John Rainer
--
--
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team d
MDP> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
MDP> Hash: SHA1
MDP> Hi John,
MDP> On 17 September 2000 at 08:32:16 GMT +0100 (which was 08:32 where I
MDP> live) John Rainer wrote and made these points on the subject
MDP> of "New user, lotsa questions":
JR>> - all
g back of html content) I would be looking
elsewhere. What have the Romans ever done for us :) Then again, you
can't please everybody - perhaps the answer would be a configuration
switch to use the Bat editor or for it to operate in the style of,
say, Agent.
John Rainer
-
others who replied). It all
seems so obvious now but then I suppose it would with hindsight. I'm
not sure that I like this as a 'feature', though.
In my defence, I've just got home after a minor operation, s
the full date, followed by the
time. Checking the message headers for the 'time only' ones shows that
the created date is there for these messages. How do I get the columns to
display the date as well as the time for all messages?
Thanks
J
AM> On Tue, 21 Mar 2000 20:38:11 +0000, John Rainer wrote:
>> I've been using The Bat now for several weeks and been generally
>> very pleased with it. The only feature that I find a bit frustrating
>> compared to other mail clients that I've used is word wrapping
ades down the screen.
If I turn wrapping off, rather than wrap to the window, everything
appears as one long line of text. I know it wraps on sending but
it all seems a bit primitive on composition. Do things improve in v2
or have I just missed a setting somewhere?
John Rainer
P.S. Could we h
33 matches
Mail list logo
