Re: Registration Question (boxed ver.)

2001-12-31 Thread Thomas F
Hello Randy, On Mon, 31 Dec 2001 18:49:58 +0100 (MET) GMT (01/01/2002, 01:49 +0800 GMT), Randy Burns wrote: RB> How long should I wait for a reply to an emailed registration form before I RB> decide that my registration attempt didn't work? I'm trying to register a RB> boxed disk version. When

Re: Quotes

2001-12-31 Thread Thomas F
Hello Jan, On Mon, 31 Dec 2001 12:45:05 -0500 GMT (01/01/2002, 01:45 +0800 GMT), Jan Rifkinson wrote: JR> TB! can automatically use a variety of prefixes to the '>' JR> (or even replace the '>' with another character if you JR> want to) via the use of %Quotestyle. No, this is what you can

AuthenticBat (was: This mailing-list (OT?))

2001-12-31 Thread Thomas F
Hello Marck, On Mon, 31 Dec 2001 12:34:45 + GMT (31/12/2001, 20:34 +0800 GMT), Marck D Pearlstone wrote: MDP> I have seen AuthenticBat - once. For long enough to help with the MDP> documentation. That's all. Hmmm. Does this mean that it disappeared again and is no longer available, or that

Re: Up and running again :-))

2001-12-31 Thread Thomas F
Hello Maurice, On Mon, 31 Dec 2001 13:15:59 +0100 GMT (31/12/2001, 20:15 +0800 GMT), Maurice Snellen wrote: TF>> I keep telling everybody with virus problems that they must have TF>> actively done something to allow the virus to be active on their TF>> computers. MS> Unfortunately, with the adv

Re: CNET Bat review (also line-wrap)

2001-12-31 Thread Thomas F
Hello Allie, On Mon, 31 Dec 2001 06:53:05 -0500 GMT (31/12/2001, 19:53 +0800 GMT), Allie C Martin wrote: TF>> move advanced funtions under an Advanced... menu item in each TF>> menu. ACM> This sounds nice to me. Although come to think of it, flow of the ACM> menus depend on the options being se

Configurable Toolbars (was: CNET Bat review (also line-wrap))

2001-12-31 Thread Thomas F
Hi Januk, On Mon, 31 Dec 2001 01:06:49 -0800GMT (31/12/01, 17:06 +0800GMT), Januk Aggarwal wrote: NA>> In my estimation, we could resolve a lot of this simply by providing NA>> User definable Toolbars, JA> I know it would be nice, but could you imagine the support horror if JA> that were implem

Re: Up and running again :-))

2001-12-30 Thread Thomas F
Hi Nick, On Sun, 30 Dec 2001 12:21:54 -0800GMT (31/12/2001, 04:21 +0800GMT), Nick Andriash wrote: >> Some virui (is that the plural of Virus?) you can catch just by being >> on line. NA> I'd be curious to know how that can happen. When you say "on line", do NA> you mean with your Browser open?

Re: CNET Bat review (also line-wrap)

2001-12-30 Thread Thomas F
Hi Don, On Sat, 29 Dec 2001 11:47:37 -0800GMT (30/12/2001, 03:47 +0800GMT), Don Taylor wrote: DT> I've never used an e-mail client that comes anywhere close to TB! in DT> terms of power and flexibility -- especially in the area of multiple DT> e-mail accounts. I recommend it heartily to anyone w

Re: template & adressbook

2001-12-28 Thread Thomas F
Hello Nick, On Fri, 28 Dec 2001 22:11:53 -0800 GMT (29/12/2001, 14:11 +0800 GMT), Nick Andriash wrote: NA> To validate that Public Key, you must first sign it with a non-exportable NA> signature, and then you can assign it a level of trust. Thanks, worked fine. :-) -- Cheers, Thomas. Moder

Re: template & adressbook

2001-12-28 Thread Thomas F
Hello Luc, On Sat, 29 Dec 2001 06:58:10 +0100 GMT (29/12/2001, 13:58 +0800 GMT), Luc wrote: L> i'm not that expert in pgp but i believe it's your setting: L> it worked for me so far. L> Choose "options" in PGP, go to "servers" then "synchronize with server L> upon" and enable the poss

Re: template & adressbook

2001-12-28 Thread Thomas F
Hello Nick, On Fri, 28 Dec 2001 19:51:36 -0800 GMT (29/12/2001, 11:51 +0800 GMT), Nick Andriash wrote: >> *** PGP Signature Status: good >> *** Signer: Luc Knaepkens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Invalid) >> *** Signed: 28/12/01 6:46:11 PM >> *** Verified: 28/12/01 7:47:15 PM >> *** BEGIN PGP VERIFIED ME

Re: Maintaining off-line mail archives (on CDROM)

2001-12-28 Thread Thomas F
Hello F.J., On Fri, 28 Dec 2001 10:48:19 +0100 GMT (28/12/2001, 17:48 +0800 GMT), F.J. de Bruin wrote: FJdB> Is there anything like that in the Bat! that allows me to keep e-mail FJdB> on CDROM and have it still accessible? I know about the backup/restore FJdB> function, but that seems to be tai

Re: Colour Groups vs. Flags

2001-12-27 Thread Thomas F
Hi M, On Thu, 27 Dec 2001 23:13:51 +0100GMT (28/12/2001, 06:13 +0800GMT), M . Vulic wrote: MV> When I in {Edit Message List View Colours} hit {Edit} (and I'm in MV> {Edit Colour Groups}) I can't change/edit {Unique ID}. It'll be MV> useful. This is a question of paradigm. If you change the name

Re: Secure Connection (SSL) with TB

2001-12-27 Thread Thomas F
Hi Gerd, On Thu, 27 Dec 2001 21:20:51 +0100GMT (28/12/2001, 04:20 +0800GMT), Gerd Ewald wrote: GE> The postmaster informed me that TLS via STARTTLS-command, RFC 2487 Jan GE> 1999 is used. To use SMTP on that server an SSL/TSL-support of TheBat GE> is necessary. GE> A) Does anybody knows how to

Re: Learning before doing

2001-12-27 Thread Thomas F
Hello Roger, On Thu, 27 Dec 2001 09:05:13 -0700 GMT (28/12/2001, 00:05 +0800 GMT), Roger Beamon wrote: RB> Using Pegasus for years, but email clients are like peanuts. You RB> can't leave them alone. Reading up on The Bat before trying it, so RB> some questions will be forthcoming. Suggest yo

Re: cookies & quick template

2001-12-26 Thread Thomas F
Hi Luc, On Wed, 26 Dec 2001 20:57:21 +0100GMT (27/12/2001, 03:57 +0800GMT), Luc wrote: >> If you want to choose them manually, yes. But TB has a random cookie >> searches. Just put your cookies in a .txt file (one cookie per line) >> and use the macro %Cookie="cookiefile.txt". L> use the macr

Re: cookies & quick template

2001-12-26 Thread Thomas F
Hello Luc, On Wed, 26 Dec 2001 18:27:49 +0100 GMT (27/12/2001, 01:27 +0800 GMT), Luc wrote: L> If i want to use several cookies, so i can insert every so often a new one in my L> mail, do i have to set up a quick template for each and every cookie ? If you want to choose them manually,

Mail Ticker

2001-12-26 Thread Thomas F
Hello David, On Wed, 26 Dec 2001 12:13:26 -0600 GMT (27/12/2001, 02:13 +0800 GMT), David Dawson wrote: DD> This is indeed a stupid problem. When I first installed TB, I turned DD> off the Ticker because it was driving me nuts. Now I understand how DD> filters and folders work, and I'd like to

Re: the bat! and pgp problems

2001-12-26 Thread Thomas F
Hi Dierk, On Wed, 26 Dec 2001 10:51:12 +0100GMT (26/12/2001, 17:51 +0800GMT), Dierk Haasis wrote: DH> You quote out of context?! ;-) Of course. ;-) DH> PS: Are you really awake on Boxing Day at 4:30 in the morning It may have been 4:30 where you live, but over here it was 11:30 and I was look

Re: the bat! and pgp problems

2001-12-25 Thread Thomas F
Hi Dierk, On Tue, 25 Dec 2001 22:41:42 +0100GMT (26/12/2001, 05:41 +0800GMT), Dierk Haasis wrote: DH> The only time you should have a problem with TB! concerning PGP is DH> with RITLab's plug-ins or the internal version. You "should have" a problem? Damn, I don't! What am I doing wrong? ;-) --

Re: Mail size?

2001-12-23 Thread Thomas F
Hi Rémi, On Sun, 23 Dec 2001 20:12:10 +0200GMT (24/12/2001, 02:12 +0800GMT), Rémi Pach wrote: RP> My previous post was a mess. Sorry. I've cleaned it up and here it is RP> again. I understood it the first time but didn't have an answer. RP> When I check the mailboxes I have set up with the ho

Re: Yahoo inbox

2001-12-23 Thread Thomas F
Hello Rick, On Sun, 23 Dec 2001 11:51:05 -0600 GMT (24/12/2001, 01:51 +0800 GMT), Rick Sovitzky wrote: RS> What is GMX? A freemail provider. www.gmx.net -- Cheers, Thomas. Moderator der deutschen The Bat! Beginner Liste. If you're born again, do you have two bellybuttons? Message reply cr

Re: Check Yahoo Inbox ONLY?

2001-12-22 Thread Thomas F
Hello Rick, On Sat, 22 Dec 2001 08:42:34 -0600 GMT (22/12/2001, 22:42 +0800 GMT), Rick Sovitzky wrote: RS> Is there a way to have TheBat check only the Inbox in Yahoo Mail? I RS> have a Bulf folder which is already catching some spam, so I do not RS> want to see that stuff. TB cannot do anythi

Re: Backup and restore question

2001-12-22 Thread Thomas F
Hello Allie, On Sat, 22 Dec 2001 06:27:14 -0500 GMT (22/12/2001, 19:27 +0800 GMT), Allie C Martin wrote: ACM> If you're restoring to the same system, fine, and your way is the way ACM> I use as well since I can automate it. ACM> However, I needed to move TB! from my desktop to my new laptop. On

Re: Backup and restore question

2001-12-22 Thread Thomas F
Hello Roman, On Sat, 22 Dec 2001 14:21:14 +0100 GMT (22/12/2001, 21:21 +0800 GMT), Roman Katzer wrote: >> my old batch file is fast and backs up everything. RK> Could you post the file here, please? This file was written by Januk Aggarwal, who kindly posted it to this list some time ago: QUOT

Re: Backup and restore question

2001-12-21 Thread Thomas F
Hello Allie, On Fri, 21 Dec 2001 19:30:21 -0500 GMT (22/12/2001, 08:30 +0800 GMT), Allie C Martin wrote: ACM> It wouldn't appear that the preferences in the Options/preferences ACM> dialog are retained. I can see with the window size and ticker ACM> location settings not being retained. However,

Re: Filtering and SPAM

2001-12-21 Thread Thomas F
Hello Jerry, On Fri, 21 Dec 2001 13:47:02 -0800 GMT (22/12/2001, 05:47 +0800 GMT), Jerry McRae wrote: JM> Tops on my wish lists is the ability to search filters. Every once in a JM> while I need to find the filter for a folder. Sometimes that isn't very JM> easy. Even if there was a way of du

Re: Numbers

2001-12-21 Thread Thomas F
Hello David, On Fri, 21 Dec 2001 11:12:34 -0500 GMT (22/12/2001, 00:12 +0800 GMT), * * * David Gonzalez * * * wrote: PA>> Can someone tell me why when I reply to something I get a number in PA>> brackets after the RE: Like Re:[2] etc? Seems awful messy. What's it PA>> mean? DG> iT'S A feature

Re: Remove attachment from message

2001-12-21 Thread Thomas F
Hi Marc, On Fri, 21 Dec 2001 10:35:35 +0100GMT (21/12/2001, 17:35 +0800GMT), Marc van Breemen wrote: MvB> I normally want the attachments to be encoded in the message (no MvB> seperate file). But somtimes, f.e. when the attachment is very large, I MvB> want to keep it in a seperate attachment di

Re: Another filter problem.

2001-12-21 Thread Thomas F
Hi Alberto, On Thu, 20 Dec 2001 18:29:59 +0100GMT (21/12/2001, 01:29 +0800GMT), Alberto Almagioni wrote: AA> Oki this is the classical one million dollar question I'm gearing up... AA> (but I can not give one million dollar for the answer). ...and slowing down. ;-) AA> I need to know if it's

Re: not wishing to sound foolish, but ...

2001-12-19 Thread Thomas F
Hi mlh, On Wed, 19 Dec 2001 09:01:08 +GMT (19/12/01, 17:01 +0800GMT), mlh wrote: m> what's the procedure for unsubscribing from this list? Empty message to: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Also see footer of each message that you have received through this lsit.) -- Cheers, Thomas. Moderator

Re: 'Ghost' Messages

2001-12-17 Thread Thomas F
Hi William, On Tue, 18 Dec 2001 06:21:25 +GMT (18/12/2001, 14:21 +0800GMT), William Moore wrote: TF>> Check out whether a message is split. I had this a few versions TF>> back; any message with the word "From" at the beginning of a line TF>> was split by TB, WM> That's it! WM> Co-incidently

Re: What does this mean?

2001-12-17 Thread Thomas F
Hi Dwight, On Mon, 17 Dec 2001 22:08:42 -0600GMT (18/12/2001, 12:08 +0800GMT), Dwight A Corrin wrote: DAC> Actually I think XP is not that bad, but not on a P-II. I use an Athlon at home. This here is my work machine, and I will not double-boot or install any other OS here. >From what I read o

Re: What does this mean?

2001-12-17 Thread Thomas F
Hi Jörn, On Tue, 18 Dec 2001 02:56:09 +0100GMT (18/12/2001, 09:56 +0800GMT), Jörn Zietz wrote: >>> [Exceptions] JZ> Only guessing: Both of you are using Win98. Because of the missing JZ> HALT-operation, the CPU always runs full power. Despite having programmed in assembler, I don't know the HA

What does this mean?

2001-12-17 Thread Thomas F
Hi TBUDL, I just got the following Application Error: "Exception EThread in module THEBAT.EXE at 00023E3A. Synchronize called when main VCL thread in WaitFor call." There was an OK button, which I clicked, and TB closed down. No programms running in the background (except PCC, SETI@Home, Ethern

Re: Why all this mess?

2001-12-16 Thread Thomas F
Hi Allie, On Sun, 16 Dec 2001 19:04:43 -0500GMT (17/12/2001, 08:04 +0800GMT), Allie C Martin wrote: ACM> I sign all my messages as seen below. Whether or not I wish to ACM> digitally sign it to prove my identity and that the contents are ACM> unaltered? I don't see where I need to do this all th

Re: A simple question

2001-12-16 Thread Thomas F
Hello Devid, On Sun, 16 Dec 2001 17:17:53 +0100 GMT (17/12/2001, 00:17 +0800 GMT), Devid Verfaillie wrote: DV> (1) Article about message priorities: DV> http://email.about.com/library/weekly/aa042301a.htm When you follow the link to RFC2421, you see that this is about voice mail, not email. Acc

Re: OT: E-mail addresses

2001-12-16 Thread Thomas F
Hello Curt, On Sun, 16 Dec 2001 07:40:20 -0500 GMT (16/12/2001, 20:40 +0800 GMT), Curt wrote: C> Does anyone know of a working e-mail address for The Bat! C> administrative folk? e-mail to addresses on the Web site bounce or C> appear to be sucked into a black hole. I have reseller issues that C

Re: Reply templates

2001-12-16 Thread Thomas F
Hello Ottar, On Sun, 16 Dec 2001 09:14:45 +0100 GMT (16/12/2001, 16:14 +0800 GMT), Ottar Grimstad wrote: OG> I have created a Reply template for TBUDL and placed it in an OG> address book entry for the list. But this does not work. The system OG> uses the general template for the account.

Re: How to send to more than one group, but.....

2001-12-15 Thread Thomas F
Hello Cyril, On Sat, 15 Dec 2001 18:18:34 +0100 GMT (16/12/2001, 01:18 +0800 GMT), Cyril MALKA wrote: CM> B and C (for example), BUT, I would also like that the people members CM> of group A and B still receive only one letter, not two... As some CM> people are members of 10 groups, they might g

Re: how do I reply to more than one mail?

2001-12-14 Thread Thomas F
Hello Pete, On Fri, 14 Dec 2001 23:41:45 +0200 GMT (15/12/2001, 05:41 +0800 GMT), Pete wrote: P> The world exists whether or not there's open source software. Well, that is certainly a new way of seeing things. I will contemplate and let you know in good time whether I can agree to this rather

Re: selecting messages in the message list pane

2001-12-14 Thread Thomas F
Hello Dave, On Fri, 14 Dec 2001 17:37:03 -0600 GMT (15/12/2001, 07:37 +0800 GMT), Dave Gorman wrote: DG> with Ctrl-click the 1st selected message stays selected, DG> subsequent Ctrl-clicks highlight the 2nd message while being DG> clicked, but the selection does not stay. DG> Demons? Apparentl

Re: 'Ghost' Messages

2001-12-14 Thread Thomas F
Hello William, On Fri, 14 Dec 2001 22:01:25 + GMT (15/12/2001, 06:01 +0800 GMT), William Moore wrote: WM> Does anyone recognise the following symptoms? WM> it appears in the message list with a blank 'from', 'to' and WM> 'subject'. When I double-click, the message opens but only WM> contain

Re: how do I reply to more than one mail?

2001-12-13 Thread Thomas F
Hi Andy, On Thu, 13 Dec 2001 16:25:09 -0500GMT (14/12/2001, 05:25 +0800GMT), Andy Spiegl wrote: AS> I would have expected that if I mark various mails and hit reply AS> that I get all of them quoted. AS> So you are saying there's no way to do that? Unfortuantely not. A suggestion has come up

Re: Yahoo slow?

2001-12-13 Thread Thomas F
Hi Marc, On Thu, 13 Dec 2001 11:00:26 +0100GMT (13/12/2001, 18:00 +0800GMT), Marc van Breemen wrote: MvB> As I want to have the ability to send and receive large e-mails (with MvB> attachments) I'm considering to take an GMXPro account. Can you MvB> recommend this?. It's certainly not very expen

Re: Just curious why ....

2001-12-13 Thread Thomas F
Hi Roberto, On Wed, 12 Dec 2001 23:55:58 -0800GMT (13/12/2001, 15:55 +0800GMT), Roberto Machorro wrote: RM> I thought the calculator and sp where a joke, that some people where RM> joking about it... Is it for real? They are indeed implemented in the current beta. However, the code is very smal

Re: Just curious why ....

2001-12-12 Thread Thomas F
Hi Roberto, On Wed, 12 Dec 2001 18:49:30 -0800GMT (13/12/2001, 10:49 +0800GMT), Roberto Machorro wrote: RM> You mean that there is a TB running natively under Linux as we read RM> this e-mail? (beta or whatever) Not quite yet. TB is being recoded from Delphi 2 to Delphi 6, module-by-module (tha

Re: Secure POP3 ?

2001-12-11 Thread Thomas F
Hi Peter, On Tue, 11 Dec 2001 16:39:17 +0100GMT (11/12/2001, 23:39 +0800GMT), Peter Palmreuther wrote: PP> No. I had problems learning this by myself, but it is PP> "Authentication" :-) PP> (I guess you're used to the German word 'Authentifizierung' Yes. ;-) This is what my last English teach

Re: Secure POP3 ?

2001-12-11 Thread Thomas F
Hi Dierk, On Tue, 11 Dec 2001 15:49:18 +0100GMT (11/12/2001, 22:49 +0800GMT), Dierk Haasis wrote: >> On a side remark: Shouldn't this be "Authentification"? DH> Not according to Longman's DCE the OED - there is no such word. It DH> goes back to the plural stem of the Latin "authenticare". I wo

Re: Secure POP3 ?

2001-12-11 Thread Thomas F
Hi Alexander, On Tue, 11 Dec 2001 09:41:20 -0800GMT (12/12/2001, 01:41 +0800GMT), Alexander Jason wrote: AJ> NOTE: TB (v153d) does NOT have this type of common authentication. AJ> Here is a reply from Stefan: >> We are working on it right now. Before we get it implemented, >> you can use the pr

Re: Connection Centre showing no progress

2001-12-11 Thread Thomas F
Hello Raj, On Tue, 11 Dec 2001 15:49:13 +0530 GMT (11/12/2001, 18:19 +0800 GMT), Raj wrote: >>My ISP *will* time me out but generally that will cause me to be >>disconnected...and I wasn't R> Have you found a solution for the problem as I too am experiencing a simmilar R> problem and its d

Re: Sorting folders

2001-12-11 Thread Thomas F
Hello Rick, On Mon, 10 Dec 2001 16:18:50 -0500 GMT (11/12/2001, 05:18 +0800 GMT), Rick Reumann wrote: RR> Not sure if there is a "sort" command, there is one: click on the column header where it says "Folder". You get a query telling you that you are about the rearrange the folders Y/N. If you

Re: Secure POP3 ?

2001-12-11 Thread Thomas F
Hello Alexander, On Mon, 10 Dec 2001 14:22:45 -0800 GMT (11/12/2001, 06:22 +0800 GMT), Alexander Jason wrote: AJ> I'm new to the list so please forgive me if this has been discussed . . .. I think not, but not many people have seen your request, because it came as a reply to "Re: Problem with U

OT: GMX (was: Yahoo slow?)

2001-12-10 Thread Thomas F
Hi Dierk, On Mon, 10 Dec 2001 09:37:38 +0100GMT (10/12/2001, 16:37 +0800GMT), Dierk Haasis wrote: >> Note the past tense. DH> Could have been something to do with Peter not as conversant in DH> English than you? No, he meant it, as you can see in his reply a few minutes ago. He said it is not

Re: Yahoo slow?

2001-12-09 Thread Thomas F
Hi Peter, On Sun, 9 Dec 2001 19:52:11 +0100GMT (10/12/2001, 02:52 +0800GMT), Peter Palmreuther wrote: PP> The '>' is not a thing of "let's annoy some people" but there were PP> times and software that _needed_ it for secure message storing and PP> re-retrieving. Note the past tense. PP> So if

Re: Ritlabs MIA?

2001-12-09 Thread Thomas F
Hello Don, On Sun, 9 Dec 2001 10:53:59 -0500 GMT (09/12/2001, 23:53 +0800 GMT), Don Zeigler wrote: DZ> Haven't been able to connect to Ritlabs either by browser or FTP since DZ> yesterday. Anyone else having a problem? No problems over here. -- Cheers, Thomas. Moderator der deutschen The Ba

Re: Yahoo slow?

2001-12-09 Thread Thomas F
Hello Marc, On Sun, 9 Dec 2001 13:30:00 +0100 GMT (09/12/2001, 20:30 +0800 GMT), Marc van Breemen wrote: MvB> What precisely do you mean? I cannot share you're experience on that point. There is no ">", just the word "from" in the next line: from See what GMX did to it? ;-) -- Cheers, Th

Re: TB! V1.54 Beta/15 - SINGLELINE

2001-12-08 Thread Thomas F
Hello Januk, On Sat, 8 Dec 2001 19:57:53 -0800 GMT (09/12/2001, 11:57 +0800 GMT), Januk Aggarwal wrote: JA> %SETPATTREGEXP="(?is-m)^.*?\n(.*)$"%- JA> %REGEXPMATCH="%Clipboard" JA> Of course, for all this work, you might as well delete the line JA> manually and just insert the new greeting by QT

Re: REPLY TO: macro

2001-12-08 Thread Thomas F
Hello jan, On Sat, 8 Dec 2001 14:11:45 -0500 GMT (09/12/2001, 03:11 +0800 GMT), [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: jbc>I had always thought that adding %REPLYTO="address" jbc>replaced the default Account Reply-To: info. Yet I have jbc>been unable to do that & I can't find a reason why. The ma

Re: Yahoo slow?

2001-12-08 Thread Thomas F
Hello Marc, On Sat, 08 Dec 2001 15:27:07 +0100 GMT (08/12/2001, 22:27 +0800 GMT), Marc van Breemen wrote: ACM>> If you give us a sample of one of the delayed message's headers ACM>> we'd be more able to tell where the problem lies i.e. where the ACM>> delay took place. MvB> My posting 'Just cur

Re: Problem with Connection Centre

2001-12-08 Thread Thomas F
Hello Juan, On Fri, 7 Dec 2001 15:29:35 -0300 GMT (08/12/2001, 02:29 +0800 GMT), Juan Manuel wrote: JM> I'm using TB 1.53bis, There were still some problems with this version, and I don't remember whether one was with the connection center, but I would suggest you upgrade to 1.53d or 1.53t a

Re: Unable to Download

2001-12-08 Thread Thomas F
Hello Raj, On Sat, 8 Dec 2001 10:22:11 +0530 GMT (08/12/2001, 12:52 +0800 GMT), Raj wrote: R>> From the afternoon today I have been experiencing problems in down loading large R>> mails. When I say large I mean around 40K or so. R> It seems that the problem appears to be localised in the sense

Re: Connection Centre showing no progress

2001-12-06 Thread Thomas F
Hi Carren, On Fri, 7 Dec 2001 16:59:27 +1300GMT (07/12/2001, 11:59 +0800GMT), Carren wrote: C> The email I was downloading appeared to download for around 20 C> minutes, still with no actual download progress indicated in the C> CC. All of a sudden the CC then closed with no warning, no error C>

Re: Connection Centre showing no progress

2001-12-06 Thread Thomas F
Hi Carren, On Fri, 7 Dec 2001 10:49:59 +1300GMT (07/12/2001, 05:49 +0800GMT), Carren wrote: C> When downloading large emails/files the Connection Centre fails to C> show any progress at all. Although there *is* internet activity and C> the email *is* actually downloading, the download informatio

Re: work offline?

2001-12-06 Thread Thomas F
Hello Paul, On Tue, 4 Dec 2001 22:10:12 -0500 GMT (05/12/2001, 11:10 +0800 GMT), Paul A. Thiessen wrote: PAT> Anyway, I guess there's no perfect solution to all this for my case - PAT> wanting to have TB not check for mail unless I'm connected somehow. Unless PAT> there's someway to tell TB "don

Re: Help help

2001-12-04 Thread Thomas F
Hi Peter, On Tue, 4 Dec 2001 21:18:38 +0100GMT (05/12/2001, 04:18 +0800GMT), Peter Meyns wrote: PM> But isn't this a beta issue? Either that, or you two have set the interface language to German. In that case, TB looks for a file bat_ger.chm or, if not found, bat_ger.hlp. -- Cheers, Thomas.

Re: work offline?

2001-12-04 Thread Thomas F
Hi Paul, On Tue, 4 Dec 2001 17:13:17 -0500GMT (05/12/2001, 06:13 +0800GMT), Paul A. Thiessen wrote: JS>> I've set my Network & Administration -> Connect to the internet using JS>> -> Local Area Network or Manual connection, PAT> Yeah, that's how I have it now. But when I start up TB when I'm

Re: v1.53d can't reply or forward emails

2001-12-04 Thread Thomas F
Hi Jernej, On Tue, 4 Dec 2001 19:32:29 +0100GMT (05/12/2001, 02:32 +0800GMT), Jernej Simončič wrote: JS> 1 day up or down is nothing - all e-mails from my ISP will be written JS> in 2031 :) LOL! I bet they're at least cheap... Since they seem to be real computer experts, they are probably just

Re: Recieved time (was: v1.53d can't reply or forward emails)

2001-12-04 Thread Thomas F
Hi Dwight, On Tue, 4 Dec 2001 14:57:40 -0600GMT (05/12/2001, 04:57 +0800GMT), Dwight A Corrin wrote: >> I think this would be fixed by a "received by server" time ordering, >> assuming my ISP keeps each of my pop mailboxes on the same machine >> (which I think it must - they're all on the same P

Re: Virus

2001-12-04 Thread Thomas F
Hello Jan, On Tue, 4 Dec 2001 09:09:25 -0500 GMT (04/12/2001, 22:09 +0800 GMT), Jan Rifkinson wrote: JR> scan engine 5.600-1011 JR> pattern 173 JR> pc cillin program v7.61.0.1421 JR> Any other thoughts on this? No. Your are using PCC7, I am using PCC6. I cannot imagine that this is the reaso

Re: TB s-l-o-w over network

2001-12-04 Thread Thomas F
Hello Geoff, On Tue, 4 Dec 2001 17:30:57 + GMT (05/12/2001, 01:30 +0800 GMT), Geoff Lane wrote: GL> Perhaps someone who knows TB "under the hood" can give a GL> more-enlightened response. I think it is not TB, but the way the OS works. When TB is open but nothing happens to the message base

Re: filtering/deleting messages moved from another account?

2001-12-04 Thread Thomas F
Hello Paul, On Tue, 4 Dec 2001 09:28:32 -0500 GMT (04/12/2001, 22:28 +0800 GMT), Paul A. Thiessen wrote: PAT> Is there some way to set up filtering so that it "cascades" - i.e. so that PAT> when messages are moved into the inbox box1 from filters on other accounts, PAT> these messages then get

Re: v1.53d can't reply or forward emails

2001-12-04 Thread Thomas F
Hi Philip, On Tue, 4 Dec 2001 21:07:50 +1100GMT (04/12/2001, 18:07 +0800GMT), Philip Yu wrote: PY> I installed The Bat! v1.53d on my Windows 2000 pro machine recently PY> and found that I can't reply or forward emails. I can still creat new PY> emails and send them. The log shows the follow mess

Re: Virus

2001-12-03 Thread Thomas F
Hello Jan, On Mon, 3 Dec 2001 09:07:28 -0500 GMT (03/12/2001, 22:07 +0800 GMT), Jan Rifkinson wrote: JR> Well, that's why I'm asking. As a PC-cillin user I have JR> been bombarded recently by 40-50 msgs w infected JR> attachments. I rcvd no notification from PC-cillin. OTOH, JR> I didn't

Re: Unable to access...

2001-12-03 Thread Thomas F
Hello Micki, On Mon, 3 Dec 2001 09:35:36 -0600 GMT (03/12/2001, 23:35 +0800 GMT), Micki Krieger wrote: MK> Since uninstalling "The Bat" I get the dread "URL not found" page MK> anytime I try to access www.ebates.com from my desktop PC. In fact, I don't know what went wrong during unistall. The

Re: HTML Viewing

2001-12-03 Thread Thomas F
Hi Januk, On Mon, 3 Dec 2001 17:43:51 +0800GMT (03/12/2001, 17:43 +0800GMT), Thomas F wrote: JA>> While beta issues should be confined to the TBBETA list, the behaviour JA>> described by Tom is present in the current release as well. Forget my previous post, I was wrong. You

Re: HTML Viewing

2001-12-03 Thread Thomas F
Hi Januk, On Mon, 3 Dec 2001 01:28:55 -0800GMT (03/12/2001, 17:28 +0800GMT), Januk Aggarwal wrote: JA> While beta issues should be confined to the TBBETA list, the behaviour JA> described by Tom is present in the current release as well. From my JA> understanding of the list charter, that makes

Re: VIRUS as welcome

2001-12-03 Thread Thomas F
Hi Syafril, On Mon, 3 Dec 2001 16:22:38 +0700GMT (03/12/2001, 17:22 +0800GMT), Syafril Hermansyah wrote: JA>> I don't know about yours, but mine didn't come through the list. JA>> I'm guessing that the infected computer simply replied to the JA>> mail coming in. I'll bet some of the less vocal m

Re: VIRUS as welcome

2001-12-03 Thread Thomas F
Hi Syafril, On Mon, 3 Dec 2001 15:06:55 +0700GMT (03/12/2001, 16:06 +0800GMT), Syafril Hermansyah wrote: TF>> Syafril, didn't you have an AV programm installed server side? SH> I do but on MDaemon, not in Exim/Listar. Are you planning to do that in Exim/Listar to prevent viruses to spread via

Re: HTML Viewing

2001-12-03 Thread Thomas F
Hi Tom, On Mon, 3 Dec 2001 07:02:41 +0100GMT (03/12/2001, 14:02 +0800GMT), Tom wrote: T> I am using version 1.54/12. I suggest you post this on the beta list. The current beta series has a completely new HTML rendering engine, so nobody on this list can help you. -- Cheers, Thomas. Moderato

Re: Global Filters

2001-12-02 Thread Thomas F
Hi Robbie, On Sun, 2 Dec 2001 22:21:25 -0800GMT (03/12/2001, 14:21 +0800GMT), Robbie Robertson wrote: RR> Is there a way that I can set up a set of folders and filters that can RR> be accessed from any account? No, but it has been confirmed that this long-standing with will be integrated in

Re: Sort Problem

2001-12-02 Thread Thomas F
Hi Kevin, On Sun, 2 Dec 2001 20:08:44 +GMT (03/12/2001, 04:08 +0800GMT), Kevin Conlin wrote: KC> I have a problem with sorting emails... i sort by KC> Received time, so new ones are to the top, but KC> since 2 days ago, i have noticed ALL new emails KC> turning up about the middl

Re: Virus

2001-12-02 Thread Thomas F
Hi Jan, On Sun, 2 Dec 2001 17:34:24 -0500GMT (03/12/2001, 06:34 +0800GMT), Jan Rifkinson wrote: JR> Does this mean that AVP automatically prevented the JR> message from downloading to your machine? That's what PC-Cillin did do. -- Cheers, Thomas. Moderator der deutschen The Bat! Beginne

Re: Virus

2001-12-02 Thread Thomas F
Hi Kevin, On Sun, 2 Dec 2001 20:02:05 +GMT (03/12/2001, 04:02 +0800GMT), Kevin Conlin wrote: KC> The Virus is the W32.Badtrans Virus, Quite a KC> Dangerous one which goes through the address book KC> and Emails all contacts, Nonsense. This virus requires Micorsoft Outlook Express.

Re: VIRUS as welcome

2001-12-02 Thread Thomas F
Hi Geek, On Sun, 2 Dec 2001 20:08:20 +0100GMT (03/12/2001, 03:08 +0800GMT), Geek wrote: G> Well, shortly after my first message to the list I received as G> a welcome the latest virus *APPARENTLY* from [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Wilhelm Alm). All of us got it. :-( Syafril, didn't you have an AV progra

Re: (SOT) Re: HTML-mail

2001-12-02 Thread Thomas F
Hi N., On Sun, 2 Dec 2001 11:40:27 -0700GMT (03/12/2001, 02:40 +0800GMT), N. Sean Timm wrote: NST>> To my the problem isn't HTML, per-se...it's the fact that the features NST>> of HTML can be misused by more unsavory types NST> I stand by my statement that there can and are valid uses of HTML N

Re: (SOT) Re: HTML-mail

2001-12-02 Thread Thomas F
Hi Kris, On Sun, 2 Dec 2001 19:35:06 +0100GMT (03/12/2001, 02:35 +0800GMT), Kris Vermandere wrote: KV> Hello, I also have a question about HTML : I know that I can't create KV> a HTML message, but what do I have to do when I want to reply to a KV> HTML message, or when I want to forward it? In

Re: Account | Clone

2001-12-01 Thread Thomas F
Hello ETM, On Sat, 1 Dec 2001 14:48:24 -0500 GMT (02/12/2001, 03:48 +0800 GMT), ETM wrote: E> I have about 3 Gig of email in my OE. Can that be imported into the BAT? E> Is there any size limitation, beyond my own PC, to mail held in the BAT? No. I think Marck has close to a zillion messages i

Re: (SOT) Re: HTML-mail

2001-12-01 Thread Thomas F
Hello N., On Sat, 1 Dec 2001 21:38:06 -0700 GMT (02/12/2001, 12:38 +0800 GMT), N. Sean Timm wrote: NST> To my the problem isn't HTML, per-se... To me it is. HTML blows the message up 2 or 3 times. -- Cheers, Thomas. Moderator der deutschen The Bat! Beginner Liste. Ad: Stock up and save. Li

Re: Connection center only when TB not minimise ?

2001-12-01 Thread Thomas F
Hello Roelof, On Sat, 1 Dec 2001 19:44:51 +0100 GMT (02/12/2001, 02:44 +0800 GMT), Roelof Otten wrote: RO> In that case you're entitled to collect my part of the paella too, RO> since I don't even know where to find Granada. Thanks. :-) Grananda is in southern Spain, 37 degrees N / 3 degrees W

Re: Connection center only when TB not minimise ?

2001-11-30 Thread Thomas F
Hello Arturo, On Fri, 30 Nov 2001 15:48:29 +0100 GMT (30/11/2001, 22:48 +0800 GMT), Arturo Quirantes wrote: AQ> SUCCESS!!! :-))) AQ> Thank to all of you who gave me a hand. Roelof and Thomas won the AQ> paella (half each) for their good suggestions. AQ> Lars also gets a second price

Re: Connection center only when TB not minimise ?

2001-11-30 Thread Thomas F
Hello Lars, On Fri, 30 Nov 2001 13:00:26 +0100 GMT (30/11/2001, 20:00 +0800 GMT), Lars Geiger wrote: TF>> Is RAS the Connection Center? LG> AFAIK, RAS stands for "remote access service". That's the name used for LG> the dial up mechanism in Windows, so I thought that the meaning is the LG> same

Re: HTML-mail

2001-11-30 Thread Thomas F
Hello Kenneth, On Fri, 30 Nov 2001 16:22:16 -0500 GMT (01/12/2001, 05:22 +0800 GMT), Kenneth S. Rhee wrote: RR>> Although for the most part I also despise HTML emails, I'm not so RR>> certain that at least having the option to use it occasionally would RR>> be such a bad idea. The only HTML I us

Re: Connection center only when TB not minimise ?

2001-11-30 Thread Thomas F
Hi Arturo, On Fri, 30 Nov 2001 12:02:42 +0100GMT (30/11/2001, 19:02 +0800GMT), Arturo Quirantes wrote: AQ> - When I press Alt+F2, the CC shows in the taskbar. You can also choose Options / Preferences / Display Connection Center: Always. AQ> The options available are: Move, Size, Minimize, Clo

Re: Connection center only when TB not minimise ?

2001-11-30 Thread Thomas F
Hi Arturo, On Fri, 30 Nov 2001 10:10:46 +0100GMT (30/11/2001, 17:10 +0800GMT), Arturo Quirantes wrote: >> How about Maximise? AQ> Maybe, because I cannot maximize, either. Of all the options in the context menu, whcih oens are available? >> When you clikc on Minimise, does the Restore

Re: Connection center only when TB not minimise ?

2001-11-30 Thread Thomas F
Hi Arturo, On Fri, 30 Nov 2001 08:53:20 +0100GMT (30/11/2001, 15:53 +0800GMT), Arturo Quirantes wrote: AQ> I have a related problem. I get the CC in the taskbar, but cannot AQ> make it appear! Hmm, over here it comes into the foreground when I click on the taskbar item. AQ> Alex Leschinsky, fr

Re: New & undesirable behavior

2001-11-29 Thread Thomas F
Hi Yuki, On Fri, 30 Nov 2001 11:01:14 +0900GMT (30/11/2001, 10:01 +0800GMT), Yuki Taga wrote: YT> I got it, thanks. Unfortunately, behavior is still exactly as I YT> described, so I'm at a complete loss. I'm sure this worked before YT> with the 'o' version, if not even with the 't' version.

Re: Beta Version's

2001-11-29 Thread Thomas F
Hello Kevin, On Thu, 29 Nov 2001 16:49:47 + GMT (30/11/2001, 00:49 +0800 GMT), Kevin Conlin wrote: KC> Where did the Beta/Developer page go?? Subscribe to the TBBETA list and you'll know. KC> I can find it and i was looking for the latest Beta to download. (..cannot) Correct. -- Cheers

Re: New & undesirable behavior

2001-11-29 Thread Thomas F
Hi Yuki, On Thu, 29 Nov 2001 12:24:13 +0900GMT (29/11/2001, 11:24 +0800GMT), Yuki Taga wrote: YT> Couple of questions then: Where can I get a copy of the 'o' version? If it's not on your box, I don't think it's on the Rit site. YT> The site seems to have only the 'd' version. Can I go ahead

Re: Oddball Folder View navigational arrows

2001-11-29 Thread Thomas F
Hi Quin, On Wed, 28 Nov 2001 17:27:30 -0700GMT (29/11/2001, 08:27 +0800GMT), Quin Selman wrote: QS> 3) Descending order QS> When viewing messages via Folder View (double-click a message in QS> Message List panel), the left or "Previous" blue arrow in the tool bar QS> displays the next m

<    3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   >