12 June 2002, 21:52, you wrote:
JR Reading their material would lead one to think that NOD32
JR was consistently the best antivirus software out there
JR [something I would want] but from this list I'm getting
JR very mixed signals.
I don't think there's any question that NOD is an
Hi Marck.
At 8:10 PM on Wednesday, June 12, 2002 you wrote the
following about [AVG or NOD32?]:
Where does one get the TB! plug-in?
Thanks for the URLs. Is there some way to ask RIT labs to
consider a plug-in for PC-cillin or how does that work?
TIA
--
Jan Rifkinson
Ridgefield, CT
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Jan,
@13 June 2002, 08:37:52 -0400 (13:37 UK time) Jan Rifkinson wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Where does one get the TB! plug-in?
Thanks for the URLs. Is there some way to ask RIT labs to
consider a plug-in for
Hi Marck.
At 8:56 AM on Thursday, June 13, 2002 you wrote the
following about [AVG or NOD32?]:
Is there some way to ask RIT labs to consider a plug-in
for PC-cillin or how does that work?
MDP The AVG and Dr.Web plug ins were written by the AV
MDP authors themselves. Sample source code
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Jan,
@13 June 2002, 09:03:01 -0400 (14:03 UK time) Jan Rifkinson wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
MDP The AVG and Dr.Web plug ins were written by the AV
MDP authors themselves. Sample source code for plug-ins was
MDP published
Hi Marck.
At 9:21 AM on Thursday, June 13, 2002 you wrote the
following about [AVG or NOD32?]:
MDP [...] I personally would rather see the very small
MDP RITlabs team concentrate on getting V2 coded and
MDP Trend's very large team concentrate on spreading the
MDP use of their AV product
Hi all,
I think the title say's it all, should I use AVG or NOD32 as my
Anti-Virus?
I must confess, AVG seems to be working seamlessly with The Bat!, but I
have concerns that AVG isn't as good as it could be at trapping virus's
(although, it did catch Klez yesterday and added
when i send a eicar test file from: http://www.aleph-tec.com/eicar/
to myself nod 32 gives an alert, but if i send a zip compressed
eicar.com file nod gives no alert .
only when i unzip it and try to open the file nod comes on.
should be no problem, ultimately the scanner works, but i wonder why
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday, June 12, 2002, 1:52 AM, you wrote:
ACM I'm not a great fan of POP scanners (the system scanner provides
ACM adequate protection IMO) and I'm only using the plugin to assist with
ACM testing. If they do manage to get it working more
12 June 2002, 11:26, you wrote:
vwn but i wonder why this is , in the main nod32 module under the tab
vwn setup , one can choose to have archives scanned (ticked).
No idea, but the important thing is that the scanner does trigger an
alert when the file is decompressed and 'dangerous.'
--
12 June 2002, 11:39, you wrote:
PC help me out here Clive, I'm not sure I fully understand how you have
PC AVG setup ( or is it NOD ?). I use AVG with TB, I have it set to check
PC attachments and check incoming mail.
I use NOD and elect to store attachments separate from TB's messages.
If an
Hi Clive,
On Wednesday, June 12, 2002 at 13:30:51 [GMT +0100], you wrote:
CT I've never been convinced that scanning outgoing mail is necessary
CT if the system is clean and incoming emails/disks are scanned
I completely agree with you on this one. If a virus is on your system
and has bypassed
Replying to your message of Tuesday, June 11, 2002, 9:29:20 PM:
In addition to what I sent you privately, I now have tried every one of
them. None of them made it to my inbox, they were all detected by eScan.
--
Pete
Tuesday, June 11, 2002
7:52:37 AM
This e-mail is brought to
Hello Clive,
Wednesday, June 12, 2002, 12:57:49 AM, you wrote:
:
12 June 2002, 04:29, you wrote:
I've just tried it here. If I double click on a copy of eicar.com, the
AMON monitor flashes up and I'm offered the opportunity to, clean,
rename, delete or exclude. Are you sure that you
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday, June 12, 2002, 8:30 AM, you wrote:
CT I use NOD and elect to store attachments separate from TB's messages.
CT If an infected message (with or without an attachment) comes in then
CT NOD's monitor triggers as the file(s) are being
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED],
Clive Taylor [CT] wrote:
CT I use NOD and elect to store attachments separate from TB's
CT messages. If an infected message (with or without an attachment)
CT comes in then NOD's monitor triggers
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday, June 12, 2002, 3:47 PM, you wrote:
CT I use NOD and elect to store attachments separate from TB's
CT messages. If an infected message (with or without an attachment)
CT comes in then NOD's monitor triggers as the file(s) are being
CT
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED],
Paul Cartwright [PC] wrote:
PC this is the same for both NOD and AVG, am I correct there ???
I don't know about AVG.
After doing this, it more solidifies the benefit of the plug-in. The
message
Hi Allie.
At 3:47 PM on Wednesday, June 12, 2002 you wrote the
following about [AVG or NOD32?]:
ACM [...] I've tried the plugin and all it really does is
ACM alert you that a message is infected, providing you
ACM with the message sender and subject. TB! continues to
ACM download the message
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED],
Jan Rifkinson [JR] wrote:
ACM [...] I've tried the plugin and all it really does is
ACM alert you that a message is infected, providing you
ACM with the message sender and subject. TB! continues
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Allie,
@12 June 2002, 15:52:06 -0500 (21:52 UK time) Allie C Martin wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
... The message may be cleaned or renegated to a quarantine folder.
... It no doubt functions better than a generic POP3
Hello Jan
Thank you for your email dated Wednesday, June 12, 2002, 9:52:11 PM, in which you
wrote:
JR would lead one to think that NOD32 was the best antivirus software
It's the best I've used but I like to keep things simple so will
continue to use it separately.
It's fast, it doesn't
Hi Allie.
At 5:13 PM on Wednesday, June 12, 2002 you wrote the
following about [AVG or NOD32?]:
ACM There's a plugin available for NOD32 that works well
ACM for incoming messages. I've tested it and it works.
ACM When it detects an infected message it can be
ACM configured to do one
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED],
Jan Rifkinson [JR] wrote:
JR That might be a convenience but what about running anti-virus
JR against some file that you get on a disk. How's that going to
JR work? Does NOD create a right button
On Wednesday, June 12, 2002, Allie C Martin wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
ACM It no doubt functions better than a generic POP3 scanner.
Allie,
I guess that's the real issue. My concern, which perhaps you can
address, is this: Eset (the NOD people) are in the AV
On Wednesday, June 12, 2002, Jan Rifkinson wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
JR Reading their material would lead one to think that NOD32
JR was consistently the best antivirus software out there
JR [something I would want] but from this list I'm getting
JR very
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Joseph,
@12 June 2002, 17:00:56 -0500 (23:00 UK time) Joseph N. wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
... Is the whole plug-in really no more than a call to the NOD32
scanner (the green cross program) with an extra option
Hi Marck.
At 6:06 PM on Wednesday, June 12, 2002 you wrote the
following about [AVG or NOD32?]:
MDP [...] The AV plug-in returns a True/False result and
MDP some identification data. TB shows the result (if a
MDP positive is found) and moves the offending message to a
MDP quarantine folder
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Jan,
@13 June 2002, 20:01:20 -0400 (01:01 UK time) Jan Rifkinson wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Where does one get the TB! plug-in?
AVG: http://www.thebat.ipex.cz/stazeni/beta/avgbatb7.zip
Dr Web:
I know this has been asked and answered, but: the 'configure' button
is grayed out. Is that for other plug-ins, but not for NOD?
Also: would someone please post the URL for the archives? I could
probably search there for the answer
--
JN
Hi Joseph,
On Wed, 12 Jun 2002 22:15:53 -0500, you wrote:
Also: would someone please post the URL for the archives? I could
probably search there for the answer
Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
It's in the footer ;)
--
Jonathan Angliss
([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Hi all,
I think the title say's it all, should I use AVG or NOD32 as my Anti-Virus?
I must confess, AVG seems to be working seamlessly with The Bat!, but I have
concerns that AVG isn't as good as it could be at trapping virus's
(although, it did catch Klez yesterday and added
Replying to your message of Tuesday, June 11, 2002, 7:12:15 AM:
WC Can people elaborate and help me make this decision?
Chris,
I can help you with this but it wouldn't be using NOD or AVG. We have a
solution that will work seamlessly with TB! or any other email client.
Your email will be
11 June 2002, 14:12, you wrote:
WC Hi all,
WC If I used NOD32, I'd like it to link in with The Bat! and scan when mails
WC come in rather than on the server, but it appears there's a problem with the
WC options once the plug-in is added?
NOD32 comes with an excellent POP3 scanner that's easy
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED],
Clive Taylor [CT] wrote:
CT NOD32 comes with an excellent POP3 scanner that's easy to
CT configure and works well with TB. Forget the (beta) plug in that's
CT mentioned here. It doesn't really add
11 June 2002, 16:57, you wrote:
ACM Will NOD32's POP3 scanner create a quarantine folder *within TB!'s
ACM interface*, where infected messages are stored and the attachments
ACM non-executable?
No, thank God. I don't want infected messages anywhere near my
database - let alone allowing TB to
On Tuesday, June 11, 2002, Allie C Martin wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
See capture image here: [...]
as seen in the capture: [...]
Allie,
The screen caps show a different font in the header display and the
folder tree than I can get. I can't find a place to set
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED],
Clive Taylor [CT] wrote:
CT No, thank God.
God help you then with the false positive's that may occur. :-)
CT I don't want infected messages anywhere near my database - let
CT alone allowing TB
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED],
Joseph N. [JN] wrote:
JN The screen caps show a different font in the header display and
JN the folder tree than I can get. I can't find a place to set those,
JN and changing other settings won't
11 June 2002, 18:13, you wrote:
ACM However, the plugin does offer
ACM interesting alternatives, so don't mislead by saying it doesn't add any
ACM functionality. :-(
Well, we'll have to disagree over this plug-in's usefulness, Allie,
but I just hope for your sake that part of its functionality
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED],
Clive Taylor [CT] wrote:
CT Well, we'll have to disagree over this plug-in's usefulness,
No problem there at all. Just felt the need to make that distinction,
i.e., no useful functionality, a
Hello Allie and Others,
I'd like to take this to TBOT as I am going to ask those who are running
different antivirus programs to test something out with The Bat.
I currently am using NOD, and have downloaded the eicar test file to check
for problems from this site:
12 June 2002, 04:29, you wrote:
D My question to fellow Bat users that using different AV's and NOD is:
D Can you delete the eicar file with NOD after it is downloaded onto your
D machine.
I've just tried it here. If I double click on a copy of eicar.com, the
AMON monitor flashes up and I'm
11 June 2002, 18:55, you wrote:
ACM I'm not a great fan of POP scanners (the system scanner provides
ACM adequate protection IMO) and I'm only using the plugin to assist with
ACM testing. If they do manage to get it working more smoothly, I may just
ACM make using it permanent.
I'm with you on
44 matches
Mail list logo
