Hi Urban,
Saturday, March 15, 2003, 2:10:59 AM, you wrote:
U> Friday, March 14, 2003, Mike Alexander wrote:
>> Yeah, I've had to transfer documents from Word to a proper web
>> designer i.e Dreamweaver and it's a pain, because even when you do
>> strip the stuff out, the formatting is usually off
Friday, March 14, 2003, Mike Alexander wrote:
> Yeah, I've had to transfer documents from Word to a proper web
> designer i.e Dreamweaver and it's a pain, because even when you do
> strip the stuff out, the formatting is usually off.
IIRC, Dreamweaver uses HTML Tidy to do this, so it should be abl
Hello Mike,
Friday, March 14, 2003, 4:20:00 PM, you wrote:
MA> Hi Pete,
MA> Thursday, March 13, 2003, 4:30:09 AM, you wrote:
PH>> Hello Mike,
MA>>> It is because (now don't laugh!) some people use Word to design their
MA>>> web pages. Consequently, the link *has* to be live, otherwise it
MA>>
Hi Jonathan,
Thursday, March 13, 2003, 5:12:03 AM, you wrote:
JA> Before this continues going... as it has clearly gone out of the
JA> bounds of tbudl... want to continue this thread over on tbot if you
JA> want to go on?
Sure. It's about time I joined that group anyway ;-)
--
Best regards,
Hi Pete,
Thursday, March 13, 2003, 4:30:09 AM, you wrote:
PH> Hello Mike,
MA>> It is because (now don't laugh!) some people use Word to design their
MA>> web pages. Consequently, the link *has* to be live, otherwise it
MA>> wouldn't work. To show you how good Word web pages are, Macromedia
MA>>
Hello Pete,
On Thu, 13 Mar 2003 12:05:03 -0500 GMT (14/03/03, 00:05 +0700 GMT),
Pete Holsberg wrote:
>>> Taraa! You have a problem with your Windows setting, not with TB.
BSM>> And here is a possible answer, per Microsoft - has to do with a
BSM>> corrupted registry file:
BSM>> http://support.mi
Hello Brian,
Tuesday, March 11, 2003, 10:30:17 PM, you wrote:
BSM> Hello Thomas,
BSM> Tuesday, March 11, 2003, 7:22:05 PM, you wrote:
>> Hello Pete,
>> On Tue, 11 Mar 2003 21:53:40 -0500 GMT (12/03/03, 09:53 +0700 GMT),
>> Pete Holsberg wrote:
TF Now open a blank Word document. No, not in
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday, March 12, 2003, Mike Alexander wrote...
TF>> I agree, Word should just call IE and let IE connect to the
TF>> internet. Alas, when I click on a URL in Word, my PFW says that
TF>> "Word" (not IE) is attempting to connnect to IP-address
TF
Hello Mike,
Wednesday, March 12, 2003, 9:00:46 PM, you wrote:
MA> Hi Thomas,
MA> Wednesday, March 12, 2003, 4:30:30 AM, you wrote:
TF>> I agree, Word should just call IE and let IE connect to the internet.
TF>> Alas, when I click on a URL in Word, my PFW says that "Word" (not IE)
TF>> is attem
Hello Mike,
On Thu, 13 Mar 2003 02:00:46 + GMT (13/03/03, 09:00 +0700 GMT),
Mike Alexander wrote:
TF>> Alas, when I click on a URL in Word, my PFW says that "Word" (not IE)
TF>> is attempting to connnect to IP-address so-and-so, port 80. That's all
TF>> I know.
> It is because (now don't lau
Hello Pete,
On Wed, 12 Mar 2003 10:24:48 -0500 GMT (12/03/03, 22:24 +0700 GMT),
Pete Holsberg wrote:
TF>> I agree, Word should just call IE and let IE connect to the internet.
TF>> Alas, when I click on a URL in Word, my PFW says that "Word" (not IE)
TF>> is attempting to connnect to IP-address s
Hi Thomas,
Wednesday, March 12, 2003, 4:30:30 AM, you wrote:
TF> I agree, Word should just call IE and let IE connect to the internet.
TF> Alas, when I click on a URL in Word, my PFW says that "Word" (not IE)
TF> is attempting to connnect to IP-address so-and-so, port 80. That's all
TF> I know.
On Wednesday, March 12, 2003, Pete Holsberg wrote...
> "PFW"??
Personal Firewall maybe?
--
Jonathan Angliss
([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Current version is 1.62 | "Using TBUDL" information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Hello Brian,
Tuesday, March 11, 2003, 10:30:17 PM, you wrote:
BSM> And here is a possible answer, per Microsoft - has to do with a
BSM> corrupted registry file:
BSM> http://support.microsoft.com/?kbid=310049
Thanks. I found thatthe value for that key was the full pathname of "iexplorer.exe
-n
Hello Thomas,
Tuesday, March 11, 2003, 11:30:30 PM, you wrote:
TF> I agree, Word should just call IE and let IE connect to the internet.
TF> Alas, when I click on a URL in Word, my PFW says that "Word" (not IE)
TF> is attempting to connnect to IP-address so-and-so, port 80. That's all
TF> I know.
Hello Jonathan,
On Tue, 11 Mar 2003 22:15:29 -0600 GMT (12/03/03, 11:15 +0700 GMT),
Jonathan Angliss wrote:
> Why does Word need access to the internet to perform a system call? If
> it does, then I think MS just put themselves another nail in the
> coffin for me. It should be a system call only.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday, March 11, 2003, Thomas Fernandez wrote...
> Now open a blank Word document. No, not in TB, in Word. Type in a URL,
> it will get highlighted as it will in TB, after you hit return. In
> Word, URLs are as clickable as they are in TB, so cl
Hello Thomas,
Tuesday, March 11, 2003, 7:22:05 PM, you wrote:
> Hello Pete,
> On Tue, 11 Mar 2003 21:53:40 -0500 GMT (12/03/03, 09:53 +0700 GMT),
> Pete Holsberg wrote:
TF>>> Now open a blank Word document. No, not in TB, in Word. Type in a URL,
TF>>> it will get highlighted as it will in TB,
Hello Pete,
On Tue, 11 Mar 2003 21:53:40 -0500 GMT (12/03/03, 09:53 +0700 GMT),
Pete Holsberg wrote:
TF>> Now open a blank Word document. No, not in TB, in Word. Type in a URL,
TF>> it will get highlighted as it will in TB, after you hit return. In
TF>> Word, URLs are as clickable as they are in
Hello Thomas,
Tuesday, March 11, 2003, 9:39:18 PM, you wrote:
TF> Hello Pete,
TF> On Tue, 11 Mar 2003 17:14:55 -0500 GMT (12/03/03, 05:14 +0700 GMT),
TF> Pete Holsberg wrote:
TF>>> My suggestion is to uninstall TB (save your message bases and config
TF>>> data first), re-download TB, and instal
Hello Pete,
On Tue, 11 Mar 2003 17:14:55 -0500 GMT (12/03/03, 05:14 +0700 GMT),
Pete Holsberg wrote:
TF>> My suggestion is to uninstall TB (save your message bases and config
TF>> data first), re-download TB, and install the newly downloaded version.
TF>> I think something got corrupted druing do
Hello Thomas,
Monday, March 10, 2003, 10:38:16 PM, you wrote:
TF> You have two problems nobody here can duplicate:
TF> 1.) TB doesn't call http links correctly
TF> 2.) TB doesn't reply to the Reply-To header when you hit reply
TF> My suggestion is to uninstall TB (save your message bases and co
Hello Pete,
On Mon, 10 Mar 2003 14:41:04 -0500 GMT (11/03/03, 02:41 +0700 GMT),
Pete Holsberg wrote:
> Already did that.
You have two problems nobody here can duplicate:
1.) TB doesn't call http links correctly
2.) TB doesn't reply to the Reply-To header when you hit reply
My suggestion is to
Hello Urban,
Monday, March 10, 2003, 3:49:16 AM, you wrote:
U> Sunday, March 9, 2003, Pete Holsberg wrote:
>> In W2K, it's Tools / File Options. HTML details indicates "Opens with
>> Internet Explorer".
>> There's a "Change" button but selecting it asks me what I would like
>> to use to open HTM
Sunday, March 9, 2003, Pete Holsberg wrote:
> In W2K, it's Tools / File Options. HTML details indicates "Opens with
> Internet Explorer".
> There's a "Change" button but selecting it asks me what I would like
> to use to open HTML files with.
In Control Panel - Internet Options - Programs, there
Hello Thomas,
Sunday, March 9, 2003, 5:11:09 PM, you wrote:
TF> Hello Pete,
TF> On Sun, 09 Mar 2003 17:01:43 -0500 GMT (10/03/03, 05:01 +0700 GMT),
TF> Pete Holsberg wrote:
PS: How do I get TB to use the Reply-To address without copy & paste?
TF>>> Hit the Reply botton. If the message hea
Hello Andre,
Sunday, March 9, 2003, 5:29:23 PM, you wrote:
AW> Hello Pete,
AW> On Sunday, March 9, 2003, 17:01:43 -0500 GMT (which was 23:01 local
AW> time), Pete Holsberg wrote:
PS: How do I get TB to use the Reply-To address without copy & paste?
TF>>> Hit the Reply botton. If the messa
Hello Pete,
On Sunday, March 9, 2003, 17:01:43 -0500 GMT (which was 23:01 local
time), Pete Holsberg wrote:
>>> PS: How do I get TB to use the Reply-To address without copy & paste?
TF>> Hit the Reply botton. If the message header contains a Reply-To
TF>> header, TB will send the reply to that a
Hello Pete,
On Sun, 09 Mar 2003 17:01:43 -0500 GMT (10/03/03, 05:01 +0700 GMT),
Pete Holsberg wrote:
>>> PS: How do I get TB to use the Reply-To address without copy & paste?
TF>> Hit the Reply botton. If the message header contains a Reply-To
TF>> header, TB will send the reply to that address.
Hello Thomas,
Sunday, March 9, 2003, 3:51:59 PM, you wrote:
>> PS: How do I get TB to use the Reply-To address without copy & paste?
TF> Hit the Reply botton. If the message header contains a Reply-To
TF> header, TB will send the reply to that address.
I did that and it put just your address in
Hello Task,
Sunday, March 9, 2003, 4:20:42 PM, you wrote:
TC> Hi tbudl at thebat.dutaint.com:
TC> In the past Thomas was post a message.
TC> The "TO" on your mail says: To: "Pete Holsberg on TBUDL"., i like it,
TC> can you post your template?
I didn't do that, honest!
--
Best regards,
Pet
Hello Task,
On Sun, 9 Mar 2003 17:20:42 -0400 GMT (10/03/03, 04:20 +0700 GMT),
Task Control wrote:
> The "TO" on your mail says: To: "Pete Holsberg on TBUDL"., i like it,
> can you post your template?
With pleasure. Add this to your template:
%TO=""%TO="""%OFromName on TBUDL"" <[EMAIL PROTECTE
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Task,
@9-Mar-2003, 17:20 -0400 (21:20 UK time) Task Control said:
> The "TO" on your mail says: To: "Pete Holsberg on TBUDL"., i like
> it, can you post your template?
%REM='List TO replacement macro by Marck'%-
%COMMENT='"%-
%ABOFROMNamePrefix=#
Hi tbudl at thebat.dutaint.com:
In the past Thomas was post a message.
The "TO" on your mail says: To: "Pete Holsberg on TBUDL"., i like it,
can you post your template?
--
Best Regards,
Task Control
mail: TaskControl at SoftHome dot net
Using:
- Windows 98 4.10.1998
- AVG 6.0 Free Edit
Hello Pete,
On Sun, 09 Mar 2003 10:52:49 -0500 GMT (09/03/03, 22:52 +0700 GMT),
Pete Holsberg wrote:
>>> When I double-click on a URL in an email message, nothing happens.
>>> If I SHIFT-double-click on say
>>> http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/FAQ.html, I get
>>> "http://www.silverstones.com/
Hello Thomas,
Saturday, March 8, 2003, 11:34:44 PM, you wrote:
TF> Hello Pete,
TF> On Sat, 08 Mar 2003 18:29:16 -0500 GMT (09/03/03, 06:29 +0700 GMT),
TF> Pete Holsberg wrote:
>> When I double-click on a URL in an email message, nothing happens.
>> If I SHIFT-double-click on say
>> http://www.
Hello Pete,
On Sat, 08 Mar 2003 18:29:16 -0500 GMT (09/03/03, 06:29 +0700 GMT),
Pete Holsberg wrote:
> When I double-click on a URL in an email message, nothing happens.
> If I SHIFT-double-click on say
> http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/FAQ.html, I get
> "http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/F
Hello TBUDL,
When I double-click on a URL in an email message, nothing happens.
If I SHIFT-double-click on say http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/FAQ.html, I get
"http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/FAQ.html"; - The system cannot find
the file specified.
IE is my default browser. Options > Netwr
38 matches
Mail list logo
