-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Saturday, January 04, 2003
10:59:14 AM
RE: "Email Download Aborted - Solved!"
Greetings Gerard,
On Thursday, January 2, 2003, 10:16:50 AM, you wrote:
G> Un-installing ZA USED to be a hassle. No just go to add/remove programs
G
Hello Allie,
On Thu, 2 Jan 2003 at 15:49:19[GMT -0500](which was 20:49 where I
live) you wrote:
> It would seem from what I read that if you reboot with it disabled
> so that the true vector engine isn't started then you can uninstall
> it without hassle.
Still lots of work needed with regedit t
Hello Tom,
On Fri, 3 Jan 2003 at 06:45:25[GMT +1100](which was 19:45 where I
live) you wrote:
> Here's a link at the Outpost site that probably will assist. I also used
> to use ZA pro, had all sorts of weird problems, but since moving to
> Outpost Pro haven't looked back.
Yup. that's the
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Richard Wakeford [RW] wrote:'
RW> Are you sure? I remember not that long ago being pointed to a
RW> well hidden page on the ZA site which took you through a long
RW> rigmarole of removing various items from the registry to
RW> completely remove it. I'
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Gi'day Richard,
It is established that on Friday, 3 January 2003, at 16:19:35[GMT
+](which was 3:19 AM where I live) you wrote:
>> Un-installing ZA USED to be a hassle. No just go to add/remove programs
>> and ZA will disappear, after wh
ON Thursday, January 2, 2003, 5:19:35 PM, you wrote:
RW> Are you sure? I remember not that long ago being pointed to a well
RW> hidden page on the ZA site which took you through a long rigmarole of
RW> removing various items from the registry to completely remove it. I've
RW> had a look but can't
Hello Gerard,
On Thu, 2 Jan 2003 at 16:16:50[GMT +0100](which was 15:16 where I
live) you wrote:
> Un-installing ZA USED to be a hassle. No just go to add/remove programs
> and ZA will disappear, after which you can install Kerio.
Are you sure? I remember not that long ago being pointed to a wel
ON Thursday, January 2, 2003, 2:02:39 PM, you wrote:
RW> Hello Lawrence,
RW> On Thu, 2 Jan 2003 at 06:43:01[GMT -0600](which was 12:43 where I
RW> live) you wrote:
>> Now that the holidays are officially over, I'll follow up with ZoneLabs
>> and see if they received my bug report.
RW> I'd be in
Hello Lawrence,
On Thu, 2 Jan 2003 at 06:43:01[GMT -0600](which was 12:43 where I
live) you wrote:
> Now that the holidays are officially over, I'll follow up with ZoneLabs
> and see if they received my bug report.
I'd be interested to hear what they have to say. In the meantime I'll
continue wi
Hello Richard,
Wednesday, January 1, 2003, 11:51:25 PM, you wrote:
RW> Well, I joined the list just before going to bed and woke to find that
RW> TB! had hung on the first connection to the list and that was only to
RW> receive the joining confirmation so something is certainly seriously
RW> wron
Hello Lawrence,
On Wed, 1 Jan 2003 at 15:05:17[GMT -0600](which was 21:05 where I
live) you wrote:
> You are welcome to subscribe to
> the list yourself and see if you can download the digest with Mailsafe
> enabled.
Well, I joined the list just before going to bed and woke to find that
TB! had
Hello Lawrence,
On Wed, 1 Jan 2003 at 15:05:17[GMT -0600](which was 21:05 where I
live) you wrote:
> You are welcome to subscribe to
> the list yourself and see if you can download the digest with Mailsafe
> enabled.
I just have done and it will be interesting to see if the same
problems occur w
Wednesday, January 1, 2003, 1:00:07 PM, you wrote:
A> Tuesday, December 31, 2002, 6:51:41 PM,Richard wrote:
RW>> Hm, I've used ZA for a couple of years now and have never had that
RW>> problem with any mail however big or small, even though I have the
RW>> Mailsafe setting on.
I can only report
Hello,
Wednesday, January 1, 2003, 3:34:50 PM, you wrote:
>> (We cannot say the same about later versions of ZA - i.e. the v3
>> series as they were almost unusable for us!)
> Confirmed again. I've tried ZAP v3.x here, and it did cause all sorts
> of problems (even with a very complete un-insta
Hello Anne,
On Wed, 1 Jan 2003 at 19:00:07[GMT +](which was 19:00 where I
live) you wrote:
> it's my view that the problem arises mainly because of an
> incompatibility between ZoneAlarm and Win XP. Those of us using
> older versions of Windows appear to have less or no problems with ZA
> or
Tuesday, December 31, 2002, 6:51:41 PM,Richard wrote:
RW> Hm, I've used ZA for a couple of years now and have never had that
RW> problem with any mail however big or small, even though I have the
RW> Mailsafe setting on.
Richard,
Having read many of the mails about this problem here and on othe
Hello Lawrence,
On Tue, 31 Dec 2002, at 08:59:58 GMT -0600 (12/31/2002, 8:59 AM -0500
GMT here), you wrote in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
LJ> I have opened up a case with ZoneLabs to determine why this option
LJ> breaks the mail download process when certain messages are
LJ> encou
Hello Lawrence,
On Tue, 31 Dec 2002 at 08:59:58[GMT -0600](which was 14:59 where I
live) you wrote:
> The aborted email download has been traced to enabling MailSafe in
> ZoneAlarm. It is supposed to "protect your computer from incoming
> e-mail attachments that contain malicious code or viruses
The aborted email download has been traced to enabling MailSafe in
ZoneAlarm. It is supposed to "protect your computer from incoming
e-mail attachments that contain malicious code or viruses." It is
supposed to quarantine "these attachments, preventing them from
running without your permission."
19 matches
Mail list logo
