On Saturday, October 05, 2002, Dierk Haasis wrote in
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
awc>>> Regardless of what some people think, email is a logical part of
awc>>> a PIM
JN>> I couldn't agree more!
DH> I am sure I do know only half of what you agree with, but
DH> if from A
Hello Joseph!
On Friday, October 4, 2002 at 11:50:57 PM you wrote:
awc>> Regardless of what some people think, email is a logical part of
awc>> a PIM
> I couldn't agree more!
I am sure I do know only half of what you agree with, but
if from A follows B
it doesn't mean
that from B f
On Friday, October 04, 2002, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
awc> Regardless of what some people think, email is a logical part of
awc> a PIM
Laura,
I couldn't agree more! Unfortunately, that also ups the ante,
because:
1. Contacts and schedules nee
ON Friday, October 4, 2002, 6:46:06 PM, you wrote:
TF> Hello Gerard,
TF> On Fri, 4 Oct 2002 16:10:14 +0200 GMT (04/10/02, 21:10 +0700 GMT),
TF> Gerard wrote:
G>> I think you mean something else but you do know you can right-click
G>> on the top of de email subject window and add & remove colum
Hello Laura,
On Fri, 4 Oct 2002 07:30:55 -0700 GMT (04/10/02, 21:30 +0700 GMT),
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
JN>> Perhaps the issue is really whether TB! should embrace a
JN>> development priority that the program should function as a
JN>> good archive database. I'm not convinced yet that it should,
Hello Gerard,
On Fri, 4 Oct 2002 16:10:14 +0200 GMT (04/10/02, 21:10 +0700 GMT),
Gerard wrote:
G> I think you mean something else but you do know you can right-click
G> on the top of de email subject window and add & remove columns. You
G> can then sort ascending and descending on each column.
Hello Joseph,
Thursday, October 3, 2002, 6:52:38 PM, you wrote:
JN>On Thursday, October 03, 2002, Jakob Breivik Grimstveit wrote in
JN> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
JN> JBG> Two things I would love to see in The Bat!:
JN> JBG> 1. Indexed searching.
JN> JBG> 2. When indexi
ON Thursday, October 3, 2002, 11:58:05 PM, you wrote:
JBG> 1. Indexed searching. All folders should be indexed. Headers, body,
JBG> the works. At least a possibility to do so. A setting somewhere. Makes
JBG> searching 200Mb worth of text mails (without attachments) somewhat
JBG> faster :)
At 04.10.2002 03:52, Joseph N. wrote the following:
> On Thursday, October 03, 2002, Jakob Breivik Grimstveit wrote in
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
JBG>> Two things I would love to see in The Bat!: 1. Indexed
JBG>> searching. 2. When indexing is in place it shouldn't be too hard
On Thursday, October 03, 2002, Jakob Breivik Grimstveit wrote in
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
JBG> Two things I would love to see in The Bat!:
JBG> 1. Indexed searching.
JBG> 2. When indexing is in place it shouldn't be too hard to include a
JBG> virtual folder option.
Two things I would love to see in The Bat!:
1. Indexed searching. All folders should be indexed. Headers, body,
the works. At least a possibility to do so. A setting somewhere. Makes
searching 200Mb worth of text mails (without attachments) somewhat
faster :)
2. When indexing is in pl
11 matches
Mail list logo
