Hello David,
On Friday, 7. March 2003, at 14:24:36 [GMT -0500] you wrote:
AM ,-[ begin ]-
AM |
AM | Building support for:
AM |
AM | - PGP 8. Finally - they've started publish the full source code again,
AM | so the plug-in and changes in The Bat! should appear soon.|
AM |
AM '-[
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Saturday, March 08, 2003, Thomas Martin wrote...
AM ,-[ begin ]-
AM |
AM | Building support for:
AM |
AM | - PGP 8. Finally - they've started publish the full source code
again,
AM | so the plug-in and changes in The Bat! should appear
Hello Jonathan,
On Saturday, 8. March 2003, at 13:07:41 [GMT -0600] you wrote:
What makes you say that because PGP 8 has no CLI interface that you
cannot develop an interface for it? Download the source code for PGP
8, and take a look at the Eudora, or Outlook Express plugin code...
that is
Hi Folks,
I've been trying to get feedback on the progress of a PGP8 plugin.
Hopefully this will be out before the next versions of PGP are already
obsolete. I personally consider in client support for the newer
versions of PGP a must if I'm to continue using the Bat.
I don't mind waiting a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
John L Crain [JLC] wrote:
JLC I've been trying to get feedback on the progress of a PGP8 plugin.
I'm not able to tell you what the progress is, only that there's
plans for one.
In a message from Stefan Tanurkov to TBBETA on Tue, 31
On Friday, March 07, 2003 at 14:17:35GMT -0500 (which was 2:17 PM where I live)
Allie Martin wrote and made these points on the subject of Getting feedback from
Ritlabs:
AM John L Crain [JLC] wrote:
JLC I've been trying to get feedback on the progress of a PGP8 plugin.
AM I'm not able
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
David Calvarese [DC] wrote:
DC On the footheels of that, how about better support for GnuPG?
That wasn't mentioned in his message. :/
What improved support are you thinking of?
- --
-= allie_M =- | List Moderator | OS: XP Pro (SP1)
_
On Friday, March 07, 2003 at 14:35:59GMT -0500 (which was 2:35 PM where I live)
Allie Martin wrote and made these points on the subject of Getting feedback from
Ritlabs:
AM David Calvarese [DC] wrote:
DC On the footheels of that, how about better support for GnuPG?
AM That wasn't
Hello Allie,
That's the sort of reply I keep getting but nothing from RitLabs;(
Being worked on, or plans, can mean 7 day or 7 years:( Microsoft plans
to release a stable operating system I hear.. Been hearing that one
for years :)
As much as I like the bat I'm afraid they are going to lose a
Hello Melissa,
Friday, March 7, 2003, 4:39:49 PM, you wrote:
MR I've tried just about every Windows email client (and own several of
MR them), but I have yet to find one as good as TB! If you quit using TB!
MR over this, which inferior client will you be happy to use in its
MR place?
Yep! It's
Friday, March 7, 2003, 2:33:41 PM, John wrote:
That's the sort of reply I keep getting but nothing from RitLabs;(
Actually Allie's quote of Stefan *is* from Ritlabs.
As much as I like the bat I'm afraid they are going to lose a customer
over this.
I suppose one could use Outhouse Express
Hello Dave,
DG Do you get this specific of development feedback from every other
DG software vendor whose product you use?
Yes from many I do get feedback of this sort when a specific question
is asked. I didn't realize there's a Beta list but Allie pointed me to
it, for which many thanks.
Hello Melissa,
Unfortunately for me I really need to use PGP all the time.
The Bat is by far the best of the clients I've seen, hands down but
it's encryption and authentication support is lacking.
If the wait for features is going to be behind the pack and I
have no way of knowing how far
13 matches
Mail list logo
