Hello Andrey & others on TBUDL following this thread,
Wednesday, January 10, 2001, you stated regarding moving folder
locations:
AGSAA> Sounds like that the whole thread could be squeezed to one sentence: RIT
AGSAA> Labs, please (please!) provide the adequate documentation on this
AGSAA> subj
Hi Andrey,
Wednesday, January 10, 2001, 6:46:24 AM, you wrote:
MA>> Thanks, unfortunately that was the one file which got corrupted when I
MA>> did a CD backup. Windows reports an "Error performing inpage
MA>> operation" whatever that is.
> Try to restore this file from the probably fa
Hi Thomas,
Wednesday, January 10, 2001, 4:05:06 AM, you wrote:
MA>> Thanks, unfortunately that was the one file which got corrupted when I
MA>> did a CD backup. Windows reports an "Error performing inpage
MA>> operation" whatever that is.
> I never saw this error. Does anybody know wha
Hello Thomas & others on TBUDL following this thread,
Tuesday, January 09, 2001, you stated regarding Cookies:
TF> As for the cookie file, I don't understand your question. You define
TF> the cookie file, for example by using the macro:
TF> %Cookie="E:\stuff\cookies.txt"
This is what I have
Hello Andrey,
Wednesday, January 10, 2001, 6:49:12 AM, you wrote:
> Wednesday, January 10, 2001, 7:05:06 AM, Thomas Fernandez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>wrote:
MA>>> Thanks, unfortunately that was the one file which got corrupted when I
MA>>> did a CD backup. Windows reports an "Error perfo
Hello!
Wednesday, January 10, 2001, 6:41:11 AM, Douglas Hinds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
DH> After a number of outstanding Batnicks discussed ways to move
DH> account folders some time ago (using Commander, Explorer and other
DH> ways), I assumed that this was indeed what had to be done, even
Hello!
Wednesday, January 10, 2001, 7:05:06 AM, Thomas Fernandez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
does you know which file TB! stores cookie lines?
>>> In account.cfg .
MA>> Thanks, unfortunately that was the one file which got corrupted when I
MA>> did a CD backup. Windows reports an "
Hello!
Tuesday, January 09, 2001, 9:19:31 PM, Mark Aston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> does you know which file TB! stores cookie lines?
>> In account.cfg .
MA> Thanks, unfortunately that was the one file which got corrupted when I
MA> did a CD backup. Windows reports an "Error perfo
Hi Allie,
On Wed, 10 Jan 2001 00:20:51 -0500GMT (10/01/2001, 13:20 +0800GMT),
A . Curtis Martin wrote:
ACM> Apparently you don't need to copy anything over and that TB! will do
ACM> this. Just browse to the new location and hit OK. The account will be
ACM> moved to the new directory and the old
On Wed, 10 Jan 2001 11:58:16 +0800, Thomas graced us with these
comments:
ACM>> The one time I had problems moving my account folders was when I
ACM>> tried doing it as you describe. I lost *all* my templates which
ACM>> were folder based and painstakingly created.
TF> I used the method Ming-Li
Hello Thomas,
TF = Thomas Fernandez
On Wed, 10 Jan 2001 at 12:05:06 GMT +0800 (which was 8:05 PM where
I live) witnesses say Thomas Fernandez typed:
TF> As for the cookie file, I don't understand your question. You define
TF> the cookie file, for example by using the macro:
TF> %Cookie="E:
Hi Mark,
On Tue, 9 Jan 2001 18:19:31 +GMT (10/01/2001, 02:19 +0800GMT),
Mark Aston wrote:
>>> does you know which file TB! stores cookie lines?
>> In account.cfg .
MA> Thanks, unfortunately that was the one file which got corrupted when I
MA> did a CD backup. Windows reports an "Err
Hi Allie,
On Tue, 9 Jan 2001 17:37:23 -0500GMT (10/01/2001, 06:37 +0800GMT),
A . Curtis Martin wrote:
ML>> I do use regedit, a lot. But it seems unnecessary in this case. Or
ML>> am I missing something?
ACM> The one time I had problems moving my account folders was when I tried
ACM> doing it as
Hello Allie Curtis. & others on TBUDL following this thread,
Tuesday, January 09, 2001, you replied to Ming Lee:
ML>> ... Go to "Account properties | Files and directories", hit the
ML>> Browse button for the "Home directory", choose the new home
ML>> directory (and you may create a new one th
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 09 Jan 2001 10:46:12 -0600, Douglas contributed this to our
collective wisdom:
ACM>> How do you normally move an entire accounts mail folder from one
ACM>> location to another?
DH> You don't. When you change the location in the account's pro
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 9 Jan 2001 05:12:30 -0800, Ming-Li graced us with these
comments:
ML> [procedure snipped]
ML> I don't really understand why you have to go that route. Go to
ML> "Account properties | Files and directories", hit the Browse button
ML> for the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Thomas!
On Monday, January 08, 2001 at 7:09:15 AM you wrote:
> I don't think these folders matter; I have never had an unread message
> in the Outbox or Sent folders, and for those in the Trash, the filter
> that moved them also marked them a
Hello Mark & others on TBUDL following this thread,
Tuesday, January 09, 2001, you stated regarding my comment:
>> Others were more important but my
>> answers include the heart, guts and bones of the original. (I can't
>> resist doing that).
MA> While we're on guts and bones, does you know
Hi Karin,
Tuesday, January 09, 2001, 5:48:19 PM, you wrote:
>> does you know which file TB! stores cookie lines?
> In account.cfg .
Thanks, unfortunately that was the one file which got corrupted when I
did a CD backup. Windows reports an "Error performing inpage
operation" whatever
On 09-01-2001 at 18:02, Mark Aston kindly wrote:
> does you know which file TB! stores cookie lines?
In account.cfg .
- K -
--
Has anyone yet said publicly how nice it is to write on
rubber with a ballpoint pen?
- Nicholson Baker: The Size of Thoughts
--
Hi Douglas,
Tuesday, January 09, 2001, 4:46:12 PM, you wrote:
> Others were more important but my
> answers include the heart, guts and bones of the original. (I can't
> resist doing that).
While we're on guts and bones, does you know which file TB! stores
cookie lines?
--
Mark Aston
Hello Ming-Li & others on TBUDL following this thread,
Tuesday, January 09, 2001, you stated regarding :
ML> Go to "Account properties | Files and directories", hit the
ML> Browse button for the "Home directory", choose the new home
ML> directory (and you may create a new one there, too), and
Hello A. & others on TBUDL following this thread,
Tuesday, January 09, 2001, you asked:
ACM> How do you normally move an entire accounts mail folder from one
ACM> location to another?
You don't. When you change the location in the account's properties,
TB! does this for you (and TELLS you tha
On Tuesday, January 09, 2001, 3:20:37 AM, A. wrote:
> How do you normally move an entire accounts mail folder from one
> location to another?
> A solid way of doing this without problems involves the registry.
[procedure snipped]
I don't really understand why you have to go that route. Go to
"
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 08 Jan 2001 23:44:43 -0600, Douglas Hinds wrote these
comments:
[.]
DH> The bad part is that for lack of space I moved an account's mail
DH> to C:\ and seem to have lost or corrupted the data base. But I'll
DH> work on that later.
Ho
Hallo Douglas,
On Tue, 09 Jan 2001 00:48:23 -0600 GMT (09/01/2001, 14:48 +0800 GMT),
Douglas Hinds wrote:
Douglas> You are recommending the full file?
ftp://ftp.ritlabs.com/pub/the_bat/the_bat.exe
Yes.
Douglas> OK. It's a bigger file (but rar is more highly compressed (in the
Douglas> compres
Hello Thomas & others on TBUDL following this thread,
Tuesday, January 09, 2001, you stated regarding my saying:
Douglas>> All I see is the executable, so I'll have to install v.
Douglas>> 1.48 first and then swap the .exe
TF> No, if you download the exe from the official site (not beta), t
Hello Thomas & others on TBUDL following this thread,
Monday, January 08, 2001, you stated regarding the difference
between compressing and purging, as well as the difference between
compressing and compressing:
TF> Purging is marking "old" messages or messages "over the limit" (in
TF> terms of
Hello Andrey & others on TBUDL following this thread,
Monday, January 08, 2001, you stated regarding why I ran out of
disk space:
DH>> I started to compress and rapidly cleared 20 additional mb, at which
DH>> point I ran out of space in C:\. I closed other programs and will
DH>> begin again. I
Hallo Douglas,
On Mon, 08 Jan 2001 23:44:43 -0600 GMT (09/01/2001, 13:44 +0800 GMT),
Douglas Hinds wrote:
Douglas> I guess that means I can download v. 1.49 now. All I see is the
Douglas> executable, so I'll have to install v. 1.48 first and then swap the
Douglas> .exe
No, if you download the e
Hallo Douglas,
On Mon, 08 Jan 2001 21:51:05 -0600 GMT (09/01/2001, 11:51 +0800 GMT),
Douglas Hinds wrote:
Douglas> I am going compress all, but hope to determine what purging does, if
Douglas> compress is actually purge deleted messages.
Purging is marking "old" messages or messages "over the l
Hello Karin & others on TBUDL following this thread,
Monday, January 08, 2001, you expressed the opinion that:
KS> That means that mail generally moves out of your inbox. If
KS> you've never compressed that, there's a helluva lot of diskspace
KS> to gain.
The only folder that had compression
Hello!
Tuesday, January 09, 2001, 7:13:50 AM, Douglas Hinds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
DH> I started to compress and rapidly cleared 20 additional mb, at which
DH> point I ran out of space in C:\. I closed other programs and will
DH> begin again. It's going to take quite a while, but the rega
Hello Januk & others on TBUDL following this thread,
Monday, January 08, 2001, you stated regarding :
JA> On Mon, 08 Jan 2001 at 21:36:06 GMT -0600 (which was 7:36 PM where
JA> I live) witnesses say Douglas Hinds typed:
JA> When compressing, TB removes the messages marked as deleted, thus
Hello Douglas,
DH = Douglas Hinds
On Mon, 08 Jan 2001 at 21:36:06 GMT -0600 (which was 7:36 PM where
I live) witnesses say Douglas Hinds typed:
DH> So if compressing is really purging, then what is purging?
Well, you're more likely to confuse yourself this way. Both Compress
and Purge a
On 09-01-2001 at 04:36, Douglas Hinds kindly wrote:
> In the Moldavian version of the word compress, no compression
> occurs. What does happen is that "deleted" messages ARE deleted (w/o
> the quotes. AIFAIK, this is equivalent to the American English word
> PURGE (purging "deleted" messages, in
Hello Karin & others on TBUDL following this thread,
Monday, January 08, 2001, you stated regarding :
KS> On 09-01-2001 at 03:07, Douglas Hinds kindly wrote:
>> I don't compress because compression can cause data loss
>> ...
KS> Only with bad mail programs. Do compress. Especially your
KS>
Hello Karin & others on TBUDL following this thread,
Monday, January 08, 2001, you also provided clear answers to most
issues, except:
>> 2).- Does this include the dupes are are killed?
KS> Dupes somehow disappear immediately.
>> 4).- That wouldn't work for a folder that disappeared then (o
Hello Andrey & others on TBUDL following this thread,
Monday, January 08, 2001, you answered clearly all the questions
asked except the following:
DH>> 5).- Would someone briefly define whether "purge all" is purge
DH>> AND compress?
AGSAA> It is "purge and compress"...
In the Moldavian vers
On 09-01-2001 at 03:06, Douglas Hinds kindly wrote:
> Hello Karin & others on TBUDL following this thread,
>>> it [would] do me any good to compress if TB! is nearly always
>>> open? (I even use it for certain word processing tasks), and
>>> don't tend to eliminate messages except manually or via
Hello!
Tuesday, January 09, 2001, 5:07:42 AM, Douglas Hinds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
TF>> ... deleted messages only get a "deleted flag" and are not taken
TF>> out of the message base, so it grows and grows. Only Compressing
TF>> would actually do the clean-up.
DH> 1).- You are saying that d
On 09-01-2001 at 03:07, Douglas Hinds kindly wrote:
> I don't compress because compression can cause data loss
> ...
Only with bad mail programs. Do compress. Especially your
inbox must have an enourmous size by now.
> and the algorithms are proprietary, so that something
> saved using one tape
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 08 Jan 2001 20:07:57 -0600, Douglas wrote these words of
wisdom:
[.]
DH> I don't compress because compression can cause data loss and the
DH> algorithms are proprietary,
Wow! Then you must have quite a bit of wasted space there then
On 09-01-2001 at 03:07, Douglas Hinds kindly wrote:
> Hello Thomas & others on TBUDL following this thread,
TF>> ... deleted messages only get a "deleted flag" and are not taken
TF>> out of the message base, so it grows and grows. Only Compressing
TF>> would actually do the clean-up.
> 1).- You
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 08 Jan 2001 20:06:40 -0600, Douglas wrote these words of
wisdom:
[.]
DH> I'd better repeat: When are folders compressed? When TB! is closed
DH> or when the folder is left for another? Or does compression have
DH> novel meaning here (
Hello Thomas & others on TBUDL following this thread,
Monday, January 08, 2001, you stated regarding :
TF> ... deleted messages only get a "deleted flag" and are not taken
TF> out of the message base, so it grows and grows. Only Compressing
TF> would actually do the clean-up.
1).- You are sa
Hello Jan & others on TBUDL following this thread,
Monday, January 08, 2001, you stated regarding :
JR> I don't understand how you use TB!.
For email.
JR> Of course this is none of my biz but "while thousands of
JR> messages in outboxes (saved drafts), sent and trash folders are
JR> count
Hello Karin & others on TBUDL following this thread,
Monday, January 08, 2001, you stated regarding whether or not:
>> it [would] do me any good to compress if TB! is nearly always
>> open? (I even use it for certain word processing tasks), and
>> don't tend to eliminate messages except manua
On 08-01-2001 at 17:31, Douglas Hinds kindly wrote:
> Would it do me any good to compress if TB! is nearly always open? (I
> even use it for certain word processing tasks), and don't tend to
> eliminate messages except manually or via spam filters
Most probably: yes. Because everything goes to y
On 08-01-2001 at 07:03, Thomas Fernandez kindly wrote:
> Douglas Hinds wrote:
KS>>> Do take notice that when you've been using 1.42 all along,
KS>>> the format of your mailboxes needs to change. You need to
KS>>> import them.
DH>> Again? That happened when upgrading from *TO* v. 1.42. Are you su
Hallo Douglas,
On Mon, 08 Jan 2001 10:31:07 -0600 GMT (09/01/2001, 00:31 +0800 GMT),
Douglas Hinds wrote:
DH> Would it do me any good to compress if TB! is nearly always open?
Yes, because that will rid the message base of the deleted messages.
You see, deleted messages only get a "deleted flag
Hello Douglas,
On Monday, January 08, 2001 10:21:09 -0600 you wrote the
following in regards to "NO Ticker as default folder setting":
Douglas> The problem is waiting while thousands of messages in outboxes
Douglas> (saved drafts), sent and trash folders are counted. TB!
Hello Thomas & others on TBUDL following this thread,
Monday, January 08, 2001, you stated re:
DH>> ... The recent versions have a kill all dupes in all folders
DH>> command, I understand.
TF> Yes. They also have "Compress All Folders", and "Purge & Compress All
TF> Folders" (mistakenly only
Hello Jan & others on TBUDL following this thread,
Monday, January 08, 2001, you stated regarding the Mail Ticker:
JR> ... While "Hide" may not
JR> solve the default MT settings on new folders, it does seem to
JR> "Hide" the MT no matter what the folder default setting is.
The problem
Hello Andrey,
On Sunday, January 07, 2001 04:59:21 +0300 you wrote the
following in regards to "NO Ticker as default folder setting":
Andrey> Please take a look at Douglas' initial message - there are some
Andrey> complaints here about MT popping out accidentally
Hi Douglas,
On Sun, 07 Jan 2001 22:54:29 -0600GMT (08/01/2001, 12:54 +0800GMT),
Douglas Hinds wrote:
DH> They made it the default for the outbox, sent and trash folders
DH> also. Does that strike you as reasonable.
I don't think these folders matter; I have never had an unread message
in the Ou
Hi Douglas,
On Sun, 07 Jan 2001 22:57:14 -0600GMT (08/01/2001, 12:57 +0800GMT),
Douglas Hinds wrote:
KS>> Do take notice that when you've been using 1.42 all along,
KS>> the format of your mailboxes needs to change. You need to
KS>> import them.
DH> Again? That happened when upgrading from *TO*
Hello Karin & others on TBUDL following this thread,
Sunday, January 07, 2001, you stated:
KS> Do take notice that when you've been using 1.42 all along,
KS> the format of your mailboxes needs to change. You need to
KS> import them.
Again? That happened when upgrading from *TO* v. 1.42. Are
Hello Thomas & others on TBUDL following this thread,
Sunday, January 07, 2001, you stated:
TF> They had to choose some default, and since they are proud of the
TF> ticker (and rightly so), they have made "show" the default.
They made it the default for the outbox, sent and trash folders
als
On 08-01-2001 at 05:15, Douglas Hinds kindly wrote:
AGSAA>> Maybe it's time to upgrade at least to a 1.48f? It can solve you
AGSAA>> mailticker problems like an accidental popups.
> Is that right? That's good to know.
Quite some bigs have been solved in the measwhile, and new
features have been
Hello Andrey & others on TBUDL following this thread,
Sunday, January 07, 2001, you stated regarding a way to set NO
TICKER as the default folder setting:
AGSAA> Unfortunately no. I've checked registry for some keys which name could
AGSAA> help me in this task but failed...
DH>> Also, is there
Hi Douglas,
On Sun, 07 Jan 2001 18:46:26 -0600GMT (08/01/2001, 08:46 +0800GMT),
Douglas Hinds wrote:
JR>> Isn't that what options -> Mail Ticker -> Hide is all about?
DH> In a word, no.
DH> That's how mine has always been. Set yours that way, then create a
DH> new folder and look at the defa
Hello!
Monday, January 08, 2001, 4:36:21 AM, Jan Rifkinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
JR> JR> Isn't that what options -> Mail Ticker -> Hide is all about?
Andrey>> it just hides the ticker out of your screen.
JR> Yes that's true, but, as a practical matter, it does solve the
JR> pro
Hello Andrey,
On Sunday, January 07, 2001 03:43:56 +0300 you wrote the
following in regards to "NO Ticker as default folder setting":
JR> Isn't that what options -> Mail Ticker -> Hide is all about?
Andrey> it just hides the ticker out of your screen.
Hello Jan & others on TBUDL following this thread,
Sunday, January 07, 2001, you stated regarding whether there is a way
to set NO TICKER as the default folder setting.
JR> Isn't that what options -> Mail Ticker -> Hide is all about?
In a word, no.
That's how mine has always been. Set yours
Hello!
Monday, January 08, 2001, 3:12:13 AM, Douglas Hinds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
DH> And THAT Bat! folk, is the reason for this post: IS there a way to
DH> set NO TICKER as the default folder setting?
Unfortunately no. I've checked registry for some keys which name could
help me in this t
Hello!
Monday, January 08, 2001, 3:37:47 AM, Jan Rifkinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Douglas>> [...] IS there a way to set NO TICKER as the default
Douglas>> folder setting? [...]
JR> Isn't that what options -> Mail Ticker -> Hide is all about?
No, it just hides the ticker out of your scre
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hello Douglas,
Sunday, January 07, 2001, 4:12:13 PM, you wrote:
DH> And THAT Bat! folk, is the reason for this post: IS there a way to
DH> set NO TICKER as the default folder setting?
I've right clicked on the ticker and chose _Hide_. But I may have
miss
Hi Douglas,
On Sunday, January 07, 2001 18:12:13 -0600 you wrote the
following in regards to "NO Ticker as default folder setting":
Douglas> [...] IS there a way to set NO TICKER as the default
Douglas> folder setting? [...]
Isn't that what options -> Mail Tic
Hello Bat! Folk:
I have to confess: I hate the ticker. I hate it because it comes on
all by itself (OK, accidentally) and that brings what I'm composing
to a screeching halt until all those unread messages add up on the
ticker - it won't quit counting them until it's done, usually;
before I can
70 matches
Mail list logo
