Re: PGP signature

2003-08-29 Thread Allie Martin
Michael Thompson, [MT] wrote: MT Is there any way to add some ones key from a message? When I get a MT PGP signed message, and click on the signature button on the viewer, MT it opens the PGP log window, but there seems to be no way off adding MT it to my keyring. MT Any ideas? I assume that

Re: PGP signature

2003-08-29 Thread Jonathan Angliss
When you select to verify the key of another your PGP should automatically scan the public key servers for that individuals key. Once located a box should pop up with the key information and you should hit SELECT then IMPORT. Once you have imported the key open PGPKeys and select that key

Re: PGP signature

2003-08-28 Thread Peter Meyns
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Michael, on Thu, 28 Aug 2003 19:05:43 +0100GMT (28.08.03, 20:05 +0200GMT here), you wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] : MT Is there any way to add some ones key from a message? When I get a PGP MT signed message, and click on the signature

Re: PGP signature

2003-08-28 Thread Jonathan Angliss
On Thursday, August 28, 2003, Michael Thompson wrote... Is there any way to add some ones key from a message? When I get a PGP signed message, and click on the signature button on the viewer, it opens the PGP log window, but there seems to be no way off adding it to my keyring. There

Re: PGP signature

2003-08-28 Thread DG Raftery Sr.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Thursday, August 28, 2003 6:19:16 PM (GMT -05:00) RE: PGP signature Greetings Michael, On Thursday, August 28, 2003, 2:05:43 PM, you wrote: Michael Is there any way to add some ones key from a message? When I get a PGP Michael signed message

Re: PGP signature removal?

2003-01-01 Thread Jonathan Angliss
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wednesday, January 01, 2003, Gavin Sinclair wrote... A lot of messages on this list, and some on others I frequent, use PGP signatures that hide the actual message in a forest of crap. :-) One person's forest of crap might be another's

Re: PGP signature removal?

2003-01-01 Thread Mary Bull
Hello Melissa! On Wednesday, January 1, 2003 at 12:03:07 AM you wrote: M -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- M Hash: SHA1 M On Tuesday, December 31, 2002, at 8:27:37 PM PST, Gavin Sinclair M wrote: A lot of messages on this list, and some on others I frequent, use PGP signatures that hide the

Re: PGP signature removal?

2003-01-01 Thread Jonathan Angliss
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wednesday, January 01, 2003, Mary Bull wrote... M -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- M Hash: SHA1 [1] See comment a little further down :) M On Tuesday, December 31, 2002, at 8:27:37 PM PST, Gavin Sinclair M wrote: A lot of messages on this

Re: PGP signature removal?

2003-01-01 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo Jonathan, On Wed, 1 Jan 2003 03:38:18 -0600GMT (1-1-03, 10:38 +0100GMT, where I live), you wrote: JA Notice how on the first line it has the %- on the end, but the JA quoted one above has the %- on the second line at the front. I'm JA not sure how much of an affect it'd have, but it'd be

Re: PGP signature removal?

2003-01-01 Thread Mary Bull
Hello Jonathan! On Wednesday, January 1, 2003 at 3:38:18 AM you wrote: J [1] See comment a little further down :) I think you are right, and I did get caught in trying to quote Melissa's MACRO. I am very inexperienced. Would have been better just to refer to it and let those interested pick it

Re: PGP signature removal?

2003-01-01 Thread Gavin Sinclair
On Wednesday, January 1, 2003, 5:03:07 PM, Melissa wrote: I'll sign this one just for you. ;-) Melissa Heh, no manual deforestation required. Thanks again! Gavin Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:

Re: PGP signature removal?

2003-01-01 Thread Allie Martin
In [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], Jonathan Angliss [JA] wrote:' True :) I understand their meaning and still think it's a forest of crap. Even if I thought signing messages in a public forum were a brilliant idea, I'd still think it's noise, because it's metadata, not actual

Re: PGP signature removal?

2003-01-01 Thread Allie Martin
In [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], Mary Bull [MB] wrote:' MB One good thing about lurking: occasionally a little manna falls MB from heaven. I copied and pasted your template into Quick MB Templates, then I used the backspace button to turn it into one MB long line. MB And it works! In

Re: PGP signature removal?

2003-01-01 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Jonathan, @1-Jan-2003, 03:38 -0600 (09:38 UK time) Jonathan Angliss [JA] in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: JA The correct version taken right from the website looks like this: ... snip That won't work either - PGP has '- '

Re: PGP signature removal?

2003-01-01 Thread Mary Bull
Hello Allie! On Wednesday, January 1, 2003 at 6:03:49 AM you wrote: MB One good thing about lurking: occasionally a little manna falls MB from heaven. I copied and pasted your template into Quick MB Templates, then I used the backspace button to turn it into one MB long line. ... A Why do

Re: PGP signature removal?

2003-01-01 Thread Allie Martin
In [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], Mary Bull [MB] wrote:' MB So I can just copy and paste there (isn't it in Accounts, MB Properties?) in the same way I did into Quick Templates? Thanks, MB Allie. I will try it now. You can do the following: Create an address book entry for TBUDL and

Re: PGP signature removal?

2003-01-01 Thread Mary Bull
Hello Allie, On Wednesday, January 01, 2003, 7:15 AM, you wrote: ... A You can do the following: A Create an address book entry for TBUDL and using the list address, A [EMAIL PROTECTED] . This entry I had already. A Right click the entry and select properties. Hit the 'Reply' tab, A enable

Re: PGP signature removal?

2003-01-01 Thread Allie Martin
In [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], Mary Bull [MB] wrote:' MB In my experience reading these lists, there must be two Enter MB clicks below the 'cut' line. For the signature delimiter to work? No, the extra empty lines aren't necessary. If you prefer having them there then your choice

Re: PGP signature removal?

2003-01-01 Thread Jonathan Angliss
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wednesday, January 01, 2003, Mary Bull wrote... J [1] See comment a little further down :) I think you are right, and I did get caught in trying to quote Melissa's MACRO. I am very inexperienced. Would have been better just to refer to it and

Re: PGP signature removal?

2003-01-01 Thread Jonathan Angliss
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wednesday, January 01, 2003, Marck D Pearlstone wrote... JA The correct version taken right from the website looks like this: ... snip That won't work either - PGP has '- ' quoted the lines that start with '-'. Then maybe the template on

Re: PGP signature removal?

2003-01-01 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Jonathan, @1-Jan-2003, 11:25 -0600 (17:25 UK time) Jonathan Angliss [JA] in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: That won't work either - PGP has '- ' quoted the lines that start with '-'. JA Then maybe the template on the main

Re: PGP signature removal?

2003-01-01 Thread M. Evans
Allie Martin, We wonder why other clients never incorporate some of the no brainer features of TB!. I wonder the same about this feature of PMMail. Exactly right. Good P G P support is one reason I bought Bat. Among other things, I use digital signatures to verify consulting contracts with

Re: PGP signature removal?

2003-01-01 Thread Jonathan Angliss
That won't work either - PGP has '- ' quoted the lines that start with '-'. JA Then maybe the template on the main site needs to be updated JA no? Nono - you misunderstand me :-). When you quoted it, there were some lines of the macro that begin with '-'. You then PGP signed the

Re: PGP signature removal?

2003-01-01 Thread Gavin Sinclair
On Wednesday, January 1, 2003, 3:27:37 PM, Gavin wrote: Hi all, [PGP signatures argably shouldn't be displayed in emails,] but the help and the FAQ mention nothing. Now that one or two reply templates have been published, could all this info be shoehorned into the FAQ somewhere? Cheers,

Re: PGP signature removal?

2003-01-01 Thread Allie Martin
In [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], Gavin Sinclair [GS] wrote:' GS Now that one or two reply templates have been published, could GS all this info be shoehorned into the FAQ somewhere? It's already there in the macro and solutions library:

Re: PGP signature removal?

2002-12-31 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Gavin, On Wed, 1 Jan 2003 15:27:37 +1100 GMT (01/01/03, 11:27 +0700 GMT), Gavin Sinclair wrote: A lot of messages on this list, and some on others I frequent, use PGP signatures that hide the actual message in a forest of crap. The Bat! being the powerful program it is, there must be a

Re: PGP signature removal?

2002-12-31 Thread Gavin Sinclair
On Wednesday, January 1, 2003, 5:03:07 PM, Melissa wrote: A lot of messages on this list, and some on others I frequent, use PGP signatures that hide the actual message in a forest of crap. :-) One person's forest of crap might be another's wondrous choreography of sparkling ciphertext!

Re: PGP, Signature Format, OK?

2001-05-16 Thread Thomas
Hi Nick, On Tue, 15 May 2001 22:19:49 -0700GMT (16/05/2001, 13:19 +0800GMT), Nick Andriash wrote: NA At first glance it would appear not. The signature delimiter is hyphen NA hyphen space, and even though a PGP signature will dash escape that text, NA The Bat! will still recognize the

Re: PGP, Signature Format, OK?

2001-05-16 Thread Nick Andriash
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On May 16, 2001, at 12:34:06 AM, Thomas wrote: No. You have to use a RegEx to cut off the sig, if it is different from the basic dash-dash-space-enter. TB does *not* recognise dash-space-dash-dash-space-enter as a sig delimiter. It sure does on

Re: PGP, Signature Format, OK?

2001-05-16 Thread Peter Palmreuther
Hello Nick, On Wednesday, May 16, 2001 at 9:53:17 AM you wrote: NA It sure does on my machine, and I have no Regex's in my reply Template. If NA I take any message of mine and hit the reply button, all information below NA my delimiter is omitted. shrug I don't know why, but you seem to make

Re: PGP, Signature Format, OK?

2001-05-16 Thread Dierk Haasis
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Peter! On Wednesday, May 16, 2001 at 11:19:36 AM you wrote: I don't know why, but you seem to make something right. I've also already noticed the PGP-delimiter is used meanwhile, but, it's harm, not all the time. YOUR mails I can reply to

Re: PGP, Signature Format, OK?

2001-05-16 Thread Nick Andriash
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On May 16, 2001, at 8:38:25 AM, Dierk Haasis wrote: Confirmed, sometimes it works, sometimes it doesn't. On your messages it doesn't... but on mine, it does. shrug Win98SE with PGP 7.1, GnuPG 1.0.5 through GnuPGShell 1.76 and WinPT 0.2.0 Nick -

Re: PGP, Signature Format, OK?

2001-05-16 Thread Marck D. Pearlstone
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Nick, On 16 May 2001 at 08:35:16 -0700 (which was 16:35 where I live) Nick Andriash wrote to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and made these points: NA Yes, I've noted that when you hit the reply button on Marck's NA messages, the delimiter is ignored for

Re: PGP, Signature Format, OK?

2001-05-16 Thread Nick Andriash
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On May 16, 2001, at 9:01:33 AM, Marck D. Pearlstone wrote: Just did a dummy run. The answer is the plug-in. I will do the same again - signed from the tool tray and you'll see it's fine. Yes, it is in the Plugin. My last message was signed via

Re: PGP, Signature Format, OK?

2001-05-15 Thread Thomas
Hello Paddy, On Tue, 15 May 2001 09:56:48 -0700 GMT (16/05/01, 00:56 +0800 GMT), Paddy L wrote: PL Have I properly formatted the PGP signature Probably (if I could only check it). PL and the cut off (-- )? That one is being mutilated by PGP signing. There is a RegEx to correct it. --

Re: PGP, Signature Format, OK?

2001-05-15 Thread Nick Andriash
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On May 15, 2001, at 9:56:48 AM, Paddy L wrote: Have I properly formatted the PGP signature and the cut off (-- )? At first glance it would appear not. The signature delimiter is hyphen hyphen space, and even though a PGP signature will dash escape

Re: PGP signature verification: always get invalid signature format

2000-10-26 Thread A . Curtis Martin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thu, 26 Oct 2000 00:20:24 -0500, Tony A. T. Mendina wrote: [snip] TATM Moral of the story: check all your settings carefully when you TATM discover a "bug!" A very important moral there. Another is to also carefully check if other

Re: PGP signature verification: always get invalid signature format

2000-10-25 Thread Tony A. T. Mendina
Tony A. T. Mendina [EMAIL PROTECTED] said at 11:57 PM on 10/24/2000: This kind of think came up this time last year, and though the discussion on how to transliterate Russian names was interesting, I couldn't find a solution in the archives. So here I am. And now I want to post my solution