Hello Stuart,
On Monday, December 11, 2017, you wrote:
> Hello Chris,
> Monday, December 11, 2017, 7:29:35 AM, you wrote:
>> One question though. Mail with photo content or linkss to web sites,
>> when transferred to my phone via GMAIL loses that content and appears
>> plain text, with no
Hello MAU,
On Monday, December 11, 2017, you wrote:
> Hello Chris,
>> Thanks for the very kind offer, filters text sent by e-mail!
> Have you done as I suggested in my previous replay 3 days ago?
>> - I have seen that most (if not all) have the Option "Continue
>> processing with
Hello MAU,
On Thursday, December 7, 2017, you wrote:
> Hello Chris,
>> Any further ideas please?
> Not much more to suggest, I'm afraid.
> - Are you using any Common Filters at all?
None
> - What about another filter down the list as Stuart Cuddy suggests?
I can't see anything although
Hello MAU,
On Thursday, December 7, 2017, you wrote:
> Hello Chris,
>> OK, thanks for checking, I must be doing something daft then. Maybe one
>> of you would be kind enough to look at what I have done here please??
> OK, what I would do in your case:
> Filter: My New Mail Folder
>
Hello MAU,
OK, thanks for checking, I must be doing something daft then. Maybe one
of you would be kind enough to look at what I have done here please??
http://www.gatesgarth.com/filter1.jpg
http://www.gatesgarth.com/filter2.jpg
Thanks, sorry to be a pain!
On Wednesday, December 6, 2017,
Hello Stuart,
No, but I have altered it now to "Source folder is: one of : ~/~/My
Mail Thanks for sticking with me ;)
On Wednesday, December 6, 2017, you wrote:
> Hello Chris,
> Wednesday, December 6, 2017, 11:02:50 AM, you wrote:
>> Nope, the sub filter still forwards every incoming
Hello Stuart,
Nope, the sub filter still forwards every incoming mail to GMAIL. Sorry
to be a pain, any other ideas? I felt sure that would work! Thanks.
Filter order relevant???
On Wednesday, December 6, 2017, you wrote:
> Hello Chris,
> Wednesday, December 6, 2017, 10:38:56 AM, you
Hello Stuart,
Ahh, silly me, I have never noticed the sub filter option, and,
obviously, never tried to use it, i have done as you suggested, we'll
see what happens! :) Thanks again Stuart.
On Wednesday, December 6, 2017, you wrote:
> Hello Chris,
> Wednesday, December 6, 2017,
Hello Stuart,
That's exactly how I did it, a second action after Move To : My Mail
Folder
I put a second action Forward To: (my GMAIL account)
But *every* mail that arrived to that PC was forwarded, not just the
ones which had been moved... Even placing that filter at the bottom of
the
Hello MAU,
On Friday, August 22, 2014, you wrote:
Hello Chris,
My filter is To: contains softroc...@yahoogroups.com
and it's stopped working. Why is this if I am using Contains as a
filter, it still contains part of the old address?
Because 'softroc...@stage.yahoogroups.com'
Hello Roger,
first of all thanks for your answer.
Sorry for my wrong description of what I called address book, I meant indeed
address groups and that implies that I have to create for each email address
one address book entry and that is something exactly what I would like to
avoid. It will
Hello Monsell,
Wednesday, March 12, 2008, 5:05:45 AM, among other things, you wrote:
2.In the 'Action' section of your filter use the item 'Address
groups' and in that, enter the name of the group you set up in
the address book. The occurrence of any one of the addreses will
trigger
Hello Roelof,
Wednesday, March 12, 2008, 1:08:36 PM, among other things, you wrote:
RO Hallo monsell,
RO On Wed, 12 Mar 2008 08:35:45 +0530GMT (12-3-2008, 4:05 +0100, where I
RO live), you wrote:
2.In the 'Action' section of your filter use the item 'Address
groups' and in that, enter
Hello Robert,
Sunday, February 3, 2008, 10:11:27 AM, you wrote:
RT Hello Jonathan,
RT Sunday, February 3, 2008, 1:39:21 PM, you wrote:
I have 3.99.29 installed. I've noticed that on my IMAP accounts, the
filtering doesn't always work. When I exit and restart the program,
and then select
Hello Dwight,
Sunday, February 3, 2008, 11:08:15 AM, you wrote:
DAC I continue to wonder what the point of filtering in TB! for IMAP. All
DAC my filtering is done server side. That way I don't have to wait until
DAC TB! has been run to have my mail filtered. If I am filtering on a
DAC machine at
Hello Michael,
Monday, April 30, 2007, 3:34:30 AM, among other things, you wrote:
MR I'm not new to TheBat. I did notice this problem, though when messages were
MR automatically moving after I checked them.
OK, no offence meant. I assumed you might be new because of your question
about Read
Hello Doug,
Sunday, April 29, 2007, 9:55:37 PM, among other things, you wrote:
DH Thanks Roger for the spacebar tip. I've been using TheBat! for at
DH least four years but this is new to me. Am I supposed to read the
DH manual or something?!
Perhaps, but it is not kept up to date! For a
rg I have a spam filter meant to trigger if a subject line contains
rg [SPAM]. ... the filter is ignoring the brackets ... as any message
rg with SPAM anywhere in the subject line is being sent to the spam
rg folder.
rg Must I do something special to alert the filtering tools NOT to
rg ignore the
IAW Try a \ before each [ or ] to make the [ or ] seen literally.
rg Old string = [SPAM]
rg New string = \[SPAM\]
rg With the old string the filter ignored the []s so ANY message with SPAM
rg in the subject (no matter with or without the []s) was placed in the
rg junk folder.
rg With the new
Hello John,
Tuesday, May 2, 2006, 7:14:01 AM, you wrote:
Another issue which puzzles me:-
Write a new filter, it goes to the bottom of the heap, and it doesn't work.
Move it to the top, and Bingo, works.
Why is this and how to find / fix whatever is causing this problem?
Since filters
Hi Stuart,
On Tue, 2 May 2006, at 07:45:45 [GMT-0500] (which was 22:45:45 Australian
Eastern Time) you wrote:
Also if one of your
filters does not have continue processing checked it will not proceed
to the next filter.
Should all filters have this option selected?
That's up to you -
Friday, September 09, 2005, Roelof Otten [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
..
JP What is the purpose of Common Filters?
To use the same filter for multiple accounts.
When you're using common filters, those will be checked first and then
the account filters will be checked.
Are common filters
Hello John,
Friday, September 9, 2005, 6:50:38 PM, you wrote:
JP Is there something else I should be doing here to get common filters to
JP work?
Go into sorting office and copy the filter you are trying and then
paste it here. We will take a look at it.
Another issue you may want to
Wednesday, September 07, 2005, Roelof Otten [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 7 Sep 2005 19:22:44 -0400GMT (8-9-2005, 1:22 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
.
Z 2. I have a filter for Outgoing message; and I want that message marked
Z as UNread. Looking under the Action tab, the only
Hello Tony,
Monday, June 13, 2005, 7:30:12 AM, you wrote:
This filter moves TBUDL mail from INBOX to TBUDL folder. Cut it from here
and paste it into your Sorting Office Filters then adjust the path in the
Actions tab.
Thanks. Got the filter working correctly now. :)
--
Best regards,
Hello Marck,
Monday, June 13, 2005, 7:34:15 AM, you wrote:
My bad. I had updated the other 3 list filter instructions but not the
TBUDL one. Even the monthly reminder had the right version. I have
updated it now and it says:
Set up a filter for incoming mail which looks for:
Header Field
Hello Paul,
Wednesday, May 4, 2005, 9:51:36 PM, you wrote:
PB I rely mainly on positive filters in the bat, like known, and can
PB live with that.
That is the issue. These spam messages were ending up in my 'known'
folder even though they did not come from a known sender.
--
Best regards,
Hello MAU,
Tuesday, May 3, 2005, 1:41:56 PM, you wrote:
M Hello MikeD,
Using The Bat! v3.5 Return RC1
M You are using a beta version, you should post this in the TBBeta list.
Ooops ... sorry. Grabbed the wrong email
--
Best regards,
MikeDmailto:[EMAIL
Thursday, January 27, 2005, 10:38:28 PM, Greg Strong wrote:
Greg However Jeanny has another problem:
Greg The Bat! 2.10.03 on Windows XP , version 5.1, build 2600.Service Pack 2
Greg She is using v2 versus Beta 3.0.2.10 for Bill which uses the NFS which
Greg is different. I don't believe should
Thursday, January 27, 2005, 3:47:10 PM, Tony Boom wrote:
JH How do I make it so that just messages from her to me are
JH filtered into her folder?
Tony Send your filter to this list with her name, your name, as they appear in
Tony the to and from feilds and the folder you want them to go to
Thursday, January 27, 2005, 3:45:23 PM, Richard Wakeford wrote:
JH I had it set up that way, then POOF!, it stopped working.
Richard Weird isn't it. the only thing I've found to do is delete the filter
and
Richard then set it up again exactly the same as before. It should kick into
Richard
Hi MAU,
Wednesday, September 1, 2004, 12:28:36 PM, you wrote:
M Hello Morgan,
I am stuck with this new filtering system. I want to make a filter
to auto move all of the message on TBUDL. Personally I preferred the
old system however others are saying that this new system will be
Hi MAU,
Wednesday, September 1, 2004, 12:59:41 PM, you wrote:
M Hello Morgan,
quote
Set up a filter for incoming mail which looks for Strings Location
Presence Reply-to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Kludges Yes Options: Regular
expressions (Checked).
/quote
How do I do this in the NFS? I can't
==Original message text===
From: Charles M. Gerungan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Adam [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Saturday, June 26, 2004, 1:49:03 AM
Subject: Filtering...
CMG Hello Adam,
CMG On Fri, 25 Jun 2004 15:23:44 -0230UTC Adam wrote:
I've made a filter who deletes the
Thanks Martin,
The filter u suggested worked perfectly!!
thanks
Hello Martin,
Saturday, May 22, 2004, 9:07:26 AM, you wrote:
MW -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
MW Hash: SHA1
MW Hello Vijay,
MW On 22 May 2004, 08:41 -0500 (14:41 local time) Vijay [V] in
MW mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wednesday, December 24, 2003, 5:47:22 PM, you wrote:
On Wednesday, December 24, 2003, 6:35:48 PM, Munango-Keewati
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
MK Hello TBUDL,
MK Is it possible to filter on HTML tags, such as html or !? I've
MK been trying without success, using the Text setting. Doesn't the
Monday, August 25, 2003, 8:28:38 AM, Roelof wrote:
R On Mon, 25 Aug 2003 08:05:32 -0400GMT (25-8-03, 14:05 +0200,
R where I live), you wrote:
DK I'd like it to work this way: X-Text-Classification: mvst
DK move to folderSwim Team
R Go to the sorting office (Account - Sorting office)
R
Hi Thomas,
On Monday, August 25, 2003 at 4:40 PM, Thomas wrote:
It 's a good idea for the wishlist. I just checked, and Incoming
filters, while they have a drop-down box arrow, don't actually have a
drop-down box. Would be nice if you could choose Source folder from
anywhere. Add it to the
On Saturday, August 23, 2003, Allie Martin wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Karen Kay, [KK] wrote:
KK It used to be that my filtering filtered mail into folders, and
KK anything not already filtered would go to the Inbox.
KK Now, for some reason, mail not affected by the
On Saturday, August 23, 2003, Roelof Otten wrote:
Does this happen on receiving them or on closing TB. If it's the
latter than maybe you've changed the properties of the inbox to remove
messages older than zero days.
You can check these properties by selecting the inbox in the account
tree
On Saturday, August 23, 2003, Thomas Fernandez wrote:
Hm. You seem to be sure that there is no filter that catches other
parts of the message and therefore moves it to trash.
My filtering is all on sender, recipient, and subject. I went through and
checked that.
I finished a paper on Wireless
On Saturday, August 23, 2003, Thomas Fernandez wrote:
What do you mean by they will need something else to do. No! They
need to listen to me! putting foot firmly on floor (LOL) But you seem
to have experience with presentations...
But 111 slides is 19 pages. IMNSHO it *is* too much, even as a
On Saturday, August 23, 2003, Allie Martin wrote:
In that case I'd have to agree with Roelof's impression that something
has been corrupted and you may have to start fresh with your filters,
i.e., actually deleting the accounts .srx file and recreating the
filters.
Right. My problem was that
On Saturday, August 23, 2003, Allie Martin wrote:
KK Right. My problem was that I redid the filters twice, and didn't
KK know what file to delete. Deleting the account.srx file seems to
KK have done the trick so far.
Did you manually recreate the filters from scratch.
Yes.
For the future, you
On Friday, August 22, 2003, Thomas Fernandez wrote:
Do you have any filter that moves messages to trash? It may be a
catch-all.
Yes, I have several filters that move messages to trash. They all
specify a recipient that is some form of my domain name. Personal mail
is addressed to [EMAIL
On Friday, August 22, 2003, Thomas Fernandez wrote:
Hello Karen,
On Fri, 22 Aug 2003 22:37:15 -0500 GMT (23/08/2003, 10:37 +0700 GMT),
Karen Kay wrote:
Do you have any filter that moves messages to trash? It may be a
catch-all.
Yes, I have several filters that move messages to trash. They
Hello,
Ok, I get it working, but I'm not sure I did it the right way. First of all,
completely automaticle seems not working. I probably so something wrong or dont
use right method. Any advice is welkome of course.
I have now:
in my normal account (the one that read the pop3 server) ar rule to
Monday, June 9, 2003, 1:33:12 PM, Bill McCarthy wrote:
Bill Since you need two conditions on the filtering strings, click
Bill Add. In the first field, type Jeanny's string. In the second,
Bill type Michelle's string and change location to Recipient.
Bill Finally, give your new rule a name and
Hello,
t I tried to apply an antispam method by applying a filtering with
It's hard to see what's wrong with your filter if you don't post it.
;-)
I didn't know it was possible t copy parameters with ctrl/c, so excuse
me !
Go to the sorting office, select your antispam filter, press Ctrl-C
Hello John,
This should help you with your filtering problems
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/filtering.html
Thanks I had read it before without finding the solution ...
You can use the Pipe character to separate multiple words that you
want in a string... for example this | would
Hello Gerard,
What you do is check to see if words appeat anywere in youre email, not
just the TEXT part.
yes and no ! I tried with all conditions, it's idem !
The problem is that you use a lot of common words like get, check,
please, etc.
If you receive an email in English my guess is
Hello,
That's easy. Each set has a filtering string and that's what you see,
but there's also a location and a presence and those are coded by the
50's and 30's you see.
OK, resolved this, no more 50, it was surely an error with
duplicating filters...
That's odd. The only way I can explain
Ming-Li and Thomas,
Thank you both for your various comments. I'm not sure yet which if
either of you understood or misunderstood my request, because I
haven't had a second to sit down and get into your responses in any
depth. I'll probably do it tonight, and post back tomorrow.
--
JN
Thomas,
Many thanks. I'll give it a try.
--
JN
Current version is 1.61 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Hello Dierk,
Tuesday, November 19, 2002, 12:54:23 AM, you wrote:
DH Hello Jos!
DH On Monday, November 18, 2002 at 10:37:00 AM you wrote:
in: Krung Thep Mahanakhon Amon Rattanakosin Mahinthara Ayuthaya
Mahadilok Phop Noppharat Ratchathani Burirom Udomratchaniwet
Mahasathan Amon Piman Awatan
Dear Thomas,
Saturday, November 16, 2002,you wrote:
On Sat, 16 Nov 2002 12:08:08 +0700 GMT (16/11/02, 12:08 +0700 GMT),
Jos Flachs wrote:
in: Krung Thep Mahanakhon Amon Rattanakosin Mahinthara Ayuthaya
Mahadilok Phop Noppharat Ratchathani Burirom Udomratchaniwet
Mahasathan Amon Piman
Hello Roelof,
Friday, November 15, 2002, 4:57:17 PM, you wrote:
JF If I use the shortcut (ctrl+shift+F), it works fine. But if I copy those
JF settings into the mail rule 'Moveto2' (in incoming mail) - no go.
RO Do you copy the new settings to the 'rule' tab on the moveto2 filter
RO or do you
Hello Tomas,
On Wednesday, September 25, 2002, 1:12:14 PM, you wrote:
T Bat! is great, yet if I could choose, it would probably be 50% Bat,
T 40% Poco, 10% Eudora. In fact, it was because of that multiple accounts
T obstacle, that I evaluated and dropped Bat! 2 times in the past.
Have you
Hello Sudip,
Monday, September 2, 2002, 10:26:43 AM, you wrote:
SP Why can't you use the Folder setting, keep messages in the base for n
SP number of days?
Wood and Trees?
Thanks Sudip
--
Best regards,
Barrymailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello Sudip,
Monday, September 2, 2002, 10:26:43 AM, you wrote:
SP Why can't you use the Folder setting, keep messages in the base for n
SP number of days?
I thought this was the answer, but it seems I have to remember to
'Purge' the folder for this option to work.
I was looking for something
Hello Sudip,
Monday, September 2, 2002, 4:32:23 PM, you wrote:
SP You don't have to. Just check the option Remove old messages on exit
SP and it is done automatically whenever you exit TB!
SP If you check compress folder on exit, then the messages are
SP automatically removed from the message
Hello Allie,
Wednesday, July 31, 2002, 2:46:35 AM, you wrote:
ACM -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
ACM Hash: SHA1
ACM In message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED],
ACM Michael Thompson [MT] wrote:
MT Is it possible to specify a filter based on whether the Sender /
MT Recipient is in
Hello Allie,
Wednesday, July 31, 2002, 2:57:58 AM, you wrote:
MT I know, but this is only a condition of a existing filter. I need
MT to make a filter *based* on wheather they are in a specific group.
ACM At first your request sounded straight forward but I'm beginning to
ACM wonder if you
Hello Allie,
Wednesday, July 31, 2002, 3:34:08 AM, you wrote:
ACM I know this. Otherwise it would just be a matter of filling the sender
ACM or recipient address in the signal strings dialog. Maybe a couple
ACM examples of the filters I use will help.
ACM I have a filter setup that will check
Hello Roelof,
RO I suppose you might be using a wrong condition. Why don't you paste
RO the filter into a message, so we can see it?
RO (You can paste a filter into a message, by selecting the filter, press
RO Ctrl-C to copy it (don't use the copy-button) and paste it in the
RO message with
Hello Roelof,
Thursday, June 27, 2002, 2:52:33 PM, you wrote:
RO At the options tab, uncheck 'enable regular expressions'
RO BTW Why do you have 'continue processing with other filters' enabled?
RO That's only necessary when the messages that trigger this filter have
RO to trigger another
Thank you - it never occurred to me that the parking might be the
problem. I have tried taking that off, the messages now seem to
appear only once, in the correct folders, with the color group
applied. I suppose I'll just have to park them manually, unless I can
work out a way to get another
Hello Marck,
I filter all UK enquiries into a seperate folder so can't filter just
on Access World - Development:.
I thought there was a way to say, ThisString(Append This|Or This)
There could be 200 countries to cater for if I did alternatives.
--
Best regards,
Jon
Thursday, May 23,
The exact situation is this: I have mailing list messages filtered
into individual folders. One of those folders is for mail pertaining
to a particular Beta program. Among those messages are occasional
ones from one of the developers, announcing the release of a new Beta
version. I would like
That would do it. I was thinking in a linear mode, and the idea of
starting out parallel from the beginning didn't even occur to me
Thanks.
Allie C Martin wrote on Monday, March 18, 2002:
How about filtering on the developers name or e-mail address and have it
move the message to
Hello Lars,
18. januar 2002, 21:58:35, you wrote:
LG String:Location:Presence:
LG Reply-To:.*[EMAIL PROTECTED]Kludges Yes
LG and activate regular expressions for this filter.
I filter (all my mailing lists, not just TB*) like this:
String:
PAT Is there some way to set up filtering so that it cascades - i.e. so that
PAT when messages are moved into the inbox box1 from filters on other accounts,
PAT these messages then get filtered by box1's filters automatically?
TF Not at the moment, but we were told it is planned for the next
Tuesday, November 20, 2001, 4:12:25 PM, you wrote:
AS - Original Message -
AS From: Thomas F [EMAIL PROTECTED]
AS To: Alastair Scott on TBUDL [EMAIL PROTECTED]
AS Sent: 20 November 2001 2:49 pm
AS Subject: Re: filtering on language
On Tue, 20 Nov 2001 14:29:05 - GMT
Hello Jan,
20. november 2001, 18:32:50, you wrote:
JR I'm not sure I understand where this content-encoding
JR header 8859- resides. I searched the header for this w/o
JR result.
Check this message. It's encoding is ISO-8859-2, so it has this in the
headers:
Content-Type: text/plain;
Hello Jan,
20. november 2001, 23:01:58, you wrote:
JR So this is not something that is set by the email client
JR automatically? Would it be safe for me to assume that if
JR this guy is using a Turkish email program that it would
JR just be set up that way or if he was using a
Januk Aggarwal [JA], on Tuesday, October 16, 2001 at 02:01 (-0700)
contributed this to our collective wisdom:
JA What version of Internet Explorer do you use? I think you need the
JA scripting engine from version 5.0 or later. Also, is Windows
JA Scripting host installed on your machine?
I
Hey A,
Saturday, July 07, 2001, 8:31:29 PM, my MUA believes you used
The Bat! (v1.53d) to write:
JN How do I set up a filter that puts all incoming mail from
JN @CNN.com to a specific folder?
TM Account \ Sorting Office/Filters (Shift+Ctrl+S)
TM Select New
TM Give your new filter a name
TM
On Monday, July 02, 2001, 1:43:16 PM, you wrote:
NA Yes. In the Filters/Advanced tab, you can select Address(es) Must
NA Be Listed in the Address Book, and even define it further as to
NA Sender, Recipient, and Groups. You can even define your filter for
NA the opposite to take place...
Hi Marck,
On Monday, July 02, 2001 18:53:42 [ +0100 GMT], you wrote the
following in regards to 'Filtering based on address book':
Marck Yes, and it is in the help under Advanced Filtering Options. Check
Marck the Advanced tab in the sorting office.
Although it may be redundant, isn't it
Thomas,
Friday, May 11, 2001, 8:52:41 AM, you wrote:
T This is exactly what I do for the TB lists.
T String: Reply-To: TBUDL
T Presence: Yes
T Location: Kludges
I've tried it and indeed, it works like a charm. For some reason I had
the (apparently misguided) idea that when filtering on
Hello Thomas and other TBUDLS,
On Thursday, February 08, 2001 at 12:14:23 GMT +0800 Thomas wrote on "Filtering
on Sender":
T I think the fitlers get a problem with the trinagular brackets around the
T email address, though. If the filter doesn't work, try deleting the brackets.
It seems to me
--
On Thursday, January 25, 2001, 1:53:29 PM, A. Curtis Martin wrote:
Abigail How do you set it up to assign a forwarded/redirected
Abigail message to a specific color group? I still don't see any
Abigail filtering options that would help to identify these
Abigail
Hello Allie,
On Thursday, January 25, 2001 16:53:29 [ -0500 GMT], you wrote the
following in regards to 'Filtering/Sorting Forwarded and Redirected
Messages':
Allie For forwarded messages, this is simple since all forwarded
Allie messages have a 'Fwd:' prefix in the subject.
Allie You could
Jumat, Subuh (was Evening in my town),
[..in milis thebat!..], A wrote:
A's The Bat! (v1.49c) Personal rip
Kludges
A's The Bat! (v1.49c) Personal rip
what's Kludges mean ?
TIA
--
i, written at Wake'Up time
solid snake mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] [ICQ: 105782737 ]
--
--
On Wednesday, January 24, 2001, 10:21:50 AM, Jan Rifkinson wrote:
Abigail 1. When I read and forward or redirect the message, I want the
Abigail message automatically moved.
JR I currently do something that I think you mean here is how I do it.
JR I
STOP SPAMING ME WITH THESE MESSAGES !!!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Abigail Marshall
Sent: Wednesday, January 24, 2001 1:27 PM
To: Jan Rifkinson
Subject: Re[2]: Filtering/Sorting Forwarded and Redirected Messages
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi A. Curtis,
On Tuesday, November 14, 2000 @ 09:46:43 -0500 you
wrote the following in regards to Filtering query:
A. Curtis [...] It's possible to be precise when using the
A. Curtis Kludges but this will not be the case
Sunday, October 08, 2000, Ming-Li [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sunday, October 08, 2000, 2:35:51 PM, Januk wrote:
I have a filter with 2 conditions -- OR, not AND. When I put one
condition on the Alternatives tab, it doesn't work. When I put
it on the Rule tab with "|", it works. There
Ming-Li,
Regarding your message dated: 11 August 2000...
ML Instead of "moving" mail to the main account's Inbox, set your
ML filters for other accounts to "redirect" mail to the main account.
ML Then enable the "Allow local delivery" option in [Options | Network
ML Administration]. This way,
Hello Ming-Li,
Thursday, July 27, 2000, 8:37:22 AM, you wrote:
ML Hi Arnie,
While on the rule tab in Sorting Office I assumed that because
Filtering Strings was already blank (default) that I could
ignore it. Much to my dismay none of my manual filters worked.
As it turns out, you
Hello Thomas,
Thursday, July 20, 2000, 11:15:04 PM, you wrote:
TF Hi Clif,
TF On Thu, 20 Jul 2000 22:48:09 -0700GMT (21/07/2000, 13:48 +0800GMT),
TF Clif Oliver wrote:
TF [...]
CO So a message from [EMAIL PROTECTED] comes in, I see it in my Inbox, read
CO it and simply want to file it as
Hello Allie,
Sunday, May 07, 2000, 8:17:51 PM, you wrote:
AM On Sun, 07 May 2000 20:09:28 -0600, Douglas Hinds wrote:
FFO! I had asked for that half a year ago! (That's more good
news, all for the price of a free upgrade).
AM The feature has been there for quite some time. Message age
AM
On Tuesday, May 09, 2000, 5:52:46 AM, Januk Aggarwal said on the
subject "Filtering READ messages to NON-TB folder":
JA As far as I know, this is not possible directly. But what you
JA can do is create a folder in TB called TBUDL Archive. Then
JA under folder properties, change the path
Hello Tom and Bat Buddies...
"Attachments" are all handled in the message body. There is no
attachment information in the header because there doesn't need to be:
the header is simply to give routing information. The attachments are
part of the message body typically in a format known as
Hello Marck and all TBUDLers,
Sunday, May 07, 2000, 2:49:05 AM, you wrote in response to Jason's
points on the subject of "Filtering / Deleting messages w/ *.vbs
attachments" and using the "anywhere" parameter.
MDP Depends where you specified it. Was it on the Alternatives tab?
MDP If not,
Hello Allie et al TBUDLers,
Sunday, May 07, 2000, 9:58:37 AM, you wrote:
AM I don't know if this whole thing of deleting messages with .vbs
AM attachments is the right approach. It's highly non-specific and
AM the message body will be gone as well which may contain
AM important material. We're
Hello Allie,
Sunday, May 07, 2000, 3:39:18 PM, you wrote:
AM On Sun, 07 May 2000 14:33:05 -0600, Douglas Hinds wrote:
I have dedicated a three character wide space for my memo column,
which I use only to indicate the presence of a memo and it's
importance. Being more or less convenient or
Hello Jast,
Sunday, May 07, 2000, 2:03:30 PM, you wrote in reference to my
saying:
As is, I can either turn it off for all folders or cuss the hell out of
it when I'm forced to wait until it counts the thousands of unread
messages that have accumulated in TB! since September of '99, when
Hello The Bat! users,
I wrote at 5/6/2000, 3:21 PM
S Try View-Display-Advanced Filtering...-Header-Sender's name
S contains [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Huh, just tried it to be absolutely sure, and it DOESN'T WORK for me!
Sorry...
--
Cheers, SyP
In love, she who gives her portrait promises the
Hi Allie Martin,
On Saturday, May 06, 2000 at 3:50:05 PM you wrote:
It does a simple string matching with the from field and nothing more.
No, it doesn't. It does that simple match with the small part of the
from-field that's actually _visible_. (BTW, can I configure that
anywhere?)
1 - 100 of 111 matches
Mail list logo
