Smilies

Hello tbudl, I know this is probably a silly question, but how does one use smilies? Sorry if this has been covered over and over, but I can't seem to find it within all of the thousands of messages :-) -- Take care, Kathy mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using Th

Adding Smilies

Hello , All Can someone please tell me where i unzip the smilies folder and MSL file too -- Best regards, Barry Current version is 3.00.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: Smilies

Hello Kathy, On 06 September 2004, 15:11 -0400 (06/09/200420:11 local time) Kathy Dunham [KD] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: KD> I know this is probably a silly question, but how does one use KD> smilies? Sorry if this has been covered over and over, but I can't KD> seem to

Some Smilies incomplete

Hello Bat users, I notice that some of the smilies (from the pcwsmilies file, I think) do not display fully in my version of the bat. The right hand side of some is truncated. The following are examples: :hooray: :pointmade: Also, :bearhug: ends up with four arms, not two! When the GIFs are

Where's the smilies?

Hi. Using The Bat! 2.12 and I simply can't seem to find where to use smilies. I've looked everywhere, and just cannot discover them. I just know it's gotta be under my nose, so could some kind person please put me out of my misery and tell me? Many thanks. Peter

Re: Adding Smilies

Hello Barry, Sunday, September 5, 2004, 4:08:19 PM, you wrote: B> Can someone please tell me where i unzip the smilies folder and MSL B> file too In your TB folder, usually C:\Program Files\The Bat!, is a folder called images. Unzip the ZIP into that folder. The .MSL will stay in the

Definitive list of Smilies.

Hi TBUDL users, I've just changed my editor settings and am now appreciating all the smilies in their full colourful glory! Apologies if I've missed it somewhere or if I'm OT, but is the a definitive list anywhere of what combinations produce what smilies, or is it a case of tri

Re: Some Smilies incomplete

Hello Alan! On Tuesday, July 06, 2004, 8:41 PM, you wrote: AT> I notice that some of the smilies (from the pcwsmilies file, I think) AT> do not display fully in my version of the bat. The right hand side of AT> some is truncated. The following are examples: AT> :hooray: The

Re: Some Smilies incomplete

Dear Alan, @7-Jul-2004, 11:41 +1000 (07-Jul 02:41 UK time) Alan Thacker said: > Also, :bearhug: ends up with four arms, not two! Confirmed. > When the GIFs are viewed with the Windows viewer they are fine. Confirmed. > Any ideas? Maybe I just need to wait for a later Bat version? There are a

Re: Some Smilies incomplete

Hello Marck! On Wednesday, July 07, 2004, 2:46 AM, you wrote: AT>> Also, :bearhug: ends up with four arms, not two! MDP> Confirmed. AT>> When the GIFs are viewed with the Windows viewer they are fine. MDP> Confirmed. AT>> Any ideas? Maybe I just need to wait for a later Bat version? MDP> There a

Re: Some Smilies incomplete

Tuesday, July 6, 2004, 9:41:57 PM, Alan wrote: AT> Hello Bat users, AT> I notice that some of the smilies (from the pcwsmilies file, I think) AT> do not display fully in my version of the bat. The right hand side of AT> some is truncated. The following are examples: AT> :hooray

Re: Some Smilies incomplete

Hello Mary, Tuesday, July 6, 2004, 9:03:23 PM, you wrote: Mary> I didn't know any better. We have so many wild-and-woolly ones Mary> in the database that I honestly thought it was a 4-armed bear. Mary> Hey, I'm just the gofer!! But I did agree to take responsibility Mary> for any errors that I my

Re: Some Smilies incomplete

Hello Leif! On Tuesday, July 06, 2004, 11:52 PM, you wrote: LG> Plan9 has been gracious enough to fix the errant ones we've been LG> coming across, maybe he'd help again. :notworthy: He's just posted to tbot that :hooray: is fixed. So I asked him to see about the other two in a reply that I just

Re: Some Smilies incomplete

On Wednesday, July 7, 2004 @ 11:03:23 AM, Mary Bull wrote: [snips] AT>> Any ideas? Maybe I just need to wait for a later Bat version? Mary> This is going to need the attention of both Leif and 9Val, in my Mary> opinion. Which was one of the major worries voiced at the start of this whole thing

Re: Some Smilies incomplete

Hello 9Val! On Wednesday, July 07, 2004, 9:14 AM, you wrote: 9> Sounds like "9Val is everywhere" or "2004: 9Val is watching you" :)) Oh, I do hope so!! Would you be a back-up support person for me, as the newly appointed Keeper of the Smileys? I'd be your slave forever, if you could find the t

Re: Some Smilies incomplete

Wednesday, July 7, 2004, 10:22:06 AM, M wrote: Mary>> This is going to need the attention of both Leif and 9Val, in my Mary>> opinion. MicCullen> Which was one of the major worries voiced at MicCullen> the start of this whole thing :-( Not really. This is a user list and the smileys can be clea

Re: Some Smilies incomplete

Hello Plan9, Wednesday, July 7, 2004, 8:29:57 AM, you wrote: Plan9> Unless in his spare time 9val wants to code a gif viewer that Plan9> takes all variations into consideration and displays them as Plan9> the creator wanted, but didn't. :-D :-D If you shoot those to me at work, I'll upload them.

Re: Some Smilies incomplete

Hello 9Val! On Wednesday, July 07, 2004, 2:06 PM, you wrote: MB>> ... Would you be a back-up support person for me, as MB>> the newly appointed Keeper of the Smileys? MB>> I'd be your slave forever, if you could find the time to say Yes to MB>> that request!! :) 9> Yes, yes, yes! :notworthy:

Re: Some Smilies incomplete

Hello Plan9, On Wednesday, July 7, 2004, 11:45:23 PM, you wrote: < text deleted for the sake of brevity > > Why don't you try your hand at fixing these two. Usual cause is one or > more frames are smaller than the largest frame and TheBat seems to > reserve space for the smallest (first?).

Re: Some Smilies incomplete

Wednesday, July 7, 2004, 9:32:29 PM, Alan wrote: >> Why don't you try your hand at fixing these two. AT> I have fixed them (using Jasc Animation Shop). It seems that by saving AT> them with optimisation towards a bigger filesize did the trick. AT> Thanks for the suggestion that I try fixing them

Re: Where's the smilies?

Hi Peter, On 7/26/2004 12:21 AM my time, Peter wrote: PB> Hi. Using The Bat! 2.12 and I simply can't seem to find where PB> to use smilies. I've looked everywhere, and just cannot discover PB> them. I just know it's gotta be under my nose, so could some kind PB> per

Re: Where's the smilies?

Hi Darrin, On 7/26/2004 12:34 AM my time, Darrin wrote: DR> You might also find this useful: http://tinyurl.com/6y333 The link above isnt the one I meant to send. It was this: http://tinyurl.com/58zzv -- Darrin WinXP Home Service Pack 1 Tbat! 2.12.00 "Computer Science: solving today's proble

Re: Definitive list of Smilies.

Chris Weaven, [CW] wrote: CW> Apologies if I've missed it somewhere or if I'm OT, but is the a CW> definitive list anywhere of what combinations produce what smilies, or CW> is it a case of trial & error/suck it and see? There's a folder called 'Images' in

Re: Definitive list of Smilies.

Message received at: 6/4/2004:7:05 PM CW> Hi TBUDL users, CW> I've just changed my editor settings and am now appreciating all CW> the smilies in their full colourful glory! CW> Apologies if I've missed it somewhere or if I'm OT, but is the a CW> definitive list

Re: Definitive list of Smilies.

Allie Martin wrote: > Chris Weaven, [CW] wrote: CW>> Apologies if I've missed it somewhere or if I'm OT, but is the a CW>> definitive list anywhere of what combinations produce what smilies, or CW>> is it a case of trial & error/suck it and see? > Ther

Re: Definitive list of Smilies.

Hello George, Saturday, June 5, 2004, 3:36:56 AM, you wrote (possibly edited): >> There's a folder called 'Images' in the TB! installation directory. In >> it are all the smileys and a file called pdsf.msl. Open that file in >> a plain text viewer. > I added it as a pad in SmartBat for ease of re

Re: Definitive list of Smilies.

en that file AM> in a plain text viewer. Ah ha, excellent. There really are some 'interesting' smilies in there! What's this one all about :42:? omg -- Cheers, Chris Using The Bat! v2.11.02 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 _

Re: Definitive list of Smilies.

Hi, On Saturday, June 5, 2004 11:51 our local time, Chris Weaven [CW] wrote; CW> What's this one all about :42:? omg Opps, :42: -- Cheers, Chris Using The Bat! v2.11.02 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Current version is 2.11.02

Re: Definitive list of Smilies.

Saturday, June 5, 2004, Chris Weaven wrote: > Opps, :42: There's this book, "The Hitchiker's Guide To the Galaxy" by Douglas Adams (actually it's a trilogy consisting of five books)... Without revealing too much I can tell you that forty-two is of great importance. -- Urban Socrates was a famo

Re: Definitive list of Smilies.

Chris Weaven @ 2004-Jun-5 6:54:02 AM "Definitive list of Smilies." <mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> :42: That's the answer to "Life! The Universe! Everything!" However, the question is another matter... -- Chris - Nun mi Esperanton lernas. Quoting when replying to this

Re[2]: Some Smilies incomplete

Hello Marck, MDP> why. It may be a fault in the component used to display animated MDP> GIFs. I could repost this in TBBETA but this also applies to the MDP> released version and I know that 9val reads here too ;-) . Sounds like "9Val is everywhere" or "2004: 9Val is watching you" :)) --

Re[2]: Some Smilies incomplete

Hello Mary, MB> Oh, I do hope so!! Would you be a back-up support person for me, as MB> the newly appointed Keeper of the Smileys? MB> I'd be your slave forever, if you could find the time to say Yes to MB> that request!! :) Yes, yes, yes! -- :9Val

Re[2]: Where's the smilies?

Hello Darrin, Monday, July 26, 2004, 7:36:56 PM, you wrote: > Hi Darrin, > On 7/26/2004 12:34 AM my time, Darrin wrote: DR>> You might also find this useful: http://tinyurl.com/6y333 > The link above isnt the one I meant to send. It was this: http://tinyurl.com/58zzv Thank you for respondi

Oh those smilies are killing me

Sorry folks, it's all rather too much for this simple Kiwi. Turning smilies off and heading for MicroEd. I'll come back when a smilie can be easily invoked via a toolbar button or something. Please don't let's loose sight of the fact that The Bat! is a fantastically powerful

Leif's h2g2 smilies for new TB! version

Hello fellow tbudl subscribers! *and Leif* Leif, thank you! I appreciate the two *Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy* emoticons that you created for Trill (my aka name, going back to the time when I didn't even know who Douglas Adams was, which you gave me over a year ago as a nickname that I tre

Re: Oh those smilies are killing me

Hello Peter! On Saturday, July 31, 2004, 2:59 PM, you wrote: PB> Please, I don't mean to criticise, and I am impressed with the PB> obvious knowledge and great camaraderie (is that spelt right I PB> wonder?) ,,, I think it is. :) PB> ... of everyone here. But, in the end I hav

Re: Oh those smilies are killing me

Hello Peter! On Saturday, July 31, 2004, 10:21 PM, you wrote: PB> Thanks for the gracious explaination Mary. I'll indeed park it for PB> when I get some spare time. PB> Errr :)? Err, put a space after the smiley symbol, before the question mark, like this :) ? Then the smiley will show for me.

Re: Oh those smilies are killing me

Mary- Sunday, August 1, 2004, 3:32:22 AM, you wrote: MB> written a three-symbol symbol Is that a TSS? Sorry... I'm being a bit symbol-minded today... -- -Mark Wieder Using The Bat! v1.63 Beta/7 on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 4 Cu

Yellow smilies don't seem to be working

Hi, For some reason, the little yellow smilie faces that are part of TB! don't seem to be working. I have the option enabled in editor preferences but still nothing. Any ideas? -- Regards, Chris Created using The Bat! v3.0.2.7 & IMAP OS of Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 __

Re: Leif's h2g2 smilies for new TB! version

Hello Mary, Friday, May 28, 2004, 12:14:12 PM, you wrote: Mary> So now I will have to get out of my comfortable, old-shoe Mary> version, with bugs and features that I'm used to, and learn the Mary> latest TB!, after June 1, 2004. It's not so bad! and you're welcome. You know I luv ya'. When I

Re: Leif's h2g2 smilies for new TB! version

On Friday, May 28, 2004, 2:14 PM, you wrote: MB> I read the entire thread (threads) about it on tbbeta, but I have a MB> fixed policy of only lurking there. MB> 42. Trill. make it :42: that makes it use the emoticon :) -- Paul Using The Bat! v2.11 Beta/8 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service

Re: Leif's h2g2 smilies for new TB! version

Saturday, May 29, 2004, 6:14:12 AM, Mary wrote: Surely this thread is: 1) OT 2) Beta related 3) A personal chit-chat referring to others of same ilk 4) Making some people wonder "What the hell are they talking about?" and therefore 5) Not appropriate for this list 6) Inappropriate for a moder

Rogues Smilies (WAS: Re: Import from Outlook fails)

Hello Leif, Thursday, June 17, 2004, 10:11:20 AM, you wrote: > You know.. this rouges smileys thing has actually worked out better > than I anticipated. I really, really like being able to put a face to > a name immediately while reading a message. Yeah, it's pretty slick isn't it? Although it i

Re[2]: Oh those smilies are killing me

Thanks for the gracious explaination Mary. I'll indeed park it for when I get some spare time. Errr :)? -- Peter in New Zealand. Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: Yellow smilies don't seem to be working

Hello Chris! On Friday, November 19, 2004, 7:23 AM, you wrote: CW> For some reason, the little yellow smilie faces that are part of CW> TB! don't seem to be working. CW> I have the option enabled in editor preferences but still nothing. Are you using Rich Text View? Right-click in the View Fold

Re: Yellow smilies don't seem to be working

Hi Mary, On Friday, November 19, 2004 08:06 your local time, which was 14:06 my local time, Mary Bull [MB] wrote; MB> Are you using Rich Text View? Right-click in the View Folder menu when MB> you're reading this message. There's a choice on the context menu. MB> Uncheck "Use plain text viewer" i

Re: Yellow smilies don't seem to be working

Hello Chris! On Friday, November 19, 2004, 8:43 AM, you wrote: MB>> Also, look in The Bat!/Images and be sure that you have both Default MB>> and default.msl files there. Hope this helps. If not, please let us MB>> know and we can explore further with you. :) CW> Ah ha, we could have a winner. N

Re: Yellow smilies don't seem to be working

Hi Mary, On Friday, November 19, 2004 08:51 your local time, which was 14:51 my local time, Mary Bull [MB] wrote; MB> Except--if someone would send you the files by PM. Would you like for MB> me to try that? My files are not the originals from The Bat! but a MB> sanitized, edited version. Ok, th

Re: Yellow smilies don't seem to be working

Hello Chris! On Friday, November 19, 2004, 10:26 AM, you wrote: MB>> If you want what comes with TB! we shall have to advertise for MB>> someone with an unedited version. :) CW> Does anyone have an unedited version of the files that they could CW> possibly send me? I'm certain that someone does

Re: Yellow smilies don't seem to be working

Hi Chris, on Fri, 19 Nov 2004 16:26:09 +GMT, you wrote: MB>> If you want what comes with TB! we shall have to advertise for someone MB>> with an unedited version. :) CW> Does anyone have an unedited version of the files that they could CW> possibly send me? I don't remember to have edited m

Re: Yellow smilies don't seem to be working

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Chris, A reminder of what Chris Weaven on TBUDL typed on: 19 November 2004 at 16:26:09 GMT + > Does anyone have an unedited version of the files that they could > possibly send me? I got one, it's on it's way. - -- Best regards,

Re: Yellow smilies don't seem to be working

Hello Maggie, A reminder of what Maggie on TBUDL typed on: 19 November 2004 at 15:23:18 GMT -0500 > I have. I've sent the default.msl file to you by PM. I bet she's got a dozen of them now, I sent her one too. -- Best regards,Tony. ___

Re: Yellow smilies don't seem to be working

Chris Weaven [CW], wrote: CW> Does anyone have an unedited version of the files that they could CW> possibly send me? You do... just re-run the MSI from Control Panel->Add or Remove Programs and select Repair... so long as you didn't delete the original installer. -- .\\artin | ICQ 15893823

Re: Yellow smilies don't seem to be working

Hi Tony, On Friday, November 19, 2004 21:19 our local time, Tony Boom [TB] wrote; >> I have. I've sent the default.msl file to you by PM. TB> I bet she's got a dozen of them now, I sent her one too. Ah, the danger of having a universal name :-) Like Allie M, I am also of the male gender :D Ma

Re: Yellow smilies don't seem to be working

Hi Chris Weaven, On 20/11/2004 6:07 AM, you wrote: TB> I bet she's got a dozen of them now, I sent her one too. Ah, the danger of having a universal name :-) Like Allie M, I am also of the male gender :D LOL!! I'm not alone. :) Maybe it's time I submitted my image to the rogues!? Where there's no

Re: Yellow smilies don't seem to be working

Hello Chris, A reminder of what Chris Weaven on TBUDL typed on: 20 November 2004 at 11:07:35 GMT + > Ah, the danger of having a universal name :-) Like Allie M, I am also > of the male gender I am so sorry Chris. My Sons name is Leslie and he even had to tell his school how to spell

Re: Yellow smilies don't seem to be working

Hello Chris! On Saturday, November 20, 2004, 5:07 AM, you wrote: CW> Maybe it's time I submitted my image to the rogues!? Waiting patiently to see you! -- Best regards, Mary :Trill: The Bat! 3.0.2.6 on Windows XP 5.1 2600 Service Pack 2 C

Re: Rogues Smilies (WAS: Re: Import from Outlook fails)

Hello Dave, Thursday, June 17, 2004, 9:31:37 AM, you wrote: Dave> Yeah, it's pretty slick isn't it? Although it is quite Dave> disconcerting when I'm scanning messages & my own face pops out Dave> at me! Excellent point. Vote time: Should I include logic in my code that would omit your own smil

Re: Rogues Smilies (WAS: Re: Import from Outlook fails)

Thursday, June 17, 2004, 1:09:22 PM, Leif wrote: LG> Hello Dave, LG> Thursday, June 17, 2004, 9:31:37 AM, you wrote: Dave>> Yeah, it's pretty slick isn't it? Although it is quite Dave>> disconcerting when I'm scanning messages & my own face pops out Dave>> at me! LG> Excellent point. LG> Vote t

Re: Rogues Smilies (WAS: Re: Import from Outlook fails)

Hello Maggie! On Thursday, June 17, 2004, 1:22 PM, you wrote: LG>>> Should I include logic in my code that would omit your own smiley from LG>>> the Rogues.MSL when you click the box to create a new .ZIP file? Plan9>> Nope. Not worth the effort and adds one more straw to the Plan9>> "logic" came

Re: Rogues Smilies (WAS: Re: Import from Outlook fails)

Hi Leif and list, On Thursday, June 17, 2004 at 11:09:22 GMT -0600 (which was 19:09 where I live) Leif Gregory wrote (at least in parts) and made these valuable points on the subject of "Rogues Smilies (WAS: Re: Import from Outlook fails)": > Should I include logic in my code th

Re: Rogues Smilies (WAS: Re: Import from Outlook fails)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Mary, On 17 June 2004, 13:26 -0500 (19:26 local time) Mary Bull [MB] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: LG Should I include logic in my code that would omit your own smiley from LG the Rogues.MSL when you click the box to create a new .ZIP

Re: Rogues Smilies (WAS: Re: Import from Outlook fails)

Hello Leif, Thursday, June 17, 2004, 12:09:22 PM, you wrote: > Should I include logic in my code that would omit your own smiley from > the Rogues.MSL when you click the box to create a new .ZIP file? It seems unanimous, and I agree with everyone else that it just wouldn't be worth the trouble.

Re: Rogues Smilies (WAS: Re: Import from Outlook fails)

Hello Dave, Thursday, June 17, 2004, 12:51:57 PM, you wrote: Dave> It seems unanimous, and I agree with everyone else that it just Dave> wouldn't be worth the trouble. I have to look in the mirror Dave> every morning anyway, so if that doesn't kill me, seeing my face Dave> in an email probably won

Re: Rogues Smilies (WAS: Re: Import from Outlook fails)

Hello Leif, Thursday, June 17, 2004, 2:19:41 PM, you wrote: > No biggie to me.. It's really a piece of cake.. > Within my while loop: >If current login name != DB login name > add line to Rogues.MSL I guess that's not so tough! It's up to you, really. I'm not too concerned e

Re: Rogues Smilies (WAS: Re: Import from Outlook fails)

a name immediately while reading a message. > Yeah, it's pretty slick isn't it? Although it is quite disconcerting > when I'm scanning messages & my own face pops out at me! Sorry to pop up an old thread, but I am having a bit of trouble with the Rogues smilies. I have the zip ex

Re: Rogues Smilies (WAS: Re: Import from Outlook fails)

ated. I really, really like being able to put a face to >>> a name immediately while reading a message. >> Yeah, it's pretty slick isn't it? Although it is quite disconcerting >> when I'm scanning messages & my own face pops out at me! AE> Sorry to pop up

Re: Rogues Smilies (WAS: Re: Import from Outlook fails)

Plan9, [P] wrote: > Since you are using 2.11.02 and not one of the later betas you must > edit the PDSF.msl to include items from the rogues and pcwsmiliys. > I've sent you a copy of my PDSF.msl by PM so you can see what needs to > be done. With each roguemoticon download, you get two files, i.e.

Re: Rogues Smilies (WAS: Re: Import from Outlook fails)

Tuesday, July 6, 2004, 6:23:14 PM, Allie wrote: AM> With each roguemoticon download, you get two files, i.e., pdsf2.msl AM> and rougues.msl. AM> For those using a non-beta, you can use only one msl file. The one to AM> use would be pdsf2.msl. It's already altered to include all the AM> roguemotico

Re[2]: Yellow smilies don't seem to be working

Hi Mary, 11/19/2004 11:49:41 AM you wrote: CW>> Does anyone have an unedited version of the files that they could CW>> possibly send me? MB> I'm certain that someone does. If not, perhaps you could make-do with MB> mine. I took out only "knifed" and "headshot," both of which are MB> offensive to

Re[2]: Rogues Smilies (WAS: Re: Import from Outlook fails)

Hello Leif, LG>> Vote time: LG>> Should I include logic in my code that would omit your own smiley from LG>> the Rogues.MSL when you click the box to create a new .ZIP file? Plan9> Nope. Not worth the effort and adds one more straw to the Plan9> "logic" camel's back. If I do not want to see my f

Re[2]: Rogues Smilies (WAS: Re: Import from Outlook fails)

Hello Plan9, Tuesday, July 6, 2004, 2:35:33 PM, you wrote: > Since you are using 2.11.02 and not one of the later betas you must > edit the PDSF.msl to include items from the rogues and pcwsmiliys. > I've sent you a copy of my PDSF.msl by PM so you can see what needs > to be done. I would be int

Re[2]: Rogues Smilies (WAS: Re: Import from Outlook fails)

Hello Allie, Tuesday, July 6, 2004, 3:23:14 PM, you wrote: > For those using a non-beta, Thanks...works great now! :-) -- Thanks, Terry Using the Bat! 2.11.02 under Windows XP Service Pack 1 2600 Current version is 2.11.02 | 'Using TBUD

Emoticons in upcoming new TB! version [was Re: Leif's h2g2 smilies for new TB!...]

Hello Allister! On Friday, May 28, 2004, 8:27 PM, you wrote: AJ> Surely this thread is: AJ> 1) OT AJ> 2) Beta related AJ> 3) A personal chit-chat referring to others of same ilk AJ> 4) Making some people wonder "What the hell are they talking about?" AJ> and therefore AJ> 5) Not appropriate fo

Re: Emoticons in upcoming new TB! version [was Re: Leif's h2g2 smilies for new TB!...]

Hello Mary, On Fri, 28 May 2004 21:11:03 -0500 GMT (29/05/2004, 09:11 +0700 GMT), Mary Bull wrote: MB> My apologies. Should have posted to tbot. However, it is somewhat on MB> topic for tbudl, in that emoticons will be available in the announced MB> release of a new version of The Bat! by RitLabs

Re: Emoticons in upcoming new TB! version [was Re: Leif's h2g2 smilies for new TB!...]

Saturday, May 29, 2004, 5:07:59 PM, Thomas wrote: TF> No, that only mean it is appropriate for TBBETA and not for TBUDL. TF> After the release it will be appropriate here. Saved me saying it myself, thanks. I am not trying to leap all over people for this, but given the usual veracity of moderat

Re: Emoticons in upcoming new TB! version [was Re: Leif's h2g2 smilies for new TB!...]

On Saturday, May 29, 2004, 2:02 AM, you wrote: AJ> I am not trying to leap all over people for this, but given the usual AJ> veracity of moderation, I am surprised this is the second time I have AJ> spotted a thread of questionable applicability being furthered by a AJ> moderator. well I can tel

Re: Emoticons in upcoming new TB! version [was Re: Leif's h2g2 smilies for new TB!...]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Paul, On 29 May 2004, 07:29 -0400 (12:29 local time) Paul Cartwright [PC] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: AJ>> I am not trying to leap all over people for this, but given the usual AJ>> veracity of moderation, I am surprised this is the second

Re: Emoticons in upcoming new TB! version [was Re: Leif's h2g2 smilies for new TB!...]

Sunday, May 30, 2004, 2:17:43 AM, Martin wrote: MW> Since I'm on a promise from Leif MW> I thought I'd risk making MW> the point that the off-topic part of this thread was just 3 messages... Yes, the *first* three. And now Paul's makes 4. So, to send this thread complete

Re: Emoticons in upcoming new TB! version [was Re: Leif's h2g2 smilies for new TB!...]

On Saturday, May 29, 2004, 11:49 PM, you wrote: AJ> Yes, the *first* three. And now Paul's makes 4. I always like even numbers:) AJ> So, to send this thread completely OT, I'll point out that it is not a AJ> holiday weekend where I am. Surely all listers know this is a very AJ> international

Re: Emoticons in upcoming new TB! version [was Re: Leif's h2g2 smilies for new TB!...]

Message received at: 5/29/2004:1:07 AM TF> On Fri, 28 May 2004 21:11:03 -0500 GMT (29/05/2004, 09:11 +0700 TF> No, that only mean it is appropriate for TBBETA and not for TBUDL. TF> After the release it will be appropriate here. TF> Just MHO (I am not a moderator on TBUDL). Disagree (again, not a

Re: Emoticons in upcoming new TB! version [was Re: Leif's h2g2 smilies for new TB!...]

Hello Dan, On Sun, 30 May 2004 10:15:05 -0400 GMT (30/05/2004, 21:15 +0700 GMT), Dan Greenberg wrote: TF>> No, that only mean it is appropriate for TBBETA and not for TBUDL. TF>> After the release it will be appropriate here. TF>> Just MHO (I am not a moderator on TBUDL). DG> Disagree (again, no