Re: Sticky send/fetch windows' positions

Hi Marck, @ 11:09:41 AM on 3/14/2001, Marck D. Pearlstone wrote: [...] > When this is turned on, the mail Send/Fetch percentage progress > windows will always appear on the screen at the position to which > you move them. Still, one very annoying aspect of the send dialog is that if you minim

Re: Sticky send/fetch windows' positions

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Peter, On 14 March 2001 at 07:56:49 -0800 (which was 15:56 where I live) Peter Chiou wrote to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and made these points: PC> What is this option? When this is turned on, the mail Send/Fetch percentage progress windows will always

Re: Sticky send/fetch windows' positions

Hey Peter, Wednesday, March 14, 2001, 10:56:49 AM, you wrote: PC> What is this option? It allows you to move the status (for getting and sending mail) window to a different part of the screen (from the center) and it will always show up there until moved. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! e

Sticky send/fetch windows' positions

Hello TB! Wizards, What is this option? Best regards, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- __ Archives : Moderators : TBTech List: Unsubscribe:

Re: "Sticky" Send/Fetch Windows Positions ?

Hi Michael, On Thu, 6 Jan 2000 17:55:54 +0100GMT (07/01/2000, 00:55 +0800GMT), Michael Heydekamp wrote: MH> I like that option, but am almost unable to use it as I have no idea how MH> to change the position. MH> Part of the problem is that I'm connecting with TB to our LAN, and am MH> thus see

Re: "Sticky" Send/Fetch Windows Positions ?

Hi Michael, On 06 January 2000 at 17:55:54 GMT +0100 (which was 16:55 where I live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote and made these points: MDP>> Sadly, no. It is an option to remember the positions of the MDP>> Sending/Receiving progress windows. MH> Part of the problem is that I'm connecting w

Re: "Sticky" Send/Fetch Windows Positions ?

Dear Marck, on Saturday, January 01, 2000, 20:04, you wrote: NA>> Can someone elaborate on what the above subject means? I cannot NA>> find anything in the Help File on it, MDP> It is a new feature introduced in 1.38. The Help file lags behind MDP> somewhat :-). NA>> I was hoping it was a feat

Re[4]: "Sticky" Send/Fetch Windows Positions ?

Hi Carsten, On Sat, 1 Jan 2000 20:27:27 +0100GMT (01/02/2000, 03:27 +0800GMT), Carsten Dreesbach wrote: MDP>>> Sadly, no. It is an option to remember the positions of the MDP>>> Sending/Receiving progress windows. NA>> Thanks for responding Marck... yes, that is sad indeed. I wonde

Re: "Sticky" Send/Fetch Windows Positions ?

Hi Nick, On 01 January 2000 at 10:37:32 GMT -0800 (which was 18:37 where I live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote and made these points: NA> Can someone elaborate on what the above subject means? I cannot find NA> anything in the Help File on it, It is a new feature introduced in 1.38. The

"Sticky" Send/Fetch Windows Positions ?

Can someone elaborate on what the above subject means? I cannot find anything in the Help File on it, yet it lists the 'feature' in the account specific Options. I was hoping it was a feature that would allow the window created for a new message, could be placed in a specific post

Re[3]: "Sticky" Send/Fetch Windows Positions ?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hey Nick, Saturday, January 01, 2000, 8:20:42 PM, you wrote: MDP>> Sadly, no. It is an option to remember the positions of the MDP>> Sending/Receiving progress windows. NA> Thanks for responding Marck... yes, that is sad indeed. I wond

Re[4]: "Sticky" Send/Fetch Windows Positions ?

Hello Carsten, Saturday, January 01, 2000, 11:27:27 AM, you wrote: CD> Well, actually, I do! ;] I have two accounts and prefer to have the CD> send/receive windows showing up off to the side and next to each other CD> because it keeps my screen less cluttered and I like seeing how my CD>

Re[2]: "Sticky" Send/Fetch Windows Positions ?

Hello Marck, Saturday, January 01, 2000, 11:04:14 AM, you wrote: MDP> Sadly, no. It is an option to remember the positions of the MDP> Sending/Receiving progress windows. Thanks for responding Marck... yes, that is sad indeed. I wonder why they would think people would want a