Hallo St,
On Fri, 27 Aug 2004 02:25:04 +0200GMT (27-8-2004, 2:25 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
AFAIK you're running TB permanently (and at very short poll intervalls).
SMN True - although 30 seconds isn't what I would consider to be _very_ short
SMN intervals. Or?
But nevertheless it
Alexander S. Kunz:
AFAIK you're running TB permanently (and at very short poll intervalls).
St:
True - although 30 seconds isn't what I would consider to be _very_
short intervals. Or?
Roelof Otten:
But nevertheless it is extremely short. When a server has multiple
users with such a
that (or at least implied
it strongly)! :) It was crucial in the discussion and is a major reason for
topic of [St's TB Annoyances] thebat.IPC.
BTW - thru the batch file method I hav been able to produce a stable fix for
the problem I outlined in [St's TB Annoyances] Periodical Checking
Hello TBUDL,
on Sat, 14. Aug 2004 at 18:05:37 +0200 Alexander S. Kunz wrote:
Repeat: How do you send TB that /EXIT command (or whatever IPC
command) when TB fails to read the file that contains the request?
** You. Do. Not. Need. The. IPC. File. **
** You. Do. Not. Need. The. IPC. File.
Hello dAniel hAhler,
18-Aug-2004 19:13, you wrote:
TB first wants to delete the THEBAT.IPC file (where it writes the
command line /EXIT into) and than exits.
Wait a minute... TB itself writes the .IPC file when you access it via the
commandline?!? Ouch, I didn't know that.
--
Best regards,
St:
Anyone having problems with Periodical (Mail) Checking that fails to
exactly so?
Thomas Fernandez:
No, I haven't. But I have noticed that I need to invoke check mail
for all in order to ensure that periodical mail check will occur.
I do, too. My problem is that I usually will have
St:
TB does not react to Windows Show Desktop try Windows+M
and see for yourself.
Allie Martin:
TB! disappears/minimizes here.
Andre Wichartz:
It depends on whether you have TB! set to show in the task bar.
I can confirm this. Options - Preferences - General, _check_
Do not
Alexander S. Kunz:
Options/Preferences/General - Display Connection centre - HIDE
Thanks - there is always something to learn!
--
St
Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
From the TB help file:
For those who are familiar with programming, here's a handy hint:
The Bat! checks a file called TheBat.IPC which is located in the
same directory in which The Bat! executable (TheBat.exe) file is
located. Within this text file, each line represents one command
Hello St - Musaic.Net,
14-Aug-2004 16:17, you wrote:
exactly how do you send TB that IPC command
when TB fails to read the file that contains the request!?!
You don't send an IPC command, you use the command line which passes its
commands to the running TB instance. That is in the helpfile,
St:
...exactly how do you send TB that IPC command when TB fails
to read the file that contains the request!?!
Alexander S. Kunz:
You don't send an IPC command, you use the command line which
passes its commands to the running TB instance. That is in the
helpfile, too.
Don't be too
Hello St - Musaic.Net,
14-Aug-2004 17:35, you wrote:
My point is this: For no reason, TB may at any time simply stop
looking for thebat.IPC - and thus TB won't know of the _future_
commands you send it (by the way of the command line).
Have you investigated why this is happening?
Hello St - Musaic.Net,
14-Aug-2004 16:04, you wrote:
Now, exactly how do you send TB that /EXIT command when TB fails
to read the file that contains the request!?! GREAT!
You can issue an thebat.exe /EXIT command and it will quit the
running instance of TB. You don't need the .IPC file
Alexander S. Kunz:
Have you investigated why this is happening? SysInternals
FileMon may be of help. Maybe your on-access virus scanner
blocks the file, something like that?
Funny that you ask - I am currently running FileMon here
(with an exclusive logging of thebat.IPC-accesses.
Hi
Tuesday, July 27, 2004, 2:41:18 PM, Allie Martin wrote:
AM St - Musaic.Net, [SMN] wrote:
TB does not react to Windows Show Desktop try Windows-
button + M and see for yourself.
AM TB! disappears/minimizes here.
Here, TB! behaves as I would expect if it is the only window open.
Connection Centre should minimize to System Tray, not Windows
Taskbar!. I have TB check for and download from three accounts
at a 30 seconds interval and the (non-timely) pop-in appearance
of the Connection Centre in the Windows Taskbar is pretty
disturbing! For example, say that I
Scenario: I use TB to download mail 24 hours a day mostly
unattended downloading and processing mail. I have TB redirect
mail to some friends (my system checks for spam and/or virus
and redirects a message if none is present). Every now and then
I reboot the PC (remotely). From time
View Message Source should not (default) to show the code of the
attachments. Big messages take a long time to open on a modest PC.
In message source attachments could be represented by an icon that
one could click on to see the code.
--
St
Anyone having problems with Periodical (Mail) Checking that fails to
do exactly so?
I have four accounts that checks mail. Accounts 1, 2, and 4 is set
to check mail every 30 seconds, the third is set to check every 30
minutes. But at the time of writing (12:49PM CET) TB hasn't checked
Double-clicking a message in Message Dispatcher does NOT open the message.
And when you do open it by hitting Enter, and then select Message -
Move to Folder, the message is copied to the folder (and not deleted
from server).
--
St
Command line parameter PARK doesnt work with importing of messages.
--
St
Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
TB does not react to Windows Show Desktop try Windows-
button + M and see for yourself.
--
St
Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
You want to exit and restart TB or reboot the PC. This is pretty
easy to do while in front of the PC - but if TB is downloading
mail unattended it is a totally different story!
[ Message contains pictures - read it here:
http://www.musaic.net/tb/warning.htm ]
--
St
St - Musaic.Net, [SMN] wrote:
TB does not react to Windows Show Desktop try Windows-
button + M and see for yourself.
TB! disappears/minimizes here.
--
-=[ Allie Martin ]=-
List Moderator and fellow end-user
PGPKeys: http://key.ac-martin.com
The Bat! v2.12.04 on WinXP Pro (SP1)
St - Musaic.Net said:
TB does not react to Windows Show Desktop try Windows-
button + M and see for yourself.
Not confirmed. Works fine here.
--
Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
On Tuesday, July 27, 2004 @ 9:32:28 PM, St - Musaic.Net wrote:
[snips]
St TB does not react to Windows Show Desktop try Windows-
St button + M and see for yourself.
What do you mean: does not react? For me, doing that minimises everything
(including TB) and I see the desktop.
--
Tue, 27 Jul 2004 15:32:28 +0200 (9:32 AM EDT here) St - Musaic.Net wrote:
TB does not react to Windows Show Desktop try Windows-
button + M and see for yourself.
TheBat! does react to Windows+M on my system.
TheBat! also reacts to the Show Desktop button on the Taskbar.
I use: The
Hello Allie,
On 27 Jul 2004 at 08:41:18 -0500 GMT [15:41 CEST] you wrote:
AM St - Musaic.Net, [SMN] wrote:
TB does not react to Windows Show Desktop try Windows-
button + M and see for yourself.
AM TB! disappears/minimizes here.
It depends on wether you have tb! set to show in the
Tuesday, July 27, 2004, 6:32:28 AM, you wrote:
SMN TB does not react to Windows Show Desktop try Windows-
SMN button + M and see for yourself.
You might find that the Show Desktop icon is not visible but rather
is in the pop up list at the right of the quick start icons. I can get
Hello Andre!
On Tuesday, July 27, 2004, 9:17 AM, you wrote:
AM St - Musaic.Net, [SMN] wrote:
St TB does not react to Windows Show Desktop try Windows-
St button + M and see for yourself.
AM TB! disappears/minimizes here.
AW It depends on wether you have tb! set to show in the task
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
***^\ ._)~~
~( __ _o Was Tue, 27 Jul 2004, at 09:44:36 -0500,
@ @ when Mary Bull wrote:
Still, I want to know, how can I have that button St. M wrote about?
You should get so called MS (some call it Windows) keyboard. It has
Hello St - Musaic.Net,
27-Jul-2004 15:31, you wrote:
check mail every 30 seconds
That is a very short interval. Some POP3 servers may not be able to cope
with it. Have you tried setting it to something like 3 Minutes and see what
happens?
--
Best regards,
Alexander
On Tuesday, July 27, 2004, 16:44:36, Mary Bull wrote:
I don't have any such Windows Button to go with a + M.
Unless you have a very old 102 or 101-key keyboard (or and IBM lap-top), you
definitely have the Windows Logo key. One is located between left Ctrl and
Alt, the other is between right
Hello St - Musaic.Net,
27-Jul-2004 15:21, you wrote:
You want to exit and restart TB or reboot the PC. This is pretty
easy to do while in front of the PC - but if TB is downloading
mail unattended it is a totally different story!
According to the help file the command line helps:
The
Hello Mica!
On Tuesday, July 27, 2004, 10:18 AM, you wrote:
MB Still, I want to know, how can I have that button St. M wrote about?
MM You should get so called MS (some call it Windows) keyboard. It has
MM additional button between Crtl and Alt.
Okay. Thanks. I was confused by the terminology.
Hello St - Musaic.Net,
27-Jul-2004 15:21, you wrote:
Connection Centre should minimize to System Tray, not Windows
Taskbar!. I have TB check for and download from three accounts at a 30
seconds interval and the (non-timely) pop-in appearance of the
Connection Centre in the Windows
Hello Jernej!
On Tuesday, July 27, 2004, 10:20 AM, you wrote:
MB I don't have any such Windows Button to go with a + M.
JS Unless you have a very old 102 or 101-key keyboard (or and IBM lap-top), you
JS definitely have the Windows Logo key. One is located between left Ctrl and
JS Alt, the other
Hello St,
On Tue, 27 Jul 2004 15:21:30 +0200 GMT (27/07/2004, 20:21 +0700 GMT),
St - Musaic.Net wrote:
SMN Scenario: I use TB to download mail 24 hours a day mostly
SMN unattended downloading and processing mail. [...]
SMN [ Message contains picture - read it here:
SMN
Hello St,
On Tue, 27 Jul 2004 15:31:26 +0200 GMT (27/07/2004, 20:31 +0700 GMT),
St - Musaic.Net wrote:
SMN Anyone having problems with Periodical (Mail) Checking that fails to
SMN do exactly so?
No, I haven't. But I have noticed that I need to invoke check mail
for all in order to ensure
Andre Wichartz, [AW] wrote:
AM TB! disappears/minimizes here.
It depends on wether you have tb! set to show in the task bar.
Ok. I set TB! to not be shown on the taskbar.
If I restore TB! from the systray and then hit Win-D, TB! simply loses
focus but isn't minimized. However, it's minimized
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
***^\ ._)~~
~( __ _o Was Tue, 27 Jul 2004, at 16:43:29 -0400,
@ @ when rich gregory wrote:
Still, I want to know, how can I have that button St. M wrote about?
MM You should get so called MS (some call it Windows) keyboard.
MM It
Hi Scott,
Tue, 27 Jul 2004 10:26:41 -0500 (11:26 AM EDT here) you wrote:
Hello Mica!
On Tuesday, July 27, 2004, 10:18 AM, you wrote:
MB Still, I want to know, how can I have that button St. M wrote
MB about?
MM You should get so called MS (some call it Windows) keyboard.
MM It has
Hello Dan!
On Tuesday, July 27, 2004, 6:40 PM, you wrote, in part:
MB Okay. Thanks. I was confused by the terminology. I have a keyboard,
MB with such a key. When button was mentioned, I thought an on-screen
MB button was meant. :)
DG In support of Mary (or was it Mary-Alice?), Lewis Carroll (I
Hello Stuart,
On Fri, 7 May 2004 17:53:33 -0500 GMT (08/05/2004, 05:53 +0700 GMT),
Stuart Cuddy wrote:
SC Please see the following bug report and add to it. It deals not only
SC with the Unread tab, but also to any folder that is filtered to show
SC unread messages only. The bug was reported
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Thomas,
On 07 May 2004, 03:27 + (07/05/200404:27 local time) Thomas
Fernandez [TF] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
TF My current pet peeve is that the Unread tab loses the message I am currently
TF reading when after a mail check there are
On Thursday, May 6, 2004, 10:27:32 PM, Thomas Fernandez wrote:
T My current pet peeve is that the Unread tab loses the message I am
T currently reading when after a mail check there are no unread
T messages in that folder any more. The message currently displayed
T in the preview pane should stay
On Thursday, May 6, 2004, 4:31:53 PM, rich gregory wrote:
r 3. I have a NEW item to add (why haven't I or others asked yet, or
r have we)?
r Can't I sort the TRASH folder by date/time DELETED?
I'd like to be able to keep track of filtering better. Searching there
should be possible, and it
Hello Dwight,
On Fri, 7 May 2004 09:54:39 -0500 GMT (07/05/2004, 21:54 +0700 GMT),
Dwight A Corrin wrote:
T My current pet peeve is that the Unread tab loses the message I am
T currently reading [...]
DAC Yes. And the fact that when you have scrolled down in a long message,
DAC then attempt to
Hello Martin,
On Fri, 7 May 2004 13:00:54 +0100 GMT (07/05/2004, 19:00 +0700 GMT),
Martin Webster wrote:
MW This seems to demonstrate that the latest release isn't as polished as
MW it could be... a little rushed don't you think?
No, it's just a new feature that has a little quirk.
TF I cannot
Thomas,
On 07-05-2004 19:25, you [TF] wrote in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
TF I cannot confirm that.
I can. Does not happen every time, however.
--
greeting Best regards /greeting
author Peter Fjelsten /author
thebat version 2.10.03 /thebat version
os Windows XP 5.1.2600 Service Pack 1/os
Hello Thomas,
Friday, May 7, 2004, 1:25:41 PM, you wrote:
DAC when you have scrolled down in a long message,
DAC then attempt to click on something there, for instance to block for
DAC reply or to open a link, the message jumps to the top.
T I cannot confirm that.
Is it possible he meant that
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Thomas,
On 07 May 2004, 00:24 +0700 (07/05/2004 18:24 local time) Thomas
Fernandez [TF] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
MW This seems to demonstrate that the latest release isn't as polished as
MW it could be... a little rushed don't you
Hello Thomas,
Thursday, May 6, 2004, 10:27:32 PM, you wrote:
TF My current pet peeve is that the Unread tab loses the message I am currently
TF reading when after a mail check there are no unread messages in that folder any
TF more. The message currently displayed in the preview pane should stay
Hello Dwight,
Friday, May 7, 2004, 9:54:39 AM, you wrote:
T My current pet peeve is that the Unread tab loses the message I am
T currently reading when after a mail check there are no unread
T messages in that folder any more. The message currently displayed
T in the preview pane should stay
Hello Stuart,
Friday, May 7, 2004, 6:56:43 PM, it was said:
DAC when you have scrolled down in a long message,
DAC then attempt to click on something there, for instance to block for
DAC reply or to open a link, the message jumps to the top.
S I have tried to describe this behavior in the
Martin Webster [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Here are a few things that are hardly bugs but do nonetheless need
resolution. I guess they're not as important as proper IMAP support, bug
fixing etc. but nonetheless will lead to a more polished product. In no
order of importance...
My current pet
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello TBUDL,
Here are a few things that are hardly bugs but do nonetheless need
resolution. I guess they're not as important as proper IMAP support, bug
fixing etc. but nonetheless will lead to a more polished product. In no
order of importance...
Hello Martin,
Thursday, May 6, 2004, 4:05:59 PM, you wrote:
M -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
M Hash: SHA1
M Hello TBUDL,
M Here are a few things that are hardly bugs but do nonetheless need
M resolution.
snip
M Okay, so I was scraping the barrel to get to ten. :-)
Perhaps a tenth could
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Maggie,
On 06 May 2004, 17:26 -0400 (06/05/200422:26 local time) mm Meister [MM]
in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
MM Perhaps a tenth could be: If you click on any text (including a link) the
MM cursor jumps to another site in the message
Hello Martin,
Thursday, May 6, 2004, 9:05:59 PM, you wrote:
MW Here are a few things that are hardly bugs but do nonetheless need
MW resolution. I guess they're not as important as proper IMAP support, bug
MW fixing etc. but nonetheless will lead to a more polished product. In no
MW order of
60 matches
Mail list logo
